Below is the abstract of a forthcoming BBS target article on:
PERCEPTUAL SYMBOL SYSTEMS
by Lawrence W. Barsalou
This article has been accepted for publication in Behavioral and Brain
Sciences (BBS), an international, interdisciplinary journal providing
Open Peer Commentary on important and controversial current research in
the biobehavioral and cognitive sciences.
Commentators must be BBS Associates or nominated by a BBS Associate. To
be considered as a commentator for this article, to suggest other
appropriate commentators, or for information about how to become a BBS
Associate, please send EMAIL to:
bbs(a)cogsci.soton.ac.uk
or write to:
Behavioral and Brain Sciences
Department of Psychology
University of Southampton
Highfield, Southampton
SO17 1BJ UNITED KINGDOM
http://www.princeton.edu/~harnad/bbs/http://www.cogsci.soton.ac.uk/bbs/ftp://ftp.princeton.edu/pub/harnad/BBS/
ftp://ftp.cogsci.soton.ac.uk/pub/bbs/
gopher://gopher.princeton.edu:70/11/.libraries/.pujournals
If you are not a BBS Associate, please send your CV and the name of a
BBS Associate (there are currently over 10,000 worldwide) who is
familiar with your work. All past BBS authors, referees and commentators
are eligible to become BBS Associates.
To help us put together a balanced list of commentators, please give
some indication of the aspects of the topic on which you would bring
your areas of expertise to bear if you were selected as a commentator.
An electronic draft of the full text is available for inspection
with a WWW browser, anonymous ftp or gopher according to the
instructions that follow after the abstract.
____________________________________________________________________
PERCEPTUAL SYMBOL SYSTEMS
Lawrence W. Barsalou
Department of Psychology
Emory University
Atlanta, GA 30322
http://userwww.service.emory.edu/~barsalou/
barsalou(a)emory.edu
KEYWORDS: analogue processing, categories, concepts, frames, imagery,
images, knowledge, perception, representation, sensory-motor
representations, simulation, symbol grounding, symbol systems
ABSTRACT: Prior to the twentieth century, theories of knowledge were
inherently perceptual. Since then, developments in logic, statistics,
and programming languages have inspired amodal theories that rest on
principles fundamentally different from those underlying perception. In
addition, perceptual approaches have become widely viewed as untenable,
because they are assumed to implement recording systems, not conceptual
systems. A perceptual theory of knowledge is developed here in the
contexts of current cognitive science and neuroscience. During
perceptual experience, association areas in the brain capture bottom-up
patterns of activation in sensory-motor areas. Later, in a top-down
manner, association areas partially reactivate sensory-motor areas to
implement perceptual symbols. The storage and reactivation of
perceptual symbols operates at the level of perceptual components--not
at the level of holistic perceptual experiences. Through the use of
selective attention, schematic representations of perceptual components
are extracted from experience and stored in memory (e.g., individual
memories of green, purr, hot). As memories of the same component become
organized around a common frame, they implement a simulator that
produces limitless simulations of the component (e.g., simulations of
purr). Not only do such simulators develop for aspects of sensory
experience, they also develop for aspects of proprioception (e.g.,
lift, run) and for introspection (e.g., compare, memory, happy,
hungry). Once established, these simulators implement a basic
conceptual system that represents types, supports categorization, and
produces categorical inferences. These simulators further support
productivity, propositions, and abstract concepts, thereby implementing
a fully functional conceptual system. Productivity results from
integrating simulators combinatorially and recursively to produce
complex simulations. Propositions result from binding simulators to
perceived individuals to represent type-token relations. Abstract
concepts are grounded in complex simulations of combined physical and
introspective events. Thus, a perceptual theory of knowledge can
implement a fully functional conceptual system while avoiding what it
is becoming increasingly apparent would be problems for amodal symbol
systems. Implications for cognition, neuroscience, evolution,
development, and artificial intelligence are explored.
--------------------------------------------------------------
To help you decide whether you would be an appropriate commentator for
this article, an electronic draft is retrievable from the World Wide
Web or by anonymous ftp or gopher from the US or UK BBS Archive.
Ftp instructions follow below. Please do not prepare a commentary on
this draft. Just let us know, after having inspected it, what relevant
expertise you feel you would bring to bear on what aspect of the
article.
The URLs you can use to get to the BBS Archive:
http://www.princeton.edu/~harnad/bbs/http://www.cogsci.soton.ac.uk/bbs/Archive/bbs.barsalou.htmlftp://ftp.princeton.edu/pub/harnad/BBS/bbs.barsalou
ftp://ftp.cogsci.soton.ac.uk/pub/bbs/Archive/bbs.barsalou
gopher://gopher.princeton.edu:70/11/.libraries/.pujournals
To retrieve a file by ftp from an Internet site, type either:
ftp ftp.princeton.edu
or
ftp 128.112.128.1
When you are asked for your login, type:
anonymous
Enter password as queried (your password is your actual userid:
yourlogin(a)yourhost.whatever.whatever - be sure to include the "@")
cd /pub/harnad/BBS
To show the available files, type:
ls
Next, retrieve the file you want with (for example):
get bbs.barsalou
When you have the file(s) you want, type:
quit
AMERICAN SCIENTIST, published by SIGMA XI, the Scientific Research Society
invites you to contribute to an On-Line Forum On:
Free Internet Access to Traditional Journals
Walker, T.J. (1998) American Scientist 86(5)
http://www.amsci.org/amsci/articles/98articles/walker.html
Moderated by: Stevan Harnad
Cognitive Sciences Center
Department of Electronics and Computer Science
Southampton University
Highfield, Southampton
SO17 1BJ United Kingdom
harnad(a)soton.ac.uk harnad(a)princeton.edu
http://www.princeton.edu/~harnad/intpub.htmlhttp://cogsci.soton.ac.uk/~harnad/intpub.ht
Subscribe to: listserv(a)amsci.org
Send message: subscribe september-forum
Or link to:
http://amsci-forum.amsci.org/archives/september-forum.html
After subscribing
send messages to:
september-forum(a)amsci-forum.amsci.org
Best wishes,
Stevan
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Moderator's Introduction:
(Please don't just read this, but the Walker target article too.)
FOR WHOM THE GATE TOLLS?
FREEING THE ON-LINE-ONLY REFEREED JOURNAL LITERATURE
Stevan Harnad
Southampton University
It is a foregone conclusion that the refereed journal corpus will
all soon be available on-line. The question is: Will access to it have
to continue to be blocked by financial firewalls as in the era of paper
publication?
This is not just a matter of marginal conveniences or utopian details:
The difference between free and fee-based access is the difference
between a seamless, completely interlinked learned literature at the
fingertips of every scholar and scientist in the world and a
jerry-rigged agglomeration of toll-ridden proprietary packages -- the
on-line counterparts of exactly what we have now in the trade world of
scholarly paper journals, funded through Subscriptions, Site-Licenses
and Pay-Per-View (tear-sheets, photocopy, interlibrary loan)
(S/SL/PPV) tolls,
And for the author, the difference is even greater than for the reader,
for it is the difference between free versus toll-gated access
to one's work, work that one has submitted to the journal for free
with the express wish of having it certified and then made public.
What will the true cost of certification and publication be once
everything is on-line-only? In other words, what will be the cost of
quality control for content (refereeing/editing) and form
(copy-editing/mark-up) once all expenses associated with paper
production are gone? Paper publishers say they will not be much lower
(30% at most), but today's brave new on-line-only publishers are
finding otherwise (70% at least). If the latter are right, then it will
no longer make sense to recover those reduced costs from S/SL/PPV, with
its attendant restrictions on access: Author pages charges, funded by
University savings from journal subscription cancellations, could cover
them up-front, and all authors, readers, and Learned Inquiry itself
would be the beneficiaries.
Suppose we agree that this outcome would be the best one: How do we
get there (page-charge-based free access to all) from here (access
restricted by S/SL/PPV)?
Thomas Walker (1998) recognises that making the refereed journal
literature in all disciplines on-line and free for all, with no
financial firewalls, is the optimal and inevitable solution for science
and scholarship, and he proposes the following transition scenario: Let
journals -- immediately, while we are still in the hybrid paper/on-line
era -- finance free access to on-line reprints out of author
page-charges (for about the same price as paper reprints currently).
The work of authors who pay appears instantly; those who do not pay
must wait a year for their work to appear publicly on-line; until then,
toll-based paper is the only means of access.
This would be responsive to the need and desire of authors for instant
free access to their work today, and it would hasten reader addiction
to this new mode of access, thereby hastening the day when paper, and
its expenses, and the S/SL/PPV tolls that needed to be levied to cover
them, can all be jettisoned and author page charges take over entirely,
making the entire literature free for all.
The only problem with this scenario is that, human nature being what it
is, people will not part with their money unless there is no
alternative. And there IS an alternative for providing free on-line
access to one's work in the paper era: Authors can put their papers
on-line themselves -- on their institutional home servers or in
centralised ones such as http://xxx.lanl.gov, the NSF/DOE-supported
Physics Eprint Archive at Los Alamos National Laboratory.
The outcome would be the same as the one sought by Walker: Reader
demand for the free on-line versions would rise (xxx has 70,000 hits
daily, and new papers are archived at the rate of 100 per weekday),
demand for the paper versions would fall, library subscriptions would
be cancelled, paper publishers would be forced to restructure as
on-line-only publishers, costs would scale down to on-line-only, and
THEN (when costs approached those or today's paper reprints) authors
would be willing to pay page charges, not for the electronic archiving,
which they could do at least as well for themselves, but for the
quality control and subsequent certification that journals have always
provided. Publishing being the imperishable mark of productivity that
it is, Universities will find the resources out of their library
windfall savings to cover the relative pittance it will cost to reap
the benefits of the optimal and the inevitable.
Does that settle it then? Not quite. There are still some controversial
issues that have only been glossed over here, and it is hoped that the
discussion will focus on these. They are at the heart of the
controversy about the future course of refereed journal publishing.
(1) What IS the true cost of on-line-only publication of a mainstream
journal?
(2) What is the current status of copyright agreements in relation to
public on-line archiving of one's own work? More important, what
justification is there for attempting to restrict such author
archiving in domains where authors neither seek nor receive fees or
royalties, but only maximal accessibility to their work?
(3) How can chaos be avoided in the unstable period of journal
cancellations, while S/SL/PPV-supported paper is not yet phased out,
costs are not yet down to online-only levels, and author page-charges
are not yet phased in?
Please read the Walker target article and then post your comments to
the list:
september-forum(a)amsci-forum.amsci.org
or link to:
http://amsci-forum.amsci.org/archives/september-forum.html
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Some relevant background links:
Ginsparg, P. (1996) Winners and Losers in the Global research Village.
Invited contribution, UNESCO Conference HQ, Paris, 19-23 Feb 1996
http://xxx.lanl.gov/blurb/pg96unesco.html
Ginsparg, P. (1994) First Steps Towards Electronic Research
Communication. Computers in Physics. (August, American Institute of
Physics). 8(4): 390-396.
http://xxx.lanl.gov/blurb/
Harnad, S. (1990) Scholarly Skywriting and the Prepublication Continuum
of Scientific Inquiry. Psychological Science 1: 342 - 343
http://www.cogsci.soton.ac.uk/~harnad/Papers/Harnad/harnad90.skywriting.htmlftp://ftp.princeton.edu/pub/harnad/Harnad/HTML/harnad90.skywriting.html
Harnad, S. (1991) Post-Gutenberg Galaxy: The Fourth Revolution in the
Means of Production of Knowledge. Public-Access Computer Systems Review
2 (1): 39 - 53
http://www.cogsci.soton.ac.uk/~harnad/Papers/Harnad/harnad91.postgutenberg.…ftp://ftp.princeton.edu/pub/harnad/Harnad/HTML/harnad91.postgutenberg.html
Harnad, S. (1992) Interactive Publication: Extending the
American Physical Society's Discipline-Specific Model for Electronic
Publishing. Serials Review, Special Issue on Economics Models for
Electronic Publishing, pp. 58 - 61.
http://www.cogsci.soton.ac.uk/~harnad/Papers/Harnad/harnad92.interactivpub.…ftp://ftp.princeton.edu/pub/harnad/Harnad/HTML/harnad92.interactivpub.html
Harnad, S. (1995) Electronic Scholarly Publication: Quo Vadis?
Serials Review 21(1) 78-80 (Reprinted in Managing Information
2(3) 31-33 1995)
http://www.cogsci.soton.ac.uk/~harnad/Papers/Harnad/harnad95.quo.vadis.htmlftp://ftp.princeton.edu/pub/harnad/Harnad/HTML/harnad95.quo.vadis.html
Harnad, S. (1995) Universal FTP Archives for Esoteric Science and
Scholarship: A Subversive Proposal. In: Ann Okerson & James O'Donnell
(Eds.) Scholarly Journals at the Crossroads; A Subversive Proposal for
Electronic Publishing. Washington, DC., Association of Research
Libraries, June 1995.
http://cogsci.soton.ac.uk/~harnad/subvert.html
ftp://ftp.cogsci.soton.ac.uk/pub/psycoloquy/Subversive.Proposal/
Harnad, S. (1995) Interactive Cognition: Exploring the Potential of
Electronic Quote/Commenting. In: B. Gorayska & J.L. Mey (Eds.) Cognitive
Technology: In Search of a Humane Interface. Elsevier. Pp. 397-414.
http://www.cogsci.soton.ac.uk/~harnad/Papers/Harnad/harnad95.interactive.co…ftp://ftp.princeton.edu/pub/harnad/Harnad/HTML/harnad95.interactive.cogniti…
Harnad, S. (1996) Implementing Peer Review on the Net:
Scientific Quality Control in Scholarly Electronic Journals. In:
Peek, R. & Newby, G. (Eds.) Scholarly Publishing: The Electronic
Frontier. Cambridge MA: MIT Press. Pp. 103-118.
http://www.cogsci.soton.ac.uk/~harnad/Papers/Harnad/harnad96.peer.review.ht…ftp://ftp.princeton.edu/pub/harnad/Harnad/HTML/harnad96.peer.review.html
Harnad, S. (1997) How to Fast-Forward Serials to the Inevitable and
the Optimal for Scholars and Scientists. Serials Librarian 30: 73-81.
http://www.cogsci.soton.ac.uk/~harnad/Papers/Harnad/harnad97.learned.serial…ftp://ftp.princeton.edu/pub/harnad/Harnad/HTML/harnad97.learned.serials.html
Harnad, S. (1997) The Paper House of Cards (And Why It Is Taking So Long
To Collapse). Ariadne 8: 6-7.
http://www.cogsci.soton.ac.uk/~harnad/Papers/Harnad/harnad97.paper.house.ar…ftp://ftp.princeton.edu/pub/harnad/Harnad/HTML/harnad97.paper.house.ariadne…http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue8/harnad/
Harnad, S. (1997) Learned Inquiry and the Net:
The Role of Peer Review, Peer Commentary and Copyright.
Antiquity 71: 1042-1048
http://www.cogsci.soton.ac.uk/~harnad/Papers/Harnad/harnad97.antiquity.htmlftp://ftp.princeton.edu/pub/harnad/Harnad/HTML/harnad97.antiquity.htmlhttp://www.cogsci.soton.ac.uk/~harnad/Papers/Harnad/harnad97.toronto.htmlftp://ftp.princeton.edu/pub/harnad/Harnad/HTML/harnad97.toronto.html
Harnad, S. (1998) On-Line Journals and Financial Fire-Walls. Nature
(in press). URL available 2nd week of September.
Harnad, S. & Hemus, M. (1997) All Or None: No Stable Hybrid
or Half-Way Solutions for Launching the Learned Periodical Literature
into the PostGutenberg Galaxy. In Butterworth, I. (Ed.)
The Impact of Electronic Publishing on the Academic Community.
London: Portland Press. Pp 18-27.
http://tiepac.portlandpress.co.uk/books/online/tiepac/session1/ch5.htmhttp://www.cogsci.soton.ac.uk/~harnad/Papers/Harnad/harnad97.hybrid.pub.htmlftp://ftp.princeton.edu/pub/harnad/Harnad/HTML/harnad97.hybrid.pub.html
Hitchcock, S., Carr, L., Harris, S., Hey, J. M. N., and Hall, W. (1997)
Citation Linking: Improving Access to Online Journals.
Proceedings of the 2nd ACM International Conference on
Digital Libraries, edited by Robert B. Allen and Edie Rasmussen
(New York, USA: Association for Computing Machinery), pp. 115-122.
http://journals.ecs.soton.ac.uk/acmdl97.htm
Hitchcock, S., Quek, F., Carr, L., Hall, W., Witbrock, A.,
and Tarr, I. (1997) Linking Everything to Everything: Journal
Publishing Myth or Reality? ICCC/IFIP conference on
Electronic Publishing 97: New Models and Opportunities, Canterbury,UK, April.
http://journals.ecs.soton.ac.uk/IFIP-ICCC97.html
Odlyzko, A.M. (1998) The economics of electronic journals. In: Ekman
R. and Quandt, R. (Eds) Technology and Scholarly Communication Univ.
Calif. Press, 1998.
http://www.research.att.com/~amo/doc/economics.journals.txt
Odlyzko, A.M. (1997) The slow evolution of electronic publishing. In
Electronic Publishing - New Models and Opportunities, A. J. Meadows and
F. Rowland, eds., ICCC Press, 1997.
http://www.research.att.com/~amo/doc/slow.evolution.txt
Odlyzko, A.M. (1995) Tragic loss or good riddance? The impending
demise of traditional scholarly journals, International Journal of
Human-Computer Studies (formerly International Journal of Man-Machine
Studies), 42 (1995), 71-122.
http://www.research.att.com/~amo/doc/tragic.loss.txt
Okerson A. & O'Donnell, J. (Eds.) (1995) Scholarly Journals at the
Crossroads; A Subversive Proposal for Electronic Publishing.
Washington, DC., Association of Research Libraries, June 1995.
http://www.arl.org/scomm/subversive/index.html
ftp://ftp.cogsci.soton.ac.uk/pub/psycoloquy/Subversive.Proposal/
Transition from Paper Study Group. (1998) Who Should "own" Scientific
Papers? Science. Science available URL on Sept. 4
Walker, T.J. (1998) Free Internet Access to Traditional Journals.
American Scientist 86(5)
http://www.amsci.org/amsci/articles/98articles/walker.html
Below is the abstract of a forthcoming BBS target article on:
A MODEL OF SACCADE GENERATION BASED ON PARALLEL PROCESSING
AND COMPETITIVE INHIBITION
by John M Findlay and Robin Walker
This article has been accepted for publication in Behavioral and Brain
Sciences (BBS), an international, interdisciplinary journal providing
Open Peer Commentary on important and controversial current research in
the biobehavioral and cognitive sciences.
Commentators must be BBS Associates or nominated by a BBS Associate. To
be considered as a commentator for this article, to suggest other
appropriate commentators, or for information about how to become a BBS
Associate, please send EMAIL to:
bbs(a)cogsci.soton.ac.uk
or write to:
Behavioral and Brain Sciences
Department of Psychology
University of Southampton
Highfield, Southampton
SO17 1BJ UNITED KINGDOM
http://www.princeton.edu/~harnad/bbs/http://www.cogsci.soton.ac.uk/bbs/ftp://ftp.princeton.edu/pub/harnad/BBS/
ftp://ftp.cogsci.soton.ac.uk/pub/bbs/
gopher://gopher.princeton.edu:70/11/.libraries/.pujournals
If you are not a BBS Associate, please send your CV and the name of a
BBS Associate (there are currently over 10,000 worldwide) who is
familiar with your work. All past BBS authors, referees and commentators
are eligible to become BBS Associates.
To help us put together a balanced list of commentators, please give
some indication of the aspects of the topic on which you would bring
your areas of expertise to bear if you were selected as a commentator.
An electronic draft of the full text is available for inspection
with a WWW browser, anonymous ftp or gopher according to the
instructions that follow after the abstract.
____________________________________________________________________
A MODEL OF SACCADE GENERATION BASED ON PARALLEL PROCESSING
AND COMPETITIVE INHIBITION
John M Findlay
Centre for Vision and Visual Cognition
Department of Psychology
University of Durham
South Road
Durham
DH1 3LE
England
j.m.findlay(a)durham.ac.uk
http://psynt.dur.ac.uk/staff/jmf/jmf.htm
Robin Walker
Department of Psychology
Royal Holloway
University of London
Egham,
Surrey
TW20 0EX
England
robin.walker(a)rhbnc.ac.uk
KEYWORDS: saccade, fixation, visual attention, salience, latency,
model, competitive interaction, reciprocal inhibition, spatial
selection, search selection.
ABSTRACT: During active vision, the eyes continually scan the
visual environment using saccadic scanning movements. This article
presents a model for the human saccadic system. The model is described
in terms of information processing and control with some close
parallels to established physiological processes in the oculomotor
system. The structure of the model consists of two separate pathways
concerned respectively with the spatial and the temporal programming of
the movement. A key aspect of the second pathway is the involvement of
spatially distributed coding and the selection of the saccade target
from a salience map. The two pathways descend through a hierarchy of
levels, the lower levels operating automatically. An important feature
is that visual onsets have automatic access to the eye control system
via the lower levels. At various levels, centres in each pathway are
interconnected via reciprocal inhibition. The model is used to account
for a number of well-established phenomena observed in the study of
target elicited saccades, notably: the gap effect, express saccades,
the remote distractor effect and the global effect. High-level control
of the pathways is discussed in relation to tasks such as visual search
and reading. It is suggested that high level control operates through
the two processes of spatial selection and search selection, which will
generally combine in an automated way. Finally, some data from patients
with unilateral neglect are examined in connection with the model.
--------------------------------------------------------------
To help you decide whether you would be an appropriate commentator for
this article, an electronic draft is retrievable from the World Wide
Web or by anonymous ftp or gopher from the US or UK BBS Archive.
Ftp instructions follow below. Please do not prepare a commentary on
this draft. Just let us know, after having inspected it, what relevant
expertise you feel you would bring to bear on what aspect of the
article.
The URLs you can use to get to the BBS Archive:
http://www.princeton.edu/~harnad/bbs/http://www.cogsci.soton.ac.uk/bbs/Archive/bbs.findlay.htmlftp://ftp.princeton.edu/pub/harnad/BBS/bbs.findlay
ftp://ftp.cogsci.soton.ac.uk/pub/bbs/Archive/bbs.findlay
gopher://gopher.princeton.edu:70/11/.libraries/.pujournals
To retrieve a file by ftp from an Internet site, type either:
ftp ftp.princeton.edu
or
ftp 128.112.128.1
When you are asked for your login, type:
anonymous
Enter password as queried (your password is your actual userid:
yourlogin(a)yourhost.whatever.whatever - be sure to include the "@")
cd /pub/harnad/BBS
To show the available files, type:
ls
Next, retrieve the file you want with (for example):
get bbs.findlay
When you have the file(s) you want, type:
quit
Rejected message: sent to koglist(a)cogpsyphy.hu by ERDI(a)SUNSERV.KFKI.HU
follows.
Reason for rejection: sender not subscribed.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
---------- Forwarded message ----------
Date: Tue, 11 Aug 1998 03:34:27 -0400
From: Dave_Touretzky(a)cs.cmu.edu
To: connectionists(a)cs.cmu.edu
Subject: Connectionist symbol processing: any progress?
I'd like to start a debate on the current state of connectionist
symbol processing? Is it dead? Or does progress continue?
A few years ago I contributed a short article on "Connectionist and
symbolic representations" to Michael Arbib's Handbook of Brain Theory
and Neural Networks (MIT Press, 1995). In that article I explained
concepts such as coarse coding, distributed representations, and
RAAMs, and how people had managed to do elementary kinds of symbol
processing tasks in this framework. The problem, though, was that we
did not have good techniques for dealing with structured information
in distributed form, or for doing tasks that require variable binding.
While it is possible to do these things with a connectionist network,
the result is a complex kludge that, at best, sort of works for small
problems, but offers no distinct advantages over a purely symbolic
implementation. The cases where people had shown interesting
generalization behavior in connectionist nets involved simple
vector-based representations, without nested structures or variable
binding.
People had gotten some interesting effects with localist networks, by
doing spreading activation and a simple form of constraint
satisfaction. A good example is the spreading activation models of
word disambiguation developed in the 1980s by Jordan Pollack and Dave
Walts, and by Gary Cottrell. But the heuristic reasoning enabled by
spreading activation models is extremely limited. This approach does
not create new structure on the fly, or deal with structured
representations or variable binding. Those localist networks that did
attempt to implement variable binding did so in a discrete, symbolic
way that did not advance the parallel constraint
satisfaction/heuristic reasoning agenda of earlier spreading
activation research.
So I concluded that connectionist symbol processing had reached a
plateau, and further progress would have to await some revolutionary
new insight about representations. The last really significant work
in the area was, in my opinion, Tony Plate's holographic reduced
representations, which offered a glimpse of how structured information
might be plausibly manipulated in distributed form. (Tony received an
IJCAI-91 best paper award for this work. For some reason, the journal
version did not appear until 1995.) But further incremental progress
did not seem possible.
People still do cognitive modeling using connectionist networks. And
there is some good work out there. One of my favorite examples is
David Plaut's use of attractor neural networks to model deep and
surface dyslexia -- an area pioneered by Geoff Hinton and Tim
Shallice. But like most connectionist cognitive models, it relies on
a simple feature vector representation. The problems of structured
representations and variable binding have remained unsolved. No one
is trying to build distributed connectionist reasoning systems any
more, like the connectionist production system I built with Geoff
Hinton, or Mark Derthick's microKLONE.
Today, Michael Arbib is working on the second edition of his handbook,
and I've been asked to update my article on connectionist symbol
processing. Is it time to write an obituary for a research path that
expired because the problems were too hard for the tools available?
Or are there important new developments to report?
I'd love to hear some good news.
-- Dave Touretzky
References:
Arbib, M. A. (ed) (1995) Handbook of Brain Theory and Neural Networks.
Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Plaut, D. C., McClelland, J. L., Seidenberg, M. S., and Patterson,
K. (1996) Understandig normal and impaired word reading: computational
principles in quasi-regular domains. Psychological Review,
103(1):56-115.
Plate, T. A. (1995) Holographic reduced representations. IEEE
Transactions on Neural Networks, 6(3):623.
Touretzky, D. S. and Hinton, G. E. (1988) A distributed connectionist
production system. Cognitive Science, vol. 12, number 3, pp. 423-466.
Touretzky, D. S. (1995) Connectionist and symbolic representations.
In M. A. Arbib (ed.), Handbook of Brain Theory and Neural Networks,
pp. 243-247. MIT Press.
OTODIK MAGYAR LATAS SZIMPOZIUM
1998 augusztus 29
MTA Pszichologiai Intezetenek eloadoterme
PROGRAM
8:50
MEGNYITO
NEM FOEMLOS TANULMANYOK I
9:00
A KEREG ES A TALAMUSZ OSSZEKOTTETESEINEK KERESZTEZETT MODALITAST EREDMENYEZO ATRENDEZODESE UJSZULOTT ENUKLEACIOT KOVETOEN PATKANYBAN
Negyessy Laszlo
MTA-SOTE EKSz, Neurobiologiai Kutatocsoport
9:20
KAPCSOLATOK A TELENCEPHALON VIZUALIS KOZPONTJAI KOZOTT
Alpar
SOTE Anatomia 1
9:40
A LATOPALYA VEGZODESEI A KULONBOZO KOZPONTOKBAN
Sebestyen
SOTE Anatomia 1
10:00
SZUNET
NEM FOEMLOS TANULMANYOK II
10:20
Modulalo palyak a latorendszerben
Tombol Terez
SOTE Anatomia 1
10:40
PEPTIDERG RENDSZEREK A MACSKA VIZUOMOTOROS KOZPONTJAIBAN
Borostyankoi Zsolt
MTA-SOTE EKSz, Neurobiologiai Kutatocsoport
11:00
SZUNET
FOEMLOS INFEROTEMPORALIS KEREG (IT)
11:20
Eber majom IT neuralis aktivitasanak variabilitasa es ingerdiszkriminacios kapacitasa
Kovacs Gyula
Szent-Gyorgyi Albert Orvostudomanyi Egyetem, Elettani Intezet
11:40
IT NEURONOK SZELEKTIVITAS-VIZSGALATA TELJES ES RESZLEGESEN TOROLT VONALAS RAJZOKKAL RHESUS MAJMOKBAN
Sary Gyula
Szent-Gyorgyi Albert Orvostudomanyi Egyetem, Elettani Intezet
12:00
SZUNET-EBED
KODOLASI MECHANIZMUSOK
2:00
HOGYAN ALAKIT KI AZ AGY MERET INVARIANS REPREZENTACIOKAT ALAKFELISMERES CELJARA?
Fiser Jozsef
University of Rochester
2:20
A SZKOTOPIAS LATAS ES A MAGNOCELLULARIS LATOPALYA
Benedek Gyorgy
Szent-Gyorgyi Albert Orvostudomanyi Egyetem, Elettani Intezet
2:40
Receptiv mezo dinamikak modellezese es zaj szures a latorendszerben
Orzo Laszlo
SOTE Anatomia 1
3:00
SZUNET
HUMAN KISERLETEK
3:20
Binokularis rivalizalas
Kovacs Ilona
Rutgers University
3:40
SPATIOTEMPORALIS VIZUALIS FUNKCIOK VIZSGALATA SCHIZOPRENIABAN
Antal Andrea
Szent-Gyorgyi Albert Orvostudomanyi Egyetem
4:00
ESOTROPIA ELLENES KESOI MUTETEK HATASA A LATOKERGI KIVALTOTT VALASZOKRA
Kozma Petra
Szent-Gyorgyi Albert Orvostudomanyi Egyetem
4:20
SZIMPOZIUM ZARAS
Szia Csaba
Megtalaltam a WEB oldal cimet:
http://sophia,jpte.hu/btk/tanszekek/nyelvtud/.
Remelem, segit.Most meg benne vagyok, ide kopizom a programot. Ha
szebben akarod olvasni, menj el a page-re.
Udv,
Andras
***************************************************
August 26, Wednesday:
9.00 Opening
9.10-12.15 Syntax and Semantics (chair: Casper de Groot)
9.10 Katalin É. Kiss (i.s.): The Hungarian Noun Phrase is like the English Noun Phrase
10.00 Gábor Alberti and Anna Medve: Constituents in Special Operator Positions
10.45 Csaba Olsvay: On the syntax of negation and quantification in Hungarian
11.30 David Tugwell: Dynamic syntax, binding and the flames of Warsaw
12.15-14.00 break
14.00-18.05 Syntax and Morphology (chair: Katalin É. Kiss)
14.00 István Kenesei (i.s.): Auxiliaries in Hungarian (?)
14.50 Huba Bartos: Affix order and the Mirror Principle
15.35 Anikó Lipták: Multiple relativization in Hungarian
16.20 coffee
16.30 Casper de Groot: Parts of speech in Hungarian
17.15 invited speaker: ?
August 27, Thursday:
9.00-18.00 Semantics (chairs: József Andor (9.00-12.20), István Kenesei (14.30-18.00))
9.00 László Hunyadi: On the interaction of LF and PF in the grammar of Hungarian
9.45 Péter Ábel: Two types of negative polarity in Hungarian
10.30 Beáta Gyuris: On the semantic interpretation of Hungarian temporal and conditional
subordinate clauses
11.15 coffee
11.35 Ildikó Tóth: -Va and -ván participles from diachronic and synchronic perspectives
12.20 László Kálmán and Viktor Tron: Classifier Constructions in Hungarian
13.05-14.30 break
14.30 Christopher Pinon: Végig `from beginning to end'
15.15 József Andor and Tamás Pólya: A frame-based, lexicalist approach to describing
functions of the verbal prefix le
16.00 Balázs Surányi and Anikó Csirmaz: Ott `there' in Hungarian: a case of an expletive?
16.45 coffee
17.00-18.00 brief presentations:
Gréte Dalmi: Psych-predicates and Relativized Modality
Edit Jakab: 'Must' in Hungarian, Serbian and Croatian (?)
Judit Uzonyi Kiss and Márta Tuba: On adverbial participle predicates
August 28, Friday:
9.00-12.40 Syntax and language acquisition/processing (chair: Nancy A. Ritter)
9.00 Csaba Pléh (i.s.): ?
9.50 Janina Radó: Topic and focus in Hungarian sentence comprehension
10.35 coffee
10.50 Szilvia Papp: Evidence of optionality in native Hungarian
and English-Hungarian interlanguage
11.35 Zoltán Bánréti: Directionality of VP ellipsis in sentence processing
12.20-12.40 a brief presentation:
Anna Babarczy: Syntax and semantics in learning and mislearning verb argument
structures
12.40-14.20 break
14.20-16.35 Phonology (chair: Zoltán Bánréti)
14.20 Nancy A. Ritter: Hungarian voicing assimilation revisited in HDP
15.05 Péter Rebrus and Miklós Törkenczy: Phonotactics and the morphophonology of the
Hungarian verb
15.50 Catherine O. Ringen and Szilárd Szentgyörgyi: Constraint reranking in the Szeged
dialect of Hungarian
16.35 coffee
16.50-18.10 brief presentations:
Gyula Zsigri: Predictable vowel properties: the phonology-phonetics interface
Mária Ladányi: Productivity, creativity and analogy in word formation: derivational
innovations in Hungarian poetic language
Genovéva Puskás: Verb focussing
Kriszta Szendrõi: The interaction of long operator movement and the subjunctive in
Hungarian
John Payne and Erika Chisarik: Demonstrative Constructions in Hungarian
19.30 Dinner
*************************************
András Bocz
Department of English
Janus Pannonius University
Ifjúság u. 6. H-7624 Pécs, Hungary
Tel/Fax: (36) (72) 314714
Az MTA KFKI RMKI Biofizikai Osztalya es a Magyar Kognitiv Tudomanyi
Alapitvany Workshopot szervez a visegradi ELTE uduloben,
augusztus 24 (del) es augutszus 27 (del) kozott.
***********************************************************
DYNAMICS OF HIPPOCAMUS (and other CORTICAL STRUCTURES)
************************************************************
A workshopon elozetesen bejelentkzett (!!) vendegeket szivesen latunk.
Korlatozott szamban lehetoseg van szallasra es etkezesre.
Jelenmezes a kovetkezo nehany napban, augusztus 14 pentek 13.00 oraig.
Szallas + ellatas: 3360 Ft (nem ELTE hallgato-oktato), es 1850 Ft
elteseknek. Ebed: 630 Ft illetve 390 Ft, vacsora 490 Ft es 304 Ft).
Csak szallas: haaat, ezt most nem tudom, talan nem lehet.
Aki ugy gondolja, hogy befizet reszveteli dijkent 1000 Ft-ot, azt
elfogadjuk, szamlat (es koszonetet) adunk.
Erdi Peter
****************************************************************
DYNAMICS OF HIPPOCAMUS (and other CORTICAL STRUCTURES)
Visegrad, August 24-27
Dept. Biophysics of the KFKI Reserach Institute for Particle and Nuclear
Physics of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences and the Hungarian Cognitive
Science Foundation
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Eotvos University Resort House.
Visegrad, Fo utca 117 Tel: +(36 26)
398 165 from Hungary dial: 06 26 398 165
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++=
There are lectures and working sessions in the workshop.
The intention of the working sessions to have discussions about the scope
and limits of models in the light of the experimental background and
develop new model frameworks, if it appears to be necessary. Six speicific
topics will be discussed, and the discussion leaders assigned are
requested to make some preparations to lead the work of the session.
Preliminary Program
August 24, Monday
Travelling to Visegrad (by bus: the boat tour we planned seems to be too
long. Further info will come next week)
13.00 Lunch
14.30 - 16.00
Gulyas, Attila: The functional anatomy of the hippocampus (Tutorial)
16.05 - 17.05
Czeh, Gabor: On the electrophysiology of hippocampal cells
17.10 - 18.10
Lengyel, Mate: An investigation of location-dependent differences between
somatic and dendritic IPSPs
Dinner
20.00-21.30
Working Session 1
[Single cell models, synaptic integration, neurochemical characterization:
how to incorporate them into the models?]
Discussion leaders: Erdi, Marsalek
August 25, Tuesday
9.00 - 10.00
Gulyas, Attila: Total number of excitatory and inhibitory synaptic inputs
onto hippocampal CA1 area neurons.
10.05 - 11. 05
Liljenstrom, Hans: A computational
approach to fluctuations and oscillations in hippocampus
11.10 - 12.10
Tsuda, Ichiro: The possible roles of chaotic itinerancy and
singular-continuous nowhere-differentiable attractors in hippocampus
Lunch
15.00 - 16.00
Olypher, Andrey: Gamma oscillations by synaptic inhibition in a
homogeneous medium model of hippocampal interneurons
16.05 - 17.05
Adorjan, Peter: Contrast adaptation and infomax in visual cortical neurons
17.30 - 18.30
Working Session 2
[Models of LTP genereation: from detailed neurochemistry to
phenomenological description]
Discussion leader: Czech
Dinner
20.00 - 21.30
Working session 3
[Rhythm generation and propagation in the hippocampus]
Discussion leaders: Borisyuk, Szalisznyo
August 26 Wendesday
9.00 - 10.00
Lorincz, Andras and Buzsaki, Gyuri: A two-stage computational
model training long-term memories in the entorhinal-hippocampal
region
10.05 - 11.05
Marsalek, Petr and Fenton, Andre: On the excess variance of firing in
place cells
11.10 - 12.10
Fenton, Andre: Physiological clues to the hippocampal processing of space
Lunch
15.00 - 16.00
Szatmary, Zoltan: Using temporal associations to model development
of place fields in a new environment
16.10 - 17.40
Working Session 4
[Place cell formation and navigation]
Discussion leaders: Fenton, Olypher
Dinner
20.00 - 21.30
Working session 5
[Hippocampal-dependent learning and memory phenomena]
Discussion leaders: Lorincz, Szatmary, Tsuda
August 27
9.00 - 10.00
Szalisznyo, Kriszta; Somogyvari, Zoltan and Payrits, Szabolcs: Population
modeling: Signal propagation in the CA3 region
10.05- 12.15
Working Session 6
[Population model: what can we expect?]
Discussion leaders: Adorjan, Somogyvari, Payrits
Lunch