koglist

koglist@maillist.ttk.hu

4 participants
5929 discussions

Jackendoff/Foundations of Language: BBS Multiple Book Review

by Behavioral & Brain Sciences

Below is a link to the forthcoming precis of a book accepted for Multiple Book Review in Behavioral and Brain Sciences (BBS). PRECIS OF: Foundations of Language: Brain, Meaning, Grammar, Evolution by Ray Jackendoff http://www.bbsonline.org/Preprints/Jackendoff-07252002/Referees/ Behavioral and Brain Sciences (BBS), is an international, interdisciplinary journal providing Open Peer Commentary on important and controversial current research in the biobehavioral and cognitive sciences. Please note that it is the *BOOK*, not the precis, that is to be reviewed. Reviewers must be BBS Associates or nominated by a BBS Associate. To be considered as a reviewer for this book, to suggest other appropriate reviewers, or for information about how to become a BBS Associate, please reply by EMAIL within three (3) weeks to: calls(a)bbsonline.org The Calls are sent to 10,000 BBS Associates, so there is no expectation (indeed, it would be calamitous) that each recipient should comment on every occasion! Hence there is no need to reply except if you wish to comment, or to nominate someone to comment. If you are not a BBS Associate, please approach a current BBS Associate (there are currently over 10,000 worldwide) who is familiar with your work to nominate you. All past BBS authors, referees and commentators are eligible to become BBS Associates. A full electronic list of current BBS Associates is available at this location to help you select a name: http://www.bbsonline.org/Instructions/assoclist.html If no current BBS Associate knows your work, please send us your Curriculum Vitae and BBS will circulate it to appropriate Associates to ask whether they would be prepared to nominate you. (In the meantime, your name, address and email address will be entered into our database as an unaffiliated investigator.) To help you decide whether you would be an appropriate reviewer for this book, an electronic draft of the precis (only) is retrievable at the URL that follows the abstract below. ======================================================================= *** IMPORTANT *** Please do not prepare a review unless you are formally invited. To help us put together a balanced list of reviewers, it would be most helpful if you would send us as specific as possible an indication of the relevant expertise you would bring to bear on the subject, and what aspect of the book you would anticipate commenting upon. We will then let you know whether it was possible to include your name on the final formal list of invitees. As noted earlier, it is the *BOOK*, not the precis, that is to be reviewed. So please indicate whether you already have the book or would require a review copy to be sent to you if invited. (Note: Please do not simply indicate that we have your expertise information in our records. We request this information in order to simplify and thus, speed up the selection process.) ======================================================================= _______________________________________________________________________ PRECIS OF: Foundations of Language: Brain, Meaning, Grammar, Evolution Ray Jackendoff Program in Linguistics, MS 013 Brandeis University Waltham, MA 02454 USA jackendoff(a)brandeis.edu ABSTRACT: The goal of this study to reintegrate the theory of generative grammar into the cognitive sciences. Generative grammar was correct to focus on the child's acquisition of language as its central problem, leading to the hypothesis of an innate Universal Grammar. However, generative grammar was mistaken to assume that the syntactic component is the sole course of combinatoriality, and that everything else is "interpretive." The proper approach is a parallel architecture, in which phonology, syntax, and semantics are autonomous generative systems, linked by interface components. The parallel architecture leads to an integration within linguistics, and to a far better integration with the rest of cognitive neuroscience. It fits naturally into the larger architecture of the mind/brain and permits a properly mentalistic theory of semantics. It leads to a view of linguistic performance in which the rules of grammar are directly involved in processing. Finally, it leads to a natural account of the incremental evolution of the language capacity. http://www.bbsonline.org/Preprints/Jackendoff-07252002/Referees/ ====================================================================== *** SUPPLEMENTARY ANNOUNCEMENT *** (1) Call for Book Nominations for BBS Multiple Book Review In the past, Behavioral and Brain Sciences (BBS) had only been able to do 1-2 BBS multiple book treatments per year, because of our limited annual page quota. BBS's new expanded page quota will make it possible for us to increase the number of books we treat per year, so this is an excellent time for BBS Associates and biobehavioral/cognitive scientists in general to nominate books you would like to see accorded BBS multiple book review. (Authors may self-nominate, but books can only be selected on the basis of multiple nominations.) It would be very helpful if you indicated in what way a BBS Multiple Book Review of the book(s) you nominate would be useful to the field (and of course a rich list of potential reviewers would be the best evidence of its potential impact!). *-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-* Please note: Your email address has been added to our user database for Calls for Commentators, the reason you received this email. If you do not wish to receive further Calls, please feel free to change your mailshot status through your User Login link on the BBSPrints homepage, using your username and password. Or, email a response with the word "remove" in the subject line. *-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-* Ralph BBS ------------------------------------------------------------------- Ralph DeMarco Editorial Coordinator Behavioral and Brain Sciences Journals Department Cambridge University Press 40 West 20th Street New York, NY 10011-4211 UNITED STATES bbs(a)bbsonline.org http://www.bbsonline.org Tel: +001 212 924 3900 ext.374 Fax: +001 212 645 5960 -------------------------------------------------------------------

23 years, 6 months

Jackendoff/Foundations of Language: BBS Multiple Book Review

by Behavioral & Brain Sciences

Dear Dr. Qwerty, Below is a link to the forthcoming precis a book accepted for Multiple Book Review in Behavioral and Brain Sciences (BBS). PRECIS OF: Foundations of Language: Brain, Meaning, Grammar, Evolution by Ray Jackendoff http://www.bbsonline.org/Preprints/Jackendoff-07252002/Referees/ Behavioral and Brain Sciences (BBS), is an international, interdisciplinary journal providing Open Peer Commentary on important and controversial current research in the biobehavioral and cognitive sciences. Please note that it is the *BOOK*, not the precis, that is to be reviewed. Reviewers must be BBS Associates or nominated by a BBS Associate. To be considered as a reviewer for this book, to suggest other appropriate reviewers, or for information about how to become a BBS Associate, please reply by EMAIL within three (3) weeks to: calls(a)bbsonline.org The Calls are sent to 10,000 BBS Associates, so there is no expectation (indeed, it would be calamitous) that each recipient should comment on every occasion! Hence there is no need to reply except if you wish to comment, or to nominate someone to comment. If you are not a BBS Associate, please approach a current BBS Associate (there are currently over 10,000 worldwide) who is familiar with your work to nominate you. All past BBS authors, referees and commentators are eligible to become BBS Associates. A full electronic list of current BBS Associates is available at this location to help you select a name: http://www.bbsonline.org/Instructions/assoclist.html If no current BBS Associate knows your work, please send us your Curriculum Vitae and BBS will circulate it to appropriate Associates to ask whether they would be prepared to nominate you. (In the meantime, your name, address and email address will be entered into our database as an unaffiliated investigator.) To help you decide whether you would be an appropriate reviewer for this book, an electronic draft of the precis (only) is retrievable at the URL that follows the abstract below. ======================================================================= *** IMPORTANT *** Please do not prepare a review unless you are formally invited. To help us put together a balanced list of reviewers, it would be most helpful if you would send us as specific as possible an indication of the relevant expertise you would bring to bear on the subject, and what aspect of the book you would anticipate commenting upon. We will then let you know whether it was possible to include your name on the final formal list of invitees. As noted earlier, it is the *BOOK*, not the precis, that is to be reviewed. So please indicate whether you already have the book or would require a review copy to be sent to you if invited. (Note: Please do not simply indicate that we have your expertise information in our records. We request this information in order to simplify and thus, speed up the selection process.) ======================================================================= _______________________________________________________________________ PRECIS OF: Foundations of Language: Brain, Meaning, Grammar, Evolution Ray Jackendoff Program in Linguistics, MS 013 Brandeis University Waltham, MA 02454 USA jackendoff(a)brandeis.edu ABSTRACT: The goal of this study to reintegrate the theory of generative grammar into the cognitive sciences. Generative grammar was correct to focus on the child's acquisition of language as its central problem, leading to the hypothesis of an innate Universal Grammar. However, generative grammar was mistaken to assume that the syntactic component is the sole course of combinatoriality, and that everything else is "interpretive." The proper approach is a parallel architecture, in which phonology, syntax, and semantics are autonomous generative systems, linked by interface components. The parallel architecture leads to an integration within linguistics, and to a far better integration with the rest of cognitive neuroscience. It fits naturally into the larger architecture of the mind/brain and permits a properly mentalistic theory of semantics. It leads to a view of linguistic performance in which the rules of grammar are directly involved in processing. Finally, it leads to a natural account of the incremental evolution of the language capacity. http://www.bbsonline.org/Preprints/Jackendoff-07252002/Referees/ ====================================================================== *** SUPPLEMENTARY ANNOUNCEMENT *** (1) Call for Book Nominations for BBS Multiple Book Review In the past, Behavioral and Brain Sciences (BBS) had only been able to do 1-2 BBS multiple book treatments per year, because of our limited annual page quota. BBS's new expanded page quota will make it possible for us to increase the number of books we treat per year, so this is an excellent time for BBS Associates and biobehavioral/cognitive scientists in general to nominate books you would like to see accorded BBS multiple book review. (Authors may self-nominate, but books can only be selected on the basis of multiple nominations.) It would be very helpful if you indicated in what way a BBS Multiple Book Review of the book(s) you nominate would be useful to the field (and of course a rich list of potential reviewers would be the best evidence of its potential impact!). *-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-* Please note: Your email address has been added to our user database for Calls for Commentators, the reason you received this email. If you do not wish to receive further Calls, please feel free to change your mailshot status through your User Login link on the BBSPrints homepage, using your username and password. Or, email a response with the word "remove" in the subject line. *-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-* Ralph BBS ------------------------------------------------------------------- Ralph DeMarco Editorial Coordinator Behavioral and Brain Sciences Journals Department Cambridge University Press 40 West 20th Street New York, NY 10011-4211 UNITED STATES bbs(a)bbsonline.org http://www.bbsonline.org Tel: +001 212 924 3900 ext.374 Fax: +001 212 645 5960 -------------------------------------------------------------------

23 years, 6 months

Philosophy of Science Colloquium, Andras Benedek

by Laszlo E. Szabo

Department of HISTORY AND PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE Eotvos University, Budapest Pazmany P. setany 1/A Budapest Phone/Fax: (36-1) 372 2924 Department's Home Page:http://hps.elte.hu Philosophy of Science Colloquium Room 6.54 (6th floor) Monday 4:00 PM ____________________________________ 25 November 4:00 PM 6th floor 6.54 (Language: Hungarian) András Benedek <benedek(a)helka.iif.hu> Research Institute for Philosophy of HAS Alkalmas-e a nem-standard analízis a mozgás metafizikai leírására? (Is nonstandard analysis applicable for the metaphysical description of motion?) A mozgás leírása Zénón aporiái óta, a Leibniz-féle infinitezimális kalkulus mu"ködo"képessége ellenére, a matematika megalapozási problémakör középpontjában áll. Az infinitezimálisok metafizikai entitásként és instrumentális segédfogalomként egyaránt szolgálták a mozgás és a folytonosság metafizikai fogalmainak matematikai analízisét. A Cauchy-féle folytonosság definíciók matematika megalapozási problémaként a matematika szigorúsági forradalmainakkiindulópontjául szolgáltak. Az Abraham Robinson-féle Nem-sztenderd Analízis a matematikai logika modellelméleti eszközeivel legitimálni látszott nemcsak az infinitezimálisokat, hanem a modern metafizikai mozgáselméleteket. Lakatos a matematika filozófia és a matematikatörténet metszéspontjába helyezte és a metamatematika önálló matematikai diszciplínává válását várta a Robinson-féle megközelítésto"l. Nyomdokain haladva - E Nelson eredményeit felhasználva - új metafizikai megoldások születtek a Zénón paradoxonok megoldására. Az elo"adásban áttekintve a problémakör történetét, amellett érvelek, hogy a Nem-sztenderd Analízis önmagában véve nem ad megoldást sem az aporiákra, sem a mozgás metafizikai magyarázatára. Robinson megközelítésmódjának tényleges hozadéka, mind a matematikus, mind a filozófus, mind a matematikatörténész számára az elméletalkotás axiomatikus döntéseinek modellelméleti alapokra helyezésében áll. Jelenség és leírás, matematikai és logikai modell, elmélet és axiómarendszer modellelméleti kezelése új interpretációs keretbe helyezte a matematika, metafizika és ismeretelmélet viszonyának továbbra is szétszakíthatatlan, de új fogalmi megkülönböztetéseken alapuló szerelmi háromszögét. Amellett foglalok állást, hogy a Nem-sztenderd Analízis ennek ellenére formálisan aligha alkalmas az infinitezimálisok iránti metafizikai vonzalom magyarázatára. ------------------------------------------------------------------------ The 60-minute lecture is followed by a 10-minute break. Then we held a 30-60-minute discussion. ------------------------------------------------------------------------ The organizer of the seminar: László E. Szabó <http://hps.elte.hu/~leszabo> (email: leszabo(a)hps.elte.hu) -- L a s z l o E. S z a b o Theoretical Physics Research Group of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences Department of History and Philosophy of Science Eotvos University, Budapest H-1518 Budapest, Pf. 32, Hungary Phone/Fax: (36-1)372-2924 Mobil/SMS: (36) 20-366-1172 http://hps.elte.hu/~leszabo

23 years, 6 months

nyelvfilozófiai miniszümpózium

by Miklos Lehmann

A "Minden filozófia 'nyelvkritika'" c. OTKA-kutatás keretében, az MTA Filozófiai Kutatóintézete és a Magyar Wittgenstein Társaság közös szervezésében nyelvfilozófiai miniszümpóziumot rendezünk 2002. december 2-án, hétfõn délután 3 órai kezdettel az MTA Filozófiai Kutatóintézetében (1054 Bp. Szemere u. 10.). Program: 15.00 Forrai Gábor: Locke versus Kripke-Putnam 16.00 Lehmann Miklós: A fényképek szerepe Wittgenstein filozófiájában 17.00 Pléh Csaba mutatja be Demeter Tamás: Az eszmék tipográfiája c. könyvét Minden érdeklõdõt szeretettel várunk!

23 years, 7 months

Aboitiz et al./Evolutionary Mammalian Isocortex: BBS Call for Commentators

by Behavioral & Brain Sciences

Below is a link to the forthcoming BBS target article The Evolutionary Origin of The Mammalian Isocortex: Towards an Integrated Developmental and Functional Approach by Francisco Aboitiz, Daniver Morales and Juan Montiel http://www.bbsonline.org/Preprints/Aboitiz/Referees/ This article has been accepted for publication in Behavioral and Brain Sciences (BBS), an international, interdisciplinary journal providing Open Peer Commentary on important and controversial current research in the biobehavioral and cognitive sciences. Commentators must be BBS Associates or suggested by a BBS Associate. To be considered as a commentator for this article, to suggest other appropriate commentators, or for information about how to become a BBS Associate, please reply by EMAIL within three (3) weeks to: calls(a)bbsonline.org The Calls are sent to 10,000 BBS Associates, so there is no expectation (indeed, it would be calamitous) that each recipient should comment on every occasion! Hence there is no need to reply except if you wish to comment, or to suggest someone to comment. If you are not a BBS Associate, please approach a current BBS Associate (there are currently over 10,000 worldwide) who is familiar with your work to nominate you. All past BBS authors, referees and commentators are eligible to become BBS Associates. An electronic list of current BBS Associates is available at this location to help you select a name: http://www.bbsonline.org/Instructions/assoclist.html (please note that this list is being updated) If no current BBS Associate knows your work, please send us your Curriculum Vitae and BBS will circulate it to appropriate Associates to ask whether they would be prepared to nominate you. (In the meantime, your name, address and email address will be entered into our database as an unaffiliated investigator.) ======================================================================= IMPORTANT To help us put together a balanced list of commentators, please give some indication of the aspects of the topic on which you would bring your areas of expertise to bear if you were selected as a commentator. To help you decide whether you would be an appropriate commentator for this article, an electronic draft is retrievable from the online BBSPrints Archive, at the URL that follows the abstract below. _______________________________________________________________________ The Evolutionary Origin of The Mammalian Isocortex: Towards an Integrated Developmental and Functional Approach Francisco Aboitiz, Daniver Morales and Juan Montiel ABSTRACT: The isocortex is a distinctive feature of mammalian brains, which has no clear counterpart in the cerebral hemispheres of other amniotes. This paper speculates on the evolutionary processes giving rise to the isocortex. As a first step, we intend to identify what structure may be ancestral to the isocortex in the reptilian brain. Then, it is necessary to account for the transformations (developmental, connectional and functional) of this ancestral structure, which resulted in the origin of the isocortex. One long-held perspective argues that part of the isocortex derives from the ventral pallium of reptiles, while another view proposes that the isocortex originated mostly from the dorsal pallium. We consider that at this point, evidence tends to favor correspondence of the isocortex with the dorsal cortex of reptiles. The isocortex may have originated partly as a consequence of an overall dorsalizing effect (that is, an expansion of the territories expressing dorsal-specific genes) during pallial development. Furthermore, expansion of the dorsal pallium may have been driven by selective pressures favoring the development of associative networks between the dorsal cortex, the olfactory cortex and the hippocampus, which participated in spatial or episodic memory in the early mammals. In this context, sensory projections that in reptiles end in the ventral pallium, are observed to terminate in the isocortex (dorsal pallium) of mammals, perhaps owing to their participation in these associative networks. KEYWORDS: basolateral amygdala; claustrum; Emx-1; endopiriform nucleus; dorsal cortex; dorsal ventricular ridge; hippocampus; homology; olfactory cortex; Pax-6; ventral pallium http://www.bbsonline.org/Preprints/Aboitiz/Referees/ ====================================================================== IMPORTANT Please do not prepare a commentary yet. Just let us know, after having inspected it, what relevant expertise you feel you would bring to bear on what aspect of the article. We will then let you know whether it was possible to include your name on the final formal list of invitees. ======================================================================= *** SUPPLEMENTARY ANNOUNCEMENT *** (1) Call for Book Nominations for BBS Multiple Book Review In the past, Behavioral and Brain Sciences (BBS) had only been able to do 1-2 BBS multiple book treatments per year, because of our limited annual page quota. BBS's new expanded page quota will make it possible for us to increase the number of books we treat per year, so this is an excellent time for BBS Associates and biobehavioral/cognitive scientists in general to nominate books you would like to see accorded BBS multiple book review. (Authors may self-nominate, but books can only be selected on the basis of multiple nominations.) It would be very helpful if you indicated in what way a BBS Multiple Book Review of the book(s) you nominate would be useful to the field (and of course a rich list of potential reviewers would be the best evidence of its potential impact!). *-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-* Please note: Your email address has been added to our user database for Calls for Commentators, the reason you received this email. If you do not wish to receive further Calls, please feel free to change your mailshot status through your User Login link on the BBSPrints homepage, using your username and password. Or, email a response with the word "remove" in the subject line. *-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-* Ralph BBS ------------------------------------------------------------------- Ralph DeMarco Editorial Coordinator Behavioral and Brain Sciences Journals Department Cambridge University Press 40 West 20th Street New York, NY 10011-4211 UNITED STATES bbs(a)bbsonline.org http://www.bbsonline.org Tel: +001 212 924 3900 ext.374 Fax: +001 212 645 5960 -------------------------------------------------------------------

23 years, 7 months

Aboitiz et al./Evolutionary Mammalian Isocortex: BBS Call for Commentators

by Behavioral & Brain Sciences

Dear Dr. Qwerty, Below is a link to the forthcoming BBS target article The Evolutionary Origin of The Mammalian Isocortex: Towards an Integrated Developmental and Functional Approach by Francisco Aboitiz, Daniver Morales and Juan Montiel http://www.bbsonline.org/Preprints/Aboitiz/Referees/ This article has been accepted for publication in Behavioral and Brain Sciences (BBS), an international, interdisciplinary journal providing Open Peer Commentary on important and controversial current research in the biobehavioral and cognitive sciences. Commentators must be BBS Associates or suggested by a BBS Associate. To be considered as a commentator for this article, to suggest other appropriate commentators, or for information about how to become a BBS Associate, please reply by EMAIL within three (3) weeks to: calls(a)bbsonline.org The Calls are sent to 10,000 BBS Associates, so there is no expectation (indeed, it would be calamitous) that each recipient should comment on every occasion! Hence there is no need to reply except if you wish to comment, or to suggest someone to comment. If you are not a BBS Associate, please approach a current BBS Associate (there are currently over 10,000 worldwide) who is familiar with your work to nominate you. All past BBS authors, referees and commentators are eligible to become BBS Associates. An electronic list of current BBS Associates is available at this location to help you select a name: http://www.bbsonline.org/Instructions/assoclist.html (please note that this list is being updated) If no current BBS Associate knows your work, please send us your Curriculum Vitae and BBS will circulate it to appropriate Associates to ask whether they would be prepared to nominate you. (In the meantime, your name, address and email address will be entered into our database as an unaffiliated investigator.) ======================================================================= IMPORTANT To help us put together a balanced list of commentators, please give some indication of the aspects of the topic on which you would bring your areas of expertise to bear if you were selected as a commentator. To help you decide whether you would be an appropriate commentator for this article, an electronic draft is retrievable from the online BBSPrints Archive, at the URL that follows the abstract below. _______________________________________________________________________ The Evolutionary Origin of The Mammalian Isocortex: Towards an Integrated Developmental and Functional Approach Francisco Aboitiz, Daniver Morales and Juan Montiel ABSTRACT: The isocortex is a distinctive feature of mammalian brains, which has no clear counterpart in the cerebral hemispheres of other amniotes. This paper speculates on the evolutionary processes giving rise to the isocortex. As a first step, we intend to identify what structure may be ancestral to the isocortex in the reptilian brain. Then, it is necessary to account for the transformations (developmental, connectional and functional) of this ancestral structure, which resulted in the origin of the isocortex. One long-held perspective argues that part of the isocortex derives from the ventral pallium of reptiles, while another view proposes that the isocortex originated mostly from the dorsal pallium. We consider that at this point, evidence tends to favor correspondence of the isocortex with the dorsal cortex of reptiles. The isocortex may have originated partly as a consequence of an overall dorsalizing effect (that is, an expansion of the territories expressing dorsal-specific genes) during pallial development. Furthermore, expansion of the dorsal pallium may have been driven by selective pressures favoring the development of associative networks between the dorsal cortex, the olfactory cortex and the hippocampus, which participated in spatial or episodic memory in the early mammals. In this context, sensory projections that in reptiles end in the ventral pallium, are observed to terminate in the isocortex (dorsal pallium) of mammals, perhaps owing to their participation in these associative networks. KEYWORDS: basolateral amygdala; claustrum; Emx-1; endopiriform nucleus; dorsal cortex; dorsal ventricular ridge; hippocampus; homology; olfactory cortex; Pax-6; ventral pallium http://www.bbsonline.org/Preprints/Aboitiz/Referees/ ====================================================================== IMPORTANT Please do not prepare a commentary yet. Just let us know, after having inspected it, what relevant expertise you feel you would bring to bear on what aspect of the article. We will then let you know whether it was possible to include your name on the final formal list of invitees. ======================================================================= *** SUPPLEMENTARY ANNOUNCEMENT *** (1) Call for Book Nominations for BBS Multiple Book Review In the past, Behavioral and Brain Sciences (BBS) had only been able to do 1-2 BBS multiple book treatments per year, because of our limited annual page quota. BBS's new expanded page quota will make it possible for us to increase the number of books we treat per year, so this is an excellent time for BBS Associates and biobehavioral/cognitive scientists in general to nominate books you would like to see accorded BBS multiple book review. (Authors may self-nominate, but books can only be selected on the basis of multiple nominations.) It would be very helpful if you indicated in what way a BBS Multiple Book Review of the book(s) you nominate would be useful to the field (and of course a rich list of potential reviewers would be the best evidence of its potential impact!). *-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-* Please note: Your email address has been added to our user database for Calls for Commentators, the reason you received this email. If you do not wish to receive further Calls, please feel free to change your mailshot status through your User Login link on the BBSPrints homepage, using your username and password. Or, email a response with the word "remove" in the subject line. *-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-* Ralph BBS ------------------------------------------------------------------- Ralph DeMarco Editorial Coordinator Behavioral and Brain Sciences Journals Department Cambridge University Press 40 West 20th Street New York, NY 10011-4211 UNITED STATES bbs(a)bbsonline.org http://www.bbsonline.org Tel: +001 212 924 3900 ext.374 Fax: +001 212 645 5960 -------------------------------------------------------------------

23 years, 7 months

Philosophy of Science Colloquium, Tamas Rudas

by Laszlo E. Szabo

Department of HISTORY AND PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE Eotvos University, Budapest Pazmany P. setany 1/A Budapest Phone/Fax: (36-1) 372 2924 Department's Home Page:http://hps.elte.hu Philosophy of Science Colloquium Room 6.54 (6th floor) Monday 4:00 PM ____________________________________ 18 November 4:00 PM 6th floor 6.54 Instead of the canceled lecture of 21 October! Tamas Rudas Department of Statistics, Institute of Sociology, Eötvös University, Budapest Measurement and modelling of association in contingency tables Association between two variables is defined in the talk as the information in their joint distribution not present in the univariate distributions. Therefore, a measure of association, together with the marginal distributions, has to parameterize the joint distribution and has to be variationally independent from the marginals. These requirements point to the odds ratio as the only appropriate measure of association. For higher dimensional contingency tables, a possible generalization is the system of conditional odds ratios. The conditional odds ratios, on an ascending class of subsets, are variationally independent from the marginal distributions on the complement descending class and together parameterize the joint distribution. Depending on the class of subsets used, one obtains a flexible class of parametereizations that can be used to model the conditional association structure. The models obtained by assuming lack of conditional association on an ascending class of subsets are of the log-linear type. The concepts discussed in the talk and the analyses based on these concepts suggest that association has a hierarchical structure. The assumption of multivariate normality, routinely applied in our thinking about multivariate data structures, is equivalent to assuming that only first order interactions exist is therefore, is an oversimplification of reality. ------------------------------------------------------------------------ The 60-minute lecture is followed by a 10-minute break. Then we held a 30-60-minute discussion. ------------------------------------------------------------------------ The organizer of the seminar: László E. Szabó <http://hps.elte.hu/~leszabo> (email: leszabo(a)hps.elte.hu) -- L a s z l o E. S z a b o Theoretical Physics Research Group of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences Department of History and Philosophy of Science Eotvos University, Budapest H-1518 Budapest, Pf. 32, Hungary Phone/Fax: (36-1)372-2924 Mobil/SMS: (36) 20-366-1172 http://hps.elte.hu/~leszabo

23 years, 7 months

Anderson & Lebiere/The Newell Test: BBS Call for Commentators

by Behavioral & Brain Sciences

Below is a link to the forthcoming BBS target article The Newell Test for a Theory of Mind by John R. Anderson and Christian Lebiere Carnegie Mellon University http://www.bbsonline.org/Preprints/Anderson/Referees/ This article has been accepted for publication in Behavioral and Brain Sciences (BBS), an international, interdisciplinary journal providing Open Peer Commentary on important and controversial current research in the biobehavioral and cognitive sciences. Commentators must be BBS Associates or suggested by a BBS Associate. To be considered as a commentator for this article, to suggest other appropriate commentators, or for information about how to become a BBS Associate, please reply by EMAIL within three (3) weeks to: calls(a)bbsonline.org The Calls are sent to 10,000 BBS Associates, so there is no expectation (indeed, it would be calamitous) that each recipient should comment on every occasion! Hence there is no need to reply except if you wish to comment, or to suggest someone to comment. If you are not a BBS Associate, please approach a current BBS Associate (there are currently over 10,000 worldwide) who is familiar with your work to nominate you. All past BBS authors, referees and commentators are eligible to become BBS Associates. An electronic list of current BBS Associates is available at this location to help you select a name: http://www.bbsonline.org/Instructions/assoclist.html (please note that this list is being updated) If no current BBS Associate knows your work, please send us your Curriculum Vitae and BBS will circulate it to appropriate Associates to ask whether they would be prepared to nominate you. (In the meantime, your name, address and email address will be entered into our database as an unaffiliated investigator.) ======================================================================= IMPORTANT To help us put together a balanced list of commentators, please give some indication of the aspects of the topic on which you would bring your areas of expertise to bear if you were selected as a commentator. To help you decide whether you would be an appropriate commentator for this article, an electronic draft is retrievable from the online BBSPrints Archive, at the URL that follows the abstract below. _______________________________________________________________________ The Newell Test for a Theory of Mind John R. Anderson Department of Psychology BH345D Carnegie Mellon University Christian Lebiere Human Computer Interaction Institute Carnegie Mellon University ABSTRACT: Newell (1980, 1990) proposed that cognitive theories be developed trying to satisfy multiple criteria to avoid theoretical myopia. He provided two overlapping lists of 13 criteria that the human cognitive architecture would have to satisfy to be functional. We have distilled these into 12: flexible behavior, real-time performance, adaptive behavior, vast knowledge base, dynamic behavior, knowledge integration, natural language, learning, development, evolution, and brain realization. There would be greater theoretical progress if we evaluated theories by a broad set of criteria such as these and attended to the weaknesses such evaluations revealed. To illustrate how theories can be evaluated we apply them to both classical connectionism (McClelland & Rumelhart, 1986; Rumelhart & McClelland, 1986) and the ACT-R theory (Anderson & Lebiere, 1998). The strengths of classical connectionism on this test derive from its intense effort in addressing empirical phenomena in domains like language and cognitive development. Its weaknesses derive from its failure to acknowledge a symbolic level to thought. In contrast, ACT-R includes both symbolic and subsymbolic components. The strengths of the ACT-R derive from its tight integration of the symbolic with the subsymbolic. Its weaknesses largely derive from its failure as yet to adequately engage in intensive analyses of issues related to certain criteria on Newells list KEYWORDS: Cognitive Architecture; Connectionism; Hybrid Systems; Language Learning; Symbolic Systems http://www.bbsonline.org/Preprints/Anderson/Referees/ ====================================================================== IMPORTANT Please do not prepare a commentary yet. Just let us know, after having inspected it, what relevant expertise you feel you would bring to bear on what aspect of the article. We will then let you know whether it was possible to include your name on the final formal list of invitees. ======================================================================= *** SUPPLEMENTARY ANNOUNCEMENT *** (1) Call for Book Nominations for BBS Multiple Book Review In the past, Behavioral and Brain Sciences (BBS) had only been able to do 1-2 BBS multiple book treatments per year, because of our limited annual page quota. BBS's new expanded page quota will make it possible for us to increase the number of books we treat per year, so this is an excellent time for BBS Associates and biobehavioral/cognitive scientists in general to nominate books you would like to see accorded BBS multiple book review. (Authors may self-nominate, but books can only be selected on the basis of multiple nominations.) It would be very helpful if you indicated in what way a BBS Multiple Book Review of the book(s) you nominate would be useful to the field (and of course a rich list of potential reviewers would be the best evidence of its potential impact!). *-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-* Please note: Your email address has been added to our user database for Calls for Commentators, the reason you received this email. If you do not wish to receive further Calls, please feel free to change your mailshot status through your User Login link on the BBSPrints homepage, using your username and password. Or, email a response with the word "remove" in the subject line. *-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-* Ralph BBS ------------------------------------------------------------------- Ralph DeMarco Editorial Coordinator Behavioral and Brain Sciences Journals Department Cambridge University Press 40 West 20th Street New York, NY 10011-4211 UNITED STATES bbs(a)bbsonline.org http://www.bbsonline.org Tel: +001 212 924 3900 ext.374 Fax: +001 212 645 5960 -------------------------------------------------------------------

23 years, 7 months

Categorization Summer Institute June 30 - July 11 2003 Montreal

by Stevan Harnad

The theme of the 2003 UQaM Summer Institute is CATEGORISATION http://www.unites.uqam.ca/sccog/liens/program.html Universite of Quebec @ Montreal: June 30 - July 11 2003 Day 1. CATEGORIZATION IN COGNITIVE SCIENCES (all disciplines) Categorization in cognitive neuroscience - S Grossberg (Boston U) Categorization in psychology - S Harnad (UQaM) Categorization in computer science - JF Sowa (LLC) Categorization in linguistics - TBA Categorization in Philosophy - TBA Categorization in cognitive sciences - A Papafragou (Penn) Day 2. SEMANTIC CATEGORIES (anthropology, linguistics, philosophy, psychology) Emotion categories across languages - J Boster (U Conn) Semantic categorization - B Gillon (McGill) Conceptual Change - P Thagard (Waterloo) Biology of substance categories - R Millikan(U Conn) Color categories across languages - P Kay (Berkeley) Semantic categories - S Coulson (UCSD) Day 3. SYNTACTIC CATEGORIES AND CATEGORY CHANGE (linguistics) Syntactic categories 1 - A Zwicky (Stanford) Multifunctional categories - Lisa Travis (McGill) Crossgcategorial constructions - R Malouf (Groningen) Category change - Ian Roberts (Cambridge) How different can languages be? - D Gil (MPI Leipzig) Syntactic categories 2 - J Bobaljik (McGill) Day 4. CATEGORIES IN SPOKEN AND SIGNED LANGUAGES (linguistics and psychology) Sign Language 1 - D Bouchard/C Dubuisson (UQaM) Sign languages 2 - Judy Kegl (U So Maine) Sign vs speech - D Lillo-Martin (U Conn) ACQUISITION OF CATEGORIES L1 acquisition - M Labelle (UQaM) L2 acquisition - L White (McGill) Categorisation and acquisition - E Clark (Stanford) Day 5. DATA MINING FOR CATEGORIES AND ONTOLOGIES (computer science, philosophy) Graph structure clustering - G Mineau (Laval) Data mining - Y Kodratoff (Paris-Sud XI) Text mining - A Napoli (LORIA) Computer-aided categorization - J-G Meunier (UQaM) Categorization nets - R Proulx (UQaM) Day 6. NEUROSCIENCE OF CATEGORIZATION AND CATEGORY LEARNING (psychology, philosophy) Neuropsychology of category learning - FG Ashby (Santa Barbara) Striatum and category learning - WT Maddox (UT Austin) Brain basis of category learning - J Gabrieli (Stanford) Categorical speech perception/production - S Ravizza (Berkeley) Neural nets - Pierre Poirier (UQaM) Day 7. MACHINE CATEGORY LEARNING (computer science, philosophy, robotics) Conceptual spaces - P Gardenfors (Lund) Symbolic learning - Patrick Gallinari (U PM Curie) Similarity in fuzzy categories - D Dubois/H Prade (U P Sabatier) Self-organizing vocabularies - S Nolfi (ICST Rome) Inferential learning theory - RS Michalski (G Mason U) Cognitive computation - SJ Hanson (Rutgers) Day 8. PERCEPTION AND INFERENCE (psychology, philosophy) Perception to symbols - L Barsalou (Emory) Return of conceptual empiricism - J Prinz (Wash U St-Louis) Category representation - R Nosofsky (Indiana) Category learning - R Goldstone (Indiana) Categorization and inference - A Markman (UT Austin) Perception and inference - S Coulson (UCSD) Day 9. GROUNDING, RECOGNITION, AND REASONING (psychology, philosophy) Reference - S Larochelle (U Montreal) Shape recognition - I Biederman (USC) Object perception - PG Schyns (Glasgow) Analogical reasoning - D Gentner (Northwestern) Categorization and reasoning - S Robert (UQaM) Day 10. THE NATURALIZATION OF CATEGORIES (philosophy) Nominalism and concepts - C Panaccio (UQTR) Social construction of categories - L Faucher (UQaM) Concept nativism - E Margolis (Rice) Category neurosemantics - C Eliasmith (Waterloo) Philosophical Analysis - G Rey (Maryland) Registration information: http://www.unites.uqam.ca/sccog/liens/registration.html

23 years, 7 months

Anderson & Lebiere/The Newell Test: BBS Call for Commentators

by Behavioral & Brain Sciences

Dear Dr. Qwerty, Below is a link to the forthcoming BBS target article The Newell Test for a Theory of Mind by John R. Anderson and Christian Lebiere Carnegie Mellon University http://www.bbsonline.org/Preprints/Anderson/Referees/ This article has been accepted for publication in Behavioral and Brain Sciences (BBS), an international, interdisciplinary journal providing Open Peer Commentary on important and controversial current research in the biobehavioral and cognitive sciences. Commentators must be BBS Associates or suggested by a BBS Associate. To be considered as a commentator for this article, to suggest other appropriate commentators, or for information about how to become a BBS Associate, please reply by EMAIL within three (3) weeks to: calls(a)bbsonline.org The Calls are sent to 10,000 BBS Associates, so there is no expectation (indeed, it would be calamitous) that each recipient should comment on every occasion! Hence there is no need to reply except if you wish to comment, or to suggest someone to comment. If you are not a BBS Associate, please approach a current BBS Associate (there are currently over 10,000 worldwide) who is familiar with your work to nominate you. All past BBS authors, referees and commentators are eligible to become BBS Associates. An electronic list of current BBS Associates is available at this location to help you select a name: http://www.bbsonline.org/Instructions/assoclist.html (please note that this list is being updated) If no current BBS Associate knows your work, please send us your Curriculum Vitae and BBS will circulate it to appropriate Associates to ask whether they would be prepared to nominate you. (In the meantime, your name, address and email address will be entered into our database as an unaffiliated investigator.) ======================================================================= IMPORTANT To help us put together a balanced list of commentators, please give some indication of the aspects of the topic on which you would bring your areas of expertise to bear if you were selected as a commentator. To help you decide whether you would be an appropriate commentator for this article, an electronic draft is retrievable from the online BBSPrints Archive, at the URL that follows the abstract below. _______________________________________________________________________ The Newell Test for a Theory of Mind John R. Anderson Department of Psychology BH345D Carnegie Mellon University Christian Lebiere Human Computer Interaction Institute Carnegie Mellon University ABSTRACT: Newell (1980, 1990) proposed that cognitive theories be developed trying to satisfy multiple criteria to avoid theoretical myopia. He provided two overlapping lists of 13 criteria that the human cognitive architecture would have to satisfy to be functional. We have distilled these into 12: flexible behavior, real-time performance, adaptive behavior, vast knowledge base, dynamic behavior, knowledge integration, natural language, learning, development, evolution, and brain realization. There would be greater theoretical progress if we evaluated theories by a broad set of criteria such as these and attended to the weaknesses such evaluations revealed. To illustrate how theories can be evaluated we apply them to both classical connectionism (McClelland & Rumelhart, 1986; Rumelhart & McClelland, 1986) and the ACT-R theory (Anderson & Lebiere, 1998). The strengths of classical connectionism on this test derive from its intense effort in addressing empirical phenomena in domains like language and cognitive development. Its weaknesses derive from its failure to acknowledge a symbolic level to thought. In contrast, ACT-R includes both symbolic and subsymbolic components. The strengths of the ACT-R derive from its tight integration of the symbolic with the subsymbolic. Its weaknesses largely derive from its failure as yet to adequately engage in intensive analyses of issues related to certain criteria on Newells list KEYWORDS: Cognitive Architecture; Connectionism; Hybrid Systems; Language Learning; Symbolic Systems http://www.bbsonline.org/Preprints/Anderson/Referees/ ====================================================================== IMPORTANT Please do not prepare a commentary yet. Just let us know, after having inspected it, what relevant expertise you feel you would bring to bear on what aspect of the article. We will then let you know whether it was possible to include your name on the final formal list of invitees. ======================================================================= *** SUPPLEMENTARY ANNOUNCEMENT *** (1) Call for Book Nominations for BBS Multiple Book Review In the past, Behavioral and Brain Sciences (BBS) had only been able to do 1-2 BBS multiple book treatments per year, because of our limited annual page quota. BBS's new expanded page quota will make it possible for us to increase the number of books we treat per year, so this is an excellent time for BBS Associates and biobehavioral/cognitive scientists in general to nominate books you would like to see accorded BBS multiple book review. (Authors may self-nominate, but books can only be selected on the basis of multiple nominations.) It would be very helpful if you indicated in what way a BBS Multiple Book Review of the book(s) you nominate would be useful to the field (and of course a rich list of potential reviewers would be the best evidence of its potential impact!). *-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-* Please note: Your email address has been added to our user database for Calls for Commentators, the reason you received this email. If you do not wish to receive further Calls, please feel free to change your mailshot status through your User Login link on the BBSPrints homepage, using your username and password. Or, email a response with the word "remove" in the subject line. *-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-* Ralph BBS ------------------------------------------------------------------- Ralph DeMarco Editorial Coordinator Behavioral and Brain Sciences Journals Department Cambridge University Press 40 West 20th Street New York, NY 10011-4211 UNITED STATES bbs(a)bbsonline.org http://www.bbsonline.org Tel: +001 212 924 3900 ext.374 Fax: +001 212 645 5960 -------------------------------------------------------------------

23 years, 7 months

Jump to page:

2026

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

2002

2001

2000

1999

1998

1997

1996

1995

1994

1993

koglist