koglist

koglist@maillist.ttk.hu

4 participants
5929 discussions

by Miklos Lehmann

Palyazati felhivas Az MTA Filozofiai Kutatointezete fiatal kutatoi allast hirdet nyelvfilozofiai temakorben szept. 1-tol. Az allas idotartama 3 ev. Lehetoseg szerint olyan palyazok jelentkezeset varjuk, akik kutatasi tervenek nyelvfilozofiatorteneti relevanciaja (is) van. A palyazati anyagnak tartalmaznia kell: (1) a palyazo kutatasi tervet, mely problemacentrikusan kifejti azt az egy, legfeljebb ket kerdest, valamint varhato megoldasi iranyat, amellyel a palyazo a kovetkezo 3 evben foglalkozni kivan; (2) a palyazo reszletes eletrajzat; (3) publikacios jegyzeket; (4) egy-ket publikalt, publikalasra elfogadott vagy publikalatlan tanulmanyat. Ez utobbiaknak nem kotelezo a kutatasi tervvel vagy nyelvfilozofiaval kapcsolatosaknak lenniok. A palyazatokat kerjuk 2 peldanyban legkesobb aug. 16-i postabelyegzovel feladni (MTA Filozofiai Kutatointezet, 1398 Budapest 62, Pf. 594), vagy pedig ugyanezen nap delelott 11 oraig leadni a Intezet titkarsagan (1054 Budapest, Szemere u. 10.). Kerjuk a palyazokat, lakcimuk es telefonszamuk mellett adjak meg esetleges e-mail cimuket is.

24 years, 11 months

(no subject)

by neumer＠PHIL-INST.HU

Kedves Kollegak! Intezetunk az alanti szoveggel palyazatot hirdet fiatal kutatoi allasra nyelvfilozofiai temakorben. Kerlek/kerem, szoljatok/szoljanak arra erdemes ifjaknak/ifju holgyeknek, hogy palyazzanak, s aki tanszeki hirdetotabla kozelben van, azt megkernem, tegye/tetesse ki (esetleg az ekezetek potlasa utan) a szoveget. Koszonom szepen, Neumer Katalin A palyazat szovege: Az MTA Filozofiai Kutatointezete fiatal kutatoi allast hirdet nyelvfilozofiai temakorben szept. 1-tol. Az allas idotartama 3 ev. Lehetoseg szerint olyan palyazok jelentkezeset varjuk, akik kutatasi tervenek nyelvfilozofia-torteneti relevanciaja (is) van. A palyazati anyagnak tartalmaznia kell (1) a palyazo kutatasi tervet, mely problemacentrikusan kifejti azt az egy, legfeljebb ket kerdest, valamint varhato megoldasi iranyat, amellyel a palyazo a kovetkezo 3 evben foglalkozni kivan; (2) a palyazo reszletes eletrajzat es (3) publikacios jegyzeket, tovabba (4) egy-ket publikalt, publikalasra elfogadott vagy publikalatlan tanulmanyat. Ez utobbiaknak nem kotelezo a kutatasi tervvel vagy nyelvfilozofiaval kapcsolatosaknak lenniok. A palyazatokat kerjuk 2 peldanyban legkesobb aug. 16-i postabelyegzovel feladni (MTA Filozofiai Kutatointezet, 1398 Budapest 62, Pf 594), vagy pedig ugyanezen nap delelott 11 oraig leadni az Intezet titkarsagan (1054 Budapest, Szemere u. 10.). Kerjuk a palyazokat, lakcimuk es telefonszamuk mellett adjak meg esetleges e-mail cimuket is. ----- Sent using MailStart.com ( http://MailStart.Com/welcome.html ) The FREE way to access your mailbox via any web browser, anywhere!

24 years, 11 months

(Fwd) A virusrol

by Laszlo Balazs

Ujabb virusnak latszo kuldemeny jott a mar ismert cimrol. Ezuttal nem sikerult azonositanom, hogy tenyleg virus-e, de az viszont tanulsagos, hogy az attachment leirasaban azt mondja, hogy ez egy "Graphic image", mikozben valojaban egy program (.exe). Ha a kivancsiskodo raklikkel, gondolvan, hogy csak egy kepet nez meg, elszabadul a pokol. Azert nem kel nagyon megijedni! Udvozlettel: Balazs Laszlo Ui: Mellekelem Szikora Laszlo megjegyzeseit a temarol: ------- Forwarded message follows ------- Date sent: Mon, 09 Jul 2001 10:22:04 +0200 From: "A. L. Szikora" <admin(a)izabell.elte.hu> Send reply to: szal(a)izabell.elte.hu Organization: ELTE BTK Psyhological Institute To: balazs(a)COGPSYPHY.HU Subject: A virusrol Kedves Balázs! Idézek a leveledbõl és kiegészitem két cimmel ahol leirják, hogy mi is ez a VIRUS. Sajnos sokkal komolyabb dolog mint aminek elsõre látszik. Legalább is ezt irják a 'szakértõk' róla. www.kaspersky.com/default.asp www.symantec.com/avcenter "Tobben erdeklodtek, hogy ki az a Muranyi. ... A virus egyebkent "w32" ill. "Magistr@MM" nevre hallgat es nem tudom mit csinal azon kivul, hogy EMail-en tovabbkuldozgeti magat az aldozat gepen talalt cimekre. A tanulsag, ...." Sajnos én nem csak "egy muranyi" felhasználóval találkoztam. Naponta 2-3 ilyen virust tartalmazó "küldemény" érkezik hozzánk. Ezeknek sem a hosszuk, sem a nevük nem jellemzõ. Az egyedüli közös bennük, hogy .EXE kiterjesztésüek. Üdvözlettel, -- Szikora A. Laszlo admin(a)izabell.elte.hu ------- End of forwarded message ------- ----------------------------------------------- Laszlo Balazs, Ph.D. Institute for Psychology, Budapest

24 years, 11 months

�=!"#�$�%

by Mur�nyi Istv�n

À=!"# $ .

24 years, 11 months

Megegyszer a virusrol.

by Laszlo Balazs

<FontFamily><param>Courier</param>Tobben erdeklodtek, hogy ki az a Muranyi. Ebbol arra kovetkeztetek, hogy nem mindenki eszlelte, hogy a KOGLIST-rol kapta a szoban forgo leveleket. Az illeto, akit en se ismerek, amugy valoszinuleg csak abban vetkes, hogy egyszer ovatlanul raklikkelt egy ilyen taposoaknara. A virus egyebkent "w32" ill. "Magistr@MM" nevre hallgat es nem tudom mit csinal azon kivul, hogy EMail-en tovabbkuldozgeti magat az aldozat gepen talalt cimekre. A tanulsag, hogy sose bontsunk fel ismeretlen helyrol szarmazo attachmentet, legkivalt, ha az .com vagy .exe kiterjesztesu. Aki okos, egybol kitorli. Aki esetleg nem tudja, hogy mi a kulonbseg egy level elolvasasa es egy attachmentkent erkezett program elinditasa kozott, annak ez legyen into jel arra nezve, hogy magyaraztassa el maganak valakivel. <color><param>0000,0000,0000</param>Udv: Balazs Laszlo</color><FontFamily><param>Arial</param> <nofill> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- dr. Balazs Laszlo ( balazs(a)cogpsyphy.hu ) tudomanyos fomunkatars MTA Pszichologiai Kutatointezet Altalanos Lelektani Osztaly Budapest VII. Szondi u. 83-85. Levelezes: Budapest, Pf. 398 Tel: (36 1) 3533 244 vagy 3533 776 Fax: (36 1) 2692 972

24 years, 11 months

VIRUS Muranyi Istvan leveleben

by Laszlo Balazs

Vigyazat a Muranyi altal kuldott levelben levo EXE virussal fertozott! NE BONTSD FEL! ----------------------------------------------- Laszlo Balazs, Ph.D. Institute for Psychology, Budapest

24 years, 11 months

�=!"#�$�%

by Mur�nyi Istv�n

À=!"# $ .

24 years, 11 months

Computational Neuroscience szeminarium: juli 9, hetfon, 14 orakor

by Erdi Peter

Julius 9-en hetfon 14 orakor a KFKI RMKI Tancstermeben (III-as epulet) szimnariumi eloadas lesz: ******************************************************** Viktor Jirsa Center for Complex Systems & Brain Sciences Florida Atlantic University http://www.ccs.fau.edu/%7Ejirsa/ ************************************************************************** Neural field dynamics as a window for understanding the EEG and MEG during motor coordination ************************************************************************* Minden erdelkodot szerettel varunk. (erdi peter) ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ Az eloadas kivonata: Dynamic systems defined on the scale of neural ensembles are well-suited to model the spatiotemporal dynamics of neural fields on the cortical sheet. These represent the current flow perpendicular to the cortex and generate the electric potentials on the surface of the skull and the magnetic fields outside the skull measured by electroencephalography (EEG) and magnetoencephalography (MEG), respectively. We wish to connect spatiotemporal neural field dynamics (Jirsa-Haken, Phys.Rev.Let. 1996) to motor behavior and simultaneous brain activity and take the following approach: 1. We develop a methodological framework, which defines the activity of the neural field on a sphere in three dimensions. Using Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) we map the neural field dynamics from the sphere onto the folded cortical surface and calculate the three-dimensional forward solutions of EEG and MEG. Non-trivial mappings between the multiple levels of observation are obtained which would not be predicted by inverse solution techniques. 2. Recent results mapping large-scale brain dynamics (EEG, MEG) onto behavioral motor patterns (Fuchs, Jirsa, Kelso, Neuroimage 2000) provide an entry point to the causal brain-behavior relation which we use to define a motor and sensorimotor loop between neural fields and behavioral data. For the case of bimanual coordination, we establish the neural field dynamics including short-and long range connections of neural ensembles. We make predictions of global features of brain dynamics during coordination tasks and test these against experimental MEG results. A key feature of our approach is that phenomenological laws at the behavioral level can be connected to a field theoretical description of cortical dynamics (see also Jirsa, Fuchs, Kelso, Neural Comp. 1998).

24 years, 11 months

Webb: Can robots make good models of biological behaviour? -- BBS Call for Commentators

by Stevan Harnad - Behavioral & Brain Sciences

Below is the abstract of a forthcoming BBS target article [Please note that this paper was in fact accepted and archived to the web in February 2001 but the recent move of BBS to New York delayed the Call until now.] Can robots make good models of biological behaviour? by Barbara Webb http://www.bbsonline.org/Preprints/Webb/ This article has been accepted for publication in Behavioral and Brain Sciences (BBS), an international, interdisciplinary journal providing Open Peer Commentary on important and controversial current research in the biobehavioral and cognitive sciences. Commentators must be BBS Associates or nominated by a BBS Associate. To be considered as a commentator for this article, to suggest other appropriate commentators, or for information about how to become a BBS Associate, please reply by EMAIL within three (3) weeks to: calls(a)bbsonline.org The Calls are sent to 8000 BBS Associates, so there is no expectation (indeed, it would be calamitous) that each recipient should comment on every occasion! Hence there is no need to reply except if you wish to comment, or to nominate someone to comment. If you are not a BBS Associate, please approach a current BBS Associate (there are currently over 10,000 worldwide) who is familiar with your work to nominate you. All past BBS authors, referees and commentators are eligible to become BBS Associates. A full electronic list of current BBS Associates is available at this location to help you select a name: http://www.bbsonline.org/Instructions/assoclist.html If no current BBS Associate knows your work, please send us your Curriculum Vitae and BBS will circulate it to appropriate Associates to ask whether they would be prepared to nominate you. (In the meantime, your name, address and email address will be entered into our database as an unaffiliated investigator.) To help us put together a balanced list of commentators, please give some indication of the aspects of the topic on which you would bring your areas of expertise to bear if you were selected as a commentator. To help you decide whether you would be an appropriate commentator for this article, an electronic draft is retrievable from the online BBSPrints Archive, at the URL that follows the abstract below. _____________________________________________________________ Can robots make good models of biological behaviour? Barbara Webb Centre for Computational and Cognitive Neuroscience Department of Psychology University of Stirling Stirling FK9 4LA Scotland, U.K. b.h.webb(a)stir.ac.uk www.stir.ac.uk/psychology/Staff/bhw1/ KEYWORDS: models; simulation; animal behaviour; neuroethology; robotics; realism; levels. ABSTRACT: How should biological behaviour be modelled? A relatively new approach is to investigate problems in neuroethology by building physical robot models of biological sensorimotor systems. The explication and justification of this approach are here placed within a framework for describing and comparing models in the behavioural and biological sciences. First, simulation models - the representation of a hypothesis about a target system - are distinguished from several other relationships also termed 'modelling' in discussions of scientific explanation. Seven dimensions on which simulation models can differ are defined and distinctions between them discussed: (1) Relevance: whether the model tests and generates hypotheses applicable to biology. (2) Level: the elemental units of the model in the hierarchy from atoms to societies. (3) Generality: the range of biological systems the model can represent. (4) Abstraction: the complexity, relative to the target, or amount of detail included in the model. (5) Structural accuracy: how well the model represents the actual mechanisms underlying the behaviour. (6) Performance match: to what extent the model behaviour matches the target behaviour (7) Medium: the physical basis by which the model is implemented No specific position in the space of models thus defined is the only correct one, but a good modelling methodology should be explicit about its position and the justification for that position. It is argued that in building robot models biological relevance is more effective than loose biological inspiration; multiple levels can be integrated; that generality cannot be assumed but might emerge from studying specific instances; abstraction is better done by simplification than idealisation; accuracy can be approached through iterations of complete systems; that the model should be able to match and predict target behaviour; and that a physical medium can have significant advantages. These arguments reflect the view that biological behaviour needs to be studied and modelled in context, that is in terms of the real problems faced by real animals in real environments. http://www.bbsonline.org/Preprints/Webb/ ___________________________________________________________ Please do not prepare a commentary yet. Just let us know, after having inspected it, what relevant expertise you feel you would bring to bear on what aspect of the article. We will then let you know whether it was possible to include your name on the final formal list of invitees. _______________________________________________________________________ *** SUPPLEMENTARY ANNOUNCEMENTS *** (1) The authors of scientific articles are not paid money for their refereed research papers; they give them away. What they want is to reach all interested researchers worldwide, so as to maximize the potential research impact of their findings. Subscription/Site-License/Pay-Per-View costs are accordingly access-barriers, and hence impact-barriers for this give-away research literature. There is now a way to free the entire refereed journal literature, for everyone, everywhere, immediately, by mounting interoperable university eprint archives, and self-archiving all refereed research papers in them. Please see: http://www.eprints.org http://www.openarchives.org/ http://www.dlib.org/dlib/december99/12harnad.html --------------------------------------------------------------------- (2) All authors in the biobehavioral and cognitive sciences are strongly encouraged to self-archive all their papers in their own institution's Eprint Archives or in CogPrints, the Eprint Archive for the biobehavioral and cognitive sciences: http://cogprints.soton.ac.uk/ It is extremely simple to self-archive and will make all of our papers available to all of us everywhere, at no cost to anyone, forever. Authors of BBS papers wishing to archive their already published BBS Target Articles should submit it to BBSPrints Archive. Information about the archiving of BBS' entire backcatalogue will be sent to you in the near future. Meantime please see: http://www.bbsonline.org/help/ and http://www.bbsonline.org/Instructions/ --------------------------------------------------------------------- (3) Call for Book Nominations for BBS Multiple Book Review In the past, Behavioral and Brain Sciences (BBS) had only been able to do 1-2 BBS multiple book treatments per year, because of our limited annual page quota. BBS's new expanded page quota will make it possible for us to increase the number of books we treat per year, so this is an excellent time for BBS Associates and biobehavioral/cognitive scientists in general to nominate books you would like to see accorded BBS multiple book review. (Authors may self-nominate, but books can only be selected on the basis of multiple nominations.) It would be very helpful if you indicated in what way a BBS Multiple Book Review of the book(s) you nominate would be useful to the field (and of course a rich list of potential reviewers would be the best evidence of its potential impact!). *-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-* Please note: Your email address has been added to our user database for Calls for Commentators, the reason you received this email. If you do not wish to receive further Calls, please feel free to change your mailshot status through your User Login link on the BBSPrints homepage, useing your username and password above: http://www.bbsonline.org/ For information about the mailshot, please see the help file at: http://www.bbsonline.org/help/node5.html#mailshot *-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*

24 years, 11 months

Webb: Can robots make good models of biological behaviour? -- BBS Call for Commentators

by Stevan Harnad - Behavioral & Brain Sciences

24 years, 11 months

Jump to page:

2026

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

2002

2001

2000

1999

1998

1997

1996

1995

1994

1993

koglist