The CEU Department of Cognitive Science cordially invites you to a talk
(as part of its Departmental Colloquium series)
by
Anna Babarczy, Budapest University of Technology and Economics
on
Can the comprehension of abstract language be rooted in sensory
experiences?
Date: Wed, March 14, 2012 - 17:00 - 18:30
Location: Department of Cognitive Science, CEU, Frankel Leó út 30-34.,
Room G15
Can the comprehension of abstract language be rooted in sensory
experiences?
ABSTRACT: The question of learning the meaning of abstract language
(roughly, expressions with no perceptible referents) has been bugging
philosophers for thousands of years. More recently, a number of
experimental paradigms have emerged trying to shed light on this issue.
The basic idea explored in the talk is that people understand abstract
(metaphorical) expressions by linking them to sensory or bodily
experiences. If this is the case, we should be able to show that these
experiences affect people’s interpretation of abstract utterances. The
talk looks at the evidence we have so far (pro and contra).We're looking
forward to see you there (Frankel Leo u. 30-34) !
_______________________________________________
Subscribe by sending an empty mail to seminars-subscribe(a)cdc.ceu.hu
Unsubscribe by sending an empty mail to seminars-unsubscribe(a)cdc.ceu.hu
The CEU Department of Philosophy cordially invites you to a talk
(as part of its Departmental Colloquium series)
by
Pierre Jacob (Institut Jean Nicod, Paris / CEU)
on
`A puzzle about belief-ascription`
Tuesday, 5 February, 2013, 5.30 PM, Zrinyi 14, Room 412
ABSTRACT
(1) Much developmental evidence based on the so-called “standard or
elicited false belief task” shows that when asked to predict where an
agent with a false belief about an object’s location will look for it,
children who know the location of the object fail until they are well
into their fifth year. (2) However, several more recent experiments
based on different paradigms, including the violation-of-expectation
paradigm, anticipatory looking, helping and referential communication,
also show that preverbal human infants seem to reliably represent an
agent’s false beliefs. The puzzle is: how to reconcile (1) and (2)?
Until recently there were two main strategies for solving the puzzle.
One strategy is to take the data on preverbal human infants at face
value and show why it is so hard for 3-year-olds to pass the standard
false belief task. The other strategy is to offer low-level explanations
for the data on preverbal human infants and deny that they are able to
represent another’s false beliefs. A third strategy has recently
emerged, based on a “two-systems” approach to belief-ascription. On
behalf of the first strategy, I will argue that there is decisive
evidence against the second strategy and that it is hard for the third
strategy to get off the ground.
THEORETICAL PHILOSOPHY FORUM
Institute of Philosophy
Faculty of Humanities, Eötvös University
Address: Múzeum krt. 4/i, Budapest
February Program
20 February (Wednesday) 5:00 PM Room 226
Peter Fekete
Former Headmaster of Black's Academy, Jersey, Channel Islands
On the Continuum
27 February (Wednesday) 5:00 PM Room 226
László Nemes
Department of Behavioural Sciences, University of Debrecen
A filozófiai praxis elméleti alapjai
(The theoretical basis of philosophical praxis)
___________________________________
Abstracts and printable program (poster) are available from the web
site of the Forum: http://phil.elte.hu/tpf (Please feel free to post
the program in your institution!)
The Forum is open to everyone, including students, visitors, and faculty
members from all departments and institutes! Format: 60 minute lecture,
coffee break, 60 minute discussion.
The organizer of the Forum: László E. Szabó
(leszabo(a)phil.elte.hu)
--
L a s z l o E. S z a b o
Professor of Philosophy
DEPARTMENT OF LOGIC, INSTITUTE OF PHILOSOPHY
EOTVOS UNIVERSITY, BUDAPEST
http://phil.elte.hu/leszabo
The CEU Department of Philosophy cordially invites you to a talk
(as part of its Departmental Colloquium series)
by
Edward Harcourt (Oxford University)
on
'Virtues and Vices of Attachment'
Tuesday, 29 January, 2013, 5.30 PM, Zrinyi 14, Room 412
ABSTRACT
Is love a response to rational autonomy (Velleman), or nothing to do
with reason (Frankfurt)? This paper aims to do justice to both outlooks
by offering a philosophical interpretation of attachment theory. The
concept of love is argued to coincide roughly with that of attachment -
a bond to another person for its own sake - and as such not a response
to any particular properties (the Frankfurtian insight). However,
attachments are to be seen as an Aristotelian ‘field’ divided into
normative subspaces (secure and the various kinds of insecure
attachment; compare the Aristotelian virtues and vices). It is thus a
kind of bond that – as in secure attachment - is made good to the extent
that intimacy is combined with the due acknowledgment of one’s own and
the other’s autonomy (the Vellemanian insight). The paper also thereby
shows why the concept of love is unified across parental, filial and
‘romantic’ subvarieties.
The CEU Department of Philosophy cordially invites you to a talk
(as part of its Departmental Colloquium series)
by
Edward Harcourt (Oxford University)
on
'Virtues and Vices of Attachment'
Tuesday, 29 January, 2013, 5.30 PM, Zrinyi 14, Room 412
ABSTRACT
Is love a response to rational autonomy (Velleman), or nothing to do
with reason (Frankfurt)? This paper aims to do justice to both outlooks
by offering a philosophical interpretation of attachment theory. The
concept of love is argued to coincide roughly with that of attachment -
a bond to another person for its own sake - and as such not a response
to any particular properties (the Frankfurtian insight). However,
attachments are to be seen as an Aristotelian ‘field’ divided into
normative subspaces (secure and the various kinds of insecure
attachment; compare the Aristotelian virtues and vices). It is thus a
kind of bond that – as in secure attachment - is made good to the extent
that intimacy is combined with the due acknowledgment of one’s own and
the other’s autonomy (the Vellemanian insight). The paper also thereby
shows why the concept of love is unified across parental, filial and
‘romantic’ subvarieties.
The CEU Department of Philosophy cordially invites you to a talk
(as part of its Departmental Colloquium series)
by
Alfred Mele (Florida State University)
on
“Free Will and Neuroscience”
Tuesday, 22 January, 2013, 5.30 PM, Zrinyi 14, Room 412
ABSTRACT
A major source of scientific skepticism about free will is the belief
(defended by neuroscientist Benjamin Libet, social psychologist Daniel
Wegner, and others) that conscious decisions and intentions never play a
role in producing corresponding actions. I discuss two serious problems
encountered by any attempt to justify this belief by appealing to
existing neuroscientific data.
Kriszta Biber
Department Coordinator
Philosophy Department
Tel: 36-1-327-3806
Fax: 36-1-327-3072
E-mail: biberk(a)ceu.hu
*LAST CALL FOR PAPERS*
* *
*V. Dubrovnik Conference on Cognitive Science - May 16-19, 2013.*
* *
*SLEEP, NEURAL OSCILLATIONS AND COGNITION***
The Central European Cognitive Science Association (CECOG) is pleased to
announce the V. Dubrovnik Conference on Cognitive Science (DuCog) to be
held in the historical town of Dubrovnik, Croatia, on May 16-19, 2013.
*DuCog *is a small-medium size annual conference with up to 100
participants. Every year a specific topic is covered by keynote speakers
and invited speakers. The focus of the conference this year is* sleep,
neural oscillations and cognition*.
*Keynote Speakers*
*
*
* **György Buzsáki*
New York University, USA**
* *
* *
*Peter Achermann*
University of Zürich, Switzerland
* *
*Philippe Peigneux*
Université Libre de Bruxelles, Belgium
*Victor Spoormaker*
Max Planck Institute of Psychiatry, Germany
*
*
*Invited speakers*
* *
*
*
*Marcello Massimini*
University of Milan, Italy
* *
*Ursula Voss*
Bonn University, Germany
* *
*Péter Simor*
Budapest University of Technology and Economics, Hungary
*Gareth Gaskell*
University of York, UK
*Péter Halász*
Péter Pázmány Catholic University, Hungary
* *
*Susanne Diekelmann*
University of Lübeck, Germany
*Róbert Bódizs*
Semmelweis University, Hungary
* *
*Submission is open until February 1, 2013.*
* *
*Submit a poster abstract!*
* *
*For further information see the attached flyer or visit the conference
website at **http://www.cecog.eu/ducog/page_invitation.php***
Csaba Pléh
professor of psychology
presently: Collegium de Lyon
15 parvis Rene Descartes
ENS Recherche R 147
69007 Lyon France
T: 33437376596 Fax: 33437376273
Mobile: 36303493735, csaba.pleh(a)ens-lyon.fr
Eszterhazy Karoly College
Eger H-3300
editor in chief, Hungarian Review of Psychology
member, Academia Europaea and the Hungarian Academy of Sciences
The CEU Department of Philosophy cordially invites you to a talk
(as part of its Departmental Colloquium series)
by
Alfred Mele (Florida State University)
on
“Free Will and Neuroscience”
Tuesday, 22 January, 2013, 5.30 PM, Zrinyi 14, Room 412
ABSTRACT
A major source of scientific skepticism about free will is the belief
(defended by neuroscientist Benjamin Libet, social psychologist Daniel
Wegner, and others) that conscious decisions and intentions never play a
role in producing corresponding actions. I discuss two serious problems
encountered by any attempt to justify this belief by appealing to
existing neuroscientific data.
Kriszta Biber
Department Coordinator
Philosophy Department
Tel: 36-1-327-3806
Fax: 36-1-327-3072
E-mail: biberk(a)ceu.hu