The CEU Philosophy department cordially invites you to a talk (as part of its Departmental Colloquium series)
by
Michael V.Griffin (Central European University)
on
"Leibniz on the Eternal Truths and the Existence of God"
5.30 PM, Tuesday, 30. September, 14. Zrinyi str. / room 412
Abstract:
Leibniz maintains that there are eternal truths (including truths
concerning possibilities and necessities) and that these truths,
nevertheless, depend on God. His statements on the topic include:
"If there were no eternal substance, there would be no eternal truths,"
"God is not only the source of existences, but also that of essences,"
and "if there were no God, there would not only be nothing actual, but
also nothing possible." Interpreters of Leibniz and philosophers
sympathetic to the dependence claim typically say that the eternal
truths, or the entities on which they depend (e.g., essences or
possibles), are God's concepts or thoughts. Without God, of course,
these things wouldn't exist. However, I think Leibniz has a deeper
sort of dependence in mind. It follows from Leibniz's metaphysics,
I'll argue, that God's non-existence would entail the internal
inconsistency of all essences.
Kriszta Biber
Department Coordinator
Philosophy Department
Tel: 36-1-327-3806
Fax: 36-1-327-3072
THEORETICAL PHILOSOPHY FORUM
Institute of Philosophy
Faculty of Humanities, Eotvos University
Room 226 Monday 4:00 PM Muzeum krt. 4/i, Budapest
Web site: http://phil.elte.hu/tpf
29 September 4:00 PM Room 226
Hanoch Ben-Yami
Department of Philosophy
Central European University, Budapest
Why Kripke's Account of Name Reference is Wrong?
Abstract: http://phil.elte.hu/tpf/2008-2009/September/#5
___________________________________
The Forum is open to everyone, including students,visitors, and faculty
members from all departments and institutes!
Format: 60 minute lecture, 10 minute coffee break, followed by a 30-60
minute discussion. The language of presentation is English or Hungarian.
A printable poster is available from here:
http://phil.elte.hu/tpf/2008-2009/September/poster.pdf
Please feel free to post it in your institution!
The organizer of the Forum: Laszlo E. Szabo
(leszabo(a)phil.elte.hu)
--
L a s z l o E. S z a b o
Department of Logic, Institute of Philosophy
Faculty of Humanities, Eotvos University, Budapest
http://phil.elte.hu/leszabo
THEORETICAL PHILOSOPHY FORUM
Institute of Philosophy
Faculty of Humanities, Eotvos University
Room 226 Monday 4:00 PM Muzeum krt. 4/i, Budapest
Web site: http://phil.elte.hu/tpf
Sandor Kalvin's lecture originally scheduled for 20 October has been
postponed! So the modified program is the following:
October Program
6 October 4:00 PM Room 226
Adolf Karda
Institute of Philosophy, Eotvos University, Budapest
Evolucios tudatfilozofia: DONALD kontra DENNETT
(Evolutionary philosophy of mind: DONALD contra DENNETT)
Abstract: http://phil.elte.hu/tpf/2008-2009/October/#1
13 October 4:00 PM Room 226
Matyas Brendel
Computer and Automation Research Institute, Budapest
'Et tu mi fili, Thomas?!' – avagy Carnap ujraertekelese
('Et tu mi fili, Thomas?!' – reconsidering Carnap)
Abstract: http://phil.elte.hu/tpf/2008-2009/October/#2
20 October 4:00 PM Room 226
Gabor Hofer-Szabo
Institute for Communication and Cultural Studies
King Sigismund College, Budapest
Department of Logic, Institute of Philosophy
Eotvos University, Budapest
Objektivista kalauz a szubjektiv valoszinuseghez
(Objectivist guide to subjective probability)
Abstract: http://phil.elte.hu/tpf/2008-2009/October/#3
___________________________________
The Forum is open to everyone, including students,visitors, and faculty
members from all departments and institutes!
Format: 60 minute lecture, 10 minute coffee break, followed by a 30-60
minute discussion. The language of presentation is English or Hungarian.
A printable poster is available from here:
http://phil.elte.hu/tpf/2008-2009/October/poster.pdf
Please feel free to post it in your institution!
The organizer of the Forum: Laszlo E. Szabo
(leszabo(a)phil.elte.hu)
--
L a s z l o E. S z a b o
Department of Logic, Institute of Philosophy
Faculty of Humanities, Eotvos University, Budapest
http://phil.elte.hu/leszabo
----- Original Message -----
From: "Dombi Peter" <dombi(a)szfki.hu>
To: "Somfai Béla " <somfaib32(a)gmail.com>
Cc: <kampis.george(a)gmail.com>; <tothmy(a)gmail.com>
Sent: Wednesday, September 17, 2008 9:19 PM
Subject: konyvbemutato
>
> Kedves Mindenki!
>
> Csatolva küldöm a tervezett meghívót a két hét múlva esedékes
> könyvbemutatóval
> kapcsolatban. Amennyiben egyetértetek a tartalmával, kérem, juttassátok el
> Ti
> is olyan helyekre/listákra, ahol érdeklődhetnek a dolog iránt. Köszönöm,
> üdvözlettel:
>
> Péter
>
>
Dear Dr. Qwerty,
==================================================================
*** CALL RESPONSE INSTRUCTIONS ***
==================================================================
Please DO NOT respond to this email. If you wish to submit a proposal for commentary and/or
suggest potential commentators, please go to the new Online Commentary Proposal System at the
following URL:
http://www.bbsonline.org/perl/commentary/commproposal?authordir=Carruthers-…
* If you only wish to suggest potential commentators, please ignore prompts to
submit a proposal with expertise information.
* If you experience technical difficulties, please email bbs(a)bbsonline.org.
* Please respond to this Call no later than October 8, 2008
NOTE: Behavioral and Brain Sciences (BBS) is an international, interdisciplinary journal
providing Open Peer Commentary on important and controversial current research in the
biobehavioral and cognitive sciences. Commentators must be BBS Associates, or suggested by
a BBS Associate. If you are not a BBS Associate, please follow the instructions linked
below:
http://www.bbsonline.org/Instructions/associnst.html
==================================================================
** Target Article Information **
==================================================================
To help you decide whether you would be an appropriate commentator for this article, an
unedited, uncorrected target article is retrievable at the URL that follows the abstract
and keywords below. This unedited draft has been prepared only for potential commentators
who wish to nominate themselves for formal commentary invitation. Please DO NOT write a
commentary until you receive a formal invitation. If you are invited to submit a
commentary, a copyedited, corrected version of this paper will be posted in the invitation
letter. The commentary invitation list is compiled by the Editors so as to balance
proposals, areas of expertise, and frequency of prior commentaries in BBS.
TITLE: How we know our own minds: the relationship between mindreading and metacognition
AUTHORS: Peter Carruthers
ABSTRACT: Four different accounts of the relationship between third-person mindreading and
first-person metacognition are compared and evaluated. While three of them endorse the
existence of introspection for propositional attitudes, the fourth (defended here) claims
that our knowledge of our own attitudes results from turning our mindreading capacities
upon ourselves. Section 1 introduces the four accounts. Section 2 develops the mindreading
is prior model in more detail, showing how it predicts introspection for perceptual and
quasi-perceptual (e.g. imagistic) mental events while claiming that metacognitive access to
our own attitudes always results from swift unconscious self-interpretation. It also
considers the models relationship to the expression of attitudes in speech. Section 3
argues that the commonsense belief in the existence of introspection should be given no
weight. Section 4 argues briefly that data from childhood development are of no help in
resolving this debate. Section 5 considers the evolutionary claims to which the different
accounts are committed, and argues that the three introspective views make predictions that
arent borne out by the data. Section 6 examines the extensive evidence that people often
confabulate when self-attributing attitudes. Section 7 considers two systems accounts of
human thinking and reasoning, arguing that although there are inrospectable events within
System 2, there are no introspectable attitudes. Section 8 examines alleged evidence of
unsymbolized thinking. Section 9 considers the claim that schizophrenia exhibits a
dissociation between mindreading and metacognition. Finally, Section 10 evaluates the claim
that autism presents a dissociation in the opposite direction, of metacognition without
mindreading.
KEYWORDS: autism, confabulation, conscious thought, introspection, metacognition,
mindreading, schizophrenia, self-interpretation, self-monitoring, self-knowledge.
FULL TEXT: http://www.bbsonline.org/Preprints/Carruthers-03112008/Referees/
==================================================================
*** CALL RESPONSE INSTRUCTIONS ***
==================================================================
Please DO NOT respond to this email. If you wish to submit a proposal for commentary and/or
suggest potential commentators, please go to the new Online Commentary Proposal System at
the following URL:
http://www.bbsonline.org/perl/commentary/commproposal?authordir=Carruthers-…
* If you only wish to suggest potential commentators, please ignore prompts to submit a
proposal with expertise information.
* If you experience technical difficulties, please email bbs(a)bbsonline.org.
* Please respond to this Call no later than October 8, 2008
NOTE: Behavioral and Brain Sciences (BBS) is an international, interdisciplinary journal
providing Open Peer Commentary on important and controversial current research in the
biobehavioral and cognitive sciences. Commentators must be BBS Associates, or suggested by
a BBS Associate. If you are not a BBS Associate, please follow the instructions linked
below:
http://www.bbsonline.org/Instructions/associnst.html
==================================================================
==================================================================
Paul Bloom - Editor
Barbara Finlay - Editor
Behavioral and Brain Sciences
bbs(a)bbsonline.org
http://www.bbsonline.org
-------------------------------------------------------------------
A BME Kognitív Tudományi Tanszék szeretettel vár mindenkit tanszéki
szeminárium sorozatának most következő
előadására<http://cogsci.bme.hu/Esem.php?esemIndex=56>:
*Emlékszünk-e ismerőseink hangjának érdességére?*
*Bőhm Tamás*
BME, Távközlési és Médiainformatikai Tanszék <http://www.tmit.bme.hu/>
Szeptember 22., hétfő, 12:00-13:00. XI., Stoczek u. 2., St. ép.,
320-as terem.
*Absztrakt: *
Korábbi eredmények arra utalnak, hogy az irreguláris zönge (érdes hang)
előfordulási aránya jellemző egyes személyek beszédére, különösen a mondatok
végén. A kísérletekben azt vizsgáltuk, hogy a hallgatók egy diszkriminációs
tesztben fel tudják-e idézni ezt az információt. Ehhez olyan ingerpárokat
(szavakat) állítottunk elő, amelyek egyik tagjának végén a zönge reguláris
(nem érdes), míg a másik tagjának végén irreguláris. Az első kísérletet
olyan személyekkel végeztük, akik ismerték a beszélők hangját. A második
kísérlet résztvevői viszont korábban nem ismerték a beszélőket, hangjukat a
kísérlet során ismerték meg. Amikor az ingerpárok közül ki kellett
választaniuk, hogy melyik a beszélő hangja, az esetek több mint 60%-ában a
beszélő személy jellegzetes zöngeminőségét (reguláris vagy irreguláris)
preferálták. Tehát az eredmények azt mutatják, hogy a kísérleti személyek
többsége emlékszik a számukra ismert hangok érdességére. (A munkát Stefanie
Shattuck-Hufnagel-lel együttműködve végeztem.)
Keresztes Attila
BME-Kognitív Tudományi Tanszék
BME-Department of Cognitive Science
akeresztes(a)cogsci.bme.hu
keresztes.attila(a)gmail.com
THEORETICAL PHILOSOPHY FORUM
Institute of Philosophy
Faculty of Humanities, Eotvos University
Room 226 Monday 4:00 PM Muzeum krt. 4/i, Budapest
Web site: http://phil.elte.hu/tpf
October Program
6 October 4:00 PM Room 226
Adolf Karda
Institute of Philosophy, Eotvos University, Budapest
Evolucios tudatfilozofia: DONALD kontra DENNETT
(Evolutionary philosophy of mind: DONALD contra DENNETT)
Abstract: http://phil.elte.hu/tpf/2008-2009/October/#1
13 October 4:00 PM Room 226
Matyas Brendel
Computer and Automation Research Institute, Budapest
'Et tu mi fili, Thomas?!' – avagy Carnap ujraertekelese
('Et tu mi fili, Thomas?!' – reconsidering Carnap)
Abstract: http://phil.elte.hu/tpf/2008-2009/October/#2
20 October 4:00 PM Room 226
Sandor Kalvin
Department of Plasma Physics
Research Institute for Particle and Nuclear Physics, Budapest
Nincs objektiv mereskiertekeles a fizikaban? – Bayesianus
konfirmacioelmelet
(Is there no objective measurement evaluation in physics? – Bayesian
theory of confirmation)
Abstract: http://phil.elte.hu/tpf/2008-2009/October/#3
___________________________________
The Forum is open to everyone, including students,visitors, and faculty
members from all departments and institutes!
Format: 60 minute lecture, 10 minute coffee break, followed by a 30-60
minute discussion. The language of presentation is English or Hungarian.
A printable poster is available from here:
http://phil.elte.hu/tpf/2008-2009/October/poster.pdf
Please feel free to post it in your institution!
The organizer of the Forum: Laszlo E. Szabo
(leszabo(a)phil.elte.hu)
--
L a s z l o E. S z a b o
Department of Logic, Institute of Philosophy
Faculty of Humanities, Eotvos University, Budapest
http://phil.elte.hu/leszabo
A Magyar Kognitív Tudományi Alapítvány a Kelet-Nyugat Kutatóintézettel karöltve és A Tan Kapuja Buddhista Főiskola, mint házigazda védnöksége alatt meghirdette a XVI. Magyar Kognitív Tudományok Konferenciát
"Szubjektív tudás - objektív tudomány" címmel.
A rendezvényünk időpontja: 2008. október 28-30.
Az előadók jelentkezését október 1-ig várjuk a szervezes(a)makogxvi.com címen.
Bővebb információ - a jelentkezés mikéntjéről, a helyszín megközelíthetőségéről, a szálláslehetőségekről, a szervezőkről (és a kognitív kutatások és a buddhizmus kapcsolatáról) a konferencia honlapján (http://makogxvi.com) található.
Dear Dr. Qwerty,
==================================================================
*** CALL RESPONSE INSTRUCTIONS ***
==================================================================
Please DO NOT respond to this email. If you wish to submit a proposal for commentary and/or
suggest potential commentators, please go to the new Online Commentary Proposal System at the
following URL:
http://www.bbsonline.org/perl/commentary/commproposal?authordir=Mitchell-08…
* If you only wish to suggest potential commentators, please ignore prompts to
submit a proposal with expertise information.
* If you experience technical difficulties, please email bbs(a)bbsonline.org.
* Please respond to this Call no later than September 30, 2008
NOTE: Behavioral and Brain Sciences (BBS) is an international, interdisciplinary journal
providing Open Peer Commentary on important and controversial current research in the
biobehavioral and cognitive sciences. Commentators must be BBS Associates, or suggested by a
BBS Associate. If you are not a BBS Associate, please follow the instructions linked below:
http://www.bbsonline.org/Instructions/associnst.html
==================================================================
** Target Article Information **
==================================================================
To help you decide whether you would be an appropriate commentator for this article, an
unedited, uncorrected target article is retrievable at the URL that follows the abstract and
keywords below. This unedited draft has been prepared only for potential commentators who
wish to nominate themselves for formal commentary invitation. Please DO NOT write a
commentary until you receive a formal invitation. If you are invited to submit a commentary,
a copyedited, corrected version of this paper will be posted in the invitation letter. The
commentary invitation list is compiled by the Editors so as to balance proposals, areas of
expertise, and frequency of prior commentaries in BBS.
TITLE: The propositional nature of human associative learning
AUTHORS: Chris J. Mitchell, Jan De Houwer, and Peter F. Lovibond
ABSTRACT: The past 50 years have seen an accumulation of evidence suggesting that associative
learning depends on high-level cognitive processes that give rise to propositional knowledge.
Yet many learning theorists maintain a belief in a learning mechanism in which links between
mental representations are formed automatically. We characterize and highlight the
differences between the propositional and link approaches, and review the relevant empirical
evidence. We conclude that learning is the consequence of propositional reasoning processes
that cooperate with the unconscious processes involved in memory retrieval and perception. We
argue that this new conceptual framework allows many of the important recent advances in
associative learning research to be retained, but recast in a model that provides a firmer
foundation for both immediate application and future research.
KEYWORDS: Conditioning, associative link, association, human associative learning,
dual-system, awareness, automatic, propositional, controlled
FULL TEXT: http://www.bbsonline.org/Preprints/Mitchell-08092007/Referees/
==================================================================
*** CALL RESPONSE INSTRUCTIONS ***
==================================================================
Please DO NOT respond to this email. If you wish to submit a proposal for
commentary and/or suggest potential commentators, please go to the new
Online Commentary Proposal System at the following URL:
http://www.bbsonline.org/perl/commentary/commproposal?authordir=Mitchell-08…
* If you only wish to suggest potential commentators, please ignore prompts to
submit a proposal with expertise information.
* If you experience technical difficulties, please email bbs(a)bbsonline.org.
* Please respond to this Call no later than September 30, 2008
NOTE: Behavioral and Brain Sciences (BBS) is an international, interdisciplinary journal
providing Open Peer Commentary on important and controversial current research in the
biobehavioral and cognitive sciences. Commentators must be BBS Associates, or suggested by a
BBS Associate. If you are not a BBS Associate, please follow the instructions linked below:
http://www.bbsonline.org/Instructions/associnst.html
==================================================================
==================================================================
Paul Bloom - Editor
Barbara Finlay - Editor
Behavioral and Brain Sciences
bbs(a)bbsonline.org
http://www.bbsonline.org
-------------------------------------------------------------------