tomorrow at 4 pm.
Dear all,
The CEU Department of Cognitive Science invites you to the following talk:
Philippe Schlenker (Institut Jean-Nicod, CNRS; New York University)
Meaning After the Multimodal Revolution: Iconological Semantics
It has long been accepted that sign language (i) employs the same logical structures as
spoken language (occasionally making its abstract components overt), and simultaneously
(ii) makes extensive use of iconicity. But the articulation between these two modules has
only been discussed piecemeal. Based on new data from American Sign Language (ASL), we
argue that natural language semantics must be extended with a pictorial component, one
that makes crucial use of the semantics of pictures recently developed by Gabriel
Greenberg and Dorit Abusch. The result, which we call ‘iconological semantics’, offers a
new integration of logical and iconic semantics, as well as a new perspective on the
foundations of meaning in natural language.
A key argument for iconological semantics lies in some constructions, called classifier
predicates, which are lexically specified as having a pictorial semantics. Just like for a
picture, their truth-conditional contribution is evaluated with respect to a viewpoint. We
argue that in ASL, the viewpoint is determined by a viewpoint variable, which may be left
free or existentially quantified, in which case it yields a remarkable interaction with
logical operators.
We also show that the pictorial semantics of classifier predicates has consequences for
their syntax. Classifier predicates often override the basic SVO order of ASL, yielding
preverbal objects instead, but crucially this is only true to the extent that the denoted
object is typically visible before the action (e.g. x ate up y). This is in essence
because the classifier predicate creates a visual animation of the denoted scene. When the
object is visible only *after* the action (e.g. x spit out y), an SVO order is regained.
In sum, the proposed framework accounts both for the syntax and semantics of classifier
predicates, as well as for their integration within larger Logical Forms. (This analysis
can be extended to offer an account of some viewpoint-sensitive gestures in spoken
language, as well as their syntax; and it can be refined by adopting a more accurate view
of the 3D and dynamic contribution of classifier predicates and iconic gestures.)
Optional readings [they will not be presupposed]
[General audience] On sign language semantics: Schlenker, What it All Means, Chapter 2.
Pre-print:
https://www.dropbox.com/s/vxi81q1hgy4xkmr/Schlenker-What%20it%20All%20Means…
[Research-level; partly technical] On iconological semantics: Schlenker and Lamberton (to
appear, Linguistics & Philosophy), ‘Iconological Semantics’:
https://ling.auf.net/lingbuzz/007048
[Research-level; partly technical] On iconic syntax: Schlenker et al. (to appear,
Linguistics & Philosophy), ‘Iconic Syntax’:
https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10988-023-09388-z,
https://ling.auf.net/lingbuzz/006060
Date: Wednesday, Jan 31, 2024
Time: 4 pm (to 5:30 pm) CET
Venue: D002* (QS Vienna) and Zoom (meeting ID: 969 2496
5784<https://ceu-edu.zoom.us/j/96924965784?pwd=c2duZ0dDMFdEMUthK2Mwa2wzMllEUT09>,
passcode: 471712)
Chair: Gergley Csibra
*Anyone not affiliated with CEU wishing to attend in-person in Vienna must RSVP
here<https://forms.microsoft.com/e/nhwe0D3DZ7> to get access to the lecture hall.
If you want to schedule a meeting with Philippe, please indicate your availability
here<https://doodle.com/meeting/participate/id/b4W4WRJa>Ja>!
Best,
Bartu
________________________________
From: Salih Bartug Celik
Sent: Thursday, 25 January 2024 09:02
To: talks(a)cogsci.ceu.edu <talks(a)cogsci.ceu.edu>
Subject: [CEU Cogsci Talks] CDC Seminar:Philippe Schlenker (Institut Jean-Nicod, CNRS; New
York University), Wednesday January 31, 4 pm
Dear all,
The CEU Department of Cognitive Science invites you to the following talk:
Philippe Schlenker (Institut Jean-Nicod, CNRS; New York University)
Meaning After the Multimodal Revolution: Iconological Semantics
It has long been accepted that sign language (i) employs the same logical structures as
spoken language (occasionally making its abstract components overt), and simultaneously
(ii) makes extensive use of iconicity. But the articulation between these two modules has
only been discussed piecemeal. Based on new data from American Sign Language (ASL), we
argue that natural language semantics must be extended with a pictorial component, one
that makes crucial use of the semantics of pictures recently developed by Gabriel
Greenberg and Dorit Abusch. The result, which we call ‘iconological semantics’, offers a
new integration of logical and iconic semantics, as well as a new perspective on the
foundations of meaning in natural language.
A key argument for iconological semantics lies in some constructions, called classifier
predicates, which are lexically specified as having a pictorial semantics. Just like for a
picture, their truth-conditional contribution is evaluated with respect to a viewpoint. We
argue that in ASL, the viewpoint is determined by a viewpoint variable, which may be left
free or existentially quantified, in which case it yields a remarkable interaction with
logical operators.
We also show that the pictorial semantics of classifier predicates has consequences for
their syntax. Classifier predicates often override the basic SVO order of ASL, yielding
preverbal objects instead, but crucially this is only true to the extent that the denoted
object is typically visible before the action (e.g. x ate up y). This is in essence
because the classifier predicate creates a visual animation of the denoted scene. When the
object is visible only *after* the action (e.g. x spit out y), an SVO order is regained.
In sum, the proposed framework accounts both for the syntax and semantics of classifier
predicates, as well as for their integration within larger Logical Forms. (This analysis
can be extended to offer an account of some viewpoint-sensitive gestures in spoken
language, as well as their syntax; and it can be refined by adopting a more accurate view
of the 3D and dynamic contribution of classifier predicates and iconic gestures.)
Optional readings [they will not be presupposed]
[General audience] On sign language semantics: Schlenker, What it All Means, Chapter 2.
Pre-print:
https://www.dropbox.com/s/vxi81q1hgy4xkmr/Schlenker-What%20it%20All%20Means…
[Research-level; partly technical] On iconological semantics: Schlenker and Lamberton (to
appear, Linguistics & Philosophy), ‘Iconological Semantics’:
https://ling.auf.net/lingbuzz/007048
[Research-level; partly technical] On iconic syntax: Schlenker et al. (to appear,
Linguistics & Philosophy), ‘Iconic Syntax’:
https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10988-023-09388-z,
https://ling.auf.net/lingbuzz/006060
Date: Wednesday, Jan 31, 2024
Time: 4 pm (to 5:30 pm) CET
Venue: D002* (QS Vienna) and Zoom (meeting ID: 969 2496
5784<https://ceu-edu.zoom.us/j/96924965784?pwd=c2duZ0dDMFdEMUthK2Mwa2wzMllEUT09>,
passcode: 471712)
Chair: Gergley Csibra
*Anyone not affiliated with CEU wishing to attend in-person in Vienna must RSVP
here<https://forms.microsoft.com/e/nhwe0D3DZ7> to get access to the lecture hall.
If you want to schedule a meeting with Philippe, please indicate your availability
here<https://doodle.com/meeting/participate/id/b4W4WRJa>Ja>!
Best,
Bartu
______________________________________________
Subscribe by sending an empty mail to talks-subscribe(a)cogsci.ceu.edu
Unsubscribe by sending an empty mail to talks-unsubscribe(a)cogsci.ceu.edu