P h i l o s o p h y o f S c i e n c e C o l l o q u i u m
____________________________________
5 May 4:00 PM 6th floor 6.54
CANCELLATION!
M r s. T i b o r M a d a r á s z & G y ö r g y F a r k a s' seminar
talk originally scheduled for 5 May is postponed through conflicting with the
Putnam Conference!
--
L a s z l o E. S z a b o
Theoretical Physics Research Group of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences
Department of History and Philosophy of Science
Eotvos University, Budapest
H-1518 Budapest, Pf. 32, Hungary
Phone/Fax: (36-1)372-2924
Mobil/SMS: (36) 20-366-1172
http://hps.elte.hu/~leszabo
Pécsi Tudományegyetem Filozófia Tanszékek
Magyar Tudományos Akadémia
University Pécs Philosophy Department
Hungarian Academy of Sciences
H i l a r y P u t n a m f i l o z ó f i á j a
The Philosophy of Hilary Putnam
Nemzetközi Filozófiai Konferencia Hilary Putnam részvételével
International Conference in Philosophy with the participation of Hilary Putnam
MTA Pécsi Akadémiai Bizottság Székháza
House of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences in Pécs
Pécs, Jurisics M. u. 44.
2003 május 5.-6.
May 5-6, 2003
Organization: János Boros, University Pécs
boros(a)btk.pte.hu
Monday, May 5, 2003
9.00-9.10 Opening
9.10-10.00 Opening Lecture
Michael Williams (Johns Hopkins Univ., Baltimore), Putnam, Pragmatism and
Truth
10.00-10.10 Break
10.10-12.20 Morning Session
Chair Michael Williams (Baltimore)
10.10-10.25
Zsolt Garai (Pécs-Paris), Varieties of therapeutical realism: McDowell and
Putnam
10.25-10.40
Andrea Clausen (Berlin), How to account for objectivity. Brandom?s
inferentialism vs. Putnam?s direct realism
10.40-10.55
Krisztián Pete (Pécs), Relativism cum Realism: is it a possible theory?
10.55-11.15 Discussion
11.15-11.30
Katalin Farkas (Budapest-London), Stopping short of the fact
11.30-11.45
Tadeusz Szubka (Lublin), Putnam on the viability of an epistemic conception of
truth
11.45-12.00
Matjaz Potrc (Ljubljana), Internal Realism
12.00-12.20 Discussion
12.20-15.00
Break - Lunch in Hotel Hunyor
15.00-18.00 Afternoon Session
Chair: Katalin Farkas (Budapest-London)
15.00-15.15
Tim Crane (London), Is the Mind a Thing?
15.15-15.30
Gyula Mezősi (Pécs), Is the strong supervenience thesis defensible?
15.30-15.45
György Kampis (Budapest), How to Be a Brain in a Vat and Why we are not
15.45-16.00
Ferenc Ruzsa (Budapest), Testing the Vat ? Talking about the Ding an sich
16.00-16.20 Discussion
16.20-16.40 Break
16.40-16.55
Ferenc Huoranszky (Budapest), Causation, Explanation and Internal Realism
16.55-17.10
István Danka (Pécs-Budapest), Rethinking non-mathematical necessity
17.10-17.25
András Máté (Budapest), First or second order logic? Putnam, Quine and the
Skolem-Argument
17.25-17.40
Bojan Borstner (Maribor), Putnam on properties
17.40-18.00 Discussion
18.00-18.30 Break
18.30-19.30 Evening Lecture
Hilary Putnam (Harvard), Objectivity without Objects
20.00
Dinner for the Participants at Pavlik Cellar (Pavlik Pince)
Pécs, Varjú dűlő 1. Phone 226 252
Tuesday, May 6, 2003
9.00-10.00 Morning Lecture
Ágnes Heller (New School, New York), Hilary Putnam on fact/value dichotomy
10.00-10.20 Break
10.20-12.30 Morning Session
Chair: Tim Crane (London)
10.20-10.35 Meredith Williams (Johns Hopkins Univ. Baltimore), Putnam?s
Wittgenstein
10.35-10.50 János Weiss (Pécs-Frankfurt), Putnam and Habermas
10.50-11.05 Jon Roberts (New York), Putnam, Truth and History: Reading the
Past Pragmatically
11.05-11.25 Discussion
11.25-11.40
László Tarnay and Tamás Pólya (Pécs), On Meaning Holism. Is Miscommunication
All We Have?
11.40-11.55
Richard Schantz (Berlin), Putnam on perception
11.55-12.10
János Tőzsér (Budapest), Is there a gap between the Mind and the World in
perception?
12.10-12.30 Discussion
12.30-15.00
Break - Lunch in Hotel Hunyor
15.00-18.00 Afternoon Session
Chair: Meredith Williams (Baltimore)
15.00-15.15
János Kelemen (Budapest), Linguistic Division of Labour: Putnam and
Rossi-Landi
15.15-15.30
László Komlósi (Pécs), Negotiated and Agreeable Inferences
15.30-15.45
Tibor Szolcsányi (Pécs), Experience, Descriptions and the Spectral Model of
Information
15.45-16.05 Discussion
16.05-16.20
Zsofia Zvolenszky (New York), The semantics of natural kind terms
16.20-16.35
Ferenc András (Pécs), The question, the possibility of the answer and the
answer
16.35-16.50
János Boros (Pécs), Internal realism is realism: Dewey and Davidson vs. Putnam
16.50-17.05
Csaba Pléh (Budapest)
17.05-17.20. Discussion
17.20-17.30 Conclusion
18.00 Take off for dinner in Villány, Blum Cellar (Blum Pince)
Villánykövesd, Pince sor 24. Phone (72) 493 088
Bus starts 18.00 from conference location, stops at 18.05 at Hotel Hunyor.
The conference is part in the series of the Pécs Philosophy Conferences.
Until today there were conferences with and about the following philosophers:
John McDowell, Pittsburgh, 1998
Daniel Dennett, Boston, 1999
Michael Williams, Baltimore, 1999
Robert Brandom, Pittsburgh, 2000
Jacques Derrida, Paris, 2000
Richard Rorty, Stanford, 2001
Ágnes Heller, New York and Budapest, 2002
A konferencia a Pécsi Filozófia Konferenciák sorozat része
Eddig az említett filozófusokról és filozófusokkal rendeztünk Pécsett
konferenciát.
*
Hilary Putnam (born in Chicago, July 31, 1926) is one of the most important
thinkers of our time. 1927-34 he lived in Paris, where his father translated
works of Cocteau, Pirandello and Cervantes? Don Quichote in English. Graduate
studies 1948-49 in mathematics, logic, philosophy at Harvard among others by
Quine. Graduate studies at University of California in Los Angeles by Hans
Reichenbach. 1951 PhD by Reichenbach with the title The Meaning of the
Concept of Probablity in Application to Finite Sequences. Teaching positions
at Princeton, MIT, since 1965 professor of philosophy at Harvard University.
His works are among others
Mind, Language and Reality, Cambridge University Press, 1975
Meaning and the Moral Sciences, London, Routledge, 1978
Reason, Truth and History, Cambridge University Press, 1981
The Many Faces of Realism, La Salle, Open Court, 1987
Realism with a Human Face, Harvard University Press, 1990
Renewing Philosophy, Harvard Univesity Press, 1992
The Threefold Cord, Columbia University Press, 1999
--
L a s z l o E. S z a b o
Theoretical Physics Research Group of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences
Department of History and Philosophy of Science
Eotvos University, Budapest
H-1518 Budapest, Pf. 32, Hungary
Phone/Fax: (36-1)372-2924
Mobil/SMS: (36) 20-366-1172
http://hps.elte.hu/~leszabo
Magyar Tudományos Akadémia
Hungarian Academy of Sciences
Tisztelettel meghívja Önt
H i l a r y P u t n a m (Harvard)
Objectivity without Objects
angol nyelvű előadására
2003 május 5 hétfő, 18.30h
Pécs, MTA Székház (PAB, Jurisics u.44.)
További információ: PTE BTK Filozófia Tanszékek
Tel. (72) 501 515
boros(a)btk.pte.hu
Hilary Putnam (born in Chicago, July 31, 1926) is one of the most important
thinkers of our time. 1927-34 he lived in Paris, where his father translated
works of Cocteau, Pirandello and Cervantes? Don Quichote in English. Graduate
studies 1948-49 in mathematics, logic, philosophy at Harvard among others by
Quine. Graduate studies at University of California in Los Angeles by Hans
Reichenbach. 1951 PhD by Reichenbach with the title The Meaning of the
Concept of Probablity in Application to Finite Sequences. Teaching positions
at Princeton, MIT, since 1965 professor of philosophy at Harvard University.
His works are among others
Mind, Language and Reality, Cambridge University Press, 1975
Meaning and the Moral Sciences, London, Routledge, 1978
Reason, Truth and History, Cambridge University Press, 1981
The Many Faces of Realism, La Salle, Open Court, 1987
Realism with a Human Face, Harvad University Press, 1990
Renewing Philosophy, Harvard Univesity Press, 1992
The Threefold Cord, Columbia University Press, 1999
--
L a s z l o E. S z a b o
Theoretical Physics Research Group of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences
Department of History and Philosophy of Science
Eotvos University, Budapest
H-1518 Budapest, Pf. 32, Hungary
Phone/Fax: (36-1)372-2924
Mobil/SMS: (36) 20-366-1172
http://hps.elte.hu/~leszabo
The Philosophy Department and the Humanities Center cordially invite you to a public lecture by
Hilary Putnam (Harvard University)
Friday, 9. May, 5.00 PM - Popper Room
"Ethics Without Metaphysics"
Chair: Howard Robinson, CEU Philosophy Department
Hilary Putnam, one of America's most distinguished philosophers, surveys an astonishingly wide range of issues and proposes a new, clear-cut approach to philosophical questions -- a renewal of philosophy. He contests the view that only science offers an appropriate model for philosophical inquiry. His discussion of topics from artificial intelligence to natural selection, and of reductive philosophical views derived from these models, identifies the insuperable problems encountered when philosophy ignores the normative or attempts to reduce it to something else.
Kriszta Biber
Department Coordinator
Philosophy Department
Tel: 36-1-327-3806
Fax: 36-1-327-3072
E-mail: biberk(a)ceu.hu
Department of HISTORY AND PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE
Eotvos University, Budapest
Pazmany P. setany 1/A Budapest
Phone/Fax: (36-1) 372 2924
Department's Home Page:http://hps.elte.hu
P h i l o s o p h y o f S c i e n c e C o l l o q u i u m
Room 6.54 (6th floor) Monday 4:00 PM
____________________________________
5 May4:00 PM 6th floor 6.54
(Language: Hungarian)
M r s. T i b o r M a d a r á s z & G y ö r g y F a r k a s
Department of Logic, Eötvös University
A "miért" kérdések szemantikájához és pragmatikájához (logikai megközelítés)
(On the semantics and pragmatics of "Why?" questions -- a logical approach)
A "miért" kérdések logikájának kidolgozását elsősorban a tudás megszerzésének
módjai, az információ kereső procedúrák megalapozása teszi elengedhetetlenné.
A miért kérdések centrális jelentőségűek a tudományos magyarázat
elméleteiben. A "miért" kérdések logikai elmélete -- szemben más
kérdéstípusokkal (eldöntendő, ki? mi? hol? kérdőszós kérdések) --
nem tekinthető megelelően kidolgozottnak. Ennek oka valószínüleg a miért
kérdések komplexitásában rejlik.
A különböző interrogatív modellek, a kérdés-válasz reláció általános
(szemantikai és pragmatikai) elmélete. (Hintikka, Aquist)
A "miért" kérdés-válasz reláció logikai rekonstrukciója. A magyarázat, mint a
"miért" kérdésre adandó válasz.
A magyarázat covering-law modellje. (Hempel) A válaszként adott magyarázat
oksági és kontrafaktuális feltételei. (Lewis) A "jó" válasz adekvátsági
feltétele. A szemantikailag illetve a pragmatikailag adekvát válaszok
megkülönböztetése. (Koura)
Kitekintés: magyarázatok covering-law nélkül, nem oksági magyarázatok
lehetősége.
___________________________________
The 60-minute lecture is followed by a 10-minute break. Then we held a
30-60-minute discussion.The participants may comment the talks and
initiate discussion on the Internet. The comments should be written in
the language of the presentation.
The organizer of the colloquium:
Laszlo E. Szabo (email: leszabo(a)hps.elte.hu)
--
L a s z l o E. S z a b o
Theoretical Physics Research Group of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences
Department of History and Philosophy of Science
Eotvos University, Budapest
H-1518 Budapest, Pf. 32, Hungary
Phone/Fax: (36-1)372-2924
Mobil/SMS: (36) 20-366-1172
http://hps.elte.hu/~leszabo
Dear all,
Science & Consciousness Review (NEW MIRROR: www.sci-con.org) has released
new articles and reviews:
_______________________
NEWS
Does the duck-billed platypus dream?
- by Bernard J. Baars
You can see a dog dreaming: it twitches and whines, and its eyes move in
rapid eye movement (REM) sleep. In fact, dreaming in dogs and cats is
quite similar to human dreaming. But a recent study of dream patterns in the
duck-billed platypus, the odd-looking Australian marsupial, reveals an
interesting surprise.
Full text at: http://sci-con.org/news/articles/20030402.html
_______________________
LATEST HEADLINES
- RADIO: Synapses and the Self
- REVIEW: The cognitive revolution
- BOOK REVIEW: Memory and Dreams
- Unconscious actions in action-blindsight
- NEW ISSUE: Brain and Mind
See NEWS IN BRIEF at: http://sci-con.org/more_news.html
_______________________
PREVIOUS ARTICLES
Editorial:
Neurophenomenology: How to combine subjective experience with brain evidence
http://sci-con.org/editorials/20030304.html
Editorial:
An Attention-Based Control Model of Consciousness (CODAM)
http://sci-con.org/news/articles/20020601.html
Visit our archives at:
http://sci-con.org/archive.html
_______________________
MIRROR SITE
Science & Consciousness Review can now be found at www.sci-con.org. Soon, we
will launch new features and forums for the scientific study of
consciousness.
_______________________
SEND YOUR CONTRIBUTION
For students, teachers, scientists, and all other fans of consciousness...
Send your news summaries to us.
See more at: http://sci-con.org/author_instructions.html
Sincerely,
Thomas Zoëga Ramsøy
Managing Editor
Department of HISTORY AND PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE
Eotvos University, Budapest
Pazmany P. setany 1/A Budapest
Phone/Fax: (36-1) 372 2924
Department's Home Page:http://hps.elte.hu
P h i l o s o p h y o f S c i e n c e C o l l o q u i u m
Room 6.54 (6th floor) Monday 4:00 PM
____________________________________
28 April 4:00 PM 6th floor 6.54
B e n e d e k L á n g <mailto:mphlab01@phd.ceu.hu>
Medieval Studies Department
Central European University, Budapest
Necromantia mint a hetedik szabad mu"vészet
avagy a tanult mágia a középkori tudomány határain innen és túl
(Necromantia as the seventh liberal art - learned magic fringing
upon the medieval science )
Az arab szövegek latinra történo" átültetését célzó program, amely az
Ibériai félsziget és Szicília 12. századi fordítóiskoláiban bontakozott
ki, alapveto" változást és nem kevés zavart hozott az európai tudomány
életébe. Egyfelo"l a keresztény nyugat szembesült az arab tudomány
gazdagságával és felso"bbrendu" voltával, valamint igyekezett annak
eredményeit asszimilálni, másfelo"l pedig az új tudással nem kevés olyan
anyag is érkezett, amely elgondolkodásra késztette a nyugat
filozófusait. A fordítók ugyanis a matematikai, csillagászati, optikai
és orvosi traktátusokkal együtt (so"t nem ritkán ezeket félretéve)
különösen szívesen fordították a divináció, a természetes mágia és a
talizmán mágia alapszövegeit.
Az új tudomány érkezése olyan helyzetet teremtett, amelyre talán nem
túlzás a ?paradigmaváltás? kifejezést alkalmazni. Nem csupán azért, mert
a természetro"l való tudás mennyisége drasztikusan megno"tt a jellege
pedig megváltozott, hanem azért is, mert az új szövegek új kihívással
szembesítették a nyugat tudósközösségeit: meg kellett határozni, hogy a
tudásanyag mely része mino"sül elfogadhatónak és tudományosnak, és mit
kell sürgo"sen kizárni a legitim tudományból, egyszóval állást kellett
foglalni a demarkáció kérdésében. A helyzet átmeneti voltára jellemzo",
hogy számunkra meglepo" tudástípusok is aspirálhattak a tudomány
státuszra: a 12. század néhány oktatási kézikönyve a necromantia
tudományát ? bármit is értettek e terminus alatt ? a hetedik szabad
mu"vészetként, azaz az oktatás legalapveto"bb elemeként említette.
Elo"adásomban 13. századi latin szerzo"k tudományklasszifikációit
segítségül híva azt a mechanizmust igyekszem rekonstruálni, amelynek
folyamán eldo"lt, hogy mely arab forrásból fordított mágiatípusok nyernek
bebocsátást a hivatalos tudomány védo"bástyái közé, és melyek mino"sülnek
veszélyes ? de nem megsemmisítendo", csupán félretéve mego"rzendo"
?tudásanyagnak. Ha vizsgálatunkat kiterjesztjük az egész középkorra,
megfigyelhetjük, hogy amíg a ?mágia? terminus egyértelmu" elutasítás
tárgya volt a kora középkorban, addig a korszak végére korlátozott
mértékben lehetségessé vált egyes mágia formák mellett érvelni. A tanult
mágia differenciálódásával és az egyes mágiatípusok elkülönülésével
párhuzamosan, bizonyos mágiához kötheto" motívumok és teóriák
?pozitivizációjáról?, tudományossá szelídüléséro"l számolhatunk be.
Úgy tu"nik, hogy nem csak a tudomány, de a mágia fogalma is történetileg
változó, állandó mozgásban lévo" és dinamikus konstrukció, valamint, hogy
végso" soron egy tágabb értelemben vett tudósközösség döntésén múlik,
hogy mi számít egyetemi szinten oktatható tudásnak, és mi mino"sül
veszélyes tévelygésnek. Ezek a következtetések persze nem okoznak
meglepetést azoknak, akik figyelemmel követték az elmúlt húsz-harminc év
tudományfilozófiai és tudásszociológiai fejleményeit. Azonban amíg e
filozófiai tételek illusztrálására és alátámasztására rendszerint 17.
századi vagy késo"bbi, modern példák szolgáltatnak történeti anyagot,
addig én azt próbálom felderíteni, hogy hogyan lehet hasonló szempontok
mentén újraolvasni a 13. század egyes vitáit, azaz hogyan lehet egy
olyan korszakot vizsgálni, amely sokkal kevesebb tudománytörténeti és
szociológiai információt hagyott ránk, és amelyhez
összehasonlíthatatlanul nehézkesebb a hozzáférésünk.
___________________________________
The 60-minute lecture is followed by a 10-minute break. Then we held a
30-60-minute discussion.The participants may comment the talks and
initiate discussion on the Internet. The comments should be written in
the language of the presentation.
The organizer of the colloquium:
Laszlo E. Szabo (email: leszabo(a)hps.elte.hu)
--
Laszlo E. Szabo
Department of Theoretical Physics
Department of History and Philosophy of Science
Eotvos University, Budapest
H-1518 Budapest, Pf. 32, Hungary
Phone/Fax: (36-1)372-2924
Home: (36-1) 200-7318
Mobil/SMS: (36) 20-366-1172
http://hps.elte.hu/~leszabo
Workshop on
Cognitive Modeling of Agents and Multi-Agent Interactions
August 9, 2003. Acapulco, Mexico
(at IJCAI'2003)
Computational models of cognitive agents that incorporate a wide
range of cognitive functionalities (such as a variety of
memory/representation, various types of learning, and sensory motor
capabilities) have been developed in both AI and cognitive science.
In AI, they appear under the rubric of intelligent agents and
multi-agent systems. In cognitive science, they are often known as
cognitive architectures. These strands of research provide useful
paradigms for addressing some fundamental questions in AI and
Cognitive Science.
Artificial intelligence started out with the goal of designing functioning
intelligent agents. However, faced with the enormous difficulty of
the task, the focus has largely been on modeling specific aspects of
intelligence, often in highly restricted domains. Nevertheless, some
researchers have focused on putting the pieces together with the goal
of designing autonomous agents. More important, there is a growing interest in
multi-agent interactions that addresses issues of coordination and cooperation
among cognitive agents.
On the other side, traditionally, the main focus of research in cognitive
science has been on specific components of cognition (e.g., perception,
memory, learning, language). Recent developments in computational modeling
of cognitive architectures provide new avenues for precisely specifying
complex cognitive processes in tangible ways, thereby addressing foundational
questions in cognitive science. Such developments need to be extended to
multi-agent interactions and there are promising developments in this regard
(see e.g. recent papers in this area in the journal Cognitive Systems Research).
Against this background, this workshop seeks to bring together cognitive
scientists and AI researchers, with a wide range of background and expertise,
to discuss research problems in understanding cognition at the individual
level as well as at the collective level.
Tentative Program
August 9, 2003. Acapulco, Mexico
9:00 - 9:10
Opening Remarks
Ron Sun
Session 1:
Cognitive Models of Physical and Social Environments (Chair: Ron Sun)
9:10 - 11:40 (30 minutes each)
A Value-Laden Architecture for Intelligent Behavior
Pat Langley
Daniel Shapiro
Meg Aycinema
Michael Siliski
Representational Content and Reciprocal Interplay
Tibor Bosse
Catholijn M. Jonker
Jan Treur
Cognitive Anatomy and Functions of Expectations
Cristiano Castelfranchi
Emiliano Lorini
Obligations and Permissions as Mental Entities
G. Boella
L. van der Torre
Finding Interaction Partners using Cognition-Based Decision Strategies
Partha Sarathi Dutta
Luc Moreau
Nicholas R. Jennings
Session 2:
ACT-R Based Cognitive Modeling (Chair: P. Langley)
1:30 - 3:00 (30 minutes each)
Cognitive Architectures, Game Playing, and Interactive Agents
Robert L. West,
Christian Lebiere,
Teamwork, Communication, and Planning in ACT-R
Brad Best
Christian Lebiere
Learning to Play Hide and Seek
Greg Trafton
Alan Schultz
Dennis Perzanowski
Bill Adams
Magda Bugajska
Nick Cassimatis
Derek Brock
Session 3:
Short Presentations (Chair: Robert West)
3:00 - 4:45 (15 minutes each)
Use of a 3D Gaming Environment for a Cognitive Agent
John F. Santore
Stuart C. Shapiro
Design Agents in 3D Virtual Worlds
Mary Lou Maher
Greg Smith
John Gero
Function-Behaviour-Structure: A Model for Social Situated Agents
John S. Gero
Udo Kannengiesser
Optimize or Adapt? Explore or Exploit? Let the Agent (Meta-)Decide
Norberto Eiji Nawa
BDI Architecture in the Framework of Situation Calculus
Robert Demolombe
Pilar Pozos Parra
Reasoning by Assumption
Tibor Bosse
Catholijn M. Jonker
Jan Treur
An Integrative Architecture for Artificial General Intelligence
Ben Goertzel
Cassio Pennachin
Andre Senna
Thiago Maia
Guilherme Lamacie
Panel Discussion: Cognitive Modeling and Multi-Agent Systems---the Synergy
5:00 - 6:00
Chair:
Ron Sun
Panelists:
Cristiano Castelfranchi
Christian Lebiere
Jan Treur
Jonathan Gratch
Contact IJCAI regarding registration and travel matters. See
http://www.ijcai-03.org
for details.
See the workshop Web page at:
http://www.cecs.missouri.edu/~rsun/wsp03.html
===================================================================
Professor Ron Sun, Ph.D James C. Dowell Professor
CECS Department, 201 EBW phone: (573) 884-7662
University of Missouri-Columbia fax: (573) 882-8318
Columbia, MO 65211-2060 email: rsun(a)cecs.missouri.edu
http://www.cecs.missouri.edu/~rsun
===================================================================
Dear Dr. Qwerty,
In the 12 days from June 30th to July 11 2003, Montreal will be the
Categorization Capital of the Cognitive World.
http://www.unites.uqam.ca/sccog/liens/program.html
The latest developments in all aspects of categorization will be
described and debated across the cognitive sciences spectrum:
cognitive anthropology, computer science, linguistics,
cognitive neuroscience, philosophy and psychology.
The University of Quebec/Montreal will host this Cognitive Sciences
Summer Institute. I hope you and your colleagues and students will
attend and participate in this remarkable convergence.
I've attached a sample of only a few of the over 50 speakers.
For the full programme:
http://www.unites.uqam.ca/sccog/liens/program.html
Best wishes,
Stevan Harnad.
Canada Research Chair
University of Quebec/Montreal
Partial List:
Categorization in cognitive neuroscience,
Stephen Grossberg, Boston University
Brain basis of category learning,
John Gabrieli, Stanford University
Categorization in linguistics,
Pieter Muysken, Universiteit van Nijmegen
Color categories across languages,
Paul Kay, University of California at Berkeley
Shape recognition,
Irv Biederman, University of Southern California
Object perception,
Phil G. Schyns, University of Glasgow
Category representation,
Rob Nosofsky, Indiana University
A state of the art on syntactic categories,
Arnold Zwicky, Stanford University
On categorisation and acquisition,
Eve Clark, Stanford University
Inferential theory of learning
Ryszard S. Michalski, George Mason University
Simulation and embodiment in situated conceptualization,
Lawrence Barsalou, Emory University
Category learning,
Rob Goldstone, Indiana University
Self-organizing vocabularies,
Stefano Nolfi, Institute of Cognitive Sciences and Technology, Rome
Analogical reasoning,
Dedre Gentner, Northwestern University
Categorisation and conceptual change,
Paul Thagard, University of Waterloo
A biological theory of empirical concepts,
Ruth Millikan, University of Connecticut
On category change,
Ian Roberts, University of Cambridge
CEU Philosophy Department and ELTE cordially invite you to a public lecture by
Harry Frankfurt
Monday, 28 April, 5.30 PM- Popper room (Nador str. 9./room 102)
"Some Mysteries of Love"
Love, in which the will is constrained to a disinterested concern for the good of the beloved, is not necessarily a response to reasons or to value. It is a creator of reasons and of value: things become valuable to us because we love them, and our love means that we have reason to perform the actions that sustaining and promoting their good requires. The ultimate ground of practical normativity and practical reason lies, then, in the contingent necessities of love. These volitional necessities, far from impairing our freedom, are in fact themselves liberating.
Harry Frankfurt is Professor Emeritus at Princeton University, a past president of the American Philosophical Association and a Fellow of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences. He specializes in ethics and the history of philosophy, with particular emphasis on the problem of free will. His publications include the articles "Freedom of the Will and the Concept of a Person,", "Alternate possibilities and moral responsibility" and the books Demons, Dreamers and Madmen: The Defense of Reason in Descartes' Meditations; The Importance of What We Care About and Necessity, Volition and Love.
***************************************************************************************************************************
CEU Philosophy Department and the Humanities Center cordially invite you to a public lecture by
Hilary Putnam
9. May, 5.00 PM - Popper Room
"Ethics Without Metaphysics"
Hilary Putnam, one of America's most distinguished philosophers, surveys an astonishingly wide range of issues and proposes a new, clear-cut approach to philosophical questions -- a renewal of philosophy. He contests the view that only science offers an appropriate model for philosophical inquiry. His discussion of topics from artificial intelligence to natural selection, and of reductive philosophical views derived from these models, identifies the insuperable problems encountered when philosophy ignores the normative or attempts to reduce it to something else.