The next talk in the CDC seminar series will be given by:
Sid Kouider, Laboratoire de Sciences Cognitives et Psycholinguistique,
Ecole Normale Superieure
Date: Wednesday, April 20, 5 PM
Location: CEU Cognitive Development Center, Hattyú u. 14, 3rd floor
Neurocognitive determinants of perceptual awareness in adults and infants
Abstract:
I will present empirical data using behavioral and/or neuroimaging
studies in human adults and infants. My talk will mainly focuses on 4
topics. First, I will talk about the extent and limits of subliminal
perception, in terms of both behavioral and neural influences;
Secondly, I will present new approaches to perception without
awareness through emotional information induced by crowded videos.
Third, I will present some methods for measuring perceptual awareness
in infants; Finally, I will focus on the existence of consciousness
without attention/access, and discuss the alternative partial
awareness hypothesis.
_______________________________________________
Subscribe by sending an empty mail to seminars-subscribe(a)cdc.ceu.hu
Unsubscribe by sending an empty mail to seminars-unsubscribe(a)cdc.ceu.hu
Hello
How are you?
Tell you a good news, several days before, i placed an order of Apple iphone
on the website: www.sneee.com they have many kinds of electronic
products, I get the item after the payment, and i was shocked by its good
quality and low price. If you need, i suggest you can order it on line, then
you will find it is very valuable .
If you are interested, you can browse the website and find what you want.
Share Happy! : )
Regards
attila keresztes
Dear Dr. Qwerty:
When a target article or recent book has been accepted for BBS Open Peer Commentary, the editorial office sends out the Call for Commentary Proposals to thousands of people. Commentary proposals help the editors craft a well-balanced commentary invitation list. Please DO NOT submit a commentary article unless you are formally invited.
If this target article interests you as a possible subject for commentary, please download the full un-copyedited preprint to see if you would like to *propose* a commentary.
If you are interested, carefully follow the instructions below the target article information. Please keep in mind that we are not asking you to submit a commentary article -- but rather, a short proposal in order to be considered as an invited author after the proposal deadline. Also be aware that we typically receive far more commentary proposals than we can accommodate with formal invitations.
NOW PROCESSING COMMENTARY PROPOSALS ON:
Target Article: "The brain basis of emotion: A meta-analytic review"
Authors: Kristen A. Lindquist, Tor D. Wager, Hedy Kober, Eliza Bliss-Moreau, and Lisa Feldman Barrett
Deadline for Commentary Proposals: May 5, 2011
Abstract: Researchers have wondered how the brain creates emotions since the early days of psychological science. With a surge of studies in affective neuroscience in recent decades, scientists are poised to answer this question. In this paper, we present a meta-analytic summary of the human neuroimaging literature on emotion. We compare the locationist approach (i.e., the hypothesis that discrete emotion categories consistently and specifically correspond to distinct brain regions) with the psychological constructionist approach (i.e., the hypothesis that discrete emotion categories are constructed of more general brain networks not specific to those categories) to better understand the brain basis of emotion. We review both locationist and psychological constructionist hypotheses of brain-emotion correspondence and report meta-analytic findings bearing on these hypotheses. Overall, we found little evidence that discrete emotion categories can be consistently and
specifically localized to distinct brain regions. Instead, we found evidence that is consistent with a psychological constructionist approach to the mind: a set of interacting brain regions commonly involved in basic psychological operations of both an emotional and non-emotional nature are active during emotion experience and perception across a range of discrete emotion categories.
Keywords: emotion, psychological construction, discrete emotion, emotion experience, emotion perception, meta-analysis, neuroimaging
Download Target Article Preprint:
http://journals.cambridge.org/BBSJournal/Call/Lindquist_preprint
COMMENTARY PROPOSALS *MUST* INCLUDE THE FOLLOWING
1. What aspect of the target article or book you would anticipate commenting on.
**Please note: This article includes a link to supplemental materials, but your commentary proposal should discuss the main target article, not the supplemental materials---unless you reference something in the supplemental materials that is germane to a theoretical point raised in the target article.**
2. The relevant expertise you would bring to bear on the target article or book.
Please include names and affiliations of your co-authors, if applicable, in the text of your commentary proposal.
SUGGESTING COMMENTATORS AND NOMINATING BBS ASSOCIATES
Commentators must be BBS Associates, or suggested by a BBS Associate. If you are not a BBS Associate, please follow the instructions below. To suggest others as possible Commentators, or to nominate others for BBS Associateship status, please email bbsjournal(a)cambridge.org.
http://journals.cambridge.org/BBSJournal/Inst/Assoc
HOW TO SUBMIT A COMMENTARY PROPOSAL
If you would like to nominate yourself for potential commentary invitation, you must submit a Commentary Proposal via our BBS Editorial Manager site:
1. Log-in as Author
Username: CQwerty-545
Password: Qwerty875632
Log-in to your BBS Editorial Manager account as an author:
http://www.editorialmanager.com/bbs.
If you do not have an account, please visit the site and register. You can also submit a request for missing username and password information if you have an existing account.
2. Submit New Manuscript
Within your author main menu please select Submit New Manuscript.
3. Select Article Type
Choose the article type of your manuscript from the pull-down menu. Commentary Proposal article types are temporarily created for each accepted target article or book. Only select the Commentary Proposal article type that you wish to submit a proposal on. For example: "Commentary Proposal (Lindquist)"
4. Enter Title
Please title your proposal submission by indicating the relevant first author name of the target article or book. For example: "Commentary Proposal on Lindquist"
5. Add Co-Authors
If you are proposing to write a commentary with any co-authors, the system will not allow you to enter their information here. Instead, include their names in the commentary proposal document you upload. These potential co-authors need not contribute to the Commentary Proposal itself.
6. Attach Files
The only required submission Item is your Commentary Proposal in MSWord or RTF format. In the Description field please add the first author name of the target article or book. For example: "Commentary Proposal on Lindquist"
7. Approve Your Submission
Editorial Manager will process your Commentary Proposal submission and will create a PDF for your approval. On the "Submissions Waiting for Author's Approval" page, you can view your PDF, edit, approve, or remove the submission. (You might have to wait several minutes for the blue "Action" menu to appear, allowing you to approve. Once you have Approved the Submission, the PDF will be sent to the editorial office.
**It is VERY important that you check and approve your Commentary Proposal manuscript as described above. Otherwise, we cannot process your submission.**
8. Editorial Office Decision
At the conclusion of the Commentary Proposal period, the editors will review all the submitted Commentary Proposals. An undetermined number of Commentary Proposals will be approved and those author names will be added to the final commentary invitation list. At that time you will be notified of the decision. If you are formally invited to submit a commentary, you will be asked to confirm your intention to submit by the commentary deadline.
Note: Before the commentary invitations are sent, the copy-edited and revised target article will be posted for invitees. In the case of Multiple Book Review, invitees will be sent a copy of the book to be commented upon if requested. With Multiple Book Reviews, it is the book, not the précis article that is the target of commentary.
Please do not write a commentary unless you have received an official invitation!
BEING REMOVED FROM THE CALL EMAIL LIST
If you DO NOT wish to receive Call for Commentary Proposals in the future, please reply to bbsjournal(a)cambridge.org, and type "remove" in the subject line.
Sincerely,
Ralph DeMarco
Editorial Administrator, BBS
Associate Editor, STM Journals
Cambridge University Press
32 Avenue of the Americas
New York, NY 10013-2473
Tel 001 212.337.5016
bbsjournal(a)cambridge.org
http://journals.cambridge.org/bbshttp://bbs.edmgr.com/
Kedves Érdeklődők,
A következő Kognitív Péntek rendezvényre holnap (pénteken) kerül sor az
ELTE-PPK Kognitív Pszichológia Tanszékének szervezésében!
Honbolygó Ferenc és Bőhm Tamás
Technológiai innováció a kognitív pszichológiában: tájékozódási rendszerek
és hallási észlelés
Időpont: 2011. április 15. 14:00
Helyszín: ELTE-PPK Pszichológia Intézet, Izabella u. 46., 216. terem
Rendhagyó módon pedig jövő héten kedden is lesz Kognitív Péntek:
Szűcs Dénes:
1. Matematikai fejlődés: viselkedéses és EEG vizsgálatok
2. A kognitív kontroll fejlődése: EEG vizsgálatok
Időpont: 2011. április 19. (kedd!) 11:00
Helyszín: ELTE-PPK Pszichológia Intézet, Izabella u. 46., 216. terem
További részletes információk:
https://sites.google.com/site/eltekognitiv/home/elte-kognitiv-pentek
Szeretettel várunk Mindenkit!
Üdvözlettel:
Garami Linda
ELTE-PPK Kognitív Pszichológia Tanszék
From: Garami Linda [mailto:garami@cogpsyphy.hu]
Sent: Monday, April 11, 2011 11:43 AM
To: 'koglist(a)cogpsyphy.hu'
Subject: Kognitív Péntek - meghívó
Tisztelt Érdeklődők!
Az ELTE-PPK Kognitív Pszichológia Tanszéke tisztelettel meghívja Önt a
Kognitív Péntek sorozat következő két rendezvényére:
1.
Honbolygó Ferenc és Bőhm Tamás
Technológiai innováció a kognitív pszichológiában: tájékozódási rendszerek
és hallási észlelés
Időpont: 2011. április 15. 14:00
Helyszín: ELTE-PPK Pszichológia Intézet, Izabella u. 46., 216. terem
2.
Szűcs Dénes:
1. Matematikai fejlődés: viselkedéses és EEG vizsgálatok
2. A kognitív kontroll fejlődése: EEG vizsgálatok
Időpont (rendhagyó!): 2011. április 19. (kedd!) 11:00
Helyszín: ELTE-PPK Pszichológia Intézet, Izabella u. 46., 216. terem
További információk: https://sites.google.com/site/eltekognitiv/
Minden érdeklődőt szeretettel várunk!
Üdvözlettel:
Garami Linda
ELTE-PPK, Kognitív Pszichológia Tanszék
__________ ESET NOD32 Antivirus - Vírusdefiníciós adatbázis: 6031 (20110410)
__________
Az üzenetet az ESET NOD32 Antivirus ellenőrizte.
http://www.eset.hu
*Értesítés*
Megtekinthetővé vált a *Bevezetés a társas-kognitív-nyelvészetbe
*előadás-sorozat
árilis 11.-én elhangzott nyolcadik része.
*A morfoszintaxis és a prototípusok* c. előadás felvétele egyrészt a
http://mnytud.arts.unideb.hu/tkny/ea1_8.html oldalon beágyazva található, a
teljesebb, a kivetített diákat is párhuzamosan mutató változat pedig a
Videotoriumban érhető el a
http://videotorium.hu/hu/recordings/details/2747,A_morfoszintaxis_es_a_prot….
A nyest.hu <http://www.nyest.hu/>-n árilis 18-án, hétfőn olvasható lesz az
előadás nagyon rövid, ismeretterjesztő összefoglalója is.
Üdvözlettel, Kis Tamás
THEORETICAL PHILOSOPHY FORUM
Institute of Philosophy
Faculty of Humanities, Eötvös University
Address: Múzeum krt. 4/i, Budapest
This is just to remind you that Ádám Miklósi's lecture (Érzelmes
robotok, avagy kell-e nekünk „érző” robot? / Emotional robots: Do we
need them?) has been CANCELLED! It is postponed for the next semester.
The organizer of the Forum: László E. Szabó
(leszabo(a)phil.elte.hu)
--
L a s z l o E. S z a b o
Professor of Philosophy
DEPARTMENT OF LOGIC, INSTITUTE OF PHILOSOPHY
EOTVOS UNIVERSITY, BUDAPEST
http://phil.elte.hu/leszabo
*MEGHÍVÓ*
A *Társas-Kognitív Nyelvészeti Kutatócsoport,*
valamint a *Magyar Nyelvtudományi Társaság Debreceni Csoportja, *a *DAB
Nyelvészeti Munkabizottsága *és a *Hatvani István Szakkollégium*
meghívja
*Fehér Krisztina*
*A nyelv modularizálódó hálógrammatikája***
című előadására
A nyelvtudományban a nyelvet elsősorban olyan önálló rendszerként
értelmezik, amelynek egyes komponensei társas-kognitív kontextusuktól és
egymástól is jórészt függetlenek. Ez a szemléletmód tulajdonképpen már
Saussure nyelvészetét jellemzi, tételszerű, főként az elmére vonatkoztatott
megfogalmazása azonban inkább a generatív nyelvelmélethez köthető: Chomsky
szerint a nyelvtan általános, absztrakt rendszere (az ún. univerzális
grammatika) egy zárt, szintaktikai meghatározottságú mentális struktúra,
amelynek egyes moduljai maguk is autonóm módon működnek.
Az előadás arra kívánja felhívni a figyelmet, hogy a nyelv ontogenezise
ennek a közkeletű elképzelésnek neurológiai és kognitív szempontból egyaránt
ellentmond: a nyelvelsajátítási, illetve a későbbi nyelvi szocializációs
folyamatok arra mutatnak, hogy a grammatikának szükségszerűen egy olyan
heterogén, dinamikus rendszernek kell lennie, ami az elme egészébe
széleskörű, elemi szintű hálókapcsolatokkal, fokozatosan modularizálódva
ágyazódik be.
*Helyszín:* a Debreceni Egyetem Kossuth Lajos III. sz. Kollégiuma (Debrecen,
Egyetem t. 1., a főépület mögött), 5. emeleti előadóterem
*Időpont:* 2011. április 18. (hétfő), 16 óra
Az előadáson minden érdeklődőt örömmel lát a Társas-Kognitív Nyelvészeti
Kutatócsoport, a Magyar Nyelvtudományi Társaság Debreceni Csoportja, a DAB
Nyelvészeti Munkabizottsága és a Hatvani István Szakkollégium.
Debrecen, 2011. április 12.
Kis Tamás, Fehér Krisztina (a Társas-Kognitív Nyelvészeti Kutatócsoport
alapító tagjai)
Rácz Anita (a Magyar Nyelvtudományi Társaság Debreceni Csoportjának titkára)
Csűry István (a DAB Nyelvtudományi Munkabizottságának elnöke)
Szirák Péter (a Hatvani István Szakkollégium szakcsoport-vezetője)
The next talk in the CDC seminar series will be given by:
Balazs Aczel, Károli Gáspár University of the Reformed Church in Hungary
Date: Wednesday, April 13, 2011, 5 PM
Location: Cognitive Development Center, Hattyú u. 14, 3rd floor
*Is there such a thing as implicit learning?*
Abstract: Consistent with the basic dichotomous propensity of human
thinking, binary descriptions of memory and learning processes (e.g.,
conscious – unconscious; declarative – procedural; short-term – long-term
etc.) became principles of our understanding of human cognition. The crucial
question, however, remains as to whether we have sufficient empirical
evidence to sustain such distinctions. While recent theories started to
postulate the existence of more than two memory systems (e.g., McDonald,
Devan, & Hong, 2004), other researchers argue that the empirical data can be
explained in a single-model view (e.g., Berry, Shanks, & Henson, 2008). I
will start my talk from a single-process learning viewpoint and discuss
whether there is enough contradictory empirical evidence to abandon this
position.
_______________________________________________
Subscribe by sending an empty mail to seminars-subscribe(a)cdc.ceu.hu
Unsubscribe by sending an empty mail to seminars-unsubscribe(a)cdc.ceu.hu
Kedves Kollegák! Normal 0 21 false false false MicrosoftInternetExplorer4 Várunk minden érdeklődőt a PPKE-ITK soronkövetkező előadására!
Időpont: Kedd, ápr. 26. 16h
Helyszín: Pázmány P. Kat. Egyetem - ITK (1083, Práter utca 50/a) Kari Tanácsterem (204-es szoba)
Prof. David Melcher, PhD
associate professor
Center for Mind/Brain Sciences (CIMeC)
University of Trento
Italy
http://www.unitn.it/en/cimec/11705/david-melcher
Visual stability across saccadic eye movements
When looking around a scene, people typically make 2 - 3 rapid, ballistic eye movements ("saccades") in order to bring their gaze to bear on objects of interest. A basic question in visual neuroscience is how information is combined across separate glances into a stable, continuous percept. Previous explanations have included theories such as integration in a trans-saccadic buffer or storage in short-term visual memory, or, on the contrary, the idea that perception begins anew with each fixation. Converging evidence from primate neurophysiology, human psychophysics and neuroimaging suggest a new explanation for smooth and stable perception. We argue that the intention to make a saccadic eye movement initiates a series of preparations in the brain that lead to a fundamental alteration in visual processing before, during and after the saccadic eye movement. The goal of these transformations is to yield continuous perception of coherent events that span across the saccade. This theory of “trans-saccadic perception” may help to explain how it is possible—despite discrete sensory input and limited memory—that conscious perception across saccades appears stable, predictable and continuous.
Az előadás után kötetlen beszélgetésre invitáljuk Önöket!
Szervezők