Kedves Kognitiv Nepek !
Mig mi itt az eletet szervezzuk, csendben megjelent Kampis gyorgz es
Kavetzky Peter veretes forditasaban:
Danile Dennett: Darwin veszelyes ideaja.
Typotex.
Igen olcso, csak 266 Forint. E helyett azonban aki elore kp. kifizet
Kurgyis kolleganak 2000 Ft-ot az annyiert kapja.
kurgyis(a)izabell.elte.hu levelcimen lehet erdeklodni, egyebkent
izabella 46, III. e., 311
Ja, es gondolom addigra Jozsi azt is kifundalja, hogy mekkora
kedvezmenyt ad az Osiris a szinten most megjeklent masik Dennettre:
Az intencionalitas filozofiaja. Bolti ara: 1120 Ft. Egyedi
valogatas, nem azonos az Intentional Stance konyvvel, bar
atfedesek vannak.
Mindenkit udvozlok CsabaCsaba Pleh
associate professor
Dept General Psychology Eotvos Lorand U
Budapest 64 P.O. Box 4 Hungary 1378
T.: 36 13423130 Fax: 36 13423109 Home: 36 23453933
Below is the abstract of the Precis of a book that will shortly be
circulated for Multiple Book Review in Behavioral and Brain
Sciences (BBS):
BIOLOGY, FREEDOM, DETERMINISM
PRECIS FOR BBS MULTIPLE REVIEW
by Steven Rose
http://www.cogsci.soton.ac.uk/bbs/Archive/bbs.rose.html
or
ftp://ftp.princeton.edu/pub/harnad/BBS/.WWW/bbs.rose.html
BBS is an international, interdisciplinary journal providing Open Peer
Commentary on important and controversial current research in the
biobehavioral and cognitive sciences.
Reviewers must be BBS Associates or nominated by a BBS Associate. To
be considered as a reviewer for this book, to suggest other
appropriate reviewers, or for information about how to become a BBS
Associate, please send EMAIL to:
bbs(a)cogsci.soton.ac.uk
or write to:
Behavioral and Brain Sciences
Department of Psychology
University of Southampton
Highfield, Southampton
SO17 1BJ UNITED KINGDOM
http://www.princeton.edu/~harnad/bbs/http://www.cogsci.soton.ac.uk/bbs/ftp://ftp.princeton.edu/pub/harnad/BBS/
ftp://ftp.cogsci.soton.ac.uk/pub/bbs/
gopher://gopher.princeton.edu:70/11/.libraries/.pujournals
If you are not a BBS Associate, please send your CV and the name of a
BBS Associate (there are currently over 10,000 worldwide) who is
familiar with your work. All past BBS authors, referees and commentators
are eligible to become BBS Associates.
To help us put together a balanced list of commentators, please give
some indication of the aspects of the topic on which you would bring
your areas of expertise to bear if you were selected as a commentator.
An electronic draft of the full text is available for inspection
with a WWW browser, anonymous ftp or gopher according to the
instructions that follow after the abstract.
Please note that it is the book, not the Precis, that is to be reviewed.
It would be helpful if you indicated in your reply whether you already
have the book or would require a copy.
____________________________________________________________________
LIFELINES: BIOLOGY, FREEDOM, DETERMINISM
PRECIS FOR BBS MULTIPLE REVIEW
Steven Rose
Professor of Biology and Director of the Brain
and Behaviour Research Group
Open University
Milton Keynes MK7 6AA
UK
s.p.r.rose(a)open.ac.uk
KEYWORDS: Neurogenetics, Homeodynamics; evolutionary theory,
reductionism, ultra-Darwinism, autopoiesis; Metabolic webs,
self-organisation; developmental trajectories; Human behaviour
ABSTRACT: There are many ways of describing and explaining the
properties of living systems; causal, functional and reductive
accounts are all necessary, but no one has primacy. The history
of biology as a discipline has given excessive authority to
reductionism, which collapses higher level accounts, such as
social or behavioural, into molecular ones. Such reductionism
becomes crudely ideological when applied to the human condition
with its claims for genes 'for' everything from sexual
orientation to compulsive shopping. The current enthusiasm for
genetic and ultraDarwinist accounts, with their selfish gene
metaphors for living processes misunderstand both the phenomena
of development and the interactive role that DNA and the fluid
genome play in the cellular orchestra. DNA is not a blueprint,
and the four dimensions of life (three of space, one of time)
cannot be read off from its one-dimensional strand. Both
developmental and evolutionary processes are more than merely
instructive or selective; the organism constructs itself, a
process known as autopoiesis, through a lifeline trajectory.
Because organisms are thermodynamically open systems, living
processes are homeodynamic, not homeostatic. The self-organising
membrane-bound and energy-utilising metabolic web of the cell
must have evolved prior to so-called naked replicators.
Evolution is constrained by physics, chemistry and structure;
not all change is powered by natural selection, and not all
phenotypes are adaptive. Finally, therefore, living processes
are radically indeterminate; we, like but to an even greater
degree than all other living organisms, make our own future,
though in circumstances not of our own choosing.
--------------------------------------------------------------
To help you decide whether you would be an appropriate commentator for
this article, an electronic draft is retrievable from the World Wide
Web or by anonymous ftp or gopher from the US or UK BBS Archive.
Ftp instructions follow below. Please do not prepare a commentary on
this draft. Just let us know, after having inspected it, what relevant
expertise you feel you would bring to bear on what aspect of the
article.
The URLs you can use to get to the BBS Archive:
http://www.princeton.edu/~harnad/bbs/http://www.cogsci.soton.ac.uk/bbs/Archive/bbs.rose.htmlftp://ftp.princeton.edu/pub/harnad/BBS/bbs.rose
ftp://ftp.cogsci.soton.ac.uk/pub/bbs/Archive/bbs.rose
gopher://gopher.princeton.edu:70/11/.libraries/.pujournals
To retrieve a file by ftp from an Internet site, type either:
ftp ftp.princeton.edu
or
ftp 128.112.128.1
When you are asked for your login, type:
anonymous
Enter password as queried (your password is your actual userid:
yourlogin(a)yourhost.whatever.whatever - be sure to include the "@")
cd /pub/harnad/BBS
To show the available files, type:
ls
Next, retrieve the file you want with (for example):
get bbs.rose
When you have the file(s) you want, type:
quit
Kedves Kollegak!
1999 junius 27 es julius 3 kozott rendezzuk Budapesten az ICON 7
(International Conference on Cognitive Neuroscience) konferenciat. A
konferenciasorozat azokat a szakembereket gyujti ossze, akik
neurofiziologiai modszereket alkalmaznak megismeresi folyamtok
tanulmanyozasara. A konferenciaval kapcsolatban szivesen adunk
tovabbi felvilagositast.
Elozetes regisztracios lehetosegek:
http://www.cogpsyphy.hu/icon/prereg.html
WWW hozzaferes hianyaban az icon(a)cogpsyphy.hu cimre irt levelre
valaszkent kuldunk regisztracios urlapot, melyet e-mail-en kerunk
visszakuldeni.
Czigler Istvan, Csepe Valeria, Karmos Gyorgy,
Molnar Mark es Winkler Istvan
Az ICON 7 szervezoi
--
Istvan Czigler PhD DSc
Institute for Psychology of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences
Mail: P.O.Box 398 H-1394 Budapest, Hungary Phone: (36-1) 1533 244
Fax: (36-1) 2692 972 e-mail: czigler(a)CogPsyPhy.hu
A Filozofia Doktoriskola logika programtagozatanak orai az oszi felevben:
Bevezetes a kategoriaelmeletbe
Sain Ildiko tud. fmts.
(sain(a)math-inst.hu, MTA Mat. Kut. Int., 1364 Bp. Pf. 127)
A matematika hagyomanyos megalapozasa arra koncentralt, hogy egyaltalan
korrekt megalapozas letrejojjon. A kategoriaelmeleti alapozas viszont,
szellemeben, sokkal inkabb filozofiailag motivalt. Az utobbinal az
uralkodo kerdesfelteves az, hogy ``jo fogalmat hasznalunk-e''. A
kategoriaelmelet valamilyen foku ismerete nelkulozhetetlen annak, aki
foglalkozni kivan a matematika filozofiai kerdeseivel. Megemlitjuk
meg, hogy mivel a strukturalizmus mint tudomanyfilozofiai iranyzat a
kategoriaelmeletre epul, a strukturalizmus irant erdeklodoknek is
ajanljuk a kategoriaelmelet tanulmanyozasat.
Matematikafilozofia szeminarium
Charles Parsons vendegprofesszor
Mate Andras docens
A felev temaja a matematika strukturalista filozofiaja. Ez az
iranyzat, bar fontos elozmenyei vannak, az utobbi tiz evben bontakozott
ki. Viszonylag kevesse fugg ossze a Bourbaki-kor korabbi, azonos cimke
alatt futo elkepzeleseivel. Lenyege az, hogy a matematika objektumait
es a veluk kapcsolatos ontologiai kerdeseket masodlagosaknak tekinti,
azt allitvan, hogy ilyen objektumokra kizarolag valamilyen struktura
kontextusaban van ertelme hivatkozni, a matematika sajatossaga pedig
eppen ezeknek a strukturaknak a tanulmanyozasa. A strukturalizmussal
osszefuggesben kerult eloterbe az a lehetoseg, hogy a matematika
alapjainak kutatasaban ne a halmazelmelet, hanem a kategoriaelmelet
legyen a kiindulopont.
A ket kurzus kozos oramegbeszelese: szept. 10 du. 2.,
Bolcseszkar Logika tanszek
Pesti B. u. 1. A ep. felem. 24.
Erdeklodoknek keresre kuldok teljesebb kurzusleirast.
mate andras
==============================================================================
Andras Mate CSc, assoc. prof. -- Dept. of Symbolic Logic
Lorand Eotvos University Budapest, Faculty of Arts and Humanities
H-1364 Budapest, POB 107
Phone: (36 1) 266 9100/5328 -- TAD/Fax: (36 1) 266 41 95
e-mail:mate@isis.elte.hu
Home: H-1119 Budapest, Nandorfehervar koz 11 / Phone: (36 1) 204 0489
Rejected message: sent to koglist(a)cogpsyphy.hu by GK(a)CAESAR.ELTE.HU follows.
Reason for rejection: sender not subscribed.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Kedves Kollegak,
annak akit illet>
Tanszekunk a TTK Lagymanyosi campusara koltozott, ahol folyik az
infrastruktura kiepitese. Lopas miatt hatrahagyott szerverunk is
leszakadt, ezt kobaltaval vesem bele az eterbe. Ha le tudom szedni
a cimlistaimat valahonnan, akkor irok direk is, egyelore
kulon ertesites helyett>
minden oram, megbeszelesem etc. szept 21. utan kezdodik ill. lesz,
addig surgos esetben tel. 209 0555/6688 titkarno, mas telefon nincs,
vagz otthon 29 na, 200 9635, nincs delete .
Ez egyebkent a TTK hivatalos kezdesi ideje az erintett egysegek
reszere, tehat ne tessek aggodni, nem lustasag vagy mas egyeni
akvcio ez.
Elnezest a formatlan elvelert, aki tudja adja at etc
udv kgy
--
Gergely Csibra Medical Research Council
Research Scientist Cognitive Development Unit
g.csibra(a)cdu.ucl.ac.uk 4 Taviton Street
tel: (44) 171 387 4692 London WC1H 0BT
fax: (44) 171 383 0398 United Kingdom
As of October 1, 1998:
Centre for Brain & Cognitive Development
Department of Psychology
Birkbeck College
32 Torrington Square
London WC1E 7HX
United Kingdom
Kedves Ifjusdag es erdeklodok !
Az ELTE Kognitiv Doktori alprogrammjaiban nehany kozerdeklodser is
aszonmt tarthato ora (mas is van ez most ami a kezemben van).
A nyelv neuropszichologiaja. Szamos eloadoval. Keressetek Konya Anikot
Michael Harnish: Introduction to cognition. csutortok, 13 - 14H30.
talalkozo Pleh Csaba szobajanal, elso ora: 1998. szeptember 10.
Angol nyelven, egyedi tematikaval.
Konya Aniko: Narrativ kutatas. megbesz. szerint.
Gergely Gyorgy: Erzelem es megismeres. Megbesz. szerint.
Pleh Csaba: A reprezentacio fogalmi kerdesei. hetfo 4-6, 201.
Udv PlehCsaba Pleh
associate professor
Dept General Psychology Eotvos Lorand U
Budapest 64 P.O. Box 4 Hungary 1378
T.: 36 13423130 Fax: 36 13423109 Home: 36 23453933
Below is the abstract of a forthcoming BBS target article on:
PERCEPTUAL SYMBOL SYSTEMS
by Lawrence W. Barsalou
This article has been accepted for publication in Behavioral and Brain
Sciences (BBS), an international, interdisciplinary journal providing
Open Peer Commentary on important and controversial current research in
the biobehavioral and cognitive sciences.
Commentators must be BBS Associates or nominated by a BBS Associate. To
be considered as a commentator for this article, to suggest other
appropriate commentators, or for information about how to become a BBS
Associate, please send EMAIL to:
bbs(a)cogsci.soton.ac.uk
or write to:
Behavioral and Brain Sciences
Department of Psychology
University of Southampton
Highfield, Southampton
SO17 1BJ UNITED KINGDOM
http://www.princeton.edu/~harnad/bbs/http://www.cogsci.soton.ac.uk/bbs/ftp://ftp.princeton.edu/pub/harnad/BBS/
ftp://ftp.cogsci.soton.ac.uk/pub/bbs/
gopher://gopher.princeton.edu:70/11/.libraries/.pujournals
If you are not a BBS Associate, please send your CV and the name of a
BBS Associate (there are currently over 10,000 worldwide) who is
familiar with your work. All past BBS authors, referees and commentators
are eligible to become BBS Associates.
To help us put together a balanced list of commentators, please give
some indication of the aspects of the topic on which you would bring
your areas of expertise to bear if you were selected as a commentator.
An electronic draft of the full text is available for inspection
with a WWW browser, anonymous ftp or gopher according to the
instructions that follow after the abstract.
____________________________________________________________________
PERCEPTUAL SYMBOL SYSTEMS
Lawrence W. Barsalou
Department of Psychology
Emory University
Atlanta, GA 30322
http://userwww.service.emory.edu/~barsalou/
barsalou(a)emory.edu
KEYWORDS: analogue processing, categories, concepts, frames, imagery,
images, knowledge, perception, representation, sensory-motor
representations, simulation, symbol grounding, symbol systems
ABSTRACT: Prior to the twentieth century, theories of knowledge were
inherently perceptual. Since then, developments in logic, statistics,
and programming languages have inspired amodal theories that rest on
principles fundamentally different from those underlying perception. In
addition, perceptual approaches have become widely viewed as untenable,
because they are assumed to implement recording systems, not conceptual
systems. A perceptual theory of knowledge is developed here in the
contexts of current cognitive science and neuroscience. During
perceptual experience, association areas in the brain capture bottom-up
patterns of activation in sensory-motor areas. Later, in a top-down
manner, association areas partially reactivate sensory-motor areas to
implement perceptual symbols. The storage and reactivation of
perceptual symbols operates at the level of perceptual components--not
at the level of holistic perceptual experiences. Through the use of
selective attention, schematic representations of perceptual components
are extracted from experience and stored in memory (e.g., individual
memories of green, purr, hot). As memories of the same component become
organized around a common frame, they implement a simulator that
produces limitless simulations of the component (e.g., simulations of
purr). Not only do such simulators develop for aspects of sensory
experience, they also develop for aspects of proprioception (e.g.,
lift, run) and for introspection (e.g., compare, memory, happy,
hungry). Once established, these simulators implement a basic
conceptual system that represents types, supports categorization, and
produces categorical inferences. These simulators further support
productivity, propositions, and abstract concepts, thereby implementing
a fully functional conceptual system. Productivity results from
integrating simulators combinatorially and recursively to produce
complex simulations. Propositions result from binding simulators to
perceived individuals to represent type-token relations. Abstract
concepts are grounded in complex simulations of combined physical and
introspective events. Thus, a perceptual theory of knowledge can
implement a fully functional conceptual system while avoiding what it
is becoming increasingly apparent would be problems for amodal symbol
systems. Implications for cognition, neuroscience, evolution,
development, and artificial intelligence are explored.
--------------------------------------------------------------
To help you decide whether you would be an appropriate commentator for
this article, an electronic draft is retrievable from the World Wide
Web or by anonymous ftp or gopher from the US or UK BBS Archive.
Ftp instructions follow below. Please do not prepare a commentary on
this draft. Just let us know, after having inspected it, what relevant
expertise you feel you would bring to bear on what aspect of the
article.
The URLs you can use to get to the BBS Archive:
http://www.princeton.edu/~harnad/bbs/http://www.cogsci.soton.ac.uk/bbs/Archive/bbs.barsalou.htmlftp://ftp.princeton.edu/pub/harnad/BBS/bbs.barsalou
ftp://ftp.cogsci.soton.ac.uk/pub/bbs/Archive/bbs.barsalou
gopher://gopher.princeton.edu:70/11/.libraries/.pujournals
To retrieve a file by ftp from an Internet site, type either:
ftp ftp.princeton.edu
or
ftp 128.112.128.1
When you are asked for your login, type:
anonymous
Enter password as queried (your password is your actual userid:
yourlogin(a)yourhost.whatever.whatever - be sure to include the "@")
cd /pub/harnad/BBS
To show the available files, type:
ls
Next, retrieve the file you want with (for example):
get bbs.barsalou
When you have the file(s) you want, type:
quit
AMERICAN SCIENTIST, published by SIGMA XI, the Scientific Research Society
invites you to contribute to an On-Line Forum On:
Free Internet Access to Traditional Journals
Walker, T.J. (1998) American Scientist 86(5)
http://www.amsci.org/amsci/articles/98articles/walker.html
Moderated by: Stevan Harnad
Cognitive Sciences Center
Department of Electronics and Computer Science
Southampton University
Highfield, Southampton
SO17 1BJ United Kingdom
harnad(a)soton.ac.uk harnad(a)princeton.edu
http://www.princeton.edu/~harnad/intpub.htmlhttp://cogsci.soton.ac.uk/~harnad/intpub.ht
Subscribe to: listserv(a)amsci.org
Send message: subscribe september-forum
Or link to:
http://amsci-forum.amsci.org/archives/september-forum.html
After subscribing
send messages to:
september-forum(a)amsci-forum.amsci.org
Best wishes,
Stevan
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Moderator's Introduction:
(Please don't just read this, but the Walker target article too.)
FOR WHOM THE GATE TOLLS?
FREEING THE ON-LINE-ONLY REFEREED JOURNAL LITERATURE
Stevan Harnad
Southampton University
It is a foregone conclusion that the refereed journal corpus will
all soon be available on-line. The question is: Will access to it have
to continue to be blocked by financial firewalls as in the era of paper
publication?
This is not just a matter of marginal conveniences or utopian details:
The difference between free and fee-based access is the difference
between a seamless, completely interlinked learned literature at the
fingertips of every scholar and scientist in the world and a
jerry-rigged agglomeration of toll-ridden proprietary packages -- the
on-line counterparts of exactly what we have now in the trade world of
scholarly paper journals, funded through Subscriptions, Site-Licenses
and Pay-Per-View (tear-sheets, photocopy, interlibrary loan)
(S/SL/PPV) tolls,
And for the author, the difference is even greater than for the reader,
for it is the difference between free versus toll-gated access
to one's work, work that one has submitted to the journal for free
with the express wish of having it certified and then made public.
What will the true cost of certification and publication be once
everything is on-line-only? In other words, what will be the cost of
quality control for content (refereeing/editing) and form
(copy-editing/mark-up) once all expenses associated with paper
production are gone? Paper publishers say they will not be much lower
(30% at most), but today's brave new on-line-only publishers are
finding otherwise (70% at least). If the latter are right, then it will
no longer make sense to recover those reduced costs from S/SL/PPV, with
its attendant restrictions on access: Author pages charges, funded by
University savings from journal subscription cancellations, could cover
them up-front, and all authors, readers, and Learned Inquiry itself
would be the beneficiaries.
Suppose we agree that this outcome would be the best one: How do we
get there (page-charge-based free access to all) from here (access
restricted by S/SL/PPV)?
Thomas Walker (1998) recognises that making the refereed journal
literature in all disciplines on-line and free for all, with no
financial firewalls, is the optimal and inevitable solution for science
and scholarship, and he proposes the following transition scenario: Let
journals -- immediately, while we are still in the hybrid paper/on-line
era -- finance free access to on-line reprints out of author
page-charges (for about the same price as paper reprints currently).
The work of authors who pay appears instantly; those who do not pay
must wait a year for their work to appear publicly on-line; until then,
toll-based paper is the only means of access.
This would be responsive to the need and desire of authors for instant
free access to their work today, and it would hasten reader addiction
to this new mode of access, thereby hastening the day when paper, and
its expenses, and the S/SL/PPV tolls that needed to be levied to cover
them, can all be jettisoned and author page charges take over entirely,
making the entire literature free for all.
The only problem with this scenario is that, human nature being what it
is, people will not part with their money unless there is no
alternative. And there IS an alternative for providing free on-line
access to one's work in the paper era: Authors can put their papers
on-line themselves -- on their institutional home servers or in
centralised ones such as http://xxx.lanl.gov, the NSF/DOE-supported
Physics Eprint Archive at Los Alamos National Laboratory.
The outcome would be the same as the one sought by Walker: Reader
demand for the free on-line versions would rise (xxx has 70,000 hits
daily, and new papers are archived at the rate of 100 per weekday),
demand for the paper versions would fall, library subscriptions would
be cancelled, paper publishers would be forced to restructure as
on-line-only publishers, costs would scale down to on-line-only, and
THEN (when costs approached those or today's paper reprints) authors
would be willing to pay page charges, not for the electronic archiving,
which they could do at least as well for themselves, but for the
quality control and subsequent certification that journals have always
provided. Publishing being the imperishable mark of productivity that
it is, Universities will find the resources out of their library
windfall savings to cover the relative pittance it will cost to reap
the benefits of the optimal and the inevitable.
Does that settle it then? Not quite. There are still some controversial
issues that have only been glossed over here, and it is hoped that the
discussion will focus on these. They are at the heart of the
controversy about the future course of refereed journal publishing.
(1) What IS the true cost of on-line-only publication of a mainstream
journal?
(2) What is the current status of copyright agreements in relation to
public on-line archiving of one's own work? More important, what
justification is there for attempting to restrict such author
archiving in domains where authors neither seek nor receive fees or
royalties, but only maximal accessibility to their work?
(3) How can chaos be avoided in the unstable period of journal
cancellations, while S/SL/PPV-supported paper is not yet phased out,
costs are not yet down to online-only levels, and author page-charges
are not yet phased in?
Please read the Walker target article and then post your comments to
the list:
september-forum(a)amsci-forum.amsci.org
or link to:
http://amsci-forum.amsci.org/archives/september-forum.html
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Some relevant background links:
Ginsparg, P. (1996) Winners and Losers in the Global research Village.
Invited contribution, UNESCO Conference HQ, Paris, 19-23 Feb 1996
http://xxx.lanl.gov/blurb/pg96unesco.html
Ginsparg, P. (1994) First Steps Towards Electronic Research
Communication. Computers in Physics. (August, American Institute of
Physics). 8(4): 390-396.
http://xxx.lanl.gov/blurb/
Harnad, S. (1990) Scholarly Skywriting and the Prepublication Continuum
of Scientific Inquiry. Psychological Science 1: 342 - 343
http://www.cogsci.soton.ac.uk/~harnad/Papers/Harnad/harnad90.skywriting.htmlftp://ftp.princeton.edu/pub/harnad/Harnad/HTML/harnad90.skywriting.html
Harnad, S. (1991) Post-Gutenberg Galaxy: The Fourth Revolution in the
Means of Production of Knowledge. Public-Access Computer Systems Review
2 (1): 39 - 53
http://www.cogsci.soton.ac.uk/~harnad/Papers/Harnad/harnad91.postgutenberg.…ftp://ftp.princeton.edu/pub/harnad/Harnad/HTML/harnad91.postgutenberg.html
Harnad, S. (1992) Interactive Publication: Extending the
American Physical Society's Discipline-Specific Model for Electronic
Publishing. Serials Review, Special Issue on Economics Models for
Electronic Publishing, pp. 58 - 61.
http://www.cogsci.soton.ac.uk/~harnad/Papers/Harnad/harnad92.interactivpub.…ftp://ftp.princeton.edu/pub/harnad/Harnad/HTML/harnad92.interactivpub.html
Harnad, S. (1995) Electronic Scholarly Publication: Quo Vadis?
Serials Review 21(1) 78-80 (Reprinted in Managing Information
2(3) 31-33 1995)
http://www.cogsci.soton.ac.uk/~harnad/Papers/Harnad/harnad95.quo.vadis.htmlftp://ftp.princeton.edu/pub/harnad/Harnad/HTML/harnad95.quo.vadis.html
Harnad, S. (1995) Universal FTP Archives for Esoteric Science and
Scholarship: A Subversive Proposal. In: Ann Okerson & James O'Donnell
(Eds.) Scholarly Journals at the Crossroads; A Subversive Proposal for
Electronic Publishing. Washington, DC., Association of Research
Libraries, June 1995.
http://cogsci.soton.ac.uk/~harnad/subvert.html
ftp://ftp.cogsci.soton.ac.uk/pub/psycoloquy/Subversive.Proposal/
Harnad, S. (1995) Interactive Cognition: Exploring the Potential of
Electronic Quote/Commenting. In: B. Gorayska & J.L. Mey (Eds.) Cognitive
Technology: In Search of a Humane Interface. Elsevier. Pp. 397-414.
http://www.cogsci.soton.ac.uk/~harnad/Papers/Harnad/harnad95.interactive.co…ftp://ftp.princeton.edu/pub/harnad/Harnad/HTML/harnad95.interactive.cogniti…
Harnad, S. (1996) Implementing Peer Review on the Net:
Scientific Quality Control in Scholarly Electronic Journals. In:
Peek, R. & Newby, G. (Eds.) Scholarly Publishing: The Electronic
Frontier. Cambridge MA: MIT Press. Pp. 103-118.
http://www.cogsci.soton.ac.uk/~harnad/Papers/Harnad/harnad96.peer.review.ht…ftp://ftp.princeton.edu/pub/harnad/Harnad/HTML/harnad96.peer.review.html
Harnad, S. (1997) How to Fast-Forward Serials to the Inevitable and
the Optimal for Scholars and Scientists. Serials Librarian 30: 73-81.
http://www.cogsci.soton.ac.uk/~harnad/Papers/Harnad/harnad97.learned.serial…ftp://ftp.princeton.edu/pub/harnad/Harnad/HTML/harnad97.learned.serials.html
Harnad, S. (1997) The Paper House of Cards (And Why It Is Taking So Long
To Collapse). Ariadne 8: 6-7.
http://www.cogsci.soton.ac.uk/~harnad/Papers/Harnad/harnad97.paper.house.ar…ftp://ftp.princeton.edu/pub/harnad/Harnad/HTML/harnad97.paper.house.ariadne…http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue8/harnad/
Harnad, S. (1997) Learned Inquiry and the Net:
The Role of Peer Review, Peer Commentary and Copyright.
Antiquity 71: 1042-1048
http://www.cogsci.soton.ac.uk/~harnad/Papers/Harnad/harnad97.antiquity.htmlftp://ftp.princeton.edu/pub/harnad/Harnad/HTML/harnad97.antiquity.htmlhttp://www.cogsci.soton.ac.uk/~harnad/Papers/Harnad/harnad97.toronto.htmlftp://ftp.princeton.edu/pub/harnad/Harnad/HTML/harnad97.toronto.html
Harnad, S. (1998) On-Line Journals and Financial Fire-Walls. Nature
(in press). URL available 2nd week of September.
Harnad, S. & Hemus, M. (1997) All Or None: No Stable Hybrid
or Half-Way Solutions for Launching the Learned Periodical Literature
into the PostGutenberg Galaxy. In Butterworth, I. (Ed.)
The Impact of Electronic Publishing on the Academic Community.
London: Portland Press. Pp 18-27.
http://tiepac.portlandpress.co.uk/books/online/tiepac/session1/ch5.htmhttp://www.cogsci.soton.ac.uk/~harnad/Papers/Harnad/harnad97.hybrid.pub.htmlftp://ftp.princeton.edu/pub/harnad/Harnad/HTML/harnad97.hybrid.pub.html
Hitchcock, S., Carr, L., Harris, S., Hey, J. M. N., and Hall, W. (1997)
Citation Linking: Improving Access to Online Journals.
Proceedings of the 2nd ACM International Conference on
Digital Libraries, edited by Robert B. Allen and Edie Rasmussen
(New York, USA: Association for Computing Machinery), pp. 115-122.
http://journals.ecs.soton.ac.uk/acmdl97.htm
Hitchcock, S., Quek, F., Carr, L., Hall, W., Witbrock, A.,
and Tarr, I. (1997) Linking Everything to Everything: Journal
Publishing Myth or Reality? ICCC/IFIP conference on
Electronic Publishing 97: New Models and Opportunities, Canterbury,UK, April.
http://journals.ecs.soton.ac.uk/IFIP-ICCC97.html
Odlyzko, A.M. (1998) The economics of electronic journals. In: Ekman
R. and Quandt, R. (Eds) Technology and Scholarly Communication Univ.
Calif. Press, 1998.
http://www.research.att.com/~amo/doc/economics.journals.txt
Odlyzko, A.M. (1997) The slow evolution of electronic publishing. In
Electronic Publishing - New Models and Opportunities, A. J. Meadows and
F. Rowland, eds., ICCC Press, 1997.
http://www.research.att.com/~amo/doc/slow.evolution.txt
Odlyzko, A.M. (1995) Tragic loss or good riddance? The impending
demise of traditional scholarly journals, International Journal of
Human-Computer Studies (formerly International Journal of Man-Machine
Studies), 42 (1995), 71-122.
http://www.research.att.com/~amo/doc/tragic.loss.txt
Okerson A. & O'Donnell, J. (Eds.) (1995) Scholarly Journals at the
Crossroads; A Subversive Proposal for Electronic Publishing.
Washington, DC., Association of Research Libraries, June 1995.
http://www.arl.org/scomm/subversive/index.html
ftp://ftp.cogsci.soton.ac.uk/pub/psycoloquy/Subversive.Proposal/
Transition from Paper Study Group. (1998) Who Should "own" Scientific
Papers? Science. Science available URL on Sept. 4
Walker, T.J. (1998) Free Internet Access to Traditional Journals.
American Scientist 86(5)
http://www.amsci.org/amsci/articles/98articles/walker.html