Dear Dr. Qwerty,
Below is a link to the forthcoming BBS target article
The Neural Basis of Predicate-Argument Structure
by
James R. Hurford
http://www.bbsonline.org/Preprints/Hurford/Referees/
This article has been accepted for publication in Behavioral and Brain
Sciences (BBS), an international, interdisciplinary journal providing
Open Peer Commentary on important and controversial current research in
the biobehavioral and cognitive sciences.
Commentators must be BBS Associates or suggested by a BBS Associate. To be
considered as a commentator for this article, to suggest other appropriate
commentators, or for information about how to become a BBS Associate,
please reply by EMAIL within three (3) weeks to:
calls(a)bbsonline.org
The Calls are sent to 10,000 BBS Associates, so there is no expectation
(indeed, it would be calamitous) that each recipient should comment on every
occasion! Hence there is no need to reply except if you wish to comment, or
to suggest someone to comment.
If you are not a BBS Associate, please approach a current BBS Associate
(there are currently over 10,000 worldwide) who is familiar with your work
to nominate you. All past BBS authors, referees and commentators are
eligible to become BBS Associates. An electronic list of current BBS
Associates is available at this location to help you select a name:
http://www.bbsonline.org/Instructions/assoclist.html
(please note that this list is being updated)
If no current BBS Associate knows your work, please send us your
Curriculum Vitae and BBS will circulate it to appropriate Associates to
ask whether they would be prepared to nominate you. (In the meantime, your
name, address and email address will be entered into our database as an
unaffiliated investigator.)
=======================================================================
IMPORTANT
To help us put together a balanced list of commentators, please give
some indication of the aspects of the topic on which you would bring
your areas of expertise to bear if you were selected as a commentator.
To help you decide whether you would be an appropriate commentator for
this article, an electronic draft is retrievable from the online
BBSPrints Archive, at the URL that follows the abstract below.
_______________________________________________________________________
The Neural Basis of Predicate-Argument Structure
James R Hurford
Language Evolution and Computation Research Unit
Linguistics Department
University of Edinburgh
jim(a)ling.ed.ac.uk
KEYWORDS: logic, predicate, argument, neural, object, dorsal, ventral,
attention, deictic, reference.
ABSTRACT: Neural correlates exist for a basic component of logical
formulae, PREDICATE(x).
Vision and audition research in primates and humans shows two independent
neural pathways; one locates objects in body-centered space, the other
attributes properties, such as colour, to objects. In vision these are the
dorsal and ventral pathways. In audition, similarly separable 'where' and
'what' pathways exist. PREDICATE(x) is a schematic representation of the
brain's integration of the two processes of delivery by the senses of the
location of an arbitrary referent object, mapped in parietal cortex, and
analysis of the properties of the referent by perceptual subsystems.
The brain computes actions using a few 'deictic' variables pointing to
objects. Parallels exist between such non-linguistic variables and
linguistic deictic devices. Indexicality and reference have linguistic and
non-linguistic (e.g. visual) versions, sharing the concept of attention.
The individual variables of logical formulae are interpreted as
corresponding to these mental variables. In computing action, the deictic
variables are linked with 'semantic' information about the objects,
corresponding to logical predicates.
Mental scene-descriptions are necessary for practical tasks of primates,
and pre-exist language phylogenetically. The type of scene-descriptions
used by non-human primates would be reused for more complex cognitive,
ultimately linguistic, purposes. The provision by the brain's
sensory/perceptual systems of about four variables for temporary
assignment to objects, and the separate processes of perceptual
categorization of the objects so identified, constitute a preadaptive
platform on which an early system for the linguistic description of scenes
developed.
http://www.bbsonline.org/Preprints/Hurford/Referees/
======================================================================
IMPORTANT
Please do not prepare a commentary yet. Just let us know, after having
inspected it, what relevant expertise you feel you would bring to bear on
what aspect of the article. We will then let you know whether it was
possible to include your name on the final formal list of invitees.
=======================================================================
*** SUPPLEMENTARY ANNOUNCEMENT ***
(1) Call for Book Nominations for BBS Multiple Book Review
In the past, Behavioral and Brain Sciences (BBS) had only been able
to do 1-2 BBS multiple book treatments per year, because of our
limited annual page quota. BBS's new expanded page quota will make
it possible for us to increase the number of books we treat per
year, so this is an excellent time for BBS Associates and
biobehavioral/cognitive scientists in general to nominate books you
would like to see accorded BBS multiple book review.
(Authors may self-nominate, but books can only be selected on the
basis of multiple nominations.) It would be very helpful if you
indicated in what way a BBS Multiple Book Review of the book(s) you
nominate would be useful to the field (and of course a rich list of
potential reviewers would be the best evidence of its potential
impact!).
*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*
Please note: Your email address has been added to our user database for
Calls for Commentators, the reason you received this email. If you do not
wish to receive further Calls, please feel free to change your mailshot
status through your User Login link on the BBSPrints homepage, using your
username and password. Or, email a response with the word "remove" in the
subject line.
*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*
Thanks,
Ralph
BBS
-------------------------------------------------------------------
Ralph DeMarco
Editorial Coordinator
Behavioral and Brain Sciences
Journals Department
Cambridge University Press
40 West 20th Street
New York, NY 10011-4211
UNITED STATES
bbs(a)bbsonline.org
http://www.bbsonline.org
Tel: +001 212 924 3900 ext.374
Fax: +001 212 645 5960
-------------------------------------------------------------------
MIT OCW Pilot Opens to the Public on September 30th
OCW = Open CourseWare
OCW plans to publish our first wave of courses on September 30, 2002.
Sample courses will be included from the following academic
departments:
Anthropology
Biology
Chemical Engineering
Chemistry
Civil and Environmental Engineering
Earth, Atmospheric, and Planetary Sciences
Economics
Electrical Engineering and Computer Science
History
Linguistics and Philosophy
Management
Mathematics
Mechanical Engineering
Ocean Engineering
Political Science
Urban Studies and Planning
The opening of these courses represents a continuation of the early
pilot of OCWs long-term effort. We expect OCW content to become
deeper and richer over time. We invite you to return on September
30th, when we will welcome your feedback.
Megjegyzes: Ha erdekel valamelyik kurzus, akkor nezd meg es segits
bekapcsolni azt az egyetemi oktatasi haloba:
http://people.inf.elte.hu/lorincz/CourseWare_SW.html
A szoftver a TouchGraph-hoz
(Lasd: http://www.touchgraph.com/TGGoogleBrowser.html
freeware: http://touchgraph.sourceforge.net/index.html)
hasonlo, sajat fejlesztesu kliens-szerver szoftvereszkozzel
tortenik.
Lorincz Andras
Department of HISTORY AND PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE
Eötvös University, Budapest
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Pázmány P. sétány 1/A
Budapest, Hungary
Phone/Fax: (36-1) 372 2924
The web site of the seminar:
http://hps.elte.hu/seminar
Philosophy of Science Colloquium
Room 6.54 (6th floor) Monday 4:00 PM
_________________________________________
30 September 4:00 PM 6th floor 6.54
(Language of presentation: English)
G i o r a H o n <http://philo.haifa.ac.il/faculty_pages/hon.htm>
Department of Philosophy
University of Haifa
Gödel, Einstein, Mach: Casting Constraints on All-embracing Concepts
[Revised! (26/09/02)]
Can a theory turn back, as it were, upon itself and vouch for its own
features? That is, can the derived elements of a theory be the very
primitive terms that provide the presuppositions of the theory? This
form of an all-embracing feature assumes a totality in which there
occurs quantification over that totality, quantification that is defined
by this very totality. I argue that the Mach principle exhibits such
features of all-embracing nature. To clarify the argument, I distinguish
between on the one hand completeness and on the other wholeness and
totality, as different all-embracing features: the former being
epistemic while the latter - ontological.
I propose an analogy between the Mach principle as a possible
selection principle in general relativity and the vicious-circle
principle in foundations of mathematics. I finally conclude with a
consequence of this analogy vis-?-vis completeness and totality, viz.,
both should be constrained if they were to be valid concepts for a
physical theory.
The paper progresses chronologically. It focuses on the physical
approach of Mach that formed the background for Einstein?s general
theory of relativity. The solutions of the field equations in the form
of cosmological models set the scene for the view of all-embracing
concepts discussed in the paper. Specifically, the ideas encapsulated in
what Einstein called the Mach principle, constitute the thread of this
account. The principle is found however to falter, in view of the fact
that there are several different types of solution of the field
equations that contradict it. One such important cosmological model with
ramifying consequences is the rotational mass solution of Gödel. The
question arises then as to whether there is an analogy between
incompleteness in foundations of mathematics and in physics?
The analogy between the vicious-circle principle and the Mach
principle demonstrates an affirmative answer which suggests in turn that
completeness and totality must be curtailed ? that is, conditions and
limits should be imposed on completeness and totality to render them
valid for physical theories.
1. Introduction: all-embracing concepts ? completeness vs. wholeness and
totality
2. Mach?s disposition: the overwhelming unity of the whole
3. Einstein?s choice: the total inertia of a mass is due to all the
other masses
4. Gödel?s criticism: objective lapse of time should not be assumed
5. Conclusion: casting constraints ? the Mach and the vicious-circle
principles
------------------------------------------------------------------------
The organizer of the seminar: László E. Szabó
<http://hps.elte.hu/~leszabo><mailto:leszabo@hps.elte.hu>)
L a s z l o E. S z a b o
Theoretical Physics Research Group of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences
Department of History and Philosophy of Science
Eotvos University, Budapest
H-1518 Budapest, Pf. 32, Hungary
Phone/Fax: (36-1)372-2924
Mobil/SMS: (36) 20-366-1172
http://hps.elte.hu/~leszabo
Department of HISTORY AND PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE
Eötvös University, Budapest
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Pázmány P. sétány 1/A
Budapest, Hungary
Phone/Fax: (36-1) 372 2924
The web site of the seminar:
http://hps.elte.hu/seminar
Philosophy of Science Colloquium
Room 6.54 (6th floor) Monday 4:00 PM
_________________________________________
30 September 4:00 PM 6th floor 6.54
(Language of presentation: English)
G i o r a H o n <http://philo.haifa.ac.il/faculty_pages/hon.htm>
Department of Philosophy
University of Haifa
Gödel, Einstein, Mach: Constraining Completeness of Physical Theory
Can a theory turn back, as it were, upon itself and vouch for its own
features? That is, can the derived elements of a theory be the very
primitive terms that provide the presuppositions of the theory? This
form of completeness assumes a totality in which there occurs
quantification over that totality, quantification that is defined
by this very totality. I argue that the Mach principle exhibits
features of this notion of completeness. I propose an analogy
between the Mach principle as a possible selection principle in
general relativity and the vicious-circle principle in foundation
of mathematics. I finally conclude with a consequence of this
analogy vis-á-vis completeness, viz., completeness has to be
constrained.
Cosmological models set the scene for the view of completeness
discussed in the paper. Specifically, the ideas encapsulated in
what Einstein called the "Mach principle" constitute the thread of
this account. The principle however is found to falter, in view of
the fact that there are several different types of solution of the
field equations that contradict it. One such important result with
ramifying consequences is the rotational mass solution of Gödel. The
question arises as to whether there is an analogy between
incompleteness in foundation of mathematics and in physics? The
analogy between the vicious-circle principle and the Mach principle
demonstrates an affirmative answer which suggests in turn that
completeness must be curtailed - that is, conditions and limits should
be imposed on completeness to render it valid.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
The organizer of the seminar: László E. Szabó
<http://hps.elte.hu/~leszabo><mailto:leszabo@hps.elte.hu>)
L a s z l o E. S z a b o
Theoretical Physics Research Group of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences
Department of History and Philosophy of Science
Eotvos University, Budapest
H-1518 Budapest, Pf. 32, Hungary
Phone/Fax: (36-1)372-2924
Mobil/SMS: (36) 20-366-1172
http://hps.elte.hu/~leszabo
Dear member of this list,
Science & Consciousness Review (http://psych.pomona.edu/scr/) has released
new articles and reviews:
_____________________
NEWS
Knowing more than you see
By Thomas Zoëga Ramsøy
News: Normally, you probably think that you see the entire visual field in
front of you. However, careful studies of vision show that this is false.
Actually, you are quite poor at seeing details falling outside your focal
attention. The discussion about how much you can be visually aware of, and
how much your visual system can process without consciousness has recently
been updated by a recent finding. The conclusion of this study is that we
are actually quite good at perceiving "complex" natural scenes even while
attending elsewhere.
Read the full article at:
http://psych.pomona.edu/scr/LN_Sep02_KnowMoreSee.htm
_____________________
NEWS IN BRIEF
- Consciousness is slower than you think
- Emotions: From neuropsychology to functional imaging
- Neural responses to emotional faces
- New issue: Dreaming
Full access at http://psych.pomona.edu/scr/more_news.html
_____________________
ARCHIVES
Previous issues of Science & Consciousness Review can be found at
http://psych.pomona.edu/scr/archive.html We have now issues from April to
August 2002, including all articles, reviews and news in brief.
_____________________
ABOUT SCIENCE & CONSCIOUSNESS REVIEW
SCR is a community-building effort. Many scientific communities study how
the human brain makes possible perception, memory, and even attention. But
for historical reasons, we have no scientific community for exploring
consciousness --- including our own experiences of the world, of each other
and of ourselves. It is probably the most important neglected topic in
science.
Students and scientists all over the world are vitally interested. Hardly a
week goes by without another major article in headline journals like Science
and Nature. The flow of evidence has increased enormously. But so far we
have few institutional resources for teaching, learning, and sharing this
information.
In the last decade we have seen new, high quality journals, professional
societies, and regular meetings. They are vitally important.
But many people feel that we need an international forum to build a sense of
shared community. SCR is an effort in that direction.
CONTRIBUTE!
Please send your contributions to us. Instructions for authors can be found
at http://psych.pomona.edu/scr/author_instructions.html
_____________________
Sincerely,
Thomas Zoëga Ramsøy
Managing Editor
Valaki egy virust kuldott a KOGLIST listara "Fogorvos" subject-tel latszolag
az en e-mail cimemrol (csibra(a)cogpsyphy.hu). Ne nyissa fel, akihez eljutott.
--
Gergely Csibra Centre of Brain and Cognitive Development
Research Scientist School of Psychology
Senior Lecturer Birkbeck College
g.csibra(a)bbk.ac.uk Malet Street
Tel: +44 20 7631 6323 London WC1E 7HX
Fax: +44 20 7631 6587 United Kingdom
Erdélyi Pszichologiai Szemle
http://www.pszichologia.ro/epsz
The editorial board of the Transilvanian Journal of Psychology highly welcomes articles from the field of cognitive sciences in Hungarian or English language.
The editorial board will blindly review manuscripts focusing on basic and applied research and clinical issues related to psychology or special education. The journal will emphasize studies with an empirical base, but review articles, issue-oriented contributions, and well-documented case studies are also welcome.
Send articles to:
Imre Péntek
imrepentek(a)pszichologia.ro
or
epsz(a)pszichologia.ro
For more information about the journal visit our website at: http://www.pszichologia.ro/epsz
Guidelines for Submissions
The editorial board of the Transylvanian Journal of Psychology will blindly review manuscripts focusing on basic and applied research and clinical issues related to psychology and special education. The journal will emphasize studies with an empirical base, but review articles, issue-oriented contributions, and well-documented case studies are also welcome.
Any manuscript submitted to the Transylvanian Journal of Psychology may not currently be under consideration by another publication. In addition, any manuscript submitted must contain original and previously unpublished (in whole or in part) work. It is the responsibility of the author to ensure that the quotations mentioned in the manuscript are authentic and have been properly cited.
Manuscripts must be submitted in the format prescribed by the most recent edition of the Publication Manual of the American Psychological Association. Each manuscript should be approximately 8000 words long and must be accompanied by an abstract containing 120-150 words and 4-6 keywords to be reviewed. All abstracts must be typed on a separate sheet of paper.
Manuscripts must be submitted on paper of good quality or by e-mail (preferably both). The author(s) should always keep an additional copy for their own records. If there is more than one author, please include addresses, phone/fax numbers and, if available, electronic mail addresses of each author.
Any submissions should be made with the understanding that if accepted for publication, ownership, copyright and the right to reproduce the article in any form will be allocated solely to the publisher.
After an initial review by the Editor, two Contributing Editors shall be assigned to review the manuscript. Each manuscript shall be returned to the Author(s) with comments and recommendations. At this point, manuscripts fall into one of the following categories:
* accepted for publication.
* accepted pending revisions based on comments and recommendations.
* rejected.
If you are interested in submitting a manuscript for review, please follow the above guidelines and mail manuscripts to:
Transylvanian Journal of Psychology
Redactia EPSZ
Cluj Napoca - 3400, O.P: 1 C.P.1060 ROMANIA
Department of HISTORY AND PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE
Eötvös University, Budapest
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Pázmány P. sétány 1/A
Budapest, Hungary
Phone/Fax: (36-1) 372 2924
The web site of the seminar:
http://hps.elte.hu/seminar
Philosophy of Science Colloquium
Room 6.54 (6th floor) Monday 4:00 PM
P r o g r a m
SEPTEMBER
30 September 4:00 PM 6th floor 6.54
(Language of presentation: English)
Giora Hon <http://philo.haifa.ac.il/faculty_pages/hon.htm>
Department of Philosophy
University of Haifa
Gödel, Einstein, Mach: Constraining Completeness of Physical Theory
Can a theory turn back, as it were, upon itself and vouch for its own
features? That is, can the derived elements of a theory be the very
primitive terms that provide the presuppositions of the theory? This
form of completeness assumes a totality in which there occurs
quantification over that totality, quantification that is defined
by this very totality. I argue that the Mach principle exhibits
features of this notion of completeness. I propose an analogy
between the Mach principle as a possible selection principle in
general relativity and the vicious-circle principle in foundation
of mathematics. I finally conclude with a consequence of this
analogy vis-á-vis completeness, viz., completeness has to be
constrained.
Cosmological models set the scene for the view of completeness
discussed in the paper. Specifically, the ideas encapsulated in
what Einstein called the "Mach principle" constitute the thread of
this account. The principle however is found to falter, in view of
the fact that there are several different types of solution of the
field equations that contradict it. One such important result with
ramifying consequences is the rotational mass solution of Gödel. The
question arises as to whether there is an analogy between
incompleteness in foundation of mathematics and in physics? The
analogy between the vicious-circle principle and the Mach principle
demonstrates an affirmative answer which suggests in turn that
completeness must be curtailed - that is, conditions and limits should
be imposed on completeness to render it valid.
==================================================================
OCTOBER
7 October 4:00 PM 6th floor 6.54
(Language of presentation: English)
René Voltz
Université Louis Pasteur, Strasbourg
Platonism in modern physics
Since Galileo, modern physics can be envisaged as progressing following
a Platonic program: explore the world beyond sensory appearances, with
ideas and theories based on the existence of unchanging physical laws
that are expressible in mathematics. In the search of unified theories
and the "dreams of a final theory", contemporary physics expresses more
than ever the Platonic tendencies: it basically admits the reality of
intelligible forms, representations of generalized symmetries, which
convince via their "beauty"besides the necessary verifications of their
empirical consequences.
The importance of Platonic inspirations during the successive conceptual
mutations which mark the History of physics was recognized by the most
creative actors. Representative examples are discussed in the presentation.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
14 October 4:00 PM 6th floor 6.54
(Language of presentation: Hungarian)
Béla Lukács <mailto:lukacs@rmki.kfki.hu>
Research Institute for Particle and Nuclear Physics
Hungarian Academy of Sciences
RETROKAUZALITÁS
Lélektudományok müvelöi közt hivei vannak azon álláspontnak, hogy idöben
VISSZAFELÉ terjedö hatások léteznek (habár csak rövid idötartamra), söt,
hogy ezeket statisztikailag ki is lehet mutatni (pl. pszichológiai
mérésekkel). A természettudományoktól a gondolat általában idegen.
Megmutatom azonban, hogy a retro folyamatok az általános
relativitáselméletbe beleférnek.
A "naiv" általános relativitáselméletben (+++-) szignatúra) az ilyen
folyamatok kivételes helyek közelében lehetségesek, oksági paradoxonokra
ill. a szabad akarat nemlétére vezetnek. Ezzel szemben BIZONYOS magasabb
dimenziójú téridökben a retro folyamat általános, és oksági
paradoxonokra ill. a szabad akarat nemlétére vezet.
Hogy a jelenség van-e, az a lélektudományokra tartozik egyelöre.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
21 October 4:00 PM 6th floor 6.54
(Language: English, except all participants speak Hungarian)
Tamás Rudas <mailto:rudas@tarki.hu>
Department of Statistics, Institute of Sociology, Eötvös University,
Budapest
Measurement and modelling of association in contingency tables
Association between two variables is defined in the talk as the
information in their joint distribution not present in the univariate
distributions. Therefore, a measure of association, together with the
marginal distributions, has to parameterize the joint distribution and
has to be variationally independent from the marginals. These
requirements point to the odds ratio as the only appropriate measure of
association.
For higher dimensional contingency tables, a possible generalization is
the system of conditional odds ratios. The conditional odds ratios, on
an ascending class of subsets, are variationally independent from the
marginal distributions on the complement descending class and together
parameterize the joint distribution. Depending on the class of subsets
used, one obtains a flexible class of parametereizations that can be
used to model the conditional association structure. The models obtained
by assuming lack of conditional association on an ascending class of
subsets are of the log-linear type.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
28 October 4:00 PM 6th floor 6.54
(Language: English)
Douwe Draaisma <http://www.ppsw.rug.nl/%7Eteng/draaisma.html>
Heymans Institute, Univerity of Groningen
The tracks of thought: metaphors of memory There has always been an
intimate link between human memory and the means invented to record
knowledge independently of that memory. From Plato's wax tablet to
holography and computers, artificial memories have supported,
relieved and occasionally replaced natural memory. Over the
centuries these artificial memories have also shaped our views of
remembering and forgetting, providing the terms and concepts with which
we have reflected on our own memory. After a general introduction on the
theme of metaphor and memory, I will demonstrate my analysis by the case
of 'panoramic memory', the experience sometimes reported by persons in
sudden mortal danger of seeing a rapid sequence of visual scenes from
their childhood 'flash before their eyes like a movie'. A brief history
of metaphorical descriptions of this sensation from the period before
the invention of film will make clear just how metaphors may lay down
the tracks of our thoughts.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Douwe Draaisma's book, METAFORAMASINA
<http://www.typotex.hu/p_0027.html>, has been recently published in
Hungarian translation.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
The 60-minute lecture is followed by a 10-minute break. Then we held a
30-60-minute discussion.
The participants may comment the talks and initiate discussion on the
Internet. The comments should be written in the language of the
presentation.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
The organizer of the seminar: László E. Szabó
<http://hps.elte.hu/~leszabo><mailto:leszabo@hps.elte.hu>)
L a s z l o E. S z a b o
Theoretical Physics Research Group of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences
Department of History and Philosophy of Science
Eotvos University, Budapest
H-1518 Budapest, Pf. 32, Hungary
Phone/Fax: (36-1)372-2924
Mobil/SMS: (36) 20-366-1172
http://hps.elte.hu/~leszabo
Dear all,
Science & Consciousness Review (http://psych.pomona.edu/scr/) has released
new articles and reviews:
_____________________
NEWS / HISTORY
The description and definition of consciousness
By Alex Green
"Empirical descriptions of consciousness have been available in Western
literature for centuries and in Eastern literature for millennia. Western
empirical descriptions are due largely to Descartes and Kant but William
James and Hermann Weyl have also made important contributions.
It is often maintained that no-one can define consciousness but there exists
a clear empirical description of consciousness as an observation of the
space, time and content of our minds (where the content contains intuitions
and feelings). Perhaps the claim that no-one can define consciousness is
frustration at the fact that no-one can explain consciousness."
Read the full article at: http://psych.pomona.edu/scr/LN_Sep02_DefConsc.htm
_____________________
NEWS IN BRIEF
- Live One Hour Online Chat with David Chalmers
- BBC Radio: Emotional Rollercoaster
- Synaesthesia: A Case Study of Discordant Monozygotic Twins
- International Society for Research on Emotions
- Call for abstracts: Toward a Science of Consciousness 2003
Full access at http://psych.pomona.edu/scr/more_news.html
_____________________
ARCHIVES
Previous issues of Science & Consciousness Review can be found at
http://psych.pomona.edu/scr/archive.html We have now issues from April to
August 2002, including all articles, reviews and news in brief.
_____________________
ABOUT SCIENCE & CONSCIOUSNESS REVIEW
SCR is a community-building effort. Many scientific communities study how
the human brain makes possible perception, memory, and even attention. But
for historical reasons, we have no scientific community for exploring
consciousness --- including our own experiences of the world, of each other
and of ourselves. It is probably the most important neglected topic in
science.
Students and scientists all over the world are vitally interested. Hardly a
week goes by without another major article in headline journals like Science
and Nature. The flow of evidence has increased enormously. But so far we
have few institutional resources for teaching, learning, and sharing this
information.
In the last decade we have seen new, high quality journals, professional
societies, and regular meetings. They are vitally important.
But many people feel that we need an international forum to build a sense of
shared community. SCR is an effort in that direction.
CONTRIBUTE!
Please send your contributions to us. Instructions for authors can be found
at http://psych.pomona.edu/scr/author_instructions.html
_____________________
Sincerely,
Thomas Zoëga Ramsøy
Managing Editor