Department of History and Philosophy of Science
Eotvos University
Budapest, Pazmany P. setany 1/A
PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE COLLOQUIUM
(http://hps.elte.hu/seminar)
________________________________________________
22 April 4:00 PM 6th floor 6.54
(Language: Hungarian)
Vallas es tudomany: a konfliktuson innen es tul
Religion and Science: this side of the conflict and beyond
Mihaly Toth
Philosophy, Pazmany Peter Catholic University, Budapest
Vallas es tudomany, kulonosen pedig a modern termeszettudomany
viszonyara gondolva leggyakrabban valamilyen szembenallas
kepe sejlik fel elottunk. Ezt az elkepzelest reszben indokoljak
az ujkori tudomanytortenet egyes fejlemenyei. A ket terulet
kapcsolata azonban sokkal arnyaltabb annal, semhogy egy
egyszeru konfliktus- modellel jellemezheto lenne. Az elmult
evtizedekben szamos kiserlet tortent mind teologusok, mind
termeszettudosok, mind a kozvetitesre vallalkozo filozofusok
reszerol, hogy a kerdeses viszony minel tobb aspektusat
feltarjak, valamint hogy a kapcsolat jelen es jovobeni lehetosegeit
felvazoljak.
Eloadasomban a legfontosabb idevonatkozo eszmefuttatasokat
kivanom roviden bemutatni - kiterve a magyar vonatkozasokra
-, altaluk illusztralva a kerdeskor aktualitasat es jelentoseget.
Vitainditokent igyekszem tovabba ramutatni az eddigi kiserletek
nehany problematikus pontjara is.
___________________
The organizer of the seminar: László E. Szabó
--
Laszlo E. Szabo
Department of Theoretical Physics
Department of History and Philosophy of Science
Eotvos University, Budapest
H-1518 Budapest, Pf. 32, Hungary
Phone/Fax: (36-1)372-2924
Home: (36-1) 200-7318
Mobil/SMS: (36) 20-366-1172
http://hps.elte.hu/~leszabo
*-----------------------------------------------------------------------*
| A FIZINFO a fizikus informacios rendszer resze |
| |
| Cikk, hozzaszolas a |
| |
| Fizinfo(a)lists.kfki.hu |
| |
| cimre kuldheto. Ilyenkor a subject-sorba a cikk cimet kell irni. |
| A cikk szovege a level torzse. Ez sima szoveg legyen! |
| |
| Informacio: http://sunserv.kfki.hu/mailman/listinfo/fizinfo |
| |
| A beerkezo levelek feldolgozasat program vegzi. Az emberi valaszt |
| igenylo kerest, kerdest az alabbi cimek valamelyikere lehet megirni: |
| |
| Jenik Livia jenik(a)rmki.kfki.hu |
| Kiraly Peterne kiraly(a)sunserv.kfki.hu |
| |
*-----------------------------------------------------------------------*
BOUNCE koglist(a)www.cogpsyphy.hu: Non-member submission from
[utak(a)nytud.hu]
---
From: utak(a)nytud.hu
Date: Tue, 16 Apr 2002 18:31:34 +0200 (CEST)
To: <koglist(a)cogpsyphy.hu>
Subject: Konferencia-felhivas
Az alabbi felhivas szovegenek magyar valtozatat a level masodik resze
tartalmazza, ekezetek nelkul.
CALL FOR PAPERS
Linguistic Socialization, Language Acquisition and Language Disorders
dedicated to the memory of Zita Reger (1944-2001)
October 7-9 2002,
at the Research Institute of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences, Budapest
(Budapest VI. Benczzr u. 33.).
The conference, organized jointly by the Research Institute of Linguistics
and
the Research Institute on National and Ethnic Minorities of the Hungarian
Academy of Sciences is set up to pay homage to the late Professor Zita
Reger, an outstanding linguist and teacher, former department head at the
Research Institute for Linguistics of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences. The
conference will feature state-of-the-art presentations on the following
three
topics, which Zita Reger made significant contributions to during her
research
career:
A) Language acquisition, child language
B) Linguistic socialization, and language use in Gypsy communities
C) Aphasia research: lexicon, syntax and phonology in impaired language
Invited speakers:
Jean Berko Gleason (Boston University)
Csaba Pleh (Budapest University of Technology and Economics)
Herman Kolk (Katholieke Universiteit Nijmegen)
Michael Stewart (University College London)
Susan Gal (University of Chicago)
The organizers invite anonymous abstracts for 30-minute talks which
will be delivered in three sessions, corresponding to the three topic
areas indicated above.
Official languages: Sessions A and C - English, Session B - English and
Hungarian.
Abstract presentation:
The maximum lenght of anonymous abstracts is two pages (single-space, Times
12
point or equivalent).
Abstracts should be written in one of the official languages of the session
they are intended to.
Electronic submission of abstracts (in rtf, i.e. Rich Text File format) is
strongly preferred.
Abstracts should be sent to the following address: utak(a)nytud.hu
Please make sure that the abstract contains no easily recognizable reference
to
your own work.
The abstracts should be accompanied by a separate page with the author's
name
and affiliation, title of abstract, e-mail address, mailing address, and
phone
and fax number.
If the author prefers submission of hard copies, they should be sent (in 5
copies without author's name + a separate page with the author's name, and
affiliation) to the following address:
Zoltan Banreti,
Research Institute for Linguistics of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences
Budapest
P.O. Box 701/518.
1399
Hungary
Deadline for the submission of abstracts: June 10, 2002
Authors will be notified of the acceptance of their abstracts before July 1
2002
Registration fee (including coffee, abstracts, and a banquet):
before August 31: 40 USD
after August 31: 50 USD
Pre-registration rates only apply if payment is transferred to our account
prior to August 31:
Research Institute for Linguistics of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences
Account no.: 10032000-01731732-00000000
Swift code: MANEHUHB
Students and scholars from Eastern and Central Europe can apply for special
grants covering the price of registration and/or accommodation when
submitting
their abstracts.
Further information about registration and accommodation (including special
rates offered to conference participants by hotels near the venue of the
conference) is available on our
website: www.nytud.hu/LSLALD/lslald.html.
On behalf of the organizers,
Zoltan Banreti, Deputy Director of the Research Institute for Linguistics,
Budapest
Laszlo Szarka, Director of the Research Institute on National and Ethnic
Minorities
************************************************************************
FELHIVAS KONFERENCIAN VALO RESZVETELRE
Az MTA Nyelvtudomanyi Intezete
es a Nemzeti-Etnikai Kisebbsegkutato Intezet
tudomanyos konferenciat szervez
Reger Zita (1944-2001) professzor emlekere:
Linguistic Socialization, Langauge Acquisition and Language Disorders cmmmel
2002. oktober 7. is 9. kozott az MTA Nyelvtudomanyi Intezeteben (Budapest
VI., Benczur utca 33.)
Reger Zita, a kivalp nyelvesz es tanar, az MTA Nyelvtudomanyi Intezetenek
volt osztalyvezetoje, elsosorban a szociolingvisztika, pszicholingvisztika
es neurolingvisztika teruleteinek kutatasaban ert el nemzetkozileg is
elismert eredmenyeket. Emleke elott uj tudomanyos eredmenyeket bemutato
eloadasokkal kivanunk tisztelegni, amelyek a kovetkezo harom temakor
valamelyikevel foglalkoznak:
a) Nyelvelsajatitas, gyermeknyelv
b) Nyelvi szocializacio es nyelvhasznalat a cigany kozossegekben
c) Afaziakutatas: a serult nyelv lexikonja, szintaxisa is fonologiaja
Meghivott eloadok:
Jean Berko Gleason (Boston University)
Plih Csaba (Budapesti Muszaki is Gazdasagtudomanyi Egyetem)
Herman Kolk (Katholieke Universiteit Nijmegen)
Michael Stewart (University College London)
Susan Gal (University of Chicago)
A szervezok varjak azok jelentkezeset, akik a fent megjelolt harom temakor
egyikeben eloadast tartananak. A jelentkezoktol eloadasuk anonim
absztraktjanak benyujtasat kerik. A tervezett eloadasok 30 percesek
lesznek.
A fenti a) is c) temakorokbeli szekciok hivatalos nyelve az angol. A fenti
b) temakorbeli szekciok hivatalos nyelve a magyar es az angol.
Az absztraktokat a kovetkezo formatumban kerjuk. Az anonim absztrakt
terjedelme maximum ket oldal legyen (egyes sortavval is 12 pontos Times
vagy annak megfelelo karakterekkel). Az absztrakt nyelve: a konferencia
kivalasztott szekciojanak hivatalos nyelve (ld. fent).
Kerjuk, hogy az absztraktokat lehetoleg elektronikus posta ztjan, is
lehetoleg rtf, azaz Rich Text File formaban kuldjek be a kovetkezo e-mail
cimre:
utak(a)nytud.hu
Egyuttal kerjuk, hogy az absztraktok lehetoleg ne tartalmazzanak a
szerzojuk nevere torteno, konnyen azonosithato hivatkozasokat.
Az absztraktokhoz egy kulon oldalon sziveskedjenek csatolni a kovetkezo
adatokat: a szerzo neve, intezmenye, az absztrakt cime, a szerzo e-mail
cime, illetve a postai cime, telefon- es faxszama.
Amennyiben a papir formaban torteno benyujtast reszesitene elonyben, ugy
kerjuk, az absztraktot 5 peldanyban, a szerzo nevenek feltuntetese nelkul
sziveskedjen benyujtani, es egy kulon lapon csatolni a szerzo nevet,
intezmenyet, postai es telefon, illetve fax elerhetoseget. Postacimunk:
Banreti Zoltan
A Magyar Tudomanyos Akademia Nyelvtudomanyi Intezete
Budapest,
Postafiok 701/518.
1399
Az absztraktok bekuldesenek hatarideje: 2002. junius 10.
A szerzoket 2002. julius 1-ig ertesitjuk absztraktjuk elfogadasarol.
A konferencia reszveteli dija (mely tobbek kozott magaban foglalja az
absztraktokat tartalmazs kotetet, az esti fogadason valo reszvetelt, es a
frissitoket a konferencia idejen):
2002.augusztus 31-ig torteno, elo-regisztracio eseten: 11.000Ft,
2002.augusztus 31. utani regisztracio eseten: 13.750Ft.
Az elo-regisztraciot akkor all modunkban alkalmazni, ha a reszveteli dijat
2002. augusztus 31-ig bezarolag atutalja az alabbi szamlaszamra:
A Magyar Tudomanyos Akademia Nyelvtudomanyi Intezete
Szamlaszam: 10032000-01731732-00000000
Swift kod: MANEHUHB
Kelet- es kozep europai kutatok szamara, tovabba diakok szamara mod nyilik
olyan tamogatas nyujtasara,amely a regisztracios dijat vagy pedig a
szallaskoltseget fedezi. Az erre vonatkozo kerest az absztrakt
benyujtasaval egyidejuleg lehet jelezni.
A regisztracio modjaval valamint a szallas lehetosgekkel (a konferencia
szinhelyehez kozeli szallodaknak a resztvevoknek ajanlott araival is
szolgaltatasaival) kapcsolatban fontos informaciok talalhatok a kovetkezo
web cimen:
www.nytud.hu/LSLALD/lslald.html
A szervezok neveben,
Banreti Zoltan, igazgatohelyettes, MTA Nyelvtudomanyi Intezet,
Szarka Laszlo, igazgato, MTA Nemzeti-Etnikai Kisebbsegkutato Intezet
Department of History and Philosophy of Science
Eotvos University
Budapest, Pazmany P. setany 1/A
PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE COLLOQUIUM
(http://hps.elte.hu/seminar)
________________________________________________
15 April 4:00 PM 6th floor 6.54
(Language: English)
Evolutionary Moral Realism
John Collier
Konrad Lorenz Institute for Evolution and Cognition Research,
Altenberg, Austria
Moral realism is the view that moral kinds, such as values,
obligations, rights, duties and the like, are objective
kinds that ground moral "oughts". Moral naturalism is the
view that moral kinds can best be explained in naturalistic
terms. The evolutionary version of moral naturalism holds
that evolutionary explanations are central to satisfactory
naturalistic explanations of morality. Evolutionary moral
realism holds that there are moral natural kinds that can
ground moral "oughts", and that these kinds are best explained
in evolutionary terms.
In previous work we have argued that evolutionary naturalism
can be objective: John Collier and Michael Stingl, "Evolutionary
Naturalism and the Objectivity of Morality", Biology and
Philosophy 8 (1993): 47-60, reprinted in Paul Thompson,
ed., Issues in Evolutionary Ethics, SUNY Press, Albany,
1995, pp. 409-429. In this talk I will discuss what is at
stake, and how our view differs from other moral naturalisms
that try to reduce or eliminate moral kinds. In particular,
I will discuss why giving an evolutionary explanation of
morality does not need to commit the "is/ought" fallacy.
___________________
The organizer of the seminar: László E. Szabó
--
Laszlo E. Szabo
Department of Theoretical Physics
Department of History and Philosophy of Science
Eotvos University, Budapest
H-1518 Budapest, Pf. 32, Hungary
Phone/Fax: (36-1)372-2924
Home: (36-1) 200-7318
Mobil/SMS: (36) 20-366-1172
http://hps.elte.hu/~leszabo
Department of History and Philosophy of Science
Eotvos University
Budapest, Pazmany P. setany 1/A
PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE COLLOQUIUM
(http://hps.elte.hu/seminar)
________________________________________________
April program
8 April 4:00 PM 6th floor 6.54
(Language: Hungarian)
Panel discussion:
A Godel-tetel filozofiai kovetkezmenyei
Philosophical upshot of Godel's theorem
Panelists:
Ferenc Csaba (Logic, Eotvos)
Janos Geier (Psychology, Eotvos)
Andras Mate (Logic, Eotvos)
Istvan Nemeti (Renyi Institute of Mathematics)
Moderator:
Laszlo E. Szabo (Theoretical Physics & HPS, Eotvos)
Iden unnepeljuk Bolyai Janos szuletesenek ketszazadik evfordulojat!
Bolyai, Gauss es Lobacsevszkij az elso nem-euklideszi geometriak
megalkotasaval inditottak el azt a folyamatot, amit a matematika
ontudatra ebredesenek nevezhetnenk. A matematika eme onreflexiojaval
a filozofia epitmenyenek masik tartopillere, a racionalizmus
is meginogni latszik. (Az elso, az empirizmus ugyanis mar
Hume ota aladucolasra szorul.) A 19. szazad vegere vilagos
volt, hogy ujra kell gondolnunk a matematika alapveto mibenletet.
Ugy tunik, a matematika -- ahogyan Russell megfogalmazta -- "olyan
tudomany, amelyben nem tudjuk mirol beszelunk, vagy hogy
igaz-e, amit mondunk". A matematikus szamara sem az axiomaknak, sem a beloluk
levezetett allitasoknak nincs jelentese, es nincs igazsaga. A matematikus
dolga a levezetes maga. Sokaig ugy tunt, hogy a Hilbert-fele
formalista/axiomatikus program a dolgokat a helyere teszi, mignem 1931-ben egy
fiatal Becsi matematikus, Kurt Godel kozzetette az "Uber
formal unentscheidbare Satze der Principia Mathematica und
verwandter Systeme" cimu dolgozatat. Altalanos
velekedes szerint, Godel eredmenyei lehetetlenne tettek
a formalista program folytatasat.
Tenyleg igy van-e? Hol tartunk most? Hogyan is kell pontosan
ertekelnunk Godel teteleit? Ezekket a kerdeseket fogjuk
megvitatni.
___________________
The organizer of the seminar: László E. Szabó
--
Laszlo E. Szabo
Department of Theoretical Physics
Department of History and Philosophy of Science
Eotvos University, Budapest
H-1518 Budapest, Pf. 32, Hungary
Phone/Fax: (36-1)372-2924
Home: (36-1) 200-7318
Mobil/SMS: (36) 20-366-1172
http://hps.elte.hu/~leszabo
Csaba Pleh, Professor of Psychology
Technical U. of Budapest Center for Cognitive Science
Presently at Collegium Budapest, Budapest, Szentharomsag u 2 H-1014
cspleh@ colbud.hu, T: 3612248323, Fax: 3612248310 Mobile: (06)303500431
----- Original Message -----
From: Nyiri Kristof <nyiri(a)phil-inst.hu>
To: <nyiri(a)phil-inst.hu>
Sent: Wednesday, March 27, 2002 9:47 AM
Subject: Registration form added to May conf. progr.
Dunabogdany, Wednesday, 27 March 2002, 09:39
Dear Colleague:
Please forgive me for burdening you with this circular. It is to inform you
that we have added a "Registration form" link to the program
http://21st.century.phil-inst.hu/2002_konf
I would be most grateful if you could distribute the present message. Also,
you are more than welcome to fill out the registration form yourself, too.
:)
Kind regards,
Kristof Nyiri
===================================
Kristof [J.C.] Nyiri
Member of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences
Professor of Philosophy, Eötvös Loránd University, Budapest
Director, Institute for Philosophical Research, Hungarian Academy of
Sciences
Address (private): H-2023 Dunabogdany, POB 8
Tel. and fax (Institute): +36 1 3120 243
Tel. and fax (home): +36 26 390 468
Tel. mobile: +36 30 350 0421
E-mail: nyiri(a)phil-inst.hu
Personal homepage: http://www.uniworld.hu/nyiri
Institute for Philosophical Research website:
http://www.phil-inst.hu
Institute for Philosophical Research Open University website:
http://openuniversity.phil-inst.hu
UNIWORLD Virtual University website: http://www.uniworld.hu
"Communications in the 21st Century" project website:
http://21st.century.phil-inst.hu
Department of History and Philosophy of Science
Eotvos University
Budapest, Pazmany P. setany 1/A
PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE COLLOQUIUM
(http://hps.elte.hu/seminar)
________________________________________________
April program
8 April 4:00 PM 6th floor 6.54
Panel discussion:
A Godel-tetel filozofiai kovetkezmenyei
Philosophical upshot of Godel's theorem
Panelists:
Ferenc Csaba (Logic, Eotvos)
Janos Geier (Psychology, Eotvos)
Andras Mate (Logic, Eotvos)
Istvan Nemeti (Renyi Institute of Mathematics)
Moderator:
Laszlo E. Szabo (Theoretical Physics & HPS, Eotvos)
Iden unnepeljuk Bolyai Janos szuletesenek ketszazadik evfordulojat!
Bolyai, Gauss es Lobacsevszkij az elso nem-euklideszi geometriak
megalkotasaval inditottak el azt a folyamatot, amit a matematika
ontudatra ebredesenek nevezhetnenk. A matematika eme onreflexiojaval
a filozofia epitmenyenek masik tartopillere, a racionalizmus
is meginogni latszik. (Az elso, az empirizmus ugyanis mar
Hume ota aladucolasra szorul.) A 19. szazad vegere vilagos
volt, hogy ujra kell gondolnunk a matematika alapveto mibenletet.
Ugy tunik, a matematika -- ahogyan Russell megfogalmazta -- "olyan
tudomany, amelyben nem tudjuk mirol beszelunk, vagy hogy
igaz-e, amit mondunk". A matematikus szamara sem az axiomaknak, sem a
beloluk
levezetett allitasoknak nincs jelentese, es nincs igazsaga. A matematikus
dolga a levezetes maga. Sokaig ugy tunt, hogy a Hilbert-fele
formalista/axiomatikus program a dolgokat a helyere teszi, mignem 1931-ben
egy
fiatal Becsi matematikus, Kurt Godel kozzetette az "Uber
formal unentscheidbare Satze der Principia Mathematica und
verwandter Systeme" cimu dolgozatat. Altalanos
velekedes szerint, Godel eredmenyei lehetetlenne tettek
a formalista program folytatasat.
Tenyleg igy van-e? Hol tartunk most? Hogyan is kell pontosan
ertekelnunk Godel teteleit? Ezekket a kerdeseket fogjuk
megvitatni.
15 April 4:00 PM 6th floor 6.54
Evolutionary Moral Realism
John Collier
Konrad Lorenz Institute for Evolution and Cognition Research,
Altenberg, Austria
Moral realism is the view that moral kinds, such as values,
obligations, rights, duties and the like, are objective
kinds that ground moral "oughts". Moral naturalism is the
view that moral kinds can best be explained in naturalistic
terms. The evolutionary version of moral naturalism holds
that evolutionary explanations are central to satisfactory
naturalistic explanations of morality. Evolutionary moral
realism holds that there are moral natural kinds that can
ground moral "oughts", and that these kinds are best explained
in evolutionary terms.
In previous work we have argued that evolutionary naturalism
can be objective: John Collier and Michael Stingl, "Evolutionary
Naturalism and the Objectivity of Morality", Biology and
Philosophy 8 (1993): 47-60, reprinted in Paul Thompson,
ed., Issues in Evolutionary Ethics, SUNY Press, Albany,
1995, pp. 409-429. In this talk I will discuss what is at
stake, and how our view differs from other moral naturalisms
that try to reduce or eliminate moral kinds. In particular,
I will discuss why giving an evolutionary explanation of
morality does not need to commit the "is/ought" fallacy.
22 April 4:00 PM 6th floor 6.54
Vallas es tudomany: a konfliktuson innen es tul
Religion and Science: this side of the conflict and beyond
Mihaly Toth
Philosophy, Pazmany Peter Catholic University, Budapest
Vallas es tudomany, kulonosen pedig a modern termeszettudomany
viszonyara gondolva leggyakrabban valamilyen szembenallas
kepe sejlik fel elottunk. Ezt az elkepzelest reszben indokoljak
az ujkori tudomanytortenet egyes fejlemenyei. A ket terulet
kapcsolata azonban sokkal arnyaltabb annal, semhogy egy
egyszeru konfliktus- modellel jellemezheto lenne. Az elmult
evtizedekben szamos kiserlet tortent mind teologusok, mind
termeszettudosok, mind a kozvetitesre vallalkozo filozofusok
reszerol, hogy a kerdeses viszony minel tobb aspektusat
feltarjak, valamint hogy a kapcsolat jelen es jovobeni lehetosegeit
felvazoljak.
Eloadasomban a legfontosabb idevonatkozo eszmefuttatasokat
kivanom roviden bemutatni - kiterve a magyar vonatkozasokra
-, altaluk illusztralva a kerdeskor aktualitasat es jelentoseget.
Vitainditokent igyekszem tovabba ramutatni az eddigi kiserletek
nehany problematikus pontjara is.
29 April 4:00 PM 6th floor 6.54
Concepts: where the critics of the classical view went
wrong
Lilia Gurova
Department of Philosophy of Science, Institute of Philosophical
Research, Bulgarian Academy of Sciences, Sofia
Department of Cognitive Science and Psychology, New Bulgarian
University, Sofia
In the 1970s, a set of experimental findings convinced cognitive
science community that the view whose main claim is that
concepts are represented by lists of defining features (the
so-called classical view) is to be recognized as inadequate
and replaced by a more sound theory. Some of the critics
of the classical view have even claimed that this view has
failed not only as a psychological theory but also as a
methodological prescription in natural sciences (especially
in biology). Taken seriously, their claim implies that the
search for well-defined concepts in science is generally
misleading. Most scientists, however, would hardly agree
with such a verdict. Is the criticism against the classical
view so unproblematic as it is seen to be today? The aim
of this presentation is to denounce some broadly accepted
myths concerning the so-called classical view and its alleged
main flaws.
___________________
The organizer of the seminar: Lszl E. Szab
--
Laszlo E. Szabo
Department of Theoretical Physics
Department of History and Philosophy of Science
Eotvos University, Budapest
H-1518 Budapest, Pf. 32, Hungary
Phone/Fax: (36-1)372-2924
Home: (36-1) 200-7318
Mobil/SMS: (36) 20-366-1172
http://hps.elte.hu/~leszabo
ELTE Fizika Tanszekcsoport
ORTVAY KOLLOKVIUM
2001. marcius 21., csut. 15:00
Az ELTE Pazmany P. s. 1/A 1. emelet 1.69
E. S z a b o L a s z l o
MTA-ELTE Elmeleti Fizikai Tanszeki Kutatocsoport
ELTE TTK Tudomanytortenet es Tudomanyfilozofia Tanszek
A relativitaselmelet tokeletesen azonos a relativitaselmelet elotti fizikaval
Poincare konvencionalista allaspontja szerint nem lehet empirikusan
eldonteni, hogy melyik a terido helyes geometriaja, mert a terido geometriaja
es a fizikai elmeletek csak egyutt vethetok ossze a kiserleti eredmenyekkel.
Vizsgalodasainkat a specialis relativitaselmeletre korlatozva, meg fogjuk
mutatni, hogy a relativitaselmelet es a klasszikus (nem-relativisztikus)
fizika nem passzol bele ebbe a kepbe. De nem azert nem, amiert a legtobben
hiszik, hogy tudniillik a kiserleti tenyek alapjan kulonbseget tudnank tenni
a relativisztikus es a klasszikus fizika kozott! Eppen ellenkezoleg, azt
fogjuk megmutatni, hogy a relativitaselmelet es a nem-relativisztikus fizika
egymassal teljesen azonos. Meghozza abban a -- fizikus szamara egyedul
elfogadhato ertelemben, hogy ugyanazon fizikai mennyisegek ertekerol ugyanazt
allitjak (beleertve a ter- es idokoordinatakat is). A relativitaselmelet es a
klasszikus fizika kozott csupan lingvisztikai kulonbseg van.
Minden erdeklodot szivesen latunk! Az eloadás elott negyed oraval a 1.69 sz.
terem bejárata elott teat szolgalunk fel.
Az eloadas-sorozatról az interneten az "ortvay-koll.elte.hu" cimen talalhato
informacio.
--
Laszlo E. Szabo
Department of Theoretical Physics
Department of History and Philosophy of Science
Eotvos University, Budapest
H-1518 Budapest, Pf. 32, Hungary
Phone/Fax: (36-1)372-2924
Home: (36-1) 200-7318
Mobil/SMS: (36) 20-366-1172
http://hps.elte.hu/~leszabo