Dear Dr. Qwerty,
==================================================================
*** CALL RESPONSE INSTRUCTIONS ***
==================================================================
Please DO NOT respond to this email. Please note that this is NOT a formal invitation. If
you wish to submit a proposal for commentary and/or suggest potential commentators,
please go to the Online Commentary Proposal System at the following URL:
http://www.bbsonline.org/perl/commentary/commproposal?authordir=Leech-11062…
* If you only wish to suggest potential commentators, please ignore prompts to
submit a proposal with expertise information.
* If you experience technical difficulties, please email bbs(a)bbsonline.org.
* Please respond to this Call no later than November 20, 2007
NOTE: Behavioral and Brain Sciences (BBS) is an international, interdisciplinary journal
providing Open Peer Commentary on important and controversial current research in the
biobehavioral and cognitive sciences. Commentators must be BBS Associates, or suggested
by a BBS Associate. If you are not a BBS Associate, please follow the instructions linked
below:
http://www.bbsonline.org/Instructions/associnst.html
==================================================================
** Target Article Information **
==================================================================
To help you decide whether you would be an appropriate commentator for this article, an
unedited, uncorrected target article is retrievable at the URL that follows the abstract
and keywords below. This unedited draft has been prepared only for potential commentators
who wish to nominate themselves for formal commentary invitation. Please DO NOT write a
commentary until you receive a formal invitation. If you are invited to submit a
commentary, a copyedited, corrected version of this paper will be posted in the
invitation letter. The commentary invitation list is compiled by the Editors so as to
balance proposals, areas of expertise, and frequency of prior commentaries in BBS.
TITLE: Analogy as relational priming: A developmental and computational perspective on
the origins of a complex cognitive skill
AUTHORS: Robert Leech, Denis Mareschal, and Richard P. Cooper
ABSTRACT: The development of analogical reasoning has traditionally been understood in
terms of theories of adult competence. This approach emphasizes structured
representations and structure mapping. In contrast, we argue that by taking a
developmental perspective, analogical reasoning can be viewed as the product of a
substantially different cognitive ability relational priming. To illustrate this, we
present a computational (here connectionist) account where analogy arises gradually as a
bi-product of pattern completion in a recurrent network. Initial exposure to a situation
primes a relation that can then be applied to a novel situation to make an analogy.
Relations are represented as transformations between states. The network exhibits
behaviors consistent with a broad range of key phenomena from the developmental
literature, lending support to the appropriateness of this approach (using low-level
cognitive mechanisms) for investigating a domain that has normally been the preserve of
high-level models. Furthermore, we present an additional simulation that integrates the
relational priming mechanism with deliberative controlled use of inhibition to
demonstrate how the framework can be extended to complex analogical reasoning, such as
the data from explicit mapping studies in the adult literature. This account highlights
how taking a developmental perspective constrains the theory construction and cognitive
modeling processes in a way that differs substantially from that based purely on adult
studies, and illustrates how a putative complex cognitive skill can emerge out of a
simple mechanism.
KEYWORDS: Analogical reasoning; cognitive development; relational priming;
transformation similarity; connectionism.
FULL TEXT:
http://www.bbsonline.org/Preprints/Leech-11062006/Referees/
==================================================================
*** CALL RESPONSE INSTRUCTIONS ***
==================================================================
Please DO NOT respond to this email. Please note that this is NOT a formal invitation. If
you wish to submit a proposal for commentary and/or suggest potential commentators,
please go to the Online Commentary Proposal System at the following URL:
http://www.bbsonline.org/perl/commentary/commproposal?authordir=Leech-11062…
* If you only wish to suggest potential commentators, please ignore prompts to
submit a proposal with expertise information.
* If you experience technical difficulties, please email bbs(a)bbsonline.org.
* Please respond to this Call no later than November 20, 2007
NOTE: Behavioral and Brain Sciences (BBS) is an international, interdisciplinary journal
providing Open Peer Commentary on important and controversial current research in the
biobehavioral and cognitive sciences. Commentators must be BBS Associates, or suggested
by a BBS Associate. If you are not a BBS Associate, please follow the instructions
linked below:
http://www.bbsonline.org/Instructions/associnst.html
==================================================================
==================================================================
Barbara Finlay - Editor
Paul Bloom - Editor
Behavioral and Brain Sciences
bbs(a)bbsonline.org
http://www.bbsonline.org
-------------------------------------------------------------------