Dear Dr. Qwerty:
We wrote to you a few weeks ago to announce that BBS had accepted an article by Dr. Evan
Charney for open peer commentary in BBS. We are writing once more to remind you that, if
you want to submit a commentary proposal but haven't yet, we're still accepting
commentary proposals----until Wednesday January 25th. If you are interested in writing a
commentary, you are welcome to submit a short proposal (see instructions below). No action
is required if you aren't interested.
Please DO NOT submit a full commentary article unless you are formally invited---AFTER you
submit a commentary *proposal*. We will review all commentary proposals and issue
invitations around the end of February. Also, please be aware that we typically receive
far more commentary proposals than we can accommodate with formal invitations. When
choosing invitations, we balance over multiple factors, including the interest of the
commentary itself, the commentator's expertise, whether the commentator's work has
been discussed in the target article, and other considerations.
If you have any questions, please email bbsjournal(a)cambridge.org.
NOW PROCESSING COMMENTARY PROPOSALS ON:
Target Article: "Behavior genetics and post genomics"
Authors: Evan Charney
Deadline for Commentary Proposals: January 25, 2012
Abstract: The science of genetics is undergoing a paradigm shift. Recent discoveries,
including the activity of retrotransposons, the extent of copy number variations, somatic
and chromosomal mosaicism, and the nature of the epigenome as a regulator of DNA
expressivity, are challenging a series of dogmas concerning the nature of the genome and
the relationship between genotype and phenotype. DNA, once held to be the unchanging
template of heredity, now appears subject to a good deal of environmental change;
considered to be identical in all cells and tissues of the body, there is growing evidence
that somatic mosaicism is the normal human condition; and treated as the sole biological
agent of heritability, we now know that the epigenome, which regulates gene expressivity,
can be inherited via the germline. These developments are particularly significant for
behavior genetics for at least three reasons: First, these phenomena appear to be
particularly prevalent in the
human brain, and likely are involved in much of human behavior; second, they have
important implications for the validity of heritability and gene association studies, the
methodologies that largely define the discipline of behavior genetics; and third, they
appear to play a critical role in development during the perinatal period, and in enabling
phenotypic plasticity in offspring in particular. I examine one of the central claims to
emerge from the use of heritability studies in the behavioral sciences, the principle of
"minimal shared maternal effects," in light of the growing awareness that the
maternal perinatal environment is a critical venue for the exercise of adaptive phenotypic
plasticity. This consideration has important implications for both developmental and
evolutionary biology.
Keywords: genetics, behavior genetics, heritability, epigenetics, twin studies, gene
association studies, developmental biology, phenotypic plasticity, evolutionary
developmental biology, evo-devo, maternal effects, stochasticity
Download Target Article
Preprint:http://journals.cambridge.org/BBSJournal/Call/Charney_preprint
COMMENTARY PROPOSALS *MUST* INCLUDE THE FOLLOWING
1. What aspect of the target article or book you would anticipate commenting on.
2. The relevant expertise you would bring to bear on the target article or book.
Please include names and affiliations of your co-authors, if applicable, in the text of
your commentary proposal.
SUGGESTING COMMENTATORS AND NOMINATING BBS ASSOCIATES
Commentators must be BBS Associates, or suggested by a BBS Associate. If you are not a BBS
Associate, please follow the instructions below. To suggest others as possible
Commentators, or to nominate others for BBS Associateship status, please email
bbsjournal(a)cambridge.org.
http://journals.cambridge.org/BBSJournal/Inst/Assoc
HOW TO SUBMIT A COMMENTARY PROPOSAL
If you would like to nominate yourself for potential commentary invitation, you must
submit a Commentary Proposal via our BBS Editorial Manager site:
1. Log-in as Author
Username: CQwerty-545
Password: Qwerty875632
Log-in to your BBS Editorial Manager account as an author:
http://www.editorialmanager.com/bbs
If you do not have an account, please visit the site and register. You can also submit a
request for missing username and password information if you have an existing account.
2. Submit New Manuscript
Within your author main menu please select Submit New Manuscript.
3. Select Article Type
Choose the article type of your manuscript from the pull-down menu. Commentary Proposal
article types are temporarily created for each accepted target article or book. Only
select the Commentary Proposal article type that you wish to submit a proposal on. For
example: "Commentary Proposal (Charney)"
4. Enter Title
Please title your proposal submission by indicating the relevant first author name of the
target article or book. For example: "Commentary Proposal on Charney"
5. Add Co-Authors
If you are proposing to write a commentary with any co-authors, the system will not allow
you to enter their information here. Instead, include their names in the commentary
proposal document you upload. These potential co-authors need not contribute to the
Commentary Proposal itself.
6. Attach Files
The only required submission Item is your Commentary Proposal in MSWord or RTF format. In
the Description field please add the first author name of the target article or book. For
example: "Commentary Proposal on Charney"
7. Approve Your Submission
Editorial Manager will process your Commentary Proposal submission and will create a PDF
for your approval. On the "Submissions Waiting for Author's Approval" page,
you can view your PDF, edit, approve, or remove the submission. (You might have to wait
several minutes for the blue "Action" menu to appear, allowing you to approve.
Once you have Approved the Submission, the PDF will be sent to the editorial office.
**It is VERY important that you check and approve your Commentary Proposal manuscript as
described above. Otherwise, we cannot process your submission.**
8. Editorial Office Decision
At the conclusion of the Commentary Proposal period, the editors will review all the
submitted Commentary Proposals. An undetermined number of Commentary Proposals will be
approved and those author names will be added to the final commentary invitation list. At
that time you will be notified of the decision. If you are formally invited to submit a
commentary, you will be asked to confirm your intention to submit by the commentary
deadline.
Note: Before the commentary invitations are sent, the copy-edited and revised target
article will be posted for invitees. In the case of Multiple Book Review, invitees will be
sent a copy of the book to be commented upon if requested. With Multiple Book Reviews, it
is the book, not the précis article that is the target of commentary.
Please do not write a commentary unless you have received an official invitation!
BEING REMOVED FROM THE CALL EMAIL LIST
If you DO NOT wish to receive Call for Commentary Proposals in the future, please reply to
bbsjournal(a)cambridge.org, and type "remove" in the subject line.
Regards,
Gennifer Levey
Managing Editor, BBS
Cambridge University Press
bbsjournal(a)cambridge.org
http://journals.cambridge.org/bbs
http://bbs.edmgr.com/