Meghívó
A Magyar Nyelvtudományi Társaság Általános Nyelvészeti Szakosztályának
felolvasó ülésére:
Kassai Ilona: Az -e kérdőszó és az is kötőszó együttes előfordulásának
szórendi megoldásai
Az ülés helye: ELTE BTK 1088 Budapest, Múzeum krt. 4. I épület, 106. terem
(alagsor)
Időpontja: 2002. november 5. (kedd), du. 1/2 5
Department of HISTORY AND PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE
Eotvos University, Budapest
Pazmany P. setany 1/A Budapest
Phone/Fax: (36-1) 372 2924
Department's Home Page:http://hps.elte.hu
Philosophy of Science Colloquium
Room 6.54 (6th floor) Monday 4:00 PM
____________________________________
November
4 November
No seminar session!Instead you are invited to
Logic, Algebra, Relativity - 2002
István Németi is 60
November 4 - 8, 2002
Alfréd Rényi Institute of Mathematics <http://www.renyi.hu/~n60/n60.html>
------------------------------------------------------------------------
11 November 4:00 PM 6th floor 6.54
(Language: Hungarian)
János Tanács <nego(a)primposta.com>
Philosophy and History of Science, Technical University of Budapest
Ami hiányzik Bolyai János Appendixébo"l - és ami nem
A Bolyai-féle paralléla-terminus hiánya és rekonstrukciója
(The missing term 'parallela' and its reconstruction in Bolyai's Appendix)
Az elo"adás célja megmutatni, hogy nem támasztható alá az a standard
nézet, amely Bolyai János Appendix címu" mu"vével, azon belül is a
Bolyai-féle paralléla-terminus értelmezésével kapcsolatban kialakult. A
bevett nézet ugyanis - egymástól kevéssé eltéro" megfogalmazási
változatokban - azt állítja, hogy Bolyai János a mu" elso" paragrafusában
(i) értelmezi, (ii) definiálja vagy (iii) újradefiniálja a párhuzamosság
fogalmát.
Az elo"adás elso" lépésben a bevett nézet rekonstrukciójára tesz
kísérletet, amely az interpretatív szándékú magyar
Appendix-fordításokat, valamint a nemzetközi matematikatörténeti
szakirodalom által - helytelenül - elso"dleges forrásként használt angol
(Halsted-féle), valamint francia (Hoüel-Schmidt-féle)
fordításokat elemzi, illetve az elso" paragrafusra vonatkozó
matematikatörténeti nézeteket összegzi.
A standard nézet cáfolásához az álláspontok legjóindulatúbb, közös
minimális megfogalmazását veszem alapul. A tézis cáfolatát az Appendix
eredeti latin nyelvu" - facsimile és levéltári - példányaira, a Bolyaiak
levelezésére, Bolyai János sajátkezu" német Appendix-fordítására és
Lobacsevszkij mu"vével kapcsolatos
feljegyzéseire, továbbá a magyar nyelvújítási mozgalom matematikai
mu"szavakra adott javaslataira valamint a szóalkotás elveire szándékozom
építeni.
Végül azzal a meglepo" tézissel fogok elo"állni, hogy a paralléla-terminus
nem az Appendix elso" paragrafusában, hanem a mu" egy másik helyén bukkan
fel. Ám hogy hol, ennek megválaszolását az elo"adásra tartogatom.
A fogalmi általánosítás problémája felo"l amellett fogok érvelni, hogy az
euklideszi geometria mellett megjeleno" nem-euklideszi geometria fogalmi
rendszere, pontosabban a ketto" közötti fogalmi átmenet aluldeterminált.
Ez azt jelenti, hogy az átmenetben a fogalmi általánosításnak nincs
kitüntetett iránya,
hanem nyitott az alternatív kiterjesztések vonatkozásában. Ennek
következménye, hogy nem beszélhetünk az euklideszi geometria egyetlen
helyes fogalmi kiterjesztéséro"l és a hiperbolikus geometria egyetlen
helyes fogalmi rendszeréro"l sem.
Ez azzal a következménnyel jár, hogy megmutatható: az adott fogalmi
rendszeren, jelesül az euklideszi geometriáén belül érvényes
szinonimitási viszonyok nem tarthatók fenn egy az egyben a fogalmi
rendszerek közötti átmenetben - egyes szinonimitási viszonyokhoz
ragaszkodva másokat fel kell adnunk, azonban bármelyik viszony
mego"rzéséhez ragaszkodhatunk a többi rovására. Bolyai János tehát teljes
joggal választhatott Lobacsevszkij vagy Gauss fogalmi kiterjesztéséto"l
eltéro"t. Mindez elméletileg támasztja alá, hogy Bolyainak miért nem
kellett szükségképpen azt a fogalmi általánosítást végrehajtania, vagy
azt a kiterjesztési alternatívát választania, amelyet a standard nézet
favorizál, és amelyet az Appendix-interpretációk és -fordítások révén,
hibásan, Bolyaira kényszerít.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
18 November 4:00 PM 6th floor 6.54
Instead of the canceled lecture of 21 October!
(Language: English, except all participants speak Hungarian)
Tamás Rudas <rudas(a)tarki.hu>
Department of Statistics, Institute of Sociology, Eötvös University,
Budapest
Measurement and modelling of association in contingency tables
Association between two variables is defined in the talk as the
information in their joint distribution not present in the univariate
distributions. Therefore, a measure of association, together with the
marginal distributions, has to parameterize the joint distribution and
has to be variationally independent from the marginals. These
requirements point to the odds ratio as the only appropriate measure of
association.
For higher dimensional contingency tables, a possible generalization is
the system of conditional odds ratios. The conditional odds ratios, on
an ascending class of subsets, are variationally independent from the
marginal distributions on the complement descending class and together
parameterize the joint distribution. Depending on the class of subsets
used, one obtains a flexible class of parametereizations that can be
used to model the conditional association structure. The models obtained
by assuming lack of conditional association on an ascending class of
subsets are of the log-linear type.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
25 November 4:00 PM 6th floor 6.54
(Language: Hungarian)
András Benedek <benedek(a)helka.iif.hu>
Research Institute for Philosophy of HAS
Alkalmas-e a nem-standard analízis a mozgás metafizikai leírására?
(Is nonstandard analysis applicable for the metaphysical description of
motion?)
TBA
------------------------------------------------------------------------
The 60-minute lecture is followed by a 10-minute break. Then we held a
30-60-minute discussion.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
The organizer of the seminar: László E. Szabó
<http://hps.elte.hu/~leszabo> (email: leszabo(a)hps.elte.hu)
--
L a s z l o E. S z a b o
Theoretical Physics Research Group of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences
Department of History and Philosophy of Science
Eotvos University, Budapest
H-1518 Budapest, Pf. 32, Hungary
Phone/Fax: (36-1)372-2924
Mobil/SMS: (36) 20-366-1172
http://hps.elte.hu/~leszabo
magyar tudomany napjaKedves Kollegak !
Nomvember 5-en 10 es 16 ra kozott igen erdekes latas eloadasok lesznek a Magyar Kepzomuveszeti Egyetemen.
Lasd a mellekt programot.
Mindekit szerettel varnak.
Csaba Pléh Center for Cognitive Science Budapest U. of Technology and Economics Budapest Muegyetem rkp 9 R. 203 H-1111 Hungary
T: (361) 4631241 Fax:: (361) 4631072 Email: pleh(a)itm.bme.hu
----- Original Message -----
From: Kovács Gyula
To: dr. Pléh Csaba
Sent: Friday, October 25, 2002 12:53 PM
Subject: magyar tudomany napja
-----Original Message-----
From: Miklos Peternak [mailto:peternak@c3.hu]
Sent: Fri 25/10/2002 12:26 PM
To: sziranyi(a)sztaki.hu; Vidnyanszky Zoltan; Kovács Gyula; Laszlo Beke; tillmann(a)c3.hu
Cc:
Subject: magyar tudomany
Kedves Kollegak,
mellekelem az aktualizalt programot, elore is koszonom a reszvetelt
(remelem, honoralni is tudom)
a rendezveny nyilvanos, rogziteni is fogjuk videora
a teremben projektor lesz, remelem, hogy computer es (nem tul eros) halozat is,
video (vhs, svhs, dv), diavetito ugyancsak elkepzelheto, ha szukseges
kosz
miklos
Kedves Barataim !
Oktober 27-en, vasarnap 14h3Otol knyvbemutato beszelgetes lesz a
Bolygo Hollandok irodalmi fesztival keretben
a BARKA SZINHAZBAN
B[p. Ulloi ut 82
Douwe Draisma: Metaformasina (Typotex)
es
Johan Goudsblom: Tuy es civilizacio (Osiris)
frissen megjelent konyvek szerzoivel.
Mindekit szerettel latunk
udv
Pleh Csaba
Csaba Pleh, professor of psychology, Center for Cognitive Science
Budapest U.of Technology and Economics Budapest Muegyetem rkp 9. R-203
H-1111 T and Fax: 36-1-4631072 email: pleh(a)itm.bme.hu
Home: Budakeszi Zichy P. u. 4 H-2092 Hungary (36)(23)453933 Fax:932
Editor: Hungarian Review of Psychology
Department of HISTORY AND PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE
Eotvos University, Budapest
----------------------------------------------------------------
Pazmany P. setany 1/A
Budapest, Hungary
Phone/Fax: (36-1) 372 2924
The web site of the seminar:
http://hps.elte.hu/seminar
Philosophy of Science Colloquium
Room 6.54 (6th floor) Monday 4:00 PM
_________________________________________
28 October 4:00 PM 6th floor 6.54
(Language of presentation: English)
Douwe Draaisma <http://www.ppsw.rug.nl/~teng/draaisma.html>
Heymans Institute, Univerity of Groningen
The tracks of thought: metaphors of memory
There has always been an intimate link between human memory and the
means invented to record knowledge independently of that memory. From
Plato's wax tablet to holography and computers, artificial memories have
supported, relieved and occasionally replaced natural memory. Over the
centuries these artificial memories have also shaped our views of
remembering and forgetting, providing the terms and concepts with which
we have reflected on our own memory. After a general introduction on the
theme of metaphor and memory, I will demonstrate my analysis by the case
of 'panoramic memory', the experience sometimes reported by persons in
sudden mortal danger of seeing a rapid sequence of visual scenes from
their childhood 'flash before their eyes like a movie'. A brief history
of metaphorical descriptions of this sensation from the period before
the invention of film will make clear just how metaphors may lay down
the tracks of our thoughts.
--------------------------------------------------------------------
Douwe Draaisma's book, METAFORAMASINA
<http://www.typotex.hu/p_0027.html>, has been recently published in
Hungarian translation.
_________________________________________________________
The 60-minute lecture is followed by a 10-minute break. Then we held a
30-60-minute discussion.
The organizer of the seminar: László E. Szabó
<http://hps.elte.hu/~leszabo> (email: leszabo(a)hps.elte.hu )
--
L a s z l o E. S z a b o
Theoretical Physics Research Group of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences
Department of History and Philosophy of Science
Eotvos University, Budapest
H-1518 Budapest, Pf. 32, Hungary
Phone/Fax: (36-1)372-2924
Mobil/SMS: (36) 20-366-1172
http://hps.elte.hu/~leszabo
UNIVERSITY OF OXFORD
OXFORD SUMMER SCHOOL ON CONNECTIONIST MODELLING
Department of Experimental Psychology
University of Oxford
Sunday 20th July - Friday 1st August, 2003
Applications are invited for participation in a 2-week residential Summer School on techniques
in connectionist modelling. The course is aimed primarily at researchers who wish to exploit
neural network models in their teaching and/or research and it will provide a general
introduction to connectionist modelling, biologically plausible neural networks and brain
function through lectures and exercises on Macintosh's and PC's. The course is
interdisciplinary in content though many of the illustrative examples are taken from cognitive
and developmental psychology, and cognitive neuroscience. The instructors with primary
responsibility for teaching the course are Kim Plunkett and Edmund Rolls.
No prior knowledge of computational modelling will be required though simple word
processing skills will be assumed. Participants will be encouraged to start work on their own
modelling projects during the Summer School.
The cost of participation in the Summer School is £950. This figure covers the cost of
accommodation (bed and breakfast at St. John's College), registration and all literature required
for the Summer School. Participants will be expected to cover their own travel and meal costs.
A number of partial bursaries (£200) will be available for graduate students. Applicants should
indicate whether they wish to be considered for a graduate student scholarship but are advised to
seek further funding as well, since in previous years the number of graduate student applications
has far exceeded the number of scholarships available.
If you are interested in participating in the Summer School, please complete the application
form at the web address http://epwww.psych.ox.ac.uk/conferences/connectionist_modelling or
alternatively send a brief description of your background with an explanation of why you would
like to attend the Summer School, to:
Mrs Sue King
Department of Experimental Psychology
University of Oxford
South Parks Road
Oxford OX1 3UD
Tel: (01865) 271353
Email: susan.king(a)psy.ox.ac.uk
no later than 28th February 2003.
FYI:
On the Biophysical Development
and Evolution of Consciousness
L. Frederick Zaman III
Neural Engineering Research & Development, Hill AFB
frederick.zaman(a)hill.af.mil
The repulsive forces arising when charges of like sign are placed in
proximity are an anomaly in electrostatic field theory, because field theory
itself (vis-à-vis Coulomb's law considered separately) simply doesn't
predict these forces. The resolution of this anomaly, wherein these forces
are properly understood in terms of electrostatic fields, requires electric
forces that are internally impressed within charges or charged bodies,
rather than being externally impressed; so that the electric fields of
charges, rather than being force, are instead information dynamically
inscribed in space. And the forces of repulsion experienced by like charges
placed in proximity are then fully explained, by electrostatic field theory
thus modified. Based on this finding, a paradigm of "informatic fields
emergent in self-organizing systems" can be proposed, wherein: (1) the
interactions of self-organizing systems in biology and elsewhere, both
internally between the system components and externally with the
environment, are based on the transmission of information, (2) the dynamics
of emergent forces in these systems do not require a vocabulary that is
fundamentally different than what is required to explain the component
dynamics, and (3) the physical understanding of the system components is in
accordance with electrostatic field theory as modified above. In an
application of this paradigm to developmental biology, the morphogenetic
"vector field" of a cell assembly becomes a morphogenetic "force field,"
which self-organizes through the forces within cells whose internal dynamics
are determined globally by supporting informatic fields. What is the
evolution of life from this point of view? It is the emergence and
self-organization of forces internal to living organisms that, through
electrostatic, magnetostatic, and electromagnetic fields that are
information rather than force, direct evolution toward ever increasing
complexity. Biological evolution in effect then becomes a physical dynamics
expressed in terms of informatic fields whose functionality in complex
systems is far greater than classical Newtonian theory allows, and which
operate at much at higher levels of system organization even up to and
including organism consciousness.
Dear member of this list,
Science & Consciousness Review (http://psych.pomona.edu/scr/ ) has released
new articles and reviews:
_____________________
NEWS ARTICLE:
Free consciousness articles
- And how to find them on the web
Did you know? The Web has an abundance of freely available consciousness
articles. Scientific articles on anaesthesia, visual attention, and
blindsight, just to mention a few. All this is available through many
different websites and services. Some websites offer documents uploaded by
the authors themselves, other sites are regular science journals that offer
free articles older than 1-2 years. Here is a brief tour guide through some
of the best places.
Full article: http://psych.pomona.edu/scr/LN_Oct02_FreeScienceOnline.htm
_____________________
NEWS IN BRIEF
- New Issue: Visual cognition
- New articles from Psyche
- ASSC-7 -- Call for papers
- Integrating emotion and cognition in formal models
- Brain activity and the perception of Rubin's vase-face illusion
- Volition to action -- an event- related fMRI study
- Pain in the persistent vegetative state
- Biology vs. the blank slate
- Destined for distinguished oblivion
- Neural correlates for feeling-of-knowing
- Orbitofrontal cortex and memory formation
- Reflective self-awareness and conscious states
Full access at http://psych.pomona.edu/scr/more_news.html
_____________________
ARCHIVES
Previous issues of Science & Consciousness Review can be found at
http://psych.pomona.edu/scr/archive.html We have now issues from April to
September, including all articles, reviews and news in brief.
_____________________
CALL FOR MANUSCRIPTS
Please send your contributions to us. Summaries of published scientific
articles, 200 words or more, in easy to read language.
Authors are encouraged to send the first 500 words of their published
articles, rewritten in teaching style. You keep the copyright. Manuscripts
may be lightly edited.
See Instructions for authors:
http://psych.pomona.edu/scr/author_instructions.html
____________________
ABOUT SCIENCE & CONSCIOUSNESS REVIEW
SCR is a community-building effort. Many scientific communities study how
the human brain makes possible perception, memory, and even attention. But
for historical reasons, we have no scientific community for exploring
consciousness --- including our own experiences of the world, of each other
and of ourselves. It is probably the most important neglected topic in
science.
Students and scientists all over the world are vitally interested. Hardly a
week goes by without another major article in headline journals like Science
and Nature. The flow of evidence has increased enormously. But so far we
have few institutional resources for teaching, learning, and sharing this
information.
In the last decade we have seen new, high quality journals, professional
societies, and regular meetings. They are vitally important.
But many people feel that we need an international forum to build a sense of
shared community.
SCR is an effort in that direction.
___________________________
Best wishes,
Thomas Zoëga Ramsøy
Managing Editor
Below is a link to the forthcoming BBS target article
The Comparative Psychology of Uncertainty Monitoring
and Metacognition
by
John D. Smith, Wendy E. Shields, and David A. Washburn
http://www.bbsonline.org/Preprints/Smith/Referees/
This article has been accepted for publication in Behavioral and Brain
Sciences (BBS), an international, interdisciplinary journal providing
Open Peer Commentary on important and controversial current research in
the biobehavioral and cognitive sciences.
Commentators must be BBS Associates or suggested by a BBS Associate. To be
considered as a commentator for this article, to suggest other appropriate
commentators, or for information about how to become a BBS Associate,
please reply by EMAIL within three (3) weeks to:
calls(a)bbsonline.org
The Calls are sent to 10,000 BBS Associates, so there is no expectation
(indeed, it would be calamitous) that each recipient should comment on every
occasion! Hence there is no need to reply except if you wish to comment, or
to suggest someone to comment.
If you are not a BBS Associate, please approach a current BBS Associate
(there are currently over 10,000 worldwide) who is familiar with your work
to nominate you. All past BBS authors, referees and commentators are
eligible to become BBS Associates. An electronic list of current BBS
Associates is available at this location to help you select a name:
http://www.bbsonline.org/Instructions/assoclist.html
(please note that this list is being updated)
If no current BBS Associate knows your work, please send us your
Curriculum Vitae and BBS will circulate it to appropriate Associates to
ask whether they would be prepared to nominate you. (In the meantime, your
name, address and email address will be entered into our database as an
unaffiliated investigator.)
=======================================================================
IMPORTANT
To help us put together a balanced list of commentators, please give
some indication of the aspects of the topic on which you would bring
your areas of expertise to bear if you were selected as a commentator.
To help you decide whether you would be an appropriate commentator for
this article, an electronic draft is retrievable from the online
BBSPrints Archive, at the URL that follows the abstract below.
_______________________________________________________________________
The Comparative Psychology of Uncertainty Monitoring and Metacognition
John David Smith
Dept. of Psychology
State University of New York at Buffalo
Buffalo, NY 14260
Wendy Ellen Shields
University of Montana
David Alan Washburn
Georgia State University
KEYWORDS: cognition, comparative cognition, consciousness, memory
monitoring, metacognition, metamemory, self-awareness, uncertainty,
uncertainty monitoring
ABSTRACT: Researchers have begun to explore animals' capacities for
uncertainty monitoring and metacognition. This exploration could extend the
study of animal self-awareness and establish the relationship of
self-awareness to other-awareness. It could sharpen descriptions of
metacognition in the human literature and suggest the earliest roots of
metacognition in human development. We summarize research on uncertainty
monitoring by humans, monkeys, and a dolphin within perceptual and
metamemory tasks. We extend phylogenetically the search for metacognitive
capacities by considering studies that have tested less cognitively
sophisticated species. By using the same uncertainty-monitoring paradigms
across species, it should be possible to map the phylogenetic distribution
of metacognition and illuminate the emergence of mind. We provide a unifying
formal description of animals' performances and examine the optimality of
their decisional strategies. Finally, we interpret animals' and humans'
nearly identical performances psychologically. Low-level, stimulus-based
accounts cannot explain the phenomena. The results suggest granting animals
a higher-level decision-making process that involves criterion setting using
controlled cognitive processes. This conclusion raises the difficult
question of animal consciousness. The results show that animals have
functional features of or parallels to human conscious cognition. Remaining
questions are whether animals also have the phenomenal features that are the
feeling/knowing states of human conscious cognition, and whether the present
paradigms can be extended to demonstrate that they do. Thus the comparative
study of metacognition potentially grounds the systematic study of animal
consciousness.
http://www.bbsonline.org/Preprints/Smith/Referees/
======================================================================
IMPORTANT
Please do not prepare a commentary yet. Just let us know, after having
inspected it, what relevant expertise you feel you would bring to bear on
what aspect of the article. We will then let you know whether it was
possible to include your name on the final formal list of invitees.
=======================================================================
*** SUPPLEMENTARY ANNOUNCEMENT ***
(1) Call for Book Nominations for BBS Multiple Book Review
In the past, Behavioral and Brain Sciences (BBS) had only been able
to do 1-2 BBS multiple book treatments per year, because of our
limited annual page quota. BBS's new expanded page quota will make
it possible for us to increase the number of books we treat per
year, so this is an excellent time for BBS Associates and
biobehavioral/cognitive scientists in general to nominate books you
would like to see accorded BBS multiple book review.
(Authors may self-nominate, but books can only be selected on the
basis of multiple nominations.) It would be very helpful if you
indicated in what way a BBS Multiple Book Review of the book(s) you
nominate would be useful to the field (and of course a rich list of
potential reviewers would be the best evidence of its potential
impact!).
*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*
Please note: Your email address has been added to our user database for
Calls for Commentators, the reason you received this email. If you do not
wish to receive further Calls, please feel free to change your mailshot
status through your User Login link on the BBSPrints homepage, using your
username and password. Or, email a response with the word "remove" in the
subject line.
*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*
Ralph
BBS
-------------------------------------------------------------------
Ralph DeMarco
Editorial Coordinator
Behavioral and Brain Sciences
Journals Department
Cambridge University Press
40 West 20th Street
New York, NY 10011-4211
UNITED STATES
bbs(a)bbsonline.org
http://www.bbsonline.org
Tel: +001 212 924 3900 ext.374
Fax: +001 212 645 5960
-------------------------------------------------------------------
Dear Dr. Qwerty,
Below is a link to the forthcoming BBS target article
The Comparative Psychology of Uncertainty Monitoring
and Metacognition
by
John D. Smith, Wendy E. Shields, and David A. Washburn
http://www.bbsonline.org/Preprints/Smith/Referees/
This article has been accepted for publication in Behavioral and Brain
Sciences (BBS), an international, interdisciplinary journal providing
Open Peer Commentary on important and controversial current research in
the biobehavioral and cognitive sciences.
Commentators must be BBS Associates or suggested by a BBS Associate. To be
considered as a commentator for this article, to suggest other appropriate
commentators, or for information about how to become a BBS Associate,
please reply by EMAIL within three (3) weeks to:
calls(a)bbsonline.org
The Calls are sent to 10,000 BBS Associates, so there is no expectation
(indeed, it would be calamitous) that each recipient should comment on every
occasion! Hence there is no need to reply except if you wish to comment, or
to suggest someone to comment.
If you are not a BBS Associate, please approach a current BBS Associate
(there are currently over 10,000 worldwide) who is familiar with your work
to nominate you. All past BBS authors, referees and commentators are
eligible to become BBS Associates. An electronic list of current BBS
Associates is available at this location to help you select a name:
http://www.bbsonline.org/Instructions/assoclist.html
(please note that this list is being updated)
If no current BBS Associate knows your work, please send us your
Curriculum Vitae and BBS will circulate it to appropriate Associates to
ask whether they would be prepared to nominate you. (In the meantime, your
name, address and email address will be entered into our database as an
unaffiliated investigator.)
=======================================================================
IMPORTANT
To help us put together a balanced list of commentators, please give
some indication of the aspects of the topic on which you would bring
your areas of expertise to bear if you were selected as a commentator.
To help you decide whether you would be an appropriate commentator for
this article, an electronic draft is retrievable from the online
BBSPrints Archive, at the URL that follows the abstract below.
_______________________________________________________________________
The Comparative Psychology of Uncertainty Monitoring and Metacognition
John David Smith
Dept. of Psychology
State University of New York at Buffalo
Buffalo, NY 14260
Wendy Ellen Shields
University of Montana
David Alan Washburn
Georgia State University
KEYWORDS: cognition, comparative cognition, consciousness, memory
monitoring, metacognition, metamemory, self-awareness, uncertainty,
uncertainty monitoring
ABSTRACT: Researchers have begun to explore animals' capacities for
uncertainty monitoring and metacognition. This exploration could extend the
study of animal self-awareness and establish the relationship of
self-awareness to other-awareness. It could sharpen descriptions of
metacognition in the human literature and suggest the earliest roots of
metacognition in human development. We summarize research on uncertainty
monitoring by humans, monkeys, and a dolphin within perceptual and
metamemory tasks. We extend phylogenetically the search for metacognitive
capacities by considering studies that have tested less cognitively
sophisticated species. By using the same uncertainty-monitoring paradigms
across species, it should be possible to map the phylogenetic distribution
of metacognition and illuminate the emergence of mind. We provide a unifying
formal description of animals' performances and examine the optimality of
their decisional strategies. Finally, we interpret animals' and humans'
nearly identical performances psychologically. Low-level, stimulus-based
accounts cannot explain the phenomena. The results suggest granting animals
a higher-level decision-making process that involves criterion setting using
controlled cognitive processes. This conclusion raises the difficult
question of animal consciousness. The results show that animals have
functional features of or parallels to human conscious cognition. Remaining
questions are whether animals also have the phenomenal features that are the
feeling/knowing states of human conscious cognition, and whether the present
paradigms can be extended to demonstrate that they do. Thus the comparative
study of metacognition potentially grounds the systematic study of animal
consciousness.
http://www.bbsonline.org/Preprints/Smith/Referees/
======================================================================
IMPORTANT
Please do not prepare a commentary yet. Just let us know, after having
inspected it, what relevant expertise you feel you would bring to bear on
what aspect of the article. We will then let you know whether it was
possible to include your name on the final formal list of invitees.
=======================================================================
*** SUPPLEMENTARY ANNOUNCEMENT ***
(1) Call for Book Nominations for BBS Multiple Book Review
In the past, Behavioral and Brain Sciences (BBS) had only been able
to do 1-2 BBS multiple book treatments per year, because of our
limited annual page quota. BBS's new expanded page quota will make
it possible for us to increase the number of books we treat per
year, so this is an excellent time for BBS Associates and
biobehavioral/cognitive scientists in general to nominate books you
would like to see accorded BBS multiple book review.
(Authors may self-nominate, but books can only be selected on the
basis of multiple nominations.) It would be very helpful if you
indicated in what way a BBS Multiple Book Review of the book(s) you
nominate would be useful to the field (and of course a rich list of
potential reviewers would be the best evidence of its potential
impact!).
*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*
Please note: Your email address has been added to our user database for
Calls for Commentators, the reason you received this email. If you do not
wish to receive further Calls, please feel free to change your mailshot
status through your User Login link on the BBSPrints homepage, using your
username and password. Or, email a response with the word "remove" in the
subject line.
*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*
Ralph
BBS
-------------------------------------------------------------------
Ralph DeMarco
Editorial Coordinator
Behavioral and Brain Sciences
Journals Department
Cambridge University Press
40 West 20th Street
New York, NY 10011-4211
UNITED STATES
bbs(a)bbsonline.org
http://www.bbsonline.org
Tel: +001 212 924 3900 ext.374
Fax: +001 212 645 5960
-------------------------------------------------------------------