koglist

koglist@maillist.ttk.hu

4 participants
5929 discussions

BBS Call for Commentators: Lehar; Gestalt Isomorphism and the Primacy of Subjective Conscious Experience: A Gestalt Bubble Model

by Behavioral & Brain Sciences

Dear Dr. Qwerty, Below is a link to the forthcoming BBS target article Gestalt Isomorphism and the Primacy of Subjective Conscious Experience: A Gestalt Bubble Model by Steven Lehar http://www.bbsonline.org/Preprints/Lehar/Referees/ This article has been accepted for publication in Behavioral and Brain Sciences (BBS), an international, interdisciplinary journal providing Open Peer Commentary on important and controversial current research in the biobehavioral and cognitive sciences. Commentators must be BBS Associates or suggested by a BBS Associate. To be considered as a commentator for this article, to suggest other appropriate commentators, or for information about how to become a BBS Associate, please reply by EMAIL within three (3) weeks to: calls(a)bbsonline.org The Calls are sent to 10,000 BBS Associates and BBSPrints Users, so there is no expectation (indeed, it would be calamitous) that each recipient should comment on every occasion! Hence there is no need to reply except if you wish to comment, or to suggest someone to comment. If you are not a BBS Associate, please approach a current BBS Associate (there are currently over 10,000 worldwide) who is familiar with your work to nominate you. All past BBS authors, referees and commentators are eligible to become BBS Associates. An electronic list of current BBS Associates is available at this location to help you select a name: http://www.bbsonline.org/Instructions/assoclist.html (please note that this list is being updated) If no current BBS Associate knows your work, please send us your Curriculum Vitae and BBS will circulate it to appropriate Associates to ask whether they would be prepared to nominate you. (In the meantime, your name, address and email address will be entered into our database as an unaffiliated investigator.) ======================================================================= IMPORTANT To help us put together a balanced list of commentators, please give some indication of the aspects of the topic on which you would bring your areas of expertise to bear if you were selected as a commentator. To help you decide whether you would be an appropriate commentator for this article, an electronic draft is retrievable from the online BBSPrints Archive, at the URL that follows the abstract below. _______________________________________________________________________ Gestalt Isomorphism and the Primacy of Subjective Conscious Experience: A Gestalt Bubble Model Steven Lehar Ph.D. Peli Lab The Schepens Eye Research Institute email: slehar(a)cns.bu.edu KEYWORDS: Brain-anchored, Cartesian theatre, consciousness, emergence, extrinsic constraints, filling-in, Gestalt, homunculus, indirect realism, intrinsic constraints, invariance, isomorphism, multistability, objective phenomenology, perceptual modeling, perspective, phenomenology, psychophysical parallelism, psychophysical postulate, qualia, reification, representationalism, structural coherence ABSTRACT: A serious crisis is identified in theories of neurocomputation marked by a persistent disparity between the phenomenological or experiential account of visual perception and the neurophysiological level of description of the visual system. In particular conventional concepts of neural processing offer no explanation for the holistic global aspects of perception identified by Gestalt theory. The problem is paradigmatic, and can be traced to contemporary concepts of the functional role of the neural cell, known as the Neuron Doctrine. In the absence of an alternative neurophysiologically plausible model, I propose a perceptual modeling approach, i.e. to model the percept as experienced subjectively, rather than the objective neurophysiological state of the visual system that supposedly subserves that experience. A Gestalt Bubble model is presented to demonstrate how the elusive Gestalt principles of emergence, reification, and invariance, can be expressed in a quantitative model of the subjective experience of visual consciousness. That model in turn reveals a unique computational strategy underlying visual processing, which is unlike any algorithm devised by man, and certainly unlike the atomistic feed-forward model of neurocomputation offered by the Neuron Doctrine paradigm. The perceptual modeling approach reveals the primary function of perception as that of generating a fully spatial virtual-reality replica of the external world in an internal representation. The common objections to this "picture-in-the-head" concept of perceptual representation are shown to be ill founded. http://www.bbsonline.org/Preprints/Lehar/Referees/ ====================================================================== IMPORTANT Please DO NOT prepare a commentary yet. Just let us know, after having inspected it, what relevant expertise you feel you would bring to bear on what aspect of the article. We will then let you know whether it was possible to include your name on the final formal list of invitees. ======================================================================= *** SUPPLEMENTARY ANNOUNCEMENT *** (1) Call for Book Nominations for BBS Multiple Book Review In the past, Behavioral and Brain Sciences (BBS) had only been able to do 1-2 BBS multiple book treatments per year, because of our limited annual page quota. BBS's new expanded page quota will make it possible for us to increase the number of books we treat per year, so this is an excellent time for BBS Associates and biobehavioral/cognitive scientists in general to nominate books you would like to see accorded BBS multiple book review. (Authors may self-nominate, but books can only be selected on the basis of multiple nominations.) It would be very helpful if you indicated in what way a BBS Multiple Book Review of the book(s) you nominate would be useful to the field (and of course a rich list of potential reviewers would be the best evidence of its potential impact!). *-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-* Please note: Your email address has been added to our user database for Calls for Commentators, the reason you received this email. If you do not wish to receive further Calls, please feel free to change your mailshot status through your User Login link on the BBSPrints homepage, using your username and password. Or, email a response with the word "remove" in the subject line. *-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-* Ralph BBS ------------------------------------------------------------------- Ralph DeMarco Editorial Coordinator Behavioral and Brain Sciences Journals Department Cambridge University Press 40 West 20th Street New York, NY 10011-4211 UNITED STATES bbs(a)bbsonline.org http://www.bbsonline.org Tel: +001 212 924 3900 ext.374 Fax: +001 212 645 5960 -------------------------------------------------------------------

23 years, 8 months

News from Science & Consciousness Review

by Thomas Zoëga Ramsøy

Dear member of this list, Science & Consciousness Review (http://psych.pomona.edu/scr/) has released new articles and reviews: _____________________ NEWS ARTICLE: Recovering consciousness: A timeline - By Bernard J. Baars There has been a steady growth of the word "consciousness" in science. It goes from almost zero citations in 1950 to more than 1400 in the year 2000. Here, we present numbers and graphs collected from the biomedical literature, using PubMed. They seem to confirm that consciousness is back in science! Full article at http://psych.pomona.edu/scr/LN_Sep02_RecoveringConsc.htm _____________________ NEWS IN BRIEF - New issue: Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences - Suggested link: "All In the Mind", a radio program on the mind - Suggested link: Intro to consciousness on Tuscon - Doctors create out-of-body sensations - Neuropsychology: Stimulating illusory own-body perceptions Full access at http://psych.pomona.edu/scr/more_news.html _____________________ UPCOMING CONFERENCES in October Oct 3-4 Rational animals? Oct 10-12 The Society for Phenomenology and The Human Sciences Oct 17-20 Carleton Philosophy & Neuroscience Conference See the Conference page at http://psych.pomona.edu/scr/conf.html _____________________ ARCHIVES Previous issues of Science & Consciousness Review can be found at http://psych.pomona.edu/scr/archive.html We have now issues from April to September, including all articles, reviews and news in brief. _____________________ CONTRIBUTE! Please send your contributions to us. Articles are read by hundreds of unique visitors each week. Since its launch in April 2002, SCR has had around 200.000 visits! Instructions for authors can be found at http://psych.pomona.edu/scr/author_instructions.html Sincerely, Thomas Zoëga Ramsøy Managing Editor

23 years, 8 months

BBS Call for Commentators: Hurford; The Neural Basis of Predicate-Argument Structure

by Behavioral & Brain Sciences

Dear Dr. Qwerty, Below is a link to the forthcoming BBS target article The Neural Basis of Predicate-Argument Structure by James R. Hurford http://www.bbsonline.org/Preprints/Hurford/Referees/ This article has been accepted for publication in Behavioral and Brain Sciences (BBS), an international, interdisciplinary journal providing Open Peer Commentary on important and controversial current research in the biobehavioral and cognitive sciences. Commentators must be BBS Associates or suggested by a BBS Associate. To be considered as a commentator for this article, to suggest other appropriate commentators, or for information about how to become a BBS Associate, please reply by EMAIL within three (3) weeks to: calls(a)bbsonline.org The Calls are sent to 10,000 BBS Associates, so there is no expectation (indeed, it would be calamitous) that each recipient should comment on every occasion! Hence there is no need to reply except if you wish to comment, or to suggest someone to comment. If you are not a BBS Associate, please approach a current BBS Associate (there are currently over 10,000 worldwide) who is familiar with your work to nominate you. All past BBS authors, referees and commentators are eligible to become BBS Associates. An electronic list of current BBS Associates is available at this location to help you select a name: http://www.bbsonline.org/Instructions/assoclist.html (please note that this list is being updated) If no current BBS Associate knows your work, please send us your Curriculum Vitae and BBS will circulate it to appropriate Associates to ask whether they would be prepared to nominate you. (In the meantime, your name, address and email address will be entered into our database as an unaffiliated investigator.) ======================================================================= IMPORTANT To help us put together a balanced list of commentators, please give some indication of the aspects of the topic on which you would bring your areas of expertise to bear if you were selected as a commentator. To help you decide whether you would be an appropriate commentator for this article, an electronic draft is retrievable from the online BBSPrints Archive, at the URL that follows the abstract below. _______________________________________________________________________ The Neural Basis of Predicate-Argument Structure James R Hurford Language Evolution and Computation Research Unit Linguistics Department University of Edinburgh jim(a)ling.ed.ac.uk KEYWORDS: logic, predicate, argument, neural, object, dorsal, ventral, attention, deictic, reference. ABSTRACT: Neural correlates exist for a basic component of logical formulae, PREDICATE(x). Vision and audition research in primates and humans shows two independent neural pathways; one locates objects in body-centered space, the other attributes properties, such as colour, to objects. In vision these are the dorsal and ventral pathways. In audition, similarly separable 'where' and 'what' pathways exist. PREDICATE(x) is a schematic representation of the brain's integration of the two processes of delivery by the senses of the location of an arbitrary referent object, mapped in parietal cortex, and analysis of the properties of the referent by perceptual subsystems. The brain computes actions using a few 'deictic' variables pointing to objects. Parallels exist between such non-linguistic variables and linguistic deictic devices. Indexicality and reference have linguistic and non-linguistic (e.g. visual) versions, sharing the concept of attention. The individual variables of logical formulae are interpreted as corresponding to these mental variables. In computing action, the deictic variables are linked with 'semantic' information about the objects, corresponding to logical predicates. Mental scene-descriptions are necessary for practical tasks of primates, and pre-exist language phylogenetically. The type of scene-descriptions used by non-human primates would be reused for more complex cognitive, ultimately linguistic, purposes. The provision by the brain's sensory/perceptual systems of about four variables for temporary assignment to objects, and the separate processes of perceptual categorization of the objects so identified, constitute a preadaptive platform on which an early system for the linguistic description of scenes developed. http://www.bbsonline.org/Preprints/Hurford/Referees/ ====================================================================== IMPORTANT Please do not prepare a commentary yet. Just let us know, after having inspected it, what relevant expertise you feel you would bring to bear on what aspect of the article. We will then let you know whether it was possible to include your name on the final formal list of invitees. ======================================================================= *** SUPPLEMENTARY ANNOUNCEMENT *** (1) Call for Book Nominations for BBS Multiple Book Review In the past, Behavioral and Brain Sciences (BBS) had only been able to do 1-2 BBS multiple book treatments per year, because of our limited annual page quota. BBS's new expanded page quota will make it possible for us to increase the number of books we treat per year, so this is an excellent time for BBS Associates and biobehavioral/cognitive scientists in general to nominate books you would like to see accorded BBS multiple book review. (Authors may self-nominate, but books can only be selected on the basis of multiple nominations.) It would be very helpful if you indicated in what way a BBS Multiple Book Review of the book(s) you nominate would be useful to the field (and of course a rich list of potential reviewers would be the best evidence of its potential impact!). *-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-* Please note: Your email address has been added to our user database for Calls for Commentators, the reason you received this email. If you do not wish to receive further Calls, please feel free to change your mailshot status through your User Login link on the BBSPrints homepage, using your username and password. Or, email a response with the word "remove" in the subject line. *-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-* Thanks, Ralph BBS ------------------------------------------------------------------- Ralph DeMarco Editorial Coordinator Behavioral and Brain Sciences Journals Department Cambridge University Press 40 West 20th Street New York, NY 10011-4211 UNITED STATES bbs(a)bbsonline.org http://www.bbsonline.org Tel: +001 212 924 3900 ext.374 Fax: +001 212 645 5960 -------------------------------------------------------------------

23 years, 8 months

MIT OCW

by LORINCZ, Andras

MIT OCW Pilot Opens to the Public on September 30th OCW = Open CourseWare OCW plans to publish our first wave of courses on September 30, 2002. Sample courses will be included from the following academic departments: Anthropology Biology Chemical Engineering Chemistry Civil and Environmental Engineering Earth, Atmospheric, and Planetary Sciences Economics Electrical Engineering and Computer Science History Linguistics and Philosophy Management Mathematics Mechanical Engineering Ocean Engineering Political Science Urban Studies and Planning The opening of these courses represents a continuation of the early pilot of OCWs long-term effort. We expect OCW content to become deeper and richer over time. We invite you to return on September 30th, when we will welcome your feedback. Megjegyzes: Ha erdekel valamelyik kurzus, akkor nezd meg es segits bekapcsolni azt az egyetemi oktatasi haloba: http://people.inf.elte.hu/lorincz/CourseWare_SW.html A szoftver a TouchGraph-hoz (Lasd: http://www.touchgraph.com/TGGoogleBrowser.html freeware: http://touchgraph.sourceforge.net/index.html) hasonlo, sajat fejlesztesu kliens-szerver szoftvereszkozzel tortenik. Lorincz Andras

23 years, 8 months

Philosophy of Science Colloquium, Giora Hon

by Laszlo E. Szabo

Department of HISTORY AND PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE Eötvös University, Budapest ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Pázmány P. sétány 1/A Budapest, Hungary Phone/Fax: (36-1) 372 2924 The web site of the seminar: http://hps.elte.hu/seminar Philosophy of Science Colloquium Room 6.54 (6th floor) Monday 4:00 PM _________________________________________ 30 September 4:00 PM 6th floor 6.54 (Language of presentation: English) G i o r a H o n <http://philo.haifa.ac.il/faculty_pages/hon.htm> Department of Philosophy University of Haifa Gödel, Einstein, Mach: Casting Constraints on All-embracing Concepts [Revised! (26/09/02)] Can a theory turn back, as it were, upon itself and vouch for its own features? That is, can the derived elements of a theory be the very primitive terms that provide the presuppositions of the theory? This form of an all-embracing feature assumes a totality in which there occurs quantification over that totality, quantification that is defined by this very totality. I argue that the Mach principle exhibits such features of all-embracing nature. To clarify the argument, I distinguish between on the one hand completeness and on the other wholeness and totality, as different all-embracing features: the former being epistemic while the latter - ontological. I propose an analogy between the Mach principle as a possible selection principle in general relativity and the vicious-circle principle in foundations of mathematics. I finally conclude with a consequence of this analogy vis-?-vis completeness and totality, viz., both should be constrained if they were to be valid concepts for a physical theory. The paper progresses chronologically. It focuses on the physical approach of Mach that formed the background for Einstein?s general theory of relativity. The solutions of the field equations in the form of cosmological models set the scene for the view of all-embracing concepts discussed in the paper. Specifically, the ideas encapsulated in what Einstein called the Mach principle, constitute the thread of this account. The principle is found however to falter, in view of the fact that there are several different types of solution of the field equations that contradict it. One such important cosmological model with ramifying consequences is the rotational mass solution of Gödel. The question arises then as to whether there is an analogy between incompleteness in foundations of mathematics and in physics? The analogy between the vicious-circle principle and the Mach principle demonstrates an affirmative answer which suggests in turn that completeness and totality must be curtailed ? that is, conditions and limits should be imposed on completeness and totality to render them valid for physical theories. 1. Introduction: all-embracing concepts ? completeness vs. wholeness and totality 2. Mach?s disposition: the overwhelming unity of the whole 3. Einstein?s choice: the total inertia of a mass is due to all the other masses 4. Gödel?s criticism: objective lapse of time should not be assumed 5. Conclusion: casting constraints ? the Mach and the vicious-circle principles ------------------------------------------------------------------------ The organizer of the seminar: László E. Szabó <http://hps.elte.hu/~leszabo><mailto:leszabo@hps.elte.hu>) L a s z l o E. S z a b o Theoretical Physics Research Group of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences Department of History and Philosophy of Science Eotvos University, Budapest H-1518 Budapest, Pf. 32, Hungary Phone/Fax: (36-1)372-2924 Mobil/SMS: (36) 20-366-1172 http://hps.elte.hu/~leszabo

23 years, 8 months

Philosophy of Science Colloquium, Semtember & October

by Laszlo E. Szabo

Department of HISTORY AND PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE Eötvös University, Budapest ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Pázmány P. sétány 1/A Budapest, Hungary Phone/Fax: (36-1) 372 2924 The web site of the seminar: http://hps.elte.hu/seminar Philosophy of Science Colloquium Room 6.54 (6th floor) Monday 4:00 PM _________________________________________ 30 September 4:00 PM 6th floor 6.54 (Language of presentation: English) G i o r a H o n <http://philo.haifa.ac.il/faculty_pages/hon.htm> Department of Philosophy University of Haifa Gödel, Einstein, Mach: Constraining Completeness of Physical Theory Can a theory turn back, as it were, upon itself and vouch for its own features? That is, can the derived elements of a theory be the very primitive terms that provide the presuppositions of the theory? This form of completeness assumes a totality in which there occurs quantification over that totality, quantification that is defined by this very totality. I argue that the Mach principle exhibits features of this notion of completeness. I propose an analogy between the Mach principle as a possible selection principle in general relativity and the vicious-circle principle in foundation of mathematics. I finally conclude with a consequence of this analogy vis-á-vis completeness, viz., completeness has to be constrained. Cosmological models set the scene for the view of completeness discussed in the paper. Specifically, the ideas encapsulated in what Einstein called the "Mach principle" constitute the thread of this account. The principle however is found to falter, in view of the fact that there are several different types of solution of the field equations that contradict it. One such important result with ramifying consequences is the rotational mass solution of Gödel. The question arises as to whether there is an analogy between incompleteness in foundation of mathematics and in physics? The analogy between the vicious-circle principle and the Mach principle demonstrates an affirmative answer which suggests in turn that completeness must be curtailed - that is, conditions and limits should be imposed on completeness to render it valid. ------------------------------------------------------------------------ The organizer of the seminar: László E. Szabó <http://hps.elte.hu/~leszabo><mailto:leszabo@hps.elte.hu>) L a s z l o E. S z a b o Theoretical Physics Research Group of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences Department of History and Philosophy of Science Eotvos University, Budapest H-1518 Budapest, Pf. 32, Hungary Phone/Fax: (36-1)372-2924 Mobil/SMS: (36) 20-366-1172 http://hps.elte.hu/~leszabo

23 years, 8 months

Science & Consciousness Review - latest news and reviews

by Thomas Zoëga Ramsøy

Dear member of this list, Science & Consciousness Review (http://psych.pomona.edu/scr/) has released new articles and reviews: _____________________ NEWS Knowing more than you see By Thomas Zoëga Ramsøy News: Normally, you probably think that you see the entire visual field in front of you. However, careful studies of vision show that this is false. Actually, you are quite poor at seeing details falling outside your focal attention. The discussion about how much you can be visually aware of, and how much your visual system can process without consciousness has recently been updated by a recent finding. The conclusion of this study is that we are actually quite good at perceiving "complex" natural scenes even while attending elsewhere. Read the full article at: http://psych.pomona.edu/scr/LN_Sep02_KnowMoreSee.htm _____________________ NEWS IN BRIEF - Consciousness is slower than you think - Emotions: From neuropsychology to functional imaging - Neural responses to emotional faces - New issue: Dreaming Full access at http://psych.pomona.edu/scr/more_news.html _____________________ ARCHIVES Previous issues of Science & Consciousness Review can be found at http://psych.pomona.edu/scr/archive.html We have now issues from April to August 2002, including all articles, reviews and news in brief. _____________________ ABOUT SCIENCE & CONSCIOUSNESS REVIEW SCR is a community-building effort. Many scientific communities study how the human brain makes possible perception, memory, and even attention. But for historical reasons, we have no scientific community for exploring consciousness --- including our own experiences of the world, of each other and of ourselves. It is probably the most important neglected topic in science. Students and scientists all over the world are vitally interested. Hardly a week goes by without another major article in headline journals like Science and Nature. The flow of evidence has increased enormously. But so far we have few institutional resources for teaching, learning, and sharing this information. In the last decade we have seen new, high quality journals, professional societies, and regular meetings. They are vitally important. But many people feel that we need an international forum to build a sense of shared community. SCR is an effort in that direction. CONTRIBUTE! Please send your contributions to us. Instructions for authors can be found at http://psych.pomona.edu/scr/author_instructions.html _____________________ Sincerely, Thomas Zoëga Ramsøy Managing Editor

23 years, 8 months

Fogorvos

by csibra

23 years, 8 months

FIGYELEM! virus fertozott "Fogorvos"

by Gergely Csibra

Valaki egy virust kuldott a KOGLIST listara "Fogorvos" subject-tel latszolag az en e-mail cimemrol (csibra(a)cogpsyphy.hu). Ne nyissa fel, akihez eljutott. -- Gergely Csibra Centre of Brain and Cognitive Development Research Scientist School of Psychology Senior Lecturer Birkbeck College g.csibra(a)bbk.ac.uk Malet Street Tel: +44 20 7631 6323 London WC1E 7HX Fax: +44 20 7631 6587 United Kingdom

23 years, 8 months

Erdélyi Pszichológiai Szemle: Call for papers

by Imre Pentek

Erdélyi Pszichologiai Szemle http://www.pszichologia.ro/epsz The editorial board of the Transilvanian Journal of Psychology highly welcomes articles from the field of cognitive sciences in Hungarian or English language. The editorial board will blindly review manuscripts focusing on basic and applied research and clinical issues related to psychology or special education. The journal will emphasize studies with an empirical base, but review articles, issue-oriented contributions, and well-documented case studies are also welcome. Send articles to: Imre Péntek imrepentek(a)pszichologia.ro or epsz(a)pszichologia.ro For more information about the journal visit our website at: http://www.pszichologia.ro/epsz Guidelines for Submissions The editorial board of the Transylvanian Journal of Psychology will blindly review manuscripts focusing on basic and applied research and clinical issues related to psychology and special education. The journal will emphasize studies with an empirical base, but review articles, issue-oriented contributions, and well-documented case studies are also welcome. Any manuscript submitted to the Transylvanian Journal of Psychology may not currently be under consideration by another publication. In addition, any manuscript submitted must contain original and previously unpublished (in whole or in part) work. It is the responsibility of the author to ensure that the quotations mentioned in the manuscript are authentic and have been properly cited. Manuscripts must be submitted in the format prescribed by the most recent edition of the Publication Manual of the American Psychological Association. Each manuscript should be approximately 8000 words long and must be accompanied by an abstract containing 120-150 words and 4-6 keywords to be reviewed. All abstracts must be typed on a separate sheet of paper. Manuscripts must be submitted on paper of good quality or by e-mail (preferably both). The author(s) should always keep an additional copy for their own records. If there is more than one author, please include addresses, phone/fax numbers and, if available, electronic mail addresses of each author. Any submissions should be made with the understanding that if accepted for publication, ownership, copyright and the right to reproduce the article in any form will be allocated solely to the publisher. After an initial review by the Editor, two Contributing Editors shall be assigned to review the manuscript. Each manuscript shall be returned to the Author(s) with comments and recommendations. At this point, manuscripts fall into one of the following categories: * accepted for publication. * accepted pending revisions based on comments and recommendations. * rejected. If you are interested in submitting a manuscript for review, please follow the above guidelines and mail manuscripts to: Transylvanian Journal of Psychology Redactia EPSZ Cluj Napoca - 3400, O.P: 1 C.P.1060 ROMANIA

23 years, 8 months

Jump to page:

2026

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

2002

2001

2000

1999

1998

1997

1996

1995

1994

1993

koglist