koglist

koglist@maillist.ttk.hu

4 participants
5929 discussions

BBS Call for Commentators--Preston & De Waal: Empathy: Its ultimate and proximate bases

by Stevan Harnad - Behavioral & Brain Sciences

Dear Dr. KogList List User, Below is the abstract of a forthcoming BBS target article Empathy: Its ultimate and proximate bases by Stephanie D. Preston & Frans B. M. de Waal http://www.bbsonline.org/Preprints/Preston/ or http://www.bbsonline.org/Preprints/Preston/Preston.pdf This article has been accepted for publication in Behavioral and Brain Sciences (BBS), an international, interdisciplinary journal providing Open Peer Commentary on important and controversial current research in the biobehavioral and cognitive sciences. Commentators must be BBS Associates or nominated by a BBS Associate. To be considered as a commentator for this article, to suggest other appropriate commentators, or for information about how to become a BBS Associate, please reply by EMAIL within three (3) weeks to: calls(a)bbsonline.org The Calls are sent to 10,000 BBS Associates, so there is no expectation (indeed, it would be calamitous) that each recipient should comment on every occasion! Hence there is no need to reply except if you wish to comment, or to nominate someone to comment. If you are not a BBS Associate, please approach a current BBS Associate (there are currently over 10,000 worldwide) who is familiar with your work to nominate you. All past BBS authors, referees and commentators are eligible to become BBS Associates. A full electronic list of current BBS Associates is available at this location to help you select a name: http://www.bbsonline.org/Instructions/assoclist.html If no current BBS Associate knows your work, please send us your Curriculum Vitae and BBS will circulate it to appropriate Associates to ask whether they would be prepared to nominate you. (In the meantime, your name, address and email address will be entered into our database as an unaffiliated investigator.) To help us put together a balanced list of commentators, please give some indication of the aspects of the topic on which you would bring your areas of expertise to bear if you were selected as a commentator. To help you decide whether you would be an appropriate commentator for this article, an electronic draft is retrievable from the online BBSPrints Archive, at the URL that follows the abstract below. _____________________________________________________________ Empathy: Its ultimate and proximate bases Stephanie D. Preston Department of Psychology 3210 Tolman Hall #1650 University of California at Berkeley Berkeley, CA 94720-1650 USA spreston(a)socrates.berkeley.edu http://socrates.berkeley.edu/~spreston Frans B. M. de Waal Living Links, Yerkes Primate Center and Psychology Department, Emory University, Atlanta, GA 30322 USA dewaal(a)rmy.emory.edu http://www.emory.edu/LIVING_LINKS/ KEYWORDS: altruism; cognitive empathy; comparative; emotion; emotional contagion; empathy; evolution; human; perception-action; perspective taking; ABSTRACT: There is disagreement in the literature about the exact nature of the phenomenon of empathy. There are emotional, cognitive, and conditioning views, applying in varying degrees across species. An adequate description of the ultimate and proximate mechanism can integrate these views. Proximately, the perception of an object's state activates the subject's corresponding representations, which in turn activate somatic and autonomic responses. This mechanism supports basic behaviors (e.g., alarm, social facilitation, vicariousness of emotions, mother-infant responsiveness, and the modeling of competitors and predators) that are crucial for the reproductive success of animals living in groups. The "Perception-Action Model" (PAM) together with an understanding of how representations change with experience can explain the major empirical effects in the literature (similarity, familiarity, past experience, explicit teaching and salience). It can also predict a variety of empathy disorders. The interaction between the PAM and prefrontal functioning can also explain different levels of empathy across species and age groups. This view can advance our evolutionary understanding of empathy beyond inclusive fitness and reciprocal altruism and can explain different levels of empathy across individuals, species, stages of development, and situations. http://www.bbsonline.org/Preprints/Preston/ or http://www.bbsonline.org/Preprints/Preston/Preston.pdf ___________________________________________________________ Please do not prepare a commentary yet. Just let us know, after having inspected it, what relevant expertise you feel you would bring to bear on what aspect of the article. We will then let you know whether it was possible to include your name on the final formal list of invitees. _______________________________________________________________________ *** SUPPLEMENTARY ANNOUNCEMENTS *** (1) The authors of scientific articles are not paid money for their refereed research papers; they give them away. What they want is to reach all interested researchers worldwide, so as to maximize the potential research impact of their findings. Subscription/Site-License/Pay-Per-View costs are accordingly access-barriers, and hence impact-barriers for this give-away research literature. There is now a way to free the entire refereed journal literature, for everyone, everywhere, immediately, by mounting interoperable university eprint archives, and self-archiving all refereed research papers in them. Please see: http://www.eprints.org http://www.openarchives.org/ http://www.dlib.org/dlib/december99/12harnad.html --------------------------------------------------------------------- (2) All authors in the biobehavioral and cognitive sciences are strongly encouraged to self-archive all their papers in their own institution's Eprint Archives or in CogPrints, the Eprint Archive for the biobehavioral and cognitive sciences: http://cogprints.soton.ac.uk/ It is extremely simple to self-archive and will make all of our papers available to all of us everywhere, at no cost to anyone, forever. Authors of BBS papers wishing to archive their already published BBS Target Articles should submit it to BBSPrints Archive. Information about the archiving of BBS' entire backcatalogue will be sent to you in the near future. Meantime please see: http://www.bbsonline.org/help/ and http://www.bbsonline.org/Instructions/ --------------------------------------------------------------------- (3) Call for Book Nominations for BBS Multiple Book Review In the past, Behavioral and Brain Sciences (BBS) had only been able to do 1-2 BBS multiple book treatments per year, because of our limited annual page quota. BBS's new expanded page quota will make it possible for us to increase the number of books we treat per year, so this is an excellent time for BBS Associates and biobehavioral/cognitive scientists in general to nominate books you would like to see accorded BBS multiple book review. (Authors may self-nominate, but books can only be selected on the basis of multiple nominations.) It would be very helpful if you indicated in what way a BBS Multiple Book Review of the book(s) you nominate would be useful to the field (and of course a rich list of potential reviewers would be the best evidence of its potential impact!). *-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-* Please note: Your email address has been added to our user database for Calls for Commentators, the reason you received this email. If you do not wish to receive further Calls, please feel free to change your mailshot status through your User Login link on the BBSPrints homepage, useing your username and password above: http://www.bbsonline.org/ For information about the mailshot, please see the help file at: http://www.bbsonline.org/help/node5.html#mailshot *-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*

24 years, 9 months

BBS Call for Commentators--Preston & De Waal: Empathy: Its ultimate and proximate bases

by Stevan Harnad - Behavioral & Brain Sciences

Dear Dr. Qwerty, Below is the abstract of a forthcoming BBS target article Empathy: Its ultimate and proximate bases by Stephanie D. Preston & Frans B. M. de Waal http://www.bbsonline.org/Preprints/Preston/ or http://www.bbsonline.org/Preprints/Preston/Preston.pdf This article has been accepted for publication in Behavioral and Brain Sciences (BBS), an international, interdisciplinary journal providing Open Peer Commentary on important and controversial current research in the biobehavioral and cognitive sciences. Commentators must be BBS Associates or nominated by a BBS Associate. To be considered as a commentator for this article, to suggest other appropriate commentators, or for information about how to become a BBS Associate, please reply by EMAIL within three (3) weeks to: calls(a)bbsonline.org The Calls are sent to 10,000 BBS Associates, so there is no expectation (indeed, it would be calamitous) that each recipient should comment on every occasion! Hence there is no need to reply except if you wish to comment, or to nominate someone to comment. If you are not a BBS Associate, please approach a current BBS Associate (there are currently over 10,000 worldwide) who is familiar with your work to nominate you. All past BBS authors, referees and commentators are eligible to become BBS Associates. A full electronic list of current BBS Associates is available at this location to help you select a name: http://www.bbsonline.org/Instructions/assoclist.html If no current BBS Associate knows your work, please send us your Curriculum Vitae and BBS will circulate it to appropriate Associates to ask whether they would be prepared to nominate you. (In the meantime, your name, address and email address will be entered into our database as an unaffiliated investigator.) To help us put together a balanced list of commentators, please give some indication of the aspects of the topic on which you would bring your areas of expertise to bear if you were selected as a commentator. To help you decide whether you would be an appropriate commentator for this article, an electronic draft is retrievable from the online BBSPrints Archive, at the URL that follows the abstract below. _____________________________________________________________ Empathy: Its ultimate and proximate bases Stephanie D. Preston Department of Psychology 3210 Tolman Hall #1650 University of California at Berkeley Berkeley, CA 94720-1650 USA spreston(a)socrates.berkeley.edu http://socrates.berkeley.edu/~spreston Frans B. M. de Waal Living Links, Yerkes Primate Center and Psychology Department, Emory University, Atlanta, GA 30322 USA dewaal(a)rmy.emory.edu http://www.emory.edu/LIVING_LINKS/ KEYWORDS: altruism; cognitive empathy; comparative; emotion; emotional contagion; empathy; evolution; human; perception-action; perspective taking; ABSTRACT: There is disagreement in the literature about the exact nature of the phenomenon of empathy. There are emotional, cognitive, and conditioning views, applying in varying degrees across species. An adequate description of the ultimate and proximate mechanism can integrate these views. Proximately, the perception of an object's state activates the subject's corresponding representations, which in turn activate somatic and autonomic responses. This mechanism supports basic behaviors (e.g., alarm, social facilitation, vicariousness of emotions, mother-infant responsiveness, and the modeling of competitors and predators) that are crucial for the reproductive success of animals living in groups. The "Perception-Action Model" (PAM) together with an understanding of how representations change with experience can explain the major empirical effects in the literature (similarity, familiarity, past experience, explicit teaching and salience). It can also predict a variety of empathy disorders. The interaction between the PAM and prefrontal functioning can also explain different levels of empathy across species and age groups. This view can advance our evolutionary understanding of empathy beyond inclusive fitness and reciprocal altruism and can explain different levels of empathy across individuals, species, stages of development, and situations. http://www.bbsonline.org/Preprints/Preston/ or http://www.bbsonline.org/Preprints/Preston/Preston.pdf ___________________________________________________________ Please do not prepare a commentary yet. Just let us know, after having inspected it, what relevant expertise you feel you would bring to bear on what aspect of the article. We will then let you know whether it was possible to include your name on the final formal list of invitees. _______________________________________________________________________ *** SUPPLEMENTARY ANNOUNCEMENTS *** (1) The authors of scientific articles are not paid money for their refereed research papers; they give them away. What they want is to reach all interested researchers worldwide, so as to maximize the potential research impact of their findings. Subscription/Site-License/Pay-Per-View costs are accordingly access-barriers, and hence impact-barriers for this give-away research literature. There is now a way to free the entire refereed journal literature, for everyone, everywhere, immediately, by mounting interoperable university eprint archives, and self-archiving all refereed research papers in them. Please see: http://www.eprints.org http://www.openarchives.org/ http://www.dlib.org/dlib/december99/12harnad.html --------------------------------------------------------------------- (2) All authors in the biobehavioral and cognitive sciences are strongly encouraged to self-archive all their papers in their own institution's Eprint Archives or in CogPrints, the Eprint Archive for the biobehavioral and cognitive sciences: http://cogprints.soton.ac.uk/ It is extremely simple to self-archive and will make all of our papers available to all of us everywhere, at no cost to anyone, forever. Authors of BBS papers wishing to archive their already published BBS Target Articles should submit it to BBSPrints Archive. Information about the archiving of BBS' entire backcatalogue will be sent to you in the near future. Meantime please see: http://www.bbsonline.org/help/ and http://www.bbsonline.org/Instructions/ --------------------------------------------------------------------- (3) Call for Book Nominations for BBS Multiple Book Review In the past, Behavioral and Brain Sciences (BBS) had only been able to do 1-2 BBS multiple book treatments per year, because of our limited annual page quota. BBS's new expanded page quota will make it possible for us to increase the number of books we treat per year, so this is an excellent time for BBS Associates and biobehavioral/cognitive scientists in general to nominate books you would like to see accorded BBS multiple book review. (Authors may self-nominate, but books can only be selected on the basis of multiple nominations.) It would be very helpful if you indicated in what way a BBS Multiple Book Review of the book(s) you nominate would be useful to the field (and of course a rich list of potential reviewers would be the best evidence of its potential impact!). *-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-* Please note: Your email address has been added to our user database for Calls for Commentators, the reason you received this email. If you do not wish to receive further Calls, please feel free to change your mailshot status through your User Login link on the BBSPrints homepage, useing your username and password above: http://www.bbsonline.org/ For information about the mailshot, please see the help file at: http://www.bbsonline.org/help/node5.html#mailshot *-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*

24 years, 9 months

8. Magyar Latas Szimpozium Meghivo

by Jozsef Fiser

M E G H I V O ! ! ! A Szegedi Egyetem Elettani Intezet szeretettel meghiv invital minden, a latorendszer kutatasa es modellezese irant erdeklodot hagyomanyos latas szimpoziumunkra. A forum kivalo lehetoseget nyujt a hallgatosag szamara hogy nemzetkozi szintu eloadasokat halljon es szemelyes kontaktust teremtsen a szakma hazai kepviseloivel. A szimpozium immaron a nyolcadik ilyen evenkent tartott osszejovetel. Cim: Nyolcadik Magyar Latas Szimpozium Idopont, idotartam, hely: 2001 Szeptember 8, szombat, Szeged Dom ter 10. Elettan Intezet eloado terme PROGRAMTERV 9:45 MEGNYITO RETINA 10:00 A fény- és [cGMP]-változások hatása a glutaminsav felszabadulására izolált patkány retinából Barabás Péter MTA Kémiai Kutatóközpont Kémiai Intézet Neurokémiai Osztály, Budapest 10:15 Egyes glutamat-receptor koto feherjek eloszlasa patkany retinaban Gábriel Robert Pécsi Tudományegyetem, Altalános Allattani es Neurobiologiai Tanszék 10:30 Tirozin-hidroxiláz aktivításukban eltérõ BALB/cJ és CXBI egértörzsek fényadaptációs folyamatainak vizsgálata Szikra T., Gabriel R., Slezia A, Juhasz G. Vadasz Cs Neurobiologiai Kutatocsoport ELTE 10:45 Reserpin-szenzitiv retinalis neuronok intracellularis analizise teknos retinaban Rabl Katalin Pécsi Tudományegyetem, Altalános Allattani es Neurobiologiai Tanszék 11:00 300 ms hosszu feldolgozott kepcsomagok hagyjak el a retinat mikroszakkadonkent: a vizualis kepfeldolgozas uj elve Juhasz G. Salfay, O, Plahalmi, J. Galambos, R. Neurobiologiai Kutatocsoport ELTE 11:15 SZUNET ANATOMIA 11:30 A retinalis rostok vegzodesi tipusai a madar tectumaban, es ezek funkcionalis jelentosege. Tombol, Alpar,Sebesteny SOTE, Budapest 11:45 Az opticus rostok vegzodese a nucleus BOR-ban. Zayats, Tombol SOTE, Budapest 12:00 A kergi nagy kosarsejtek axoneloszlasa orientacio specifikus fejlodesre utal. Kovács Krisztina, Ferecskó Alex, Buzás Péter, Ulf T. Eysel, Kisvárday Zoltán Institut für Physiologie, Abteilung für Neurophysiologie, Ruhr-Universität Bochum 12:15 Orientacio specifikus kortiko-kortikalis inputok eloszlasa a piramis sejtek dendritfajan. Ferecskó Alex, Kovács Krisztina, Buzás Péter, Ulf T. Eysel, Kisvárday Zoltán Institut für Physiologie, Abteilung für Neurophysiologie, Ruhr-Universität Bochum 12: 30 SZUNET EBED FIZIOLOGIA 2:00 Irányérzékeny complex sejtek látómezejének temporális struktúrája a macska V2-es látóterületében. Vajda Ildiko Department of Physiology, University Utrecht 2:15 Akusztikus és vizuális ingerek térbeli kódolása a macska polymodális asszociációs agykérgében Eördegh Gabriella, Nagy Attila Szegedi Tudományegyetem, Általános Orvosi Kar, Élettani Intézet 2:30 Az inferotemporális kéregben elhelyezked_ idegsejtek tüzelési frekvenciája és a vizuális stimulus jellegzetessége közötti összefüggés. Ráduly Levente, Köteles Károly, Boda Krisztina, Chadaide Zoltán, Tompa Tamás, Benedek György SZTE, ÁOK Élettani Intézet es a Domus Hungarica Scientiarium et Artium alapítvány 2:45 Illuzórikus kontúr percepció rhesus majomban Chadaide Zoltán, Tompa Tamás, Kovács Gyula*, Köteles Károly, Benedek György SZTE Élettani Intézet, Szeged és *Richter Rt., Budapest 3:00 SZUNET HUMAN KISERLETEK ES MODELLJEIK I: MUKODES 3:15 Tranziensek a retinán: a Hermann-grid-illúzió szokásos magyarázatának kritikája Geier János ELTE, Kísérleti és Általános Pszichológiai Tanszék 3:30 Automatikus változás-detekció a látásban Czigler Istvan MTA Pszichológiai Kutatóintézet 3:45 A vizuális mozgáspercepció figyelmi modulációjának mechanizmusai Vidnyánszky Zoltán Rutgers University 4:00 Szimmetria percepció és holografikus reprezentáció Csathó Árpád Pécsi Tudományegyetem, Magatartástudományi Intézet 4:15 SZUNET HUMAN KISERLETEK ES MODELLJEIK II: FEJLODES 4:30 Dorzális vizuális rendszer és a fejlödési dyslexia Karádi Kázmér PTE, ÁOK, Magatartástudományi Intézet 4:45 A háttér kép strukturaltságának hatása egyszeru vizuális alakjellemzök statisztikus tanulására Fiser József Center for Visual Science, University of Rochester 5:00 Tudja-e a látórendszer is a fizikát? Kovács Ilona, Rutgers University 5:15 Ockham borotvájával simított" homunculus modell Lõrincz András Informacio Rendszerek Tanszek , ELTE TTK 5:30 SZIMPOZIUM ZÁRÁS

24 years, 10 months

Norman: Two Visual Systems -- BBS Call for Commentators

by Stevan Harnad - Behavioral & Brain Sciences

Dear Dr. KogList List User, Below is the abstract of a forthcoming BBS target article Two Visual Systems and Two Theories of Perception: An Attempt to Reconcile the Constructivist and Ecological Approaches by Joel Norman http://www.bbsonline.org/Preprints/Norman/ http://psy.haifa.ac.il/~maga/tvs&ttp.pdf This article has been accepted for publication in Behavioral and Brain Sciences (BBS), an international, interdisciplinary journal providing Open Peer Commentary on important and controversial current research in the biobehavioral and cognitive sciences. Commentators must be BBS Associates or nominated by a BBS Associate. To be considered as a commentator for this article, to suggest other appropriate commentators, or for information about how to become a BBS Associate, please reply by EMAIL within three (3) weeks to: calls(a)bbsonline.org The Calls are sent to 8000 BBS Associates, so there is no expectation (indeed, it would be calamitous) that each recipient should comment on every occasion! Hence there is no need to reply except if you wish to comment, or to nominate someone to comment. If you are not a BBS Associate, please approach a current BBS Associate (there are currently over 10,000 worldwide) who is familiar with your work to nominate you. All past BBS authors, referees and commentators are eligible to become BBS Associates. A full electronic list of current BBS Associates is available at this location to help you select a name: http://www.bbsonline.org/Instructions/assoclist.html If no current BBS Associate knows your work, please send us your Curriculum Vitae and BBS will circulate it to appropriate Associates to ask whether they would be prepared to nominate you. (In the meantime, your name, address and email address will be entered into our database as an unaffiliated investigator.) To help us put together a balanced list of commentators, please give some indication of the aspects of the topic on which you would bring your areas of expertise to bear if you were selected as a commentator. To help you decide whether you would be an appropriate commentator for this article, an electronic draft is retrievable from the online BBSPrints Archive, at the URL that follows the abstract below. _____________________________________________________________ Two Visual Systems and Two Theories of Perception: An Attempt to Reconcile the Constructivist and Ecological Approaches Joel Norman Department of Psychology University of Haifa Haifa, Israel jnorman(a)psy.haifa.ac.il KEYWORDS: Visual perception theories, ecological, constructivist, two visual systems, space perception, size perception, dual-process approach ABSTRACT: The two contrasting theoretical approaches to visual perception, the constructivist and the ecological, are briefly presented and illustrated through their analyses of space perception and size perception. Earlier calls for their reconciliation and unification are reviewed. Neurophysiological, neuropsychological, and psychophysical evidence for the existence of two quite distinct visual systems, the ventral and the dorsal, is presented. These two perceptual systems differ in their functions; the ventral systems central function is that of identification, while the dorsal system is mainly engaged in the visual control of motor behavior. The strong parallels between the ecological approach and the functioning of the dorsal system and between the constructivist approach and the functioning of the ventral system are noted. It is also shown that the experimental paradigms used by the proponents of these two approaches match the functions of the respective visual systems. A dual-process approach to visual perception emerges from this analysis, with the ecological-dorsal process transpiring mainly without conscious awareness, while the constructivist-ventral process is normally conscious. Some implications of this dual-process approach to visual-perceptual phenomena are presented, with emphasis on space perception. http://www.bbsonline.org/Preprints/Norman/ http://psy.haifa.ac.il/~maga/tvs&ttp.pdf ___________________________________________________________ Please do not prepare a commentary yet. Just let us know, after having inspected it, what relevant expertise you feel you would bring to bear on what aspect of the article. We will then let you know whether it was possible to include your name on the final formal list of invitees. _______________________________________________________________________ *** SUPPLEMENTARY ANNOUNCEMENTS *** (1) The authors of scientific articles are not paid money for their refereed research papers; they give them away. What they want is to reach all interested researchers worldwide, so as to maximize the potential research impact of their findings. Subscription/Site-License/Pay-Per-View costs are accordingly access-barriers, and hence impact-barriers for this give-away research literature. There is now a way to free the entire refereed journal literature, for everyone, everywhere, immediately, by mounting interoperable university eprint archives, and self-archiving all refereed research papers in them. Please see: http://www.eprints.org http://www.openarchives.org/ http://www.dlib.org/dlib/december99/12harnad.html --------------------------------------------------------------------- (2) All authors in the biobehavioral and cognitive sciences are strongly encouraged to self-archive all their papers in their own institution's Eprint Archives or in CogPrints, the Eprint Archive for the biobehavioral and cognitive sciences: http://cogprints.soton.ac.uk/ It is extremely simple to self-archive and will make all of our papers available to all of us everywhere, at no cost to anyone, forever. Authors of BBS papers wishing to archive their already published BBS Target Articles should submit it to BBSPrints Archive. Information about the archiving of BBS' entire backcatalogue will be sent to you in the near future. Meantime please see: http://www.bbsonline.org/help/ and http://www.bbsonline.org/Instructions/ --------------------------------------------------------------------- (3) Call for Book Nominations for BBS Multiple Book Review In the past, Behavioral and Brain Sciences (BBS) had only been able to do 1-2 BBS multiple book treatments per year, because of our limited annual page quota. BBS's new expanded page quota will make it possible for us to increase the number of books we treat per year, so this is an excellent time for BBS Associates and biobehavioral/cognitive scientists in general to nominate books you would like to see accorded BBS multiple book review. (Authors may self-nominate, but books can only be selected on the basis of multiple nominations.) It would be very helpful if you indicated in what way a BBS Multiple Book Review of the book(s) you nominate would be useful to the field (and of course a rich list of potential reviewers would be the best evidence of its potential impact!). *-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-* Please note: Your email address has been added to our user database for Calls for Commentators, the reason you received this email. If you do not wish to receive further Calls, please feel free to change your mailshot status through your User Login link on the BBSPrints homepage. Check the helpfiles for details of how to obtain your username and password. http://www.bbsonline.org/ For information about the mailshot, please see the help file at: http://www.bbsonline.org/help/node5.html#mailshot *-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*

24 years, 10 months

Norman: Two Visual Systems -- BBS Call for Commentators

by Stevan Harnad - Behavioral & Brain Sciences

Dear Dr. Qwerty, Below is the abstract of a forthcoming BBS target article Two Visual Systems and Two Theories of Perception: An Attempt to Reconcile the Constructivist and Ecological Approaches by Joel Norman http://www.bbsonline.org/Preprints/Norman/ http://psy.haifa.ac.il/~maga/tvs&ttp.pdf This article has been accepted for publication in Behavioral and Brain Sciences (BBS), an international, interdisciplinary journal providing Open Peer Commentary on important and controversial current research in the biobehavioral and cognitive sciences. Commentators must be BBS Associates or nominated by a BBS Associate. To be considered as a commentator for this article, to suggest other appropriate commentators, or for information about how to become a BBS Associate, please reply by EMAIL within three (3) weeks to: calls(a)bbsonline.org The Calls are sent to 8000 BBS Associates, so there is no expectation (indeed, it would be calamitous) that each recipient should comment on every occasion! Hence there is no need to reply except if you wish to comment, or to nominate someone to comment. If you are not a BBS Associate, please approach a current BBS Associate (there are currently over 10,000 worldwide) who is familiar with your work to nominate you. All past BBS authors, referees and commentators are eligible to become BBS Associates. A full electronic list of current BBS Associates is available at this location to help you select a name: http://www.bbsonline.org/Instructions/assoclist.html If no current BBS Associate knows your work, please send us your Curriculum Vitae and BBS will circulate it to appropriate Associates to ask whether they would be prepared to nominate you. (In the meantime, your name, address and email address will be entered into our database as an unaffiliated investigator.) To help us put together a balanced list of commentators, please give some indication of the aspects of the topic on which you would bring your areas of expertise to bear if you were selected as a commentator. To help you decide whether you would be an appropriate commentator for this article, an electronic draft is retrievable from the online BBSPrints Archive, at the URL that follows the abstract below. _____________________________________________________________ Two Visual Systems and Two Theories of Perception: An Attempt to Reconcile the Constructivist and Ecological Approaches Joel Norman Department of Psychology University of Haifa Haifa, Israel jnorman(a)psy.haifa.ac.il KEYWORDS: Visual perception theories, ecological, constructivist, two visual systems, space perception, size perception, dual-process approach ABSTRACT: The two contrasting theoretical approaches to visual perception, the constructivist and the ecological, are briefly presented and illustrated through their analyses of space perception and size perception. Earlier calls for their reconciliation and unification are reviewed. Neurophysiological, neuropsychological, and psychophysical evidence for the existence of two quite distinct visual systems, the ventral and the dorsal, is presented. These two perceptual systems differ in their functions; the ventral systems central function is that of identification, while the dorsal system is mainly engaged in the visual control of motor behavior. The strong parallels between the ecological approach and the functioning of the dorsal system and between the constructivist approach and the functioning of the ventral system are noted. It is also shown that the experimental paradigms used by the proponents of these two approaches match the functions of the respective visual systems. A dual-process approach to visual perception emerges from this analysis, with the ecological-dorsal process transpiring mainly without conscious awareness, while the constructivist-ventral process is normally conscious. Some implications of this dual-process approach to visual-perceptual phenomena are presented, with emphasis on space perception. http://www.bbsonline.org/Preprints/Norman/ http://psy.haifa.ac.il/~maga/tvs&ttp.pdf ___________________________________________________________ Please do not prepare a commentary yet. Just let us know, after having inspected it, what relevant expertise you feel you would bring to bear on what aspect of the article. We will then let you know whether it was possible to include your name on the final formal list of invitees. _______________________________________________________________________ *** SUPPLEMENTARY ANNOUNCEMENTS *** (1) The authors of scientific articles are not paid money for their refereed research papers; they give them away. What they want is to reach all interested researchers worldwide, so as to maximize the potential research impact of their findings. Subscription/Site-License/Pay-Per-View costs are accordingly access-barriers, and hence impact-barriers for this give-away research literature. There is now a way to free the entire refereed journal literature, for everyone, everywhere, immediately, by mounting interoperable university eprint archives, and self-archiving all refereed research papers in them. Please see: http://www.eprints.org http://www.openarchives.org/ http://www.dlib.org/dlib/december99/12harnad.html --------------------------------------------------------------------- (2) All authors in the biobehavioral and cognitive sciences are strongly encouraged to self-archive all their papers in their own institution's Eprint Archives or in CogPrints, the Eprint Archive for the biobehavioral and cognitive sciences: http://cogprints.soton.ac.uk/ It is extremely simple to self-archive and will make all of our papers available to all of us everywhere, at no cost to anyone, forever. Authors of BBS papers wishing to archive their already published BBS Target Articles should submit it to BBSPrints Archive. Information about the archiving of BBS' entire backcatalogue will be sent to you in the near future. Meantime please see: http://www.bbsonline.org/help/ and http://www.bbsonline.org/Instructions/ --------------------------------------------------------------------- (3) Call for Book Nominations for BBS Multiple Book Review In the past, Behavioral and Brain Sciences (BBS) had only been able to do 1-2 BBS multiple book treatments per year, because of our limited annual page quota. BBS's new expanded page quota will make it possible for us to increase the number of books we treat per year, so this is an excellent time for BBS Associates and biobehavioral/cognitive scientists in general to nominate books you would like to see accorded BBS multiple book review. (Authors may self-nominate, but books can only be selected on the basis of multiple nominations.) It would be very helpful if you indicated in what way a BBS Multiple Book Review of the book(s) you nominate would be useful to the field (and of course a rich list of potential reviewers would be the best evidence of its potential impact!). *-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-* Please note: Your email address has been added to our user database for Calls for Commentators, the reason you received this email. If you do not wish to receive further Calls, please feel free to change your mailshot status through your User Login link on the BBSPrints homepage. Check the helpfiles for details of how to obtain your username and password. http://www.bbsonline.org/ For information about the mailshot, please see the help file at: http://www.bbsonline.org/help/node5.html#mailshot *-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*

24 years, 10 months

Fw: Taliban/taleban

by Gergely Csibra

Header field too long (>1024) ----- Date: 13 Aug 01 13:55:00 +0200 From: gyorgy buzsaki <buzsaki(a)axon.rutgers.edu> Subject: Taliban/taleban To: Elizabeth Abercrombie <abercrombie(a)axon.rutgers.edu>, Albert Aguayo <MC10@MCGILLA>, David Amaral <dgamaral(a)ucdavis.edu>, Colin Beer <beer(a)andromeda.rutgers.edu>, April Benasich <benasich(a)axon.rutgers.edu>, Benjamin Martin Bly <ben(a)psychology.rutgers.edu>, Edward Bonder <ebonder(a)andromeda.rutgers.edu>, Linda Brzustowicz <brzustowicz(a)nel-exchange.rutgers.edu>, Gyorgy Buzsaki <buzsaki(a)axon.rutgers.edu>, "Mei-Fang Cheng" <mcheng(a)axon.rutgers.edu>, Hungarian Cognitive Group <koglist(a)cogpsyphy.hu>, Ian Creese <creese(a)axon.rutgers.edu>, Joel Davis <davisjl(a)ONRHQ.ONR.NAVY.MIL>, Michale Fee <fee(a)physics.bell-labs.com>, Walter Freeman <wfreeman(a)socrates.berkeley.edu>, Doina Ganea <dganea(a)andromeda.rutgers.edu>, George Gerstein <george(a)mulab.physiol.upenn.edu>, Alan Gilchrist <gilchrist(a)andromeda.rutgers.edu>, Mark Gluck <gluck(a)pavlov.rutgers.edu>, Robert L Isaacson <Isaacson(a)binghampton.edu>, John Jefferys <j.g.r.jefferys(a)bham.ac.uk>, Mill Jonakait <jonakait(a)andromeda.rutgers.edu>, Frank Jordan <frjordan(a)andromeda.rutgers.edu>, Anita Kamondi <anita(a)neur.sote.hu>, G Karmos <KARMOS(a)cogpsyphy.hu>, David Kleinfeld <dk(a)physics.ucsd.edu>, Barry Komisaruk <brk(a)andromeda.rutgers.edu>, Gyuszi Kuti <JKuti(a)ucsd.edu>, Joe LeDoux <ledoux(a)cns.nyu.edu>, LS Leung <SLEUNG(a)julian.UWO.CA>, Zili Liu <liu(a)psychology.rutgers.edu>, Chris McBain <chrismcb(a)codon.nih.gov>, Joan Morrell <morrell(a)axon.rutgers.edu>, Farzan Nadim <farzan(a)andromeda.rutgers.edu>, Markku Penttonen <penttone(a)keula.uku.fi>, Teresa Perney <perney(a)axon.rutgers.edu>, Howard Poizner <poizner(a)axon.rutgers.edu>, Michael Recce <recce(a)axon.rutgers.edu>, Jay Rosenblatt <jzr(a)andromeda.rutgers.edu>, Phil Schwartzkroin <PAS(a)U.WASHINGTON.EDU>, m segal <JNSEGAL(a)weizmann.weizmann.ac.IL>, Maggie Shiffrar <mag(a)psychology.rutgers.edu>, Harold Siegel <hisiegel(a)psychology.rutgers.edu>, Ralph Siegel <axon(a)cortex.rutgers.edu>, ivan soltesz <isoltesz(a)uci.edu>, Andras Spielman <spielmna(a)acfcluster.nyu.edu>, kevin staley <staleyk(a)Jove.UCHSC.edu>, Wendy Susuki <wendy(a)wotan.cns.nyu.edu>, Paula Tallal <tallal(a)axon.rutgers.edu>, Nobu Tamamaki <F00540(a)jpnac.bitnet>, James Tepper <tepper(a)axon.rutgers.edu>, Dennis Turner <turne008(a)MC.DUKE.EDU>, Menno Witter <MP.Witter.Anat(a)med.vu.nl>, Laszlo Zaborszky <zaborszky(a)axon.rutgers.edu> Dear Friends, > >Please take a few minutes to read and act on this email. > >On May 23rd 2001 the Taleban authorities in Afghanistan confirmed >that all Hindus will be required to wear a strip of yellow cloth >sewn onto a shirt pocket in order to identify themselves. They >claim that the measure is for their "protection". The world has faced this >before, in 1939 the world was required, at great cost, >to rid itself of Hitler's tyranny, it is not hard to spot his child. >Those who fail to learn from history are condemned to relive it. > >The Taleban's record on respecting other religions gives great >cause for concern that their ultimate aim, upon which they are >intent, is "religious cleansing". They have already >demonstrated their distain and intolerance for other religions and >traditions by the desecration and destruction of the ancient Buddhist >statues, our collective heritage, within the Afghanistan. >Whatever your religion, or even if you have none, we hope that >you will agree that this fundamentally wrong. Remember, >"All it takes for evil to triumph is for good men to do nothing". >Please do not do nothing, add your voice. > > DIRECTIONS: >PLEASE COPY this email on to a new message, >add your name and those of your household who wish to >participate to the bottom and forward it to everyone on your >distribution list. If you receive this petition and you find that you >will be the 251st name on it, please e-mail a copy of it to: >alastair(a)om-int.com. It will then be forwarded to the UN. > > >Even if you decide not to sign, please be considerate and do not kill >the petition as you will be denying your friends, and theirs, >their legitimate voice. Instead return it to alastair(a)om-int.com > >To The Secretary General, Security >Council and General Assembly of the United Nations. > >We the undersigned are appalled by the decision of the Taleban >government of Afghanistan to require all Hindus to wear a piece >of yellow cloth sewn onto a shirt pocket in order to identify >themselves. An individual's communion with God, however >they find him, is a matter of personal conscience and must not be >the subject of intimidation or persecution. The right of >everyone to worship as they wish is fundamental and inalienable. The >United Nations was founded in order to defeat Hitler and his >henchmen who required the same from another religion with all >it's horrific consequences. It is completely unacceptable that > nearly 60 years later history is repeating itself. We ask the following: > >1. That the Taleban government is made aware in the strongest >possible terms that the world will not countenance this >perversion of human rights. > >2. That prior to the United Nations and/or it's constituent members >granting recognition of the Taleban government this >obscene policy is reversed. > >3. That the United Nations widen the terms of the trade sanctions >currently in force. > >1. Alastair Mitton - London UK >2. Robert Mitton - London UK >3. Paulette Budd - London UK >4. Andrew Peake - London UK >5. Pippa Howell - London UK >6. Cecile Kusters - Arnhem, the Netherlands >7. Sarah Malpas - London UK >8. Susan Donnelly - Newcastle UK >9. Paul Donnelly - London UK >10. Pauline Bartholomew - London UK >11. Is0bel McMillan London UK >12. Fiona Adamson >13. Minka Emina Kulenovic La Jolla, US >14. Cath Dolan, London, England >15. Liz Murphy, Murcia, Spain >16. William M. Rueter, Wisconsin, US >17. Jaclyn A. Knapper, Tennessee, US >18. Louise Morris, Tennessee, US >19. Joe Stoud, Matsuyama, Japan >20. Keiko Stroud, Matsuyama, Japan >21.Larry Asher, Nepal >22. Phyl Asher, Nepal >23. Reiny de Wit, Nepal >24. Helen Johnston, Nepal >25. Isaac Thompson, Northern Ireland >26. Anne Thompson, Northern Ireland >27. Paul Carter, Vancouver, Canada >28. Lois Carter, Vancouver, Canada >29. Bronwyn Short, Vancouver, Canada >30. David Short, Vancouver, Canada >31. Mark Calder, Sydney, Australia >32. Graham Wintle, Surbiton, UK >33. Geoff Chivers, Surbiton, UK >34. Derek Nathan New Malden UK >35. Mary Nathan New Malden UK >36 Rosalind Preston, London UK >37 Marlena Schmool, UK >38 Ephraim Borowski, Glasgow, UK >39. Ruth Warrens, London, UK >40. Anthony Warrens, London, UK >41. Ian Goodman, London, UK >42. Liz Lightstone, London, UK >43 Elizabeth Simpson, London UK >44. Dimitris Kioussis >45. John_Griffin >46. Hermann Bujard, Heidelberg, Germany >47. Regine Bujard, Heidelberg, Germany >48. Konrad Beyreuther, Heidelberg, Germany >49. Ursula Beyreuther, Heidelberg, Germany >50. Horst Simon, Heidelberg, Germany >51. Michael Brand, Dresden >52. Dorothea Brand, Dresden >53. Christoph Lorra, Dresden >54. Martin Stocker, London, UK >55. Walter St=FChmer, G=F6ttingen, Germany >56. Michael Hans, Bonn, Germany >57. Wolfgang Mueller, Berlin, Germany >58. Claude Wasterlain, Los Angeles, USA 59. Jerome Engel, Jr., Los Angeles, USA 60. Gyorgy Buzsaki, Millburn, NJ, USA Gyorgy Buzsaki, MD, PhD Veronika Solt MD Lili Buzsaki 51 Sagamore Rd Millburn, NJ, USA

24 years, 10 months

Kommunikációs kérdőív

by Krajcsi Attila

Kedves Kollegák, Egy internetes-mobilos kommunikációs szokások vizsgálatot végzünk Pléh Csabával és Kovács Kristóffal. Egy kérdőívet tettünk fel a netre a http://www.pszichologia.hu/hirdetes/internet.html címen. Ha valakinek van ideje és kedve, töltse ki a rövid (nem olyan hosszú) kérdőívet. Üdv, Krajcsi Attila

24 years, 10 months

Two recent issues of Cognitive Systems Research

by rsun＠cecs.missouri.edu

The TOC of the two recent issues of Cognitive Systems Research: --------------------------------------------------------- Table of Contents for Cognitive Systems Research Volume 2, Issue 1, April 2001 Ron Sun Individual action and collective function: From sociology to multi-agent learning 1-3 [Abstract] [Full text] (PDF 42.3 Kb) Cristiano Castelfranchi The theory of social functions: challenges for computational social science and multi-agent learning 5-38 [Abstract] [Full text] (PDF 425.2 Kb) Tom R. Burns and Anna Gomoliñska Socio-cognitive mechanisms of belief change - Applications of generalized game theory to belief revision, social fabrication, and self-fulfilling prophesy 39-54 [Abstract] [Full text] (PDF 139.5 Kb) Michael L. Littman Value-function reinforcement learning in Markov games [Abstract] [Full text] (PDF 108 Kb) 55-66 Junling Hu and Michael P. Wellman Learning about other agents in a dynamic multiagent system [Abstract] [Full text] (PDF 515.3 Kb) 67-79 Maja J. Mataric Learning in behavior-based multi-robot systems: policies, models, and other agents 81-93 [Abstract] [Full text] (PDF 295.6 Kb) Table of Contents for Cognitive Systems Research Volume 2, Issue 2, May 2001 Rosaria Conte Emergent (info)institutions [Abstract] [Full text] (PDF 103.1 Kb) 97-110 L. Andrew Coward The recommendation architecture: lessons from large-scale electronic systems applied to cognition 111-156 [Abstract] [Full text] (PDF 858 Kb) Agnès Guillot and Jean-Arcady Meyer The animat contribution to cognitive systems research [Abstract] [Full text] (PDF 67.2 Kb) 157-165 Sheila Garfield Review of Speech and language processing [Abstract] [Full text] (PDF 55.2 Kb) 167-172 * Full text files can be viewed and printed using the Adobe Acrobat Reader. Download from the Web site: http://www.cecs.missouri.edu/~rsun/journal.html http://www.elsevier.nl/locate/cogsys http://www.elsevier.com/locate/cogsys © Copyright 2001, Elsevier Science, All rights reserved. =========================================================================== Prof. Ron Sun http://www.cecs.missouri.edu/~rsun CECS Department phone: (573) 884-7662 University of Missouri-Columbia fax: (573) 882 8318 201 Engineering Building West Columbia, MO 65211-2060 email: rsun(a)cecs.missouri.edu http://www.cecs.missouri.edu/~rsun http://www.cecs.missouri.edu/~rsun/journal.html http://www.elsevier.com/locate/cogsys ===========================================================================

24 years, 10 months

Psycoloquy 1-30 2001: Calls for Commentators

by Stevan Harnad

Below are the half-year contents of Psycoloquy for 2001. Please note that the full articles themselves will no longer be posted to subscribers and lists, just the summary contents, with the URLs where they can be retrieved. Note that below there are a number of target articles on which Open Peer Commentary is now invited: (1) 6 related target articles on Nicotine Addiction: Balfour, Le Houezec, Oscarson, Sivilotti, Smith& Sachse, Wonnacott http://www.cogsci.soton.ac.uk/cgi/psyc/ptopic?topic=nicotine-addiction (2) 4 independent target articles, all inviting commentary: Navon on Mirror Reversal http://www.cogsci.soton.ac.uk/psyc-bin/newpsy?12.017 Kramer & Moore on Family Therapy http://www.cogsci.soton.ac.uk/cgi/psyc/newpsy?12.024 Sherman on Bipolar Disorder http://www.cogsci.soton.ac.uk/cgi/psyc/newpsy?12.028 Overgaard on Consciousness http://www.cogsci.soton.ac.uk/cgi/psyc/newpsy?12.029 (3) 5 book Precis, all inviting Multiple Book Review: Miller on the Mating Mind http://www.cogsci.soton.ac.uk/cgi/psyc/newpsy?12.008 Ben-Ze'ev on Emotion http://www.cogsci.soton.ac.uk/cgi/psyc/newpsy?12.007 Bolton & Hill on Mental Disorder http://www.cogsci.soton.ac.uk/cgi/psyc/newpsy?12.018 Zachar on Biological Psychiatry http://www.cogsci.soton.ac.uk/cgi/psyc/newpsy?12.023 Praetoriuus on Cognition/Action http://www.cogsci.soton.ac.uk/cgi/psyc/newpsy?12.027 (4) 15 ongoing commentaries and responses on current Psycoloquy target articles: Social-Bias, Reduced-Wason-Task, Self-Consciousness, Electronic-Journals, Brain-Intelligence, Autonomous Brain, Stroop-Differences, Lashley-Hebb, Bell-Curve. ----------------------------------------------------------------------- TABLE OF CONTENTS: PSYCOLOQUY 2001 January - July: Balfour, D. (2001), The Role of Mesolimbic Dopamine in Nicotine Dependence. Psycoloquy 12(001) http://www.cogsci.soton.ac.uk/cgi/psyc/newpsy?12.001 Le Houezec, J. (2001), Non-Dopaminergic Pathways in Nicotine Dependence. Psycoloquy 12 (002) http://www.cogsci.soton.ac.uk/cgi/psyc/newpsy?12.002 Oscarson, M. (2001), Nicotine Metabolism by the Polymorphic Cytochrome P450 2A6 (CYP2A6) Enzyme: Implications for Interindividual Differences in Smoking Behaviour. Psycoloquy 12 (003) http://www.cogsci.soton.ac.uk/cgi/psyc/newpsy?12.003 Sivilotti, L. (2001), Nicotinic Receptors: Molecular Issues. Psycoloquy 12 (004) http://www.cogsci.soton.ac.uk/cgi/psyc/newpsy?12.004 Smith, G. & Sachse, C. (2001), A Role for CYP2D6 in Nicotine Metabolism? Psycoloquy 12 (005) http://www.cogsci.soton.ac.uk/cgi/psyc/newpsy?12.005 Wonnacott, S. (2001), Nicotinic Receptors in Relation to Nicotine Addiction. Psycoloquy 12 (006) http://www.cogsci.soton.ac.uk/cgi/psyc/newpsy?12.006 Ben-Ze'ev, A. (2001), The Subtlety of Emotions. Psycoloquy 12 (007) http://www.cogsci.soton.ac.uk/cgi/psyc/newpsy?12.007 Miller, G. F. (2001), The Mating Mind: How Sexual Choice Shaped the Evolution of Human Nature. Psycoloquy 12 (008) http://www.cogsci.soton.ac.uk/cgi/psyc/newpsy?12.008 Krueger, J. (2001), Social Bias Engulfs the Field Psycoloquy 12 (009) http://www.cogsci.soton.ac.uk/cgi/psyc/newpsy?12.009 Margolis, H. (2001), More On Modus Tollens and the Wason Task Psycoloquy 12 (010) http://www.cogsci.soton.ac.uk/cgi/psyc/newpsy?12.010 Newen, A. (2001), Kinds of Self-Consciousness Psycoloquy 12 (011) http://www.cogsci.soton.ac.uk/cgi/psyc/newpsy?12.011 Turner, R. (2001), An End to Great Publishing Myths Psycoloquy 12 (012) http://www.cogsci.soton.ac.uk/cgi/psyc/newpsy?12.012 Storfer, M. D. (2001), The Parallel Increase in Brain Size, Intelligence, and Myopia. Psycoloquy 12 (013) http://www.cogsci.soton.ac.uk/cgi/psyc/newpsy?12.013 Storfer, M. D. (2001), Interrelating Population Trends on Brain Size, Intelligence and Myopia. Psycoloquy 12 (014) http://www.cogsci.soton.ac.uk/cgi/psyc/newpsy?12.014 Storfer, M. D. (2001), Brain and Eye Size, Myopia, and IQ. Psycoloquy 12 (015) http://www.cogsci.soton.ac.uk/cgi/psyc/newpsy?12.015 Milner, P.M. (2001), Stimulus Equivalence, Attention and the Self: A Punless Reply to Gellatly's Smell Assemblies. Psycoloquy 12 (016) http://www.cogsci.soton.ac.uk/cgi/psyc/newpsy?12.016 Navon, D. (2001), The Puzzle of Mirror Reversal: A View From Clockland. Psycoloquy 12 (017) http://www.cogsci.soton.ac.uk/cgi/psyc/newpsy?12.017 Bolton, D. & Hill, J. (2001), Mind, Meaning & Mental Disorder: The Nature of Causal Explanation in Psychology & Psychiatry. Psycoloquy 12 (018) http://www.cogsci.soton.ac.uk/cgi/psyc/newpsy?12.018 Meyer, J. (2001), Scientific Journals by and for Scientists. Psycoloquy 12 (019) http://www.cogsci.soton.ac.uk/cgi/psyc/newpsy?12.019 Hutto, D. D. (2001), Syntax Before Semantics. Structure Before Content. Psycoloquy 12 (020) http://www.cogsci.soton.ac.uk/cgi/psyc/newpsy?12.020 Mills, M. E. (2001), Authors of the World Unite: Liberating Academic Content From PublisherS' Restrictions. Psycoloquy 12 (021) http://www.cogsci.soton.ac.uk/cgi/psyc/newpsy?12.021 Oullier, O. (2001), Does Scientific Publication Need A Peer Consensus? Psycoloquy 12 (022) http://www.cogsci.soton.ac.uk/cgi/psyc/newpsy?12.022 Zachar, P. (2001), Psychological Concepts and Biological Psychiatry: A Philosophical Analysis. Psycoloquy 12 (023) http://www.cogsci.soton.ac.uk/cgi/psyc/newpsy?12.023 Kramer, D. & Moore, M. (2001), Gender Roles, Romantic Fiction and Family Therapy. Psycoloquy 12 (024) http://www.cogsci.soton.ac.uk/cgi/psyc/newpsy?12.024 Koch, C. (2001) Stroop Interference and Working Memory. Psycoloquy 12 (025) http://www.cogsci.soton.ac.uk/cgi/psyc/newpsy?12.025 Abeles, M. (2001), Founders of Neuropsychology - Who is Ignored?. Psycoloquy 12 (026) http://www.cogsci.soton.ac.uk/cgi/psyc/newpsy?12.026 Praetorius, N. (2001), Principles of Cognition, Language and Action: Essays on the Foundations of a Science of Psychology. Psycoloquy 12 (027) http://www.cogsci.soton.ac.uk/cgi/psyc/newpsy?12.027 Sherman, J. A. (2001), Evolutionary Origin of Bipolar Disorder (EOBD). Psycoloquy 12 (028) http://www.cogsci.soton.ac.uk/cgi/psyc/newpsy?12.028 Overgaard, M. (2001), The Role of Phenomenological Reports in Experiments on Consciousness. Psycoloquy 12 (029) http://www.cogsci.soton.ac.uk/cgi/psyc/newpsy?12.029 Reifman, A. (2001), Heritability, Economic Inequality, and the Time Course of the "Bell Curve" Debate. Psycoloquy 12 (030) http://www.cogsci.soton.ac.uk/cgi/psyc/newpsy?12.030

24 years, 11 months

Fiatal kutatoi palyazat

by Miklos Lehmann

Kedves Kollegak, az MTA Filozofiai Kutatointezete palyazati kiirasaba sajnalatos hiba csuszott: a leadasi hatarido nem augusztus 16, hanem 6. A hibaert elnezest kerunk.

24 years, 11 months

Jump to page:

2026

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

2002

2001

2000

1999

1998

1997

1996

1995

1994

1993

koglist