Andrew Brook (Institute of Cognitive Science, Carleton University,
Ottawa, Canada) alábbi két előadására minden érdeklődőt szeretettel
várunk:**
*1.* 2005. május 2, 16:00:
* *
*Zombies and Imprisoned Minds*
*Andrew Brook and Paul Raymont *
*Abstract*
Thought experiments (TEs) about zombies are one standard way to argue
for anti-cognitivism about consciousness, the view that consciousness is
not a cognitive (information processing) property of minds. Another
class of TEs are actually more interesting in this regard, TEs about
what we call imprisoned minds. Imprisoned minds are minds that have no
way of expressing themselves behaviourally. Unlike zombies, they
actually exist, which adds to their interest - administration of curare
and certain massive strokes in the brain stem can both produce
imprisoned minds, curare temporally, strokes permanently.
In both cases, one has to add an exotic premise to get an
anti-cognitivist argument going. For zombie TEs, the exotic premise is
that an utterly nonconscious zombie could be behaviourally, cognitively,
or even molecule-for-molecule identical to us conscious beings. The
exotic premise in the case of imprisoned mind TEs is that in addition to
no behavioural expression, the activities of an imprisoned mind could
also make no neural difference. (We call such minds Radically Imprisoned
Minds [RIMs].)
As has often been noted, part of what makes zombie TEs difficult to
assess is their close kinship to the traditional problem of knowledge of
other minds. In particular, we do not know by what criterion or criteria
we could settle whether another being is conscious. The same is true of
imprisoned minds. It turns out, interestingly enough, that it is easier
to resolve the knowledge problem that arises in connection with each TE
than it is to settle whether they have any potential as arguments for
anti-cognitivism. The reason is the same in both cases: the exotic
premise required for the TEs to work as arguments for anti-cognitivism,
premises that are very difficult to assess, do not affect the knowledge
problem.
As arguments for anti-cognitivism, the two TEs are different. As we will
show, zombie TEs do not work as arguments for anti-cognitivism. By
contrast, we know of no definitive cognitivist response to imprisoned
minds TEs.
<>
<>*Biographical Notes*
Andrew Brook (D.Phil., Oxon.) is Professor of Philosophy and Director of
the Institute of Cognitive Science at Carleton University, Ottawa,
Canada. He is the author of /Kant and the Mind/ (Cambridge 1994) and,
with Paul Raymont, /A Unified Theory of Consciousness/ (MIT Press
forthcoming) and has written or edited five other books and about 80
papers, chapters, etc. He was recently President of the Canadian
Philosophical Association.
Paul Raymont (Ph.D., Toronto) was recently a Social Sciences and
Humanities Research Council post-doctoral fellow at Carleton University,
Ottawa, Canada. He is currently at the University of Toronto. He has
numerous journal publications and co-authored /A Unified Theory of
Consciousness/ with Andrew Brook.
* *
*Helyszín: *Tudományfilozófiai szeminárium*, * ELTE Tudománytörténet és Tudományfilozófia Tanszék, Pázmány P. sétány 1/A, 6. emelet, 654, terem
*2.* 2005. május 3, 17:00:
*The Representational Base of Consciousness *
* *
*Andrew Brook and Paul Raymont*
* *
*Abstract*
Everyone agrees, no matter what else they think about consciousness,
that it has a representational base. However, there have been relatively
few worked-out attempts to say what this base might be like. The two
best developed are perhaps the higher-order thought (HOT) model of David
Rosenthal and the transparency approach of Fred Dretske and others. As
we will show, both face serious problems.
Our alternative to these models starts from the notion of a
self-presenting representation, a representation that presents not only
what it is about (if it is about anything; not all representations have
an object) but also itself to the representing subject. Thus, seeing
text on the computer display tells one not only about the text but also
about this representations of it, that, for example, one is seeing it,
not touching it. Indeed, in our view, representations, being
self-presenting, are the representational base for not just for
consciousness of their objects (when they have one) and of themselves.
They are also the representational base for consciousness of oneself as
subject.
Though we take mainly a philosophical approach, we hope that
the unified picture of consciousness that flows from our picture of the
representational base will assist research on consciousness no matter
what the approach.
<>
*Biographical Notes*
Andrew Brook (D.Phil., Oxon.) is Professor of Philosophy and Director of
the Institute of Cognitive Science at Carleton University, Ottawa,
Canada. He is the author of /Kant and the Mind/ (Cambridge 1994) and,
with Paul Raymont, /A Unified Theory of Consciousness/ (MIT Press
forthcoming) and has written or edited five other books and about 80
papers, chapters, etc. He was recently President of the Canadian
Philosophical Association.
Paul Raymont (Ph.D., Toronto) was recently a Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council post-doctoral fellow at Carleton University, Ottawa, Canada.
He is currently at the University of Toronto. He has numerous journal publications and co-authored /A Unified Theory of Consciousness/ with Andrew Brook.
*Helyszín:* Közép-Európai Egyetem, Filozófia Tanszék, Zrínyi u. 14, 412 terem
Új előadás sorozat:
KÍSÉRLETES NYELVÉSZET II.
Helyszín: MTA Nyelvtudományi Intézete,
1068 Benczúr u. 33.
földszinti előadóterem
PROGRAM:
Március 1. kedd, 14 órától:
Hunyadi László, tanszékvezető egyetemi tanár, KLTE, Általános és
alkalmazott nyelvészeti tanszék:
A csoportosítás kognitív képessége mint a nyelvi képesség alapja
Március 8. kedd, 14 órától:
Fehér Zsuzsa, főiskolai adjunktus, ELTE, Bárczi Gusztáv
Gyógypedagógiai Főiskolai Kar:
Nyelvfejlődési elmaradások; adatok és elméletek
Március 22. kedd 14 órától,
Babarczy Anna, tudományos munkatárs, BME Kognitív Tudományi Intézete:
Az implicit negatív visszajelzés szerepe az argumentumstruktúra
elsajátításában
Március 29. kedd 14 órától:
Gervain Judit tudományos ösztöndíjas, Trieszti Nemzetközi
Kutatóközpont, Kognitiv Idegtudományi szekció:
A mesterséges nyelvtan tanulás paradigmája a nyelvtanulás és a
nyelvelsajátítás kutatásában
Április 5. 14 órától:
Dr. Horváth Szabolcs, neurológus, osztályvezető főorvos, (Szent Rókus
Kórház), egyetemi tanár (ELTE, Bárczi Gusztáv Gyógypedagógiai Kar):
Bepillantás a beszéd megváltozásának gyakorlati kérdéseibe; a
neuorológus szemével
Április 12. kedd, 14 órától:
Németh Dezső, egyetemi tanársegéd, SZTE, Bölcsészettudományi Kar,
Pszichológia tanszék:
Az emlékezeti rendszerek és a nyelvi folyamatok kapcsolata
Április 19. kedd 14 óra
Bánréti Zoltán, tudományos főmunkatárs, MTA Nyelvtudományi Intézete:
Mit jelent a nyelvtan sérülése agrammatikus afáziában?
Április 26. kedd, 14 óra:
Mészáros Éva, tudományos munkatárs, MTA Nyelvtudományi Intézete:
A struktúra és a jelentés kapcsolata a mondatok grammatikalitásának
megítélésében
Május 3. kedd 14 óra:
Lukács Ágnes, tudományos munkatárs, MTA Nyelvtudományi Intézete,
egyetemi adjunktus, BME Kognitív Tudományi Intézete:
A nyelvi fejlődés zavarainak vizsgálata
Május 10. kedd 14 óra:
Szentkuti-Kiss Katalin, tudományos munkatárs, MTA Nyelvtudományi
Intézete:
Afáziás mondatmegértési mintázatok értelmezhetősége minimalista
keretben
Május 17. kedd 14 óra:
Szépe Judit, tudományos főmunkatárs, MTA Nyelvtudományi Intézete:
Fonológiai szekvencia szervezési korlátozottságok műveleti
megközelítése, sok érdekes adattal
Május 24. kedd 14 óra:
Szalai Andrea, tudományos munkatárs, MTA Nyelvtudományi Intézete:
Antropológiai nyelvészeti vizsgálatok roma közösségekben
-----------
MTA Nyelvtudomanyi Intezete
Research Institute for Linguistics,
Hungarian Academy of Sciences
H-1068 Budapest
Benczúr u. 33
tel: 36-1-351-0413
fax: 36-1-322-9297
email: banreti(a)nytud.hu
MTA Nyelvtudomanyi Intezete
Research Institute for Linguistics,
Hungarian Academy of Sciences
H-1068 Budapest
Benczúr u. 33
tel: 36-1-351-0413
fax: 36-1-322-9297
email: banreti(a)nytud.hu
Tisztelt Hölgyem/Uram!
Örömmel értesítjük, hogy új száma jelent meg a Szabad Változóknak, online
folyóiratunknak.
( http://www.szv.hu )
Kérjük, látogasson el honlapunkra. Az új számhoz Geréby Györggyel készítettünk
interjút. A lapban emellett Csordás Attila, Michael John Gorman, Kiricsi
Zoltán, Rónai András, Sidney Shoemaker, J.M.E. McTaggart és Tamás Ábel írásai
olvashatóak.
Amennyiben az írásokhoz véleményt szeretne fűzni, ezt könnyedén megteheti a
honlap fórum rovatában, ahol számos más tudományos, bölcseleti, és
oktatáspolitikai témahoz is hozzá tud szólni. A szerkesztőséget az info(a)szv.hu,
a főszerkesztőt a margocsy.daniel(a)szv.hu címen érheti el. Reméljük, lapunk
elnyeri tetszését.
E levél többszöri kézbesítése esetén türelmüket kérjük.
Üdvözlettel,
Szabad Változók
Dear Dr. Qwerty,
If you would like to be considered a potential commentator, or you would like to
suggest one, please follow the instructions below. NOTE: Your proposal and/or
suggestions should be submitted via the new Online Commentary Proposal system no
later than March 23, 2005.
The following target article has recently been accepted:
"'Economic Man' in cross-cultural perspective: Behavioral experiments in 15
small-scale societies"
Joseph Henrich, Robert Boyd, Samuel Bowles, Colin Camerer, Ernst Fehr, Herbert
Gintis, Richard McElreath, Michael Alvard, Abigail Barr, Jean Ensminger, Natalie
Smith Henrich, Kim Hill, Francisco Gil-White, Michael Gurven, Frank W. Marlowe,
John Q. Patton and David Tracer
=========================================================================
NEW BBS CALL INSTRUCTIONS
=========================================================================
Please DO NOT respond to this email. If you wish to submit a proposal for
commentary and/or suggest potential commentators, please go to the new Online
Commentary Proposal System at the following URL:
http://www.bbsonline.org/perl/commentary/commproposal?authordir=Henrich.ACC
Note: Commentators must be BBS Associates, or suggested by a BBS Associate. If you
are not a BBS Associate, please follow the instructions linked below:
http://www.bbsonline.org/Instructions/associnst.html
=========================================================================
TARGET ARTICLE INFORMATION
=========================================================================
TARGET ARTICLE: 'Economic Man' in cross-cultural perspective: Behavioral
experiments in 15 small-scale societies
AUTHORS: Joseph Henrich, Robert Boyd, Samuel Bowles, Colin Camerer, Ernst Fehr,
Herbert Gintis, Richard McElreath, Michael Alvard, Abigail Barr, Jean Ensminger,
Natalie Smith Henrich, Kim Hill, Francisco Gil-White, Michael Gurven, Frank W.
Marlowe, John Q. Patton and David Tracer
ABSTRACT: Researchers from across the social sciences have found consistent
deviations from the predictions of the canonical model of self-interest in
hundreds of experiments from around the world. This research, however, cannot
determine whether this uniformity results from universal patterns of human
behavior or from the limited cultural variation available among the university
students used in virtually all prior experimental work. To address this, we
undertook a cross-cultural study of behavior in Ultimatum, Public Goods, and
Dictator Games in fifteen small-scale societies exhibiting a wide variety of
economic and cultural conditions.
We found, first, that the canonical modelbased on pure self-interestfails in
all of the societies studied. Second, the data reveals substantially more
behavioral variability across social groups than has been found in previous
research. Third, group-level differences in economic organization and the
structure of social interactions explain a substantial portion of the behavioral
variation across societies: the higher the degree of market integration and the
higher the payoffs to cooperation in everyday life, the greater the level of
prosociality expressed in experimental games. Fourth, the available
individual-level economic and demographic variables do not robustly explain game
behavior, either within or across groups. Fifth, in many cases experimental play
appears to reflect the common interactional patterns of everyday life.
KEYWORDS: Self-interest, altruism, cooperation, Ultimatum Game, Public Goods
Game, cross-cultural research, experimental economics, game theory
FULL TEXT: http://www.bbsonline.org/Preprints/Henrich/Referees/
This article has been accepted for publication in Behavioral and Brain Sciences
(BBS), an international, interdisciplinary journal providing Open Peer Commentary
on important and controversial current research in the biobehavioral and
cognitive sciences.
The Calls are sent to 10,000 BBS Associates, so there is no expectation (indeed,
it would be calamitous) that each recipient should comment on every occasion!
Please DO NOT prepare a commentary unless you eventually receive a formal
invitation, indicating that it was possible to include your name on the final
list, which is constructed so as to balance areas of expertise and frequency of
prior commentaries in BBS.
To help you decide whether you would be an appropriate commentator for this
article, an electronic draft is retrievable at the URL that follows the abstract
and keywords above.
=========================================================================
NEW BBS CALL INSTRUCTIONS
=========================================================================
Please DO NOT respond to this email. If you wish to submit a proposal for
commentary and/or suggest potential commentators, please go to the new Online
Commentary Proposal System at the following URL:
http://www.bbsonline.org/perl/commentary/commproposal?authordir=Henrich.ACC
Note: Commentators must be BBS Associates, or suggested by a BBS Associate. If
you are not a BBS Associate, please follow the instructions linked below:
http://www.bbsonline.org/Instructions/associnst.html
=========================================================================
Barbara Finlay - Editor
Paul Bloom - Editor
Behavioral and Brain Sciences
bbs(a)bbsonline.org
http://www.bbsonline.org
-------------------------------------------------------------------
P h i l o s o p h y o f S c i e n c e C o l l o q u i u m
Department of History and Philosophy of Science
Eotvos Lorand University, Budapest
Room 6.54 (6th floor) Monday 4:00 PM
Pazmany P. setany 1/A Budapest, Hungary
Phone/Fax: (36-1) 372 2924
http://philosophy.elte.hu/colloquium
28 February 4:00 PM 6th floor 6.54
Language: Hungarian
V i k t o r B i n z b e r g e r
Department of Philosophy and History of Science
Budapest University of Technology and Economics
Az MI hermeneutikai kritikaja
(The hermeneutic critique of AI)
Abstract: http://philosophy.elte.hu/colloquium/2005/February/#4
___________________________________
The colloquium is open to everyone, including students, visitors, and faculty
members from all departments!
The 60-minute lecture is followed by a 10-minute break. Then we hold a
30-60-minute discussion. The participants may comment on the talks and are
encouraged to initiate discussion through the Internet. The comments should
be written in the language of the presentation.
The organizer of the colloquium: Laszlo E. Szabo (email: leszabo(a)hps.elte.hu)
--
L a s z l o E. S z a b o
Theoretical Physics Research Group of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences
Department of History and Philosophy of Science
Eotvos University, Budapest
http://hps.elte.hu/leszabo
P h i l o s o p h y o f S c i e n c e C o l l o q u i u m
Department of History and Philosophy of Science
Eotvos Lorand University, Budapest
Room 6.54 (6th floor) Monday 4:00 PM
Pazmany P. setany 1/A Budapest, Hungary
Phone/Fax: (36-1) 372 2924
http://philosophy.elte.hu/colloquium
_______________________
Contrary to the previously circulated announcement, there will be no seminar
session on 14 March! Jozsef Topal's lecture is postponed to April.
(14 March is a non-working day. I'm sorry for this mistake - L. E. Szabo)
_______________________
Corrected PROGRAM - March
A printable poster is available here:
http://philosophy.elte.hu/colloquium/2005/March/poster.pdf
7 March 4:00 PM 6th floor 6.54
Language: Hungarian
L a s z l o N e m e s
Institute of Ethology, University of Debrecen
Egy feltorekvo uj terulet: az etologia filozofiaja
(A new field of research: philosophy of ethology)
Abstract: http://philosophy.elte.hu/colloquium/2005/March/#1
21 March 4:00 PM 6th floor 6.54
Language: Hungarian
T a m a s D e m e t e r
Institute for Philosophical Research of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences,
Budapest
Mi a nepi pszichologia?
(What is folk psychology?)
Abstract: http://philosophy.elte.hu/colloquium/2005/March/#3
___________________________________
The colloquium is open to everyone, including students, visitors, and faculty
members from all departments!
The 60-minute lecture is followed by a 10-minute break. Then we hold a
30-60-minute discussion. The participants may comment on the talks and are
encouraged to initiate discussion through the Internet. The comments should
be written in the language of the presentation.
The organizer of the colloquium: Laszlo E. Szabo (email: leszabo(a)hps.elte.hu)
--
L a s z l o E. S z a b o
Theoretical Physics Research Group of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences
Department of History and Philosophy of Science
Eotvos University, Budapest
http://hps.elte.hu/leszabo
MEGHÍVÓ
Az ELTE PPK Pszichológia Doktori Iskola tisztelettel meghívja Önt
Németh Dezső
doktori értekezésének védésére.
Az értekezés címe:
Nyelv és emlékezet
Opponensek:
Dr. Csépe Valéria, az MTA doktora
Dr. Bánréti Zoltán, a nyelvtudomány kandidátusa
A védés időpontja: 2005. február 25. péntek 10 óra
A védés helye: ELTE PPK, Budapest, Kazinczy u. 23-27. Tanácsterem
----------------------------------------------------------
NEMETH Dezso
University of Szeged, Department of Psychology
Email: nemethd(a)edpsy.u-szeged.hu
Web: http://www.staff.u-szeged.hu/~nemethd/
Cognitive Sciences at University of Szeged: http://kognit.edpsy.u-szeged.hu
MEGHÍVÓ
A Csillaghegyi Közösségi Ház három részből álló előadássorozatot szervez az Új Mandátum Kiadó gondozásában megjelent Magyar Pantheon könyvsorozat kötetei alapján.
Szeretettel meghívjuk/meghívunk a 2005. február. 23. 19.00-kor kezdődő második rendezvényünkre, amely
Miklóssy Endre
előadásában
Hamvas Béla filozófiája
címmel kerül megrendezésre.
A program két részből áll: egy körülbelül 45 perces előadásból, majd azt követő beszélgetésből.
A belépés ingyenes.
Helyszín: 1039 Budapest-Csillaghegy, Mátyás király út 13-15.
(megközelíthető: BKV-val a szentedrei HÉV vonalán a Csillaghegy megálló felől, autóval a Szentendrei út- Mátyás király út útvonalon.)
További információ: info(a)bananklub.hu
P h i l o s o p h y o f S c i e n c e C o l l o q u i u m
Department of History and Philosophy of Science
Eotvos Lorand University, Budapest
Room 6.54 (6th floor) Monday 4:00 PM
Pazmany P. setany 1/A Budapest, Hungary
Phone/Fax: (36-1) 372 2924
http://philosophy.elte.hu/colloquium
PROGRAM - March
A printable poster is available here:
http://philosophy.elte.hu/colloquium/2005/March/poster.pdf
7 March 4:00 PM 6th floor 6.54
Language: Hungarian
L a s z l o N e m e s
Institute of Ethology, University of Debrecen
Egy feltorekvo uj terulet: az etologia filozofiaja
(A new field of research: philosophy of ethology)
Abstract: http://philosophy.elte.hu/colloquium/2005/March/#1
14 March 4:00 PM 6th floor 6.54
Language: Hungarian
J o z s e f T o p a l
Comparative Ethology Research Group of HAS
Eotvos Lorand University, Budapest
A kutya kizarason alapulo kovetkeztetesi kepessegei: Ahogyan azt az etologus
latja
(Dog's exclusionary inference capacity: from the ethologist's point of view)
Abstract: http://philosophy.elte.hu/colloquium/2005/March/#2
21 March 4:00 PM 6th floor 6.54
Language: Hungarian
T a m a s D e m e t e r
Institute for Philosophical Research of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences,
Budapest
Mi a nepi pszichologia?
(What is folk psychology?)
Abstract: http://philosophy.elte.hu/colloquium/2005/March/#3
___________________________________
The colloquium is open to everyone, including students, visitors, and faculty
members from all departments!
The 60-minute lecture is followed by a 10-minute break. Then we hold a
30-60-minute discussion. The participants may comment on the talks and are
encouraged to initiate discussion through the Internet. The comments should
be written in the language of the presentation.
The organizer of the colloquium: Laszlo E. Szabo (email: leszabo(a)hps.elte.hu)
--
L a s z l o E. S z a b o
Theoretical Physics Research Group of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences
Department of History and Philosophy of Science
Eotvos University, Budapest
http://hps.elte.hu/leszabo