koglist

koglist@maillist.ttk.hu

4 participants
5929 discussions

by Laszlo Balazs

Dear Koglist members, Due to the relocation of our servers Koglist will be on hold for a few days as of 23.01.2014. The messages sent to Koglist during downtime will be delivered as soon as the servers are operational at our new location. We apologize for any inconvenience. Best, Laszlo Balazs -- -- *** Please make a note of my new Email *** *** Kérem jegyezze fel az új Email címet *** balazs.laszlo(a)ttk.mta.hu dr. Balázs László MTA Természettudományi Kutatóközpont Kognitív Idegtudományi és Pszichológiai Intézet Laszlo Balazs, Ph.D. MTA Research Centre for Natural Sciences Institute of Cognitive Neuroscience and Psychology P O B 398, Budapest, Hungary, H-1394 Tel:+36(1)382-6811 http://www.cogpsyphy.hu/balazs -- -- *** Please make a note of my new Email *** *** Kérem jegyezze fel az új Email címet *** balazs.laszlo(a)ttk.mta.hu dr. Balázs László MTA Természettudományi Kutatóközpont Kognitív Idegtudományi és Pszichológiai Intézet Laszlo Balazs, Ph.D. MTA Research Centre for Natural Sciences Institute of Cognitive Neuroscience and Psychology P O B 398, Budapest, Hungary, H-1394 Tel:+36(1)382-6811 http://www.cogpsyphy.hu/balazs

12 years, 4 months

[koglist] inaugural lecture of Dan Sperber

by Pléh Csaba

terjesszétek.

12 years, 4 months

[koglist] invitation to a philosophy talk by Clotilde Calabi on “Ancona”? Aha, that’s her name!Tots and Clicks' - 28 January,5.30 PM

by Krisztina Biber

The CEU Department of Philosophy cordially invites you to a talk (as part of its Departmental Colloquium series) by Clotilde Calabi (University of Milan) on “Ancona”? Aha, that’s her name! Tots and Clicks Tuesday, 28 January, 2014, 5.30 PM, Zrinyi 14, Room 412 ABSTRACT Someone asks me what is her name. I feel I know it. As we often say, her name is on the tip of my tongue. I can’t say it now, but I am sure that in a few moments it will come back. Sometimes I do not make efforts to recall. I sit back and let the question linger on me. One minute later, the answer comes out. It is as if the obstacles occluding it are gone all together and I have done nothing to remove them. I shout: “Ancona!”. I feel that that the word clicks. Yet, generally, I do make efforts and try to recall the name by relying on some cues. In fact, I do not have a total blank. I remember something and I try to fill the gap by deliberately retrieving information I have about the bearer of the name and some other general information. If there is no general information to retrieve, I may also go through the alphabet letter by letter, until I find the letter that helps me to fill the gap. Or, I recall in some way how the word sounds – where is the pitch, whether it is an open mouth word, and so on - and search, until I find it. Again, the word clicks. It may also happen that I give one answer and immediately afterwards I acknowledge that I was wrong and correct myself. For example, after saying “Ancona”, I rejoin “No, wait a minute. It is D’Ancona”. Now it clicks! In all these cases, first I have the feeling that I am about to bring to consciousness a piece of knowledge I possess concerning a lexical item, and then, when the lexical item pops out, I have a feeling of rightness. Of course, I may get the name wrong: my feeling of rightness does not entail infallibility. Call the experience before retrieval tip of the tongue (TOT) experience and the experience after retrieval CLICK experience. My question is what kind of experience they are. Are they beliefs, memories, emotions, gut feelings, or what?

12 years, 4 months

[koglist] reminder: invitation to a philosophy talk by Claudine Tiercelin on`Should one be afraid of essentialism ?`- 21. January 5.30 PM

by Krisztina Biber

The CEU Department of Philosophy cordially invites you to a talk (as part of its Departmental Colloquium series) By Claudine Tiercelin (College de France) on `Should one be afraid of essentialism ?` Tuesday, 21 January, 2014, 5.30 PM, Zrinyi 14, Room 412 ABSTRACT Essentialism, basically viewed both as aristotelian and anti-scientific, was largely out of favor during the two thirds of the twentieth century, thanks to the prevailing anti-metaphysical attitude associated with the linguistic and logical positivist heritage (Quine). Together with a revival of metaphysics, some new forms of essentialism came to the fore, which were no longer tied to a substantialist or « deep » approach, but insisted more (as in Kripke or Putnam’s versions) on viewing essence as a modality. More recently, such conceptions have been attacked (Fine) and other versions of essentialist metaphysics have been proposed : either along neo-aristotelian lines (E. J. Lowe), or in such versions as B. Ellis’s « scientific essentialism ». However, essentialism still has a bad reputation in many circles, and not only among metaphysicians but among scientists (and philosophers of biology in particular). Now, are they right to be afraid of essentialism ? In the first part of my talk, I shall proceed to a brief clarification of the main meanings attached to the concepts of essence and essentialism ; I shall then present, in broad outlines, the merits and limits of the various essentialist responses that have been proposed to some antimetaphysical reactions, before suggesting, in the last part of my talk, another (hopefully more convincing and reassuring) approach, which I have called « aliquidditism » - consisting mainly in viewing essence along relational and dispositional lines – and which is part and parcel of the dispositional realistic and scientific attitude I recommend in metaphysics.

12 years, 4 months

[koglist] invitation to a philosophy talk by Claudine Tiercelin on`Should one be afraid of essentialism ?`- 21. January 5.30 PM

by Krisztina Biber

12 years, 4 months

[koglist] [CEU Cogsci Talks] REMINDER: Gerry Altmann (University of York), Wednesday, January 15, 5PM, Cognitive Development Center

by olivier mascaro

Dear all, This is to remind you that the next talk in the CEU Cognitive Science seminar series will by given by: *Gerry Altmann* *(The **University of York)* Date: Wednesday, January 15, 2013, 5 PM Location: Cognitive Development Center, Hattyú u. 14, 3rd floor *Title:* Representing objects across time: eye movement and fMRI studies of language-mediated event representation. Language is often used to describe the changes that occur around us – changes in either state (“I cracked the glass…”) or location (“I moved the glass onto the table…”). To fully comprehend such events requires that we represent the ‘before’ and ‘after’ states of the object. But how do we represent these mutually exclusive states of a single object at the same time? I shall summarise a series of studies, primarily from fMRI, which show that we do represent such alternative states, and that these alternative states compete with one another in much the same way as alternative interpretations of an ambiguous word might compete. These studies also show that whereas the representations of distinct but similar objects (e.g. a glass and a cup) interfere with one another in proportion to their similarity, representations of the distinct states of the same object interfere in proportion to their dissimilarity. This interference, or competition, manifests in a part of the brain that has been implicated in resolving competition. Furthermore, activity in this area is predicted by the dissimilarity, elsewhere in the brain, between sensorimotor instantiations of the described object’s distinct states. I shall end with new data (still too hot to touch) whose interpretation is a first step towards a brain mechanism for distinguishing between object types, tokens, and token-states. PLEASE NOTE: Our seminar room has a limited capacity. Please arrive early to ensure you get a seat. The talk will begin promptly at 5. Cognitive Science Events at CEU: http://cognitivescience.ceu.hu/events _______________________________________________ Subscribe by sending an empty mail to seminars-subscribe(a)cdc.ceu.hu Unsubscribe by sending an empty mail to seminars-unsubscribe(a)cdc.ceu.hu _______________________________________________ Subscribe by sending an empty mail to seminars-subscribe(a)cdc.ceu.hu Unsubscribe by sending an empty mail to seminars-unsubscribe(a)cdc.ceu.hu

12 years, 4 months

[koglist] reminder: invitation to a philosophy talk on`The Difference between Teaching and Habituation in Plato and Aristotle`by David Ebrey - 14 January, 5.30 PM

by Krisztina Biber

The CEU Department of Philosophy cordially invites you to a talk (as part of its Departmental Colloquium series) by David Ebrey (Northwestern University) on `The Difference between Teaching and Habituation in Plato and Aristotle` Tuesday, 14 January, 2014, 5.30 PM, Zrinyi 14, Room 412 ABSTRACT One of Plato and Aristotle’s insights is that moral education should develop both reason and the emotions. But how should it do this? Should there be a single type of education that simultaneously develops both reason and the emotions or should these be developed by separate processes? If separate, how should they relate to each other? Our answers to these questions will be tightly connected to our understanding of moral psychology: what is the relation between reason, desires, and emotions, and what role do they play in a good life? I argue that Plato and Aristotle have interesting, compelling, and yet importantly different answers to these questions. It is frequently thought that their views on moral education are very similar, perhaps with different emphases. I argue that they differ on some key issues. We can put the basic issue this way: are there fundamentally different methods for acquiring different virtues, or is the acquisition of virtue a more holistic process, in which the same sort of training is involved in the acquisition of the virtues? Aristotle thinks that there are two fundamentally different processes for different types of virtues. Habituation is the process for developing the non-rational part of our soul and, in doing so, one develops the character virtues. Teaching, by contrast, properly develops the rational part of the soul, leading to the intellectual virtues. Plato, by contrast, doesn’t think that there are fundamentally distinct processes for developing the different parts of the soul. Instead, in Plato’s Republic moral education sometimes involves the same activity developing different parts of the soul and sometimes involves very different activities developing the very same part of the soul. Typically the goal of this web of activities is to bring the different parts of the soul into harmony, not to separately develop the different parts. And Plato doesn’t contrast teaching with habituation at all. He gives habituation a different role from Aristotle, an interesting development found in his Phaedo, Republic, and Laws.

12 years, 5 months

[koglist] [CEU Cogsci Talks] ANNOUNCEMENT: Gerry Altmann (University of York), Wednesday, January 15, 5PM, Cognitive Development Center

by olivier mascaro

Dear all, The next talk in the CEU Cognitive Science seminar series will by given by: *Gerry Altmann* *(The **University of York)* Date: Wednesday, January 15, 2013, 5 PM Location: Cognitive Development Center, Hattyú u. 14, 3rd floor *Title:* Representing objects across time: eye movement and fMRI studies of language-mediated event representation. Language is often used to describe the changes that occur around us – changes in either state (“I cracked the glass…”) or location (“I moved the glass onto the table…”). To fully comprehend such events requires that we represent the ‘before’ and ‘after’ states of the object. But how do we represent these mutually exclusive states of a single object at the same time? I shall summarise a series of studies, primarily from fMRI, which show that we do represent such alternative states, and that these alternative states compete with one another in much the same way as alternative interpretations of an ambiguous word might compete. These studies also show that whereas the representations of distinct but similar objects (e.g. a glass and a cup) interfere with one another in proportion to their similarity, representations of the distinct states of the same object interfere in proportion to their dissimilarity. This interference, or competition, manifests in a part of the brain that has been implicated in resolving competition. Furthermore, activity in this area is predicted by the dissimilarity, elsewhere in the brain, between sensorimotor instantiations of the described object’s distinct states. I shall end with new data (still too hot to touch) whose interpretation is a first step towards a brain mechanism for distinguishing between object types, tokens, and token-states. PLEASE NOTE: Our seminar room has a limited capacity. Please arrive early to ensure you get a seat. The talk will begin promptly at 5. Cognitive Science Events at CEU: http://cognitivescience.ceu.hu/events _______________________________________________ Subscribe by sending an empty mail to seminars-subscribe(a)cdc.ceu.hu Unsubscribe by sending an empty mail to seminars-unsubscribe(a)cdc.ceu.hu _______________________________________________ Subscribe by sending an empty mail to seminars-subscribe(a)cdc.ceu.hu Unsubscribe by sending an empty mail to seminars-unsubscribe(a)cdc.ceu.hu

12 years, 5 months

[koglist] MTA Nyelvtudományi Intézet januári program

by Hegedus Veronika

Kedves Kollégák! Alább bemásolva küldöm a Nyelvtudományi Intézet januári programját. Üdvözlettel, Hegedűs Veronika tudományos titkár ------------------- Az MTA Nyelvtudományi Intézetének januári programja 2014. január 21. kedd, 11.00 óra Garamszegi László Zsolt Estacion Biológica de Donana – CSIC Kényszerházasság a nyelvészet és az evolúcióbiológia között? Lexikális hálózatok, filogenetikai módszerek és az állati kommunikáció helyszín: földszinti előadóterem 2014. január 23. csütörtök, 11.00 óra Andreas Nolda Szegedi Tudományegyetem, Német Nyelvészeti Tanszék Word-formation types. Definition, identification, classification szervező: Elméleti Nyelvészeti Osztály helyszín: földszinti előadóterem 2014. január 28. kedd, 11.00 óra Olach Zsuzsanna MTA-SzTE Turkológiai Kutatócsoport Ószövetségi szövegek halicsi karaim fordításának nyelvészeti tanulságai helyszín: földszinti előadóterem *** http://www.nytud.hu/intprog.html MTA Nyelvtudományi Intézet 1068 Budapest, Benczúr u. 33.

12 years, 5 months

[koglist] [CEU Cogsci Talks] CEU - Summer University Course on Morality - June 23-30, 2014

by Gyorgyne Finta

Dear All, Please find the announcement of the CEU Summer University course on MORALITY: EVOLUTIONARY ORIGINS AND COGNITIVE MECHANISMS. (Gergely Csibra and Dan Sperber representing the department) Date: between June 23-30, 2014. We would very much appreciate if you could share this AD with your colleagues/students/in your email lists. Thank you very much, Kind regards, Reka _______________________________________________ Subscribe by sending an empty mail to seminars-subscribe(a)cdc.ceu.hu Unsubscribe by sending an empty mail to seminars-unsubscribe(a)cdc.ceu.hu

12 years, 5 months

Jump to page:

2026

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

2002

2001

2000

1999

1998

1997

1996

1995

1994

1993

koglist