The CEU Philosophy Department cordially invites you to a talk
by
István Aranyosi (Centre for Consciousness-ANU,CEU)
on
'Phenomenal intentionality'
22 March, 5:00pm, Zrinyi 14, room 412
Abstract:
http://www.ceu.hu/phil/talks_abstracts.html#IA
Kriszta Biber
Department Coordinator
Philosophy Department
Tel: 36-1-327-3806
Fax: 36-1-327-3072
E-mail: biberk(a)ceu.hu
Meghívó
Az ELTE PPK Pszichológiai Intézet
Kognitív Pszichológia Tanszéke
szeretettel meghívja Önt és munkatársait
2006. április 7-én 14 órakor a
(Bp. VI., Izabella u. 46., 216 terem)
a Kognitív Péntek
sorozat következő rendezvényére, melynek programja:
"Kognitív autizmus-kutatás"
Győri Miklós
ELTE Kognitív Pszichológia Tanszék; Autizmus Alapítvány
Új modellek felé a neurokognitív autizmus kutatásban
Stefanik Krisztina
Autizmus Alapítvány
Fejlődési prognózis autizmusban elméletalapú eszközökkel
A két előadás együtt áttekintést igyekszik nyújtani arról a kognitív
szemléletű, részben alkalmazott, részben alapkutatás jellegű kutatási
tevékenységről, amely az Autizmus Alapítványnál folyik az ELTE
Pszichológiai Intézettel együttműködésben.
Győri Miklós előadása összegzi alapkutatásaink eddigi legfontosabb
eredményeit, s részben ezekre támaszkodva érvel amellett, hogy számos
okunk van újragondolni az autizmus kognitív háttere kapcsán kialakított
eddigi modelljeinket, s a finomabb magyarázatok érdekében neurológiai
szintű hipotézisek mentén tervezni a kognitív/pszichológiai kutatásokat
is. Ennek példájaként részletesebben tárgyalja jövőbeni kutatásainkat
vezérlő "törékeny prefrontális funkciók" munkahipotézisünket.
Stefanik Krisztina előadása egy olyan empirikus kutatásunkat és
eredményeit mutatja be, amely céljában klinikai hangsúlyú, ám
eszközeiben erősen támaszkodik az elmélet-vezérelt alapkutatások
eredményeire. Központi kérdése az, mennyiben prognosztizálható
autizmussal élő gyermekek esetében a kisgyermekkorban mutatott
szociális-kommunikatív viselkedésmintázatok alapján az iskoláskorban
mutatott klinikai kép és kognitív teljesítmény. Az előadás a kérdés
gyakorlati relevanciája mellett elemzi a korábbi hasonló célú
vizsgálatok eredményeit, a vizsgálat közvetlen elméleti hátterét, s az
eredmények mellett röviden bemutatja azokat az alkalmazott eszközöket
is, amelyek kialakítása részben kutatásaink során történt.
_______________________________________________________
Tanszékvezető: Dr. Csépe Valéria 1068 Bp. Szondi u. 83-85.
' 354-2290, e-mail: csepe(a)cogpsyphy.hu
Adminisztráció: Horváth Zsuzsa 1064 Izabella u. 46.
' 461-2600 e-mail: horvath.zsuzsa(a)ppk.elte.hu
Dear Dr. Qwerty,
==================================================================
** CALL RESPONSE INSTRUCTIONS **
==================================================================
Please DO NOT respond to this email. If you wish to submit a proposal for
commentary and/or suggest potential commentators, please go to the new
Online Commentary Proposal System at the following URL:
http://www.bbsonline.org/perl/commentary/commproposal?authordir=Erdelyi-040…
* If you only wish to suggest potential commentators, please ignore prompts to
submit a proposal with expertise information.
* If you experience technical difficulties, please email bbs(a)bbsonline.org.
* Please respond to this Call no later than April 6, 2006
NOTE: Behavioral and Brain Sciences (BBS) is an international, interdisciplinary journal
providing Open Peer Commentary on important and controversial current research in the
biobehavioral and cognitive sciences. Commentators must be BBS Associates, or suggested by
a BBS Associate. If you are not a BBS Associate, please follow the instructions linked
below:
http://www.bbsonline.org/Instructions/associnst.html
==================================================================
CALL FOR COMMENTATORS
==================================================================
"The unified theory of repression" by Matthew Hugh Erdelyi has been accepted for
publication in Behavioral and Brain Sciences (BBS). Calls for Commentators are sent to
over 10,000 BBS Associates, so there is no expectation (indeed, it would be calamitous)
that each recipient should comment on every occasion!
To help you decide whether you would be an appropriate commentator for this article, an
unedited, uncorrected target article is retrievable at the URL that follows the abstract
and keywords below.
Please DO NOT write a commentary unless you receive a formal invitation in the near
future. If you are invited to submit a commentary, a copyedited, corrected version of
this paper will be posted in the commentary invitation letter. The commentary invitation
list is compiled by the Editors so as to balance proposals, areas of expertise, and
frequency of prior commentaries in BBS.
==================================================================
** TARGET ARTICLE INFORMATION **
==================================================================
TITLE: The unified theory of repression
AUTHOR: Matthew Hugh Erdelyi
ABSTRACT: Repression has become an empirical fact that is at once obvious and problematic.
Fragmented clinical and laboratory traditions and disputed terminology have resulted in a
Babel of misunderstandings in which false distinctions are imposed (e.g., between
repression and suppression) and necessary distinctions not drawn (e.g., between the
mechanism and the use to which it is put, defense being just one). "Repression" was
introduced by Herbart to designate the (nondefensive) inhibition of ideas by other ideas
in their struggle for consciousness. Freud adapted repression to the defensive inhibition
of "unbearable" mental contents. Substantial experimental literatures on attentional
biases, thought avoidance, interference, and intentional forgetting exist, the oldest
prototype being the work of Ebbinghaus, who showed that intentional avoidance of memories
results in their progressive forgetting over time. It has now become clear, as clinicians
had claimed, that the inaccessible materials are often available and emerge indirectly
(e.g., procedurally, implicitly). It is also now established that the Ebbinghaus retention
function can be partly reversed, with resulting increases of conscious memory over time
(hypermnesia). Freud's clinical experience revealed early on that exclusion from
consciousness was effected not just by simple repression (inhibition) but also by a
variety of distorting techniques, some deployed to degrade latent contents (denial), all
eventually subsumed under the rubric of defense mechanisms ("repression in the widest
sense"). Freudian and Bartlettian distortions are essentially the same, even in name, but
for motive (cognitive vs. emotional), and experimentally induced false memories and other
"memory illusions" are laboratory analogs of self-induced distortions.
KEYWORDS: Avoidance, Bartlett, Defense, Denial, Distortion, Ebbinghaus, False-Memories,
Freud, Inhibition, Repression, Suppression.
FULL TEXT: http://www.bbsonline.org/Preprints/Erdelyi-04022004/Referees/
==================================================================
* * CALL RESPONSE INSTRUCTIONS * *
==================================================================
Please DO NOT respond to this email. If you wish to submit a proposal for
commentary and/or suggest potential commentators, please go to the new
Online Commentary Proposal System at the following URL:
http://www.bbsonline.org/perl/commentary/commproposal?authordir=Erdelyi-040…
* If you only wish to suggest potential commentators, please ignore prompts to
submit a proposal with expertise information.
* If you experience technical difficulties, please email bbs(a)bbsonline.org.
* Please respond to this Call no later than April 6, 2006
NOTE: Behavioral and Brain Sciences (BBS) is an international, interdisciplinary journal
providing Open Peer Commentary on important and controversial current research in the
biobehavioral and cognitive sciences. Commentators must be BBS Associates, or suggested by
a BBS Associate. If you are not a BBS Associate, please follow the instructions linked
below:
http://www.bbsonline.org/Instructions/associnst.html
==================================================================
==================================================================
Barbara Finlay - Editor
Paul Bloom - Editor
Behavioral and Brain Sciences
bbs(a)bbsonline.org
http://www.bbsonline.org
-------------------------------------------------------------------
Philosophy of Science Colloquium
Department of History and Philosophy of Science
Eotvos Lorand University, Budapest
Room 1.817 (1st floor) Monday 4:00 PM
Pazmany P. setany 1/C Budapest, Hungary
Phone/Fax: (36-1) 372 2924
http://philosophy.elte.hu/colloquium
Program - April
3 April 4:00 PM 1st floor 1.817
Language: Hungarian
Gergely Szekely
Alfred Renyi Institute of Mathematics, Budapest
Az ikerparadoxon logikai analizise
(Logical analysis of the twin's paradox)
Abstract: http://philosophy.elte.hu/colloquium/2006/April/#1
___
10 April 4:00 PM 1st floor 1.817
Language: Hungarian
Janos Tanacs
Department of Philosophy and History of Science
History and Philosophy of Science Research Group of the HAS
Budapest University of Technology and Economics
Mifele kulonbseg? Avagy fogalmi vagy pusztan terminologiai kulonbseg-e a
nem-euklideszi parhuzamossag Bolyai- es Lobacsevszkij-fele meghatarozasa?
(Is there a conceptual or merely a terminological difference between Bolyai's
and Lobatchevsky's definitions of parallelism?)
Abstract: http://philosophy.elte.hu/colloquium/2006/April/#2
___
24 April 4:00 PM 1st floor 1.817
Language: English
Takashi Hashimoto
School of Knowledge Science
Japan Advanced Institute for Science and Technology
On origin and evolution of language - significance of constructive approach
Abstract: http://philosophy.elte.hu/colloquium/2006/April/#4
___________________________________
The colloquium is open to everyone, including students, visitors, and faculty
members from all departments!
The 60-minute lecture is followed by a 10-minute break. Then we hold a
30-60-minute discussion. The participants may comment on the talks and are
encouraged to initiate discussion through the Internet. The comments should
be written in the language of the presentation.
The organizer of the colloquium: Laszlo E. Szabo (email: leszabo(a)hps.elte.hu)
--
L a s z l o E. S z a b o
Theoretical Physics Research Group of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences
Department of History and Philosophy of Science
Eotvos University, Budapest
http://philosophy.elte.hu/leszabo
==================================================================
** CALL RESPONSE INSTRUCTIONS **
==================================================================
Please DO NOT respond to this email. If you wish to submit a proposal for
commentary and/or suggest potential commentators, please go to the new
Online Commentary Proposal System at the following URL:
http://www.bbsonline.org/perl/commentary/commproposal?authordir=Erdelyi-040…
* If you only wish to suggest potential commentators, please ignore prompts to
submit a proposal with expertise information.
* If you experience technical difficulties, please email bbs(a)bbsonline.org.
* Please respond to this Call no later than April 6, 2006
NOTE: Behavioral and Brain Sciences (BBS) is an international, interdisciplinary journal
providing Open Peer Commentary on important and controversial current research in the
biobehavioral and cognitive sciences. Commentators must be BBS Associates, or suggested by
a BBS Associate. If you are not a BBS Associate, please follow the instructions linked
below:
http://www.bbsonline.org/Instructions/associnst.html
==================================================================
CALL FOR COMMENTATORS
==================================================================
"The unified theory of repression" by Matthew Hugh Erdelyi has been accepted for
publication in Behavioral and Brain Sciences (BBS). Calls for Commentators are sent to
over 10,000 BBS Associates, so there is no expectation (indeed, it would be calamitous)
that each recipient should comment on every occasion!
To help you decide whether you would be an appropriate commentator for this article, an
unedited, uncorrected target article is retrievable at the URL that follows the abstract
and keywords below.
Please DO NOT write a commentary unless you receive a formal invitation in the near
future. If you are invited to submit a commentary, a copyedited, corrected version of
this paper will be posted in the commentary invitation letter. The commentary invitation
list is compiled by the Editors so as to balance proposals, areas of expertise, and
frequency of prior commentaries in BBS.
==================================================================
** TARGET ARTICLE INFORMATION **
==================================================================
TITLE: The unified theory of repression
AUTHOR: Matthew Hugh Erdelyi
ABSTRACT: Repression has become an empirical fact that is at once obvious and problematic.
Fragmented clinical and laboratory traditions and disputed terminology have resulted in a
Babel of misunderstandings in which false distinctions are imposed (e.g., between
repression and suppression) and necessary distinctions not drawn (e.g., between the
mechanism and the use to which it is put, defense being just one). "Repression" was
introduced by Herbart to designate the (nondefensive) inhibition of ideas by other ideas
in their struggle for consciousness. Freud adapted repression to the defensive inhibition
of "unbearable" mental contents. Substantial experimental literatures on attentional
biases, thought avoidance, interference, and intentional forgetting exist, the oldest
prototype being the work of Ebbinghaus, who showed that intentional avoidance of memories
results in their progressive forgetting over time. It has now become clear, as clinicians
had claimed, that the inaccessible materials are often available and emerge indirectly
(e.g., procedurally, implicitly). It is also now established that the Ebbinghaus retention
function can be partly reversed, with resulting increases of conscious memory over time
(hypermnesia). Freud's clinical experience revealed early on that exclusion from
consciousness was effected not just by simple repression (inhibition) but also by a
variety of distorting techniques, some deployed to degrade latent contents (denial), all
eventually subsumed under the rubric of defense mechanisms ("repression in the widest
sense"). Freudian and Bartlettian distortions are essentially the same, even in name, but
for motive (cognitive vs. emotional), and experimentally induced false memories and other
"memory illusions" are laboratory analogs of self-induced distortions.
KEYWORDS: Avoidance, Bartlett, Defense, Denial, Distortion, Ebbinghaus, False-Memories,
Freud, Inhibition, Repression, Suppression.
FULL TEXT: http://www.bbsonline.org/Preprints/Erdelyi-04022004/Referees/
==================================================================
* * CALL RESPONSE INSTRUCTIONS * *
==================================================================
Please DO NOT respond to this email. If you wish to submit a proposal for
commentary and/or suggest potential commentators, please go to the new
Online Commentary Proposal System at the following URL:
http://www.bbsonline.org/perl/commentary/commproposal?authordir=Erdelyi-040…
* If you only wish to suggest potential commentators, please ignore prompts to
submit a proposal with expertise information.
* If you experience technical difficulties, please email bbs(a)bbsonline.org.
* Please respond to this Call no later than April 6, 2006
NOTE: Behavioral and Brain Sciences (BBS) is an international, interdisciplinary journal
providing Open Peer Commentary on important and controversial current research in the
biobehavioral and cognitive sciences. Commentators must be BBS Associates, or suggested by
a BBS Associate. If you are not a BBS Associate, please follow the instructions linked
below:
http://www.bbsonline.org/Instructions/associnst.html
==================================================================
==================================================================
Barbara Finlay - Editor
Paul Bloom - Editor
Behavioral and Brain Sciences
bbs(a)bbsonline.org
http://www.bbsonline.org
-------------------------------------------------------------------
------------- Forwarded message follows -------------
Tisztelt Kollégák,
Az MTA nyelvtudományi Intézetben a Kisérletes nyelvészet program
következő előadása március 16-án, csütörtökön 14 órától a földszinti
előadóban:
Jolsvai Hajnal (MTA nyelvtudományi Intézet):
Nyelvfeldolgozás az eseményhez kötött agyi aktivitás vizsgálatok
tükrében
Az új, kísérleti eredményeket bemutató előadásra minden érdeklődőt
szerettel várunk. Az előadás absztraktja az alábbiakban olvasható.
Üdvözlettel,
Bánréti Zoltán
--------------------------
Nyelvfeldolgozás az eseményhez kötött agyi aktivitás vizsgálatok
tükrében
Jolsvai Hajnal
(MTA Nyelvtudományi Intézet)
A nyelvfeldolgozás különböző folyamatai (hangalak, jelentés, szerkezet)
jól követhetőek a minőségileg és funkcionálisan is eltérő esemény
kiváltotta agyi potenciál (EKP) válaszok alapján. A szavak
jelentésének feldolgozását a szókezdettől számított ~250 ms-al induló
és 400 ms körül a centrális elvezetés felett maximális amplitúdóval
jelentkező hullámösszetevő kíséri. Ezt a szemantikai folyamatokkal
korreláló komponenst nevezzük N400-nak.
A mondat szerkezetének feldolgozásával két jellegzetes agyi válasz
korrelál, ezek a szintaktikai feldolgozás eltérő szakaszaihoz köthető
LAN-ok (ELAN, LAN)(Early left anterior negativity/korai elülső
negativitás valamint Left anterort negativity/ Bal elülső negativitás)
és a P600/SPS (Syntictic positive shift) komponens. A LAN az irodalmi
adatok egy része szerint a nyelvi munkamemória folyamataival korrelál,
mások viszont a LAN-t a szintaktikai feldolgozás korai folyamataihoz
kapcsolják. A LAN funkcionális természetére vonatkozó eltérő
álláspontok angol, német és holland kísérleti bizonyítékait
részletesen bemutatom, a LAN-t tesztelő magyar kísérletünk mellett.
Az előadásban a nyelvi komponensek elektorfiziológiai és funkcionális
természetére vonatkozó kísérleti eredmények és legfőbb kritikáik
ismertetése mellett, a területen megfogalmazott, egymással versengő
szériális és párhuzamos feldolgozást támogató modelleket ismertetem.
----------------
MTA Nyelvtudomanyi Intezete
Research Institute for Linguistics,
Hungarian Academy of Sciences
H-1068 Budapest
Benczúr u. 33
tel: 36-1-351-0413
fax: 36-1-322-9297
email: banreti(a)nytud.hu
MTA Nyelvtudomanyi Intezete
Research Institute for Linguistics,
Hungarian Academy of Sciences
H-1068 Budapest
Benczúr u. 33
tel: 36-1-351-0413
fax: 36-1-322-9297
email: banreti(a)nytud.hu
MTA Nyelvtudomanyi Intezete
Research Institute for Linguistics,
Hungarian Academy of Sciences
H-1068 Budapest
Benczúr u. 33
tel: 36-1-351-0413
fax: 36-1-322-9297
email: banreti(a)nytud.hu
Tisztelt Kollégák,
Az MTA nyelvtudományi Intézetben a Kisérletes nyelvészet program
következő előadása március 16-án, csütörtökön 14 órától a földszinti
előadóban:
Jolsvai Hajnal (MTA nyelvtudományi Intézet):
Nyelvfeldolgozás az eseményhez kötött agyi aktivitás vizsgálatok
tükrében
Az új, kísérleti eredményeket bemutató előadásra minden érdeklődőt
szerettel várunk. Az előadás absztraktja az alábbiakban olvasható.
Üdvözlettel,
Bánréti Zoltán
--------------------------
Nyelvfeldolgozás az eseményhez kötött agyi aktivitás vizsgálatok
tükrében
Jolsvai Hajnal
(MTA Nyelvtudományi Intézet)
A nyelvfeldolgozás különböző folyamatai (hangalak, jelentés, szerkezet)
jól követhetőek a minőségileg és funkcionálisan is eltérő esemény
kiváltotta agypotenciál (EKP) válaszok alapján. A szavak jelentésének
feldolgozását a szókezdettől számított ~250 ms-al induló és 400 ms
körül a centrális elvezetés felett maximális amplitúdóval jelentkező
hullámösszetevő kíséri. Ezt a szemantikai folyamatokkal korreláló
komponenst nevezzük N400-nak.
A mondat szerkezetének feldolgozásával két jellegzetes agyi válasz
korrelál, ezek a szintaktikai feldolgozás eltérő szakaszaihoz köthető
LAN-ok (ELAN, LAN)(Early left anterior negativity/korai elülső
negativitás valamint Left anterort negativity/ Bal elülső negativitás)
és a P600/SPS (Syntictic positive shift) komponens. A LAN az irodalmi
adatok egy része szerint a nyelvi munkamemória folyamataival korrelál,
mások viszont a LAN-t a szintaktikai feldolgozás korai folyamataihoz
kapcsolják. A LAN funkcionális természetére vonatkozó eltérő
álláspontok angol, német és holland kísérleti bizonyítékait
részletesen bemutatom, a LAN-t tesztelő magyar kísérletünk mellett.
Az előadásban a nyelvi komponensek elektorfiziológiai és funkcionális
természetére vonatkozó kísérleti eredmények és legfőbb kritikáik
ismertetése mellett, a területen megfogalmazott, egymással versengő
szériális és párhuzamos feldolgozást támogató modelleket ismertetem.
----------------
MTA Nyelvtudomanyi Intezete
Research Institute for Linguistics,
Hungarian Academy of Sciences
H-1068 Budapest
Benczúr u. 33
tel: 36-1-351-0413
fax: 36-1-322-9297
email: banreti(a)nytud.hu
MTA Nyelvtudomanyi Intezete
Research Institute for Linguistics,
Hungarian Academy of Sciences
H-1068 Budapest
Benczúr u. 33
tel: 36-1-351-0413
fax: 36-1-322-9297
email: banreti(a)nytud.hu
Philosophy of Science Colloquium
Department of History and Philosophy of Science
Eotvos Lorand University, Budapest
Room 1.817 (1st floor) Monday 4:00 PM
Pazmany P. setany 1/C Budapest, Hungary
Phone/Fax: (36-1) 372 2924
http://philosophy.elte.hu/colloquium
20 March 4:00 PM 1st floor 1.817
Language: English
Laszlo E. Szabo
Theoretical Physics Research Group
Department of History and Philosophy of Science
Eotvos Lorand University, Budapest
The metaphysical basis of logic and mathematics
(A physicalist approach)
Abstract: http://philosophy.elte.hu/colloquium/2006/March/#3
___________________________________
The colloquium is open to everyone, including students, visitors, and faculty
members from all departments!
The 60-minute lecture is followed by a 10-minute break. Then we hold a
30-60-minute discussion. The participants may comment on the talks and are
encouraged to initiate discussion through the Internet. The comments should
be written in the language of the presentation.
The organizer of the colloquium: Laszlo E. Szabo (email: leszabo(a)hps.elte.hu)
--
L a s z l o E. S z a b o
Theoretical Physics Research Group of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences
Department of History and Philosophy of Science
Eotvos University, Budapest
http://hps.elte.hu/leszabo
This talk has been rescheduled for the second time, please note the
FINAL time below:
To avoid confusion I'll resend this announcement once more before the
time comes.
Hope to see you there!
Zoltán Jakab
*Katalin Balog*
Department of Philosophy, Yale University
The Quotational Account of Phenomenal Concepts
12 April, 2006 (Wednesday) 5 PM
CEU Department of Philosophy, 1051 Budapest, Zrínyi u. 14, 4th floor,
rm. 412.
The central /metaphysical/ question in the philosophy of mind is
whether mental phenomena- intentionality and phenomenal consciousness-
are ultimately /physical/biological /phenomena or whether they are or
involve fundamental aspects of reality that transcend the physical and
biological. Most contemporary philosophers and neuro-scientists reject
dualism because - among other difficulties - it cannot account for how
consciousness causally interacts with physical events including
behavior. The central /explanatory /issue is whether mental phenomena -
even if they are physical - can be explained in terms of more basic
physical/biological phenomena. While there has been some progress with
respect to understanding intentional and rational features of mentality
in biological/physical terms we still have no idea of how the subjective
experience - /the what its like -/ of seeing a sunset can emerge from a
brain process. The situation with respect to subjective experience
contrasts, for example, with the way we can understand (although many
details are lacking) how the complex organization of molecules can
constitute cells and how cells can constitute living organisms, and in
general, how chemical processes can give rise to biological phenomena.
There seems to be something about consciousness that /resists/
scientific explanation. Lacking a physicalist account of consciousness,
a defense of physicalism needs to explain the existence of this
explanatory gap in a way that is compatible with the truth of physicalism.
<> On my account, our lack of understanding the psychophysical
connection, the /explanatory gap/, is not due to consciousness being
non-physical but rather to the special nature of the /concepts /via
which we represent our subjective experiences to ourselves. My view is
that these concepts are partly /constituted/ by the experiences they
represent. This view has recently become popular among physicalists who
accept the existence of the explanatory gap. However, proponents of the
constitutional theory of phenomenal concepts have to offer and account
of how the reference of phenomenal concepts are determined. After all,
constitution doesn't make for reference in most cases. The concept DOG
is not constituted by dogs, and the fact that the concept ATOM /is/
constituted by atoms has nothing to do with why it refers to atoms. It
seems to me plausible that one must look to the /conceptual role /of
phenomenal concepts for an explanation of their self-referential nature.
The idea of an item partly constituting a representation that refers to that item is reminiscent of how linguistic quotation works.
The referent of "__" is exemplified by whatever fills in the blank. My proposal is that there is a concept forming mechanism that operates on
an experience and turns it into a phenomenal concept that refers to a type of experience where the type is qualitative property (a qualia) of
the experience. Further, the operation, like linguistic quotation, can be explained in terms of its conceptual roles.
* *
*BMS home page:* http://philosophy.elte.hu/bms
*Inquiries:* zjakab(a)cogsci.bme.hu <mailto:zjakab@cogsci.bme.hu>
Dear Sir/ Madame!
We would like to inform You that from 15th till 18th March 2007 there will
be held at Wroclaw University, Poland 1st Symposium of Pedagogy and
Psychology PhD Students.
The originators and administrators of the assembly are PhD students from
University of Wrocław.
The main aim of the symposium will be the comparison of experiences and
knowledge between different academic centres in the area of current
scientific investigations in pedagogy and psychology.
With regard to the ideas and views exchange among different scientific
societies from Europe and Asia, we would like to invite PhD students,
representing your university to participation in our conference.
In the attachment we are sending all the details concerning symposium. We
would like also to ask you for spreading this information among your
students.
Thank you for Your consideration.
Yours Truly,
Alicja Osio