koglist

koglist@maillist.ttk.hu

4 participants
5929 discussions

by Istvan Aranyosi

Hello Everyone! Below and linked find the info about the 4th Meeting of the Budapest Mind Society, which will have Prof. Crane from London as its protagonist. Note that from November 2004 on the sessions will be chaired by -and information about the activities of BMS will be avalilable from- Andras Simonyi simka(a)ludens.elte.hu , as both Hong Yu Wong and Istvan Aranyosi, who founded this group, will have left Hungary by then. http://www.personal.ceu.hu/students/03/Istvan_Aranyosi/Budapest_Mind_Societ… --------------------------------------------------------------- Professor Tim Crane, Philosophy, University College London 'The efficacy of colour, shape and size' 10 November, Wednesday, 2004, 5 PM, Dept. of Philosophy, CEU, Zrinyi 14, #412. Asbtract: This paper presents an antinomy about the role of properties in causation. If we think of causation in terms of counterfactual dependence, then there is a persuasive case (made, for example, by Stephen Yablo) for thinking that determinable properties (like redness) can be causes. But on the other hand, if we think of properties as the 'truth-makers' for predications, then it is arguable that only determinate properties (maximally specific shades of colour) are causes. But these claims cannot both be true; which should we deny? ------------------------------------------------------------ Everybody welcome! I will send a reminder a few days before the talk. Cheers Istvan

21 years, 7 months

Philosophy of Science Colloquium, Matolcsi

by Laszlo E. Szabo

21 years, 7 months

Philosophy of Science Colloquium, November

by Laszlo E. Szabo

P h i l o s o p h y o f S c i e n c e C o l l o q u i u m Department of History and Philosophy of Science Eotvos Lorand University, Budapest Room 6.54 (6th floor) Monday 4:00 PM Pazmany P. setany 1/A Budapest, Hungary Phone/Fax: (36-1) 372 2924 http://hps.elte.hu/seminar Program: November 8 November 4:00 PM 6th floor 6.54 (Language: Hungarian) T a m a s M a t o l c s i Applied Analysis, Eötvös Loránd University, Budapest Terido-modellek: kozos gyokerek (Space-time models: common roots) Abstract: http://hps.elte.hu/seminar/2004/November/index.html#1 15 November 4:00 PM 6th floor 6.54 (Language: English, except if all participants speak Hungarian) L a s z l o E. S z a b o Theoretical Physics Research Group Department of History and Philosophy of Science Eötvös Loránd University, Budapest Does special relativity theory tell us anything new about space and time? Abstract: http://hps.elte.hu/seminar/2004/November/index.html#2 22 November 4:00 PM 6th floor 6.54 (Language: English) H o w a r d M. R o b i n s o n Philosophy, Central European University, Budapest Concept of matter and concept of power Abstract: http://hps.elte.hu/seminar/2004/November/index.html#3 29 November 4:00 PM 6th floor 6.54 (Language: English, except if all participants speak Hungarian) K a t a l i n M a r t i n a s*+ L a s z l o R o p o l y i++ ___________ * lecturer +Atomic Physics, ++History and Philosophy of Science Eötvös Loránd University, Budapest Aristotelian thermodynamics Abstract: http://hps.elte.hu/seminar/2004/November/index.html#3 ___________________________________ The 60-minute lecture is followed by a 10-minute break. Then we hold a 30-60-minute discussion. The participants may comment on the talks and are encouraged to initiate discussion through the Internet. The comments should be written in the language of the presentation. The organizer of the colloquium: Laszlo E. Szabo (email: leszabo(a)hps.elte.hu) -- L a s z l o E. S z a b o Theoretical Physics Research Group of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences Department of History and Philosophy of Science Eotvos University, Budapest http://hps.elte.hu/leszabo

21 years, 7 months

Let's dumb-up (journal citation) impact factors

by Stevan Harnad

The following is a commentary on an editorial in the British Medical Journal entitled: Let's dump impact factors Kamran Abbasi, acting editor BMJ 2004;329 (16 October), doi:10.1136/bmj.329.7471.0-h http://bmj.bmjjournals.com/cgi/content/full/329/7471/0-h I've submitted the following commentary. It should appear Monday at: http://bmj.bmjjournals.com/cgi/eletters/329/7471/0-h Prior Amsci Topic Thread: "Citation and Rejection Statistics for Eprints and Ejournals" http://www.ecs.soton.ac.uk/~harnad/Hypermail/Amsci/0138.html http://www.ecs.soton.ac.uk/~harnad/Hypermail/Amsci/1112.html ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Enrich Impact Measures Through Open Access Analysis (Or: "Let's Dumb-Up Impact Factors") Stevan Harnad The "journal impact factor" -- the average number of citations received by the articles in a journal -- is not an *invalid* instrument, but a blunt (and obsolescent) one. It does have some meaning and some predictive value (i.e., it is not merely a circular "definition" of impact), but we can do far better. Research impact evaluation should be thought of in multiple-regression terms: The journal impact factor is just one of many potential predictive factors, each with its own weight, and each adding a certain amount to the accuracy of the prediction/evaluation. The journal impact factor is the first of the regression weights, but not because it is the biggest or strongest, but just because it came first in time: Gene Garfield (1955, 1999) and the Institute for Scientific Information (ISI) started to count citations (and citation immediacy, and other data) and produced an index of the average (2-year) citation counts of journals -- as well as the individual citation counts of articles and authors. The fact that unenterprising and unreflecting evaluation committees found it easier to simply weight their researchers' publication counts with the impact factors of the journals in which they appeared was due in equal parts to laziness and to the valid observation that journal impact factors *do* correlate, even if weakly, with journals' rejection rates, hence with the rigour of their peer review, and hence with the quality of their contents: "High citation rates... and low manuscript acceptance rates... appear to be predictive of higher methodological quality scores for journal articles" (Lee et al. 2002) "The majority of the manuscripts that were rejected... were eventually published... in specialty journals with lower impact factor..." (Ray et al. 2000) "perceived quality ratings of the journals are positively correlated with citation impact factors... and negatively correlated with acceptance rate." (Donohue & Fox 2000) "There was a high correlation between the rejection rate and the impact factor" (Yamasaki 1995) But even then, the article and author exact citation counts could have been added to the regression equation -- yet only lately are evaluation committees beginning to do this. Why? Again, laziness and unenterprisingness, but also effort and cost: An institution needs to be subscribed to ISI's citation databases and needs to take the trouble to consult them systematically. But other measures -- richer and more diverse ones -- are developing, and with them the possibility of ever more powerful, accurate and equitable assessment and prediction of research performance and impact (Harnad et al. 2004). These measures (e.g. citebase http://citebase.eprints.org/) include: citation counts for article, author, and journal; download counts for article, author and journal; co-citation counts (who is jointly cited with whom?); eventually co-download counts (what is being downloaded with what?); analogs of google's "page-rank" algorithm (recursively weighting citations by the weight of the citing work); "hub/authority" analysis (much-cited vs. much-citing works); co-text "semantic" analysis (what -- and whose -- text patterns resemble the cited work?); early-days download/citation correlations (http://citebase.eprints.org/analysis/correlation.php) (downloads today predict citations citations in two years (Harnad & Brody 2004); time-series analyses; and much more. So the ISI journal-impact factor is merely a tiny dumbed-down portion of the rich emerging spectrum of objective impact indicators; it now needs to be dumbed-up, not dumped! Two things need to be kept in mind in making pronouncements about the use of such performance indicators: (i) Consider the alternative! The reason we resort to objective measures at all is that reading and evaluating every single work anew each time it needs to be evaluated is not only subjective but labour-intensive, and requires at least the level of expertise and scrutiny that (one hopes!) the journal peer review itself has accorded the work once already, in a world in which qualified refereeing time is an increasingly scarce, freely-given resource, stolen from researchers' own precious research time. Citations (and downloads) indicate that researchers have found the work in question useful in their own research. (ii) The many new forms of impact analysis can now be done automatically, without having to rely on ISI -- if and when researchers make all their journal articles Open Access, by self-archiving them in OAI compliant Eprint Archives on the Web. Remarkable new scientometric engines are just waiting for that open database to be provided in order to add the rich new panoply of impact measures promised above (Harnad et al. 2003). Donohue JM, Fox JB (2000) A multi-method evaluation of journals in the decision and management sciences by US academics. OMEGA-INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT SCIENCE 28 (1): 17-36 Garfield, E., (1955) Citation Indexes for Science: A New Dimension in Documentation through Association of Ideas. SCIENCE 122: 108-111 http://www.garfield.library.upenn.edu/papers/science_v122(3159)p108y1955.htm Garfield E. (1999) Journal impact factor: a brief review. CMAJ 161(8): 979-80. http://www.cmaj.ca/cgi/content/full/161/8/979 Harnad, S. and Brody, T. (2004) Prior evidence that downloads predict citations BMJ Rapid Responses, 6 September 2004 http://bmj.bmjjournals.com/cgi/eletters/329/7465/546#73000 Harnad, S., Brody, T., Vallieres, F., Carr, L., Hitchcock, S., Gingras, Y, Oppenheim, C., Stamerjohanns, H., & Hilf, E. (2004) The Access/Impact Problem and the Green and Gold Roads to Open Access. SERIALS REVIEW 30. http://www.ecs.soton.ac.uk/~harnad/Temp/impact.html Harnad, S., Carr, L., Brody, T. & Oppenheim, C. (2003) Mandated online RAE CVs Linked to University Eprint Archives: Improving the UK Research Assessment Exercise whilst making it cheaper and easier. ARIADNE 35 (April 2003). http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue35/harnad/ Lee KP, Schotland M, Bacchetti P, Bero LA (2002) Association of journal quality indicators with methodological quality of clinical research articles. AMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION 287 (21): 2805-2808 Ray J, Berkwits M, Davidoff, F (2000) The fate of manuscripts rejected by a general medical journal. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF MEDICINE 109 (2): 131-135. Yamazaki, S (1995) Refereeing System of 29 Life-Science Journals Preferred by Japanese Scientists SCIENTOMETRICS 33 (1): 123-129

21 years, 7 months

Philosophy of Science Colloquium, Gy. Bene

by Laszlo E. Szabo

21 years, 8 months

Fw: final call: 9th International Pragmatics Conference

by Kampis

> ----- Original Message ----- > From: Jef Verschueren <jef.verschueren(a)ua.ac.be> > To: <cogling(a)ucsd.edu> > Sent: Sunday, October 17, 2004 11:35 PM > Subject: final call: 9th International Pragmatics Conference > > >> THE ABSTRACTS DEADLINE HAS BEEN MOVED FROM 15 OCTOBER 2004 TO 1 NOVEMBER >> = >> 2004. No further extensions will be possible! >> >> The 9TH INTERNATIONAL PRAGMATICS CONFERENCE will be held on 10-15 July = >> 2005 at the Riva del Garda Congressi conference center = >> (www.palacongressi.it ), RIVA DEL GARDA, ITALY=20 >> >> >> For the full call for papers, go to the IPrA website at >> >> www.ipra.be=20 >> >> Abstracts submission is entirely web-based. Just visit the site and = >> follow the instructions. >> >> >> CONFERENCE CHAIR: Marina SBISA (Univ. of Trieste; sbisama(a)units.it )=20 >> >> LOCAL SITE COMMITTEE: The other members of the Local Site Committee are: >> = >> Claudia BIANCHI (Univ. of Genova); Paolo BOUQUET (Univ. of Trento); = >> Claudia CAFFI (Univ. of Genova); Alessandra FASULO (Univ. of Roma 'La = >> Sapienza'); Roberta FERRARIO (Univ. of Trento); Franca ORLETTI (Univ. of >> = >> Roma Tre); Luigi PERISSINOTTO (Univ. Ca Foscari of Venezia); Fabio = >> PIANESI (Istituto per la Ricerca Scientifica e Tecnologica, Trento); = >> Oliviero STOCK (Istituto per la Ricerca Scientifica e Tecnologica, = >> Trento); Stefano ZANOBINI (Univ. of Trento). >> >> INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE COMMITTEE: In addition to the members of the = >> Local Site Committee, the International Conference Committee includes: = >> Karin AIJMER (Univ. of G=F6teborg); Jens ALLWOOD (Univ. of G=F6teborg); = >> Charles ANTAKI (Loughborough Univ.);=20 >> Walter DE MULDER (Univ. of Antwerp; IPrA Editor); Helmut GRUBER (Univ. = >> of Vienna; IPrA Editor); John GUMPERZ (Univ. of California, Santa = >> Barbara; IPrA President 1986-1990); Monica HELLER (Univ. of Toronto); = >> Andreas JUCKER (Justus Liebig Univ. Giessen; IPrA Treasurer); Sophia = >> MARMARIDOU (Univ. of Athens; IPrA Editor); Bonnie McELHINNY (Univ. of = >> Toronto); Jacob MEY (Odense Univ.); Jan-Ola =D6STMAN (Univ. of = >> Helsinki); Ben RAMPTON (King's College London); Anna-Brita STENSTR=D6M = >> (Univ. of Bergen); Elizabeth TRAUGOTT (Stanford Univ.); Jef VERSCHUEREN = >> (Univ. of Antwerp; IPrA Secretary General); Yorick WILKS (Univ. of = >> Sheffield); John WILSON (Univ. of Ulster at Jordanstown). >> >> >> >> THEMES: As always, the conference will be open to all themes relevant to >> = >> the pragmatics of language in its widest sense as an interdisciplinary = >> cognitive, social, and cultural perspective. In addition, there is a = >> special theme.=20 >> >> SPECIAL THEME: Pragmatics and Philosophy=20 >> >> It is both interesting and scientifically productive for pragmatics to = >> revisit and discuss its philosophical starting points and enduring = >> presuppositions, as well as its philosophical implications. Various = >> philosophical problems may benefit from being discussed in a pragmatic = >> perspective, and philosophy itself as a discourse genre is liable to be = >> analyzed by a pragmatic approach. The range of themes meant to be = >> covered by the special topic "Pragmatics and Philosophy" therefore = >> includes at least:=20 >> . philosophical heritages of pragmatics: Austin, Grice, Searle, = >> Wittgenstein, Carnap, pragmatism, phenomenology;=20 >> . philosophical frameworks for pragmatics: speech act theory, = >> neo-Gricean and post-Gricean frameworks, theories of meaning as use, = >> theories of context, pragmatics and hermeneutics, pragmatics and = >> cultural studies;=20 >> . overlaps between pragmatics and philosophy: the semantics/pragmatics = >> interface, indexicals, presupposition, implicature, speech acts, = >> propositional attitudes, context logics, contextualist epistemology, = >> intentionality and subjectivity, agency, emotions, rhetoric, personal or >> = >> collective identities;=20 >> . pragmatics of the philosophical discourse genre: analysis of = >> philosophical discourse, pragmatic approaches to argumentation and = >> dialogue, pragmatics and the teaching of philosophy.=20 >> >> Plenary lectures will include: >> >> Rukmini BHAYA NAIR (Indian Institute of Technology, Delhi, India), = >> Pragmatics, pragmatism & the postcolonial >> >> >> Robyn CARSTON (University College London), Pragmatics: From philosophy = >> to cognitive science >> >> Steven DAVIS (Carleton University, Ottawa), Demonstratives and = >> understanding >> >> Charles GOODWIN (Univ. of California at Los Angeles), Multi-modal action >> = >> in discourse >> >> Clotilde PONTECORVO (Univ. of Roma 'La Sapienza'), From talking to = >> reasoning >> >> >> Marina SBISA (Univ. of Trieste), How to read Austin >> >> >> >> And there will be a plenary session organized by: >> >> Paolo BOUQUET (Univ. of Trento) & Oliviero STOCK (IRST), Computational = >> pragmatics. Guest speaker: Wolfgang WAHLSTER (Universit=E4t des = >> Saarlandes). >> >> >> >> CALL FOR PAPERS=20 >> Abstracts Deadline: 1 November 2004 >> >> >> Two types of paper proposals are invited:=20 >> >> 1. For single-paper presentations to be included in regular lecture = >> sessions (20-minute presentations followed by 5 minutes for discussion = >> and allowing 5 minutes for switching between sessions). Author who wish = >> to present their paper as a poster, may choose to do so. >> >> 2. For panels or multi-paper sessions. Panels take the form of a series = >> of closely related lectures on a specific topic. They may consist of = >> one, two or three units of 120 minutes. Within each panel unit an = >> average of four 20-minute presentations are given consecutively; the = >> rest of the period may be taken up by an introduction, open discussion, = >> comments by a discussant or discussants, or any combination of these. = >> Panels are composed of contributions invited by panel organizers, = >> combined with individually submitted papers when judged appropriate by = >> the Conference Committee in consultation with the panel organizers. = >> Typically, written versions or extensive outlines of all panel = >> contributions should be available to the other contributors before the = >> conference in order to facilitate discussion.=20 >> Note that in addition to a panel abstract (to be submitted by the panel = >> organizers), abstracts for all panel contributions, even when invited = >> directly by panel organizers, have to be sent in individually (following >> = >> the single-paper presentations option) and will be reviewed individually >> = >> and anonymously.=20 >> >> For detailed instructions, go to www.ipra.be >> >> Contact: info(a)ipra.be=20 >> > >

21 years, 8 months

meghívó Mérő László

by Sz. Molnár Szilvia

Tisztelt Hölgyem/Uram, mellékelve küldöm meghívónkat Mérő László új könyvének bemutatójára és dedikálására. Üdvözlettel: Sz. Molnár Szilvia Tericum Kiadó szmolnar(a)tericum.hu www.tericum.hu 1036 Budapest Evező u. 1. II. em. 2. Tel: 453 09 29 Fax: 240 56 73

21 years, 8 months

kognitiv pszichofiziologia kurzus

by Honbolygo Ferenc

Az ELTE-PPK és a DE-BTK Doktori Iskolák Kognitív Pszichológiai Alprogramja elõadás-sorozatot hirdet "KOGNITÍV PSZICHOFIZIOLÓGIA" címmel. Az elõadások helye: MTA Pszichológiai Kutatóintézet (VI. Budapest, Szondi u. 83-85). Az elõadások a megadott napokon de. 10.00-kor kezdõdnek. Minden érdeklõdõt szeretettel várunk! Idõpont Elõadó Elõadás címe október 29. Marton Magda születésnapja alkalmából tartott tudományos ülés (MTA-PKI, XIII. Victor H. u. 18-22, alagsor 31. sz. elõadóterem) november 5. Csépe Valéria Fejlõdés-idegtudomány november 12. Czigler István Újdonságdetekció november 19. Csépe Valéria Pszicho-fizio-lingvisztika november 26. Czigler István Az öregedés pszichofiziológiája december 3. Molnár Márk Nemlineáris és lineáris EEG-szinkronizáció: pszichofiziológiai háttér, klinikai vonatkozások december 10. Karmos György Az eseményhez kötött agyi potenciálok genezise december 17. Winkler István Az egyszerû ötlettõl a bonyolult kísérletig: esettanulmány a hallási eseményfüggõ válaszok körébõl The following section of this message contains a file attachment prepared for transmission using the Internet MIME message format. If you are using Pegasus Mail, or any other MIME-compliant system, you should be able to save it or view it from within your mailer. If you cannot, please ask your system administrator for assistance. ---- File information ----------- File: kogn_pszichfiz_kiiras.doc Date: 15 Oct 2004, 11:36 Size: 33792 bytes. Type: Unknown

21 years, 8 months

REMINDER Jakab-talk @ 3rd Mind Society meeting

by Istvan Aranyosi

Hello Everyone! THIS IS A REMINDER THAT THERE IS A THIRD MEETING OF THE: Budapest Mind Society: http://www.personal.ceu.hu/students/03/Istvan_Aranyosi/Budapest_Mind_Societ… Dr. Zoltán Jakab, Cognitive Science, Budapesti Mûszaki és Gazdaságtudományi Egyetem (Technical University Budapest) "Perceptual content: an objection to externalism" October 20, 2004, 5 PM, Department of Philosophy, CEU, Zrínyi utca 14, 4th floor, room 412. ABSTRACT: I start by arguing for one important difference between visual perception of shape and that of color. Visual representation of shapes is compositional, whereas that of colors is representationally atomic. This difference explains a few other features of visual perception. The first is that shape is absolute whereas color is relative, even though both shapes and colors are reasonably taken to be physical properties. The second is that vision is revelatory with respect to shape and space but it is not revelatory with respect to color. Finally, there is one way in which shape perception is normative, and color perception is not. Shape percepts encode the structure of the corresponding stimuli, and this imposes constraints on which percept can correctly track which stimulus. There is no such constraint in color perception, due to the fact that color percepts are representationally atomic.This picture in turn gives rise to an anti-externalist argument about perceptual content which, in my opinion, is quite compelling. ------------------------------------------------------------------- Cheers, István Aranyosi www.personal.ceu.hu/students/03/Istvan_Aranyosi/

21 years, 8 months

ECAP5 - konferencia-felhivas

by Laszlo E. Szabo

Fifth European Congress for Analytic Philosophy, ECAP 5 University of Lisbon, Faculty of Letters, 27-31 August 2005 http://www.centrofilosofia.org/ecap5 First Announcement and Call for Papers (Please circulate) ECAP-congresses are organized every three years by the European Society forAnalytic Philosophy, ESAP. The Society organizes these congresses to furthercontacts and collaboration amongst European analytic hilosophers. Plenary speakers: John Broome, University of Oxford Kit Fine, University of New York François Récanati, Institut Jean Nicod, Paris Sections and chairpersons: 1. History of Philosophy, Wolfgang Künne 2. Logic and Philosophy of Language, Sten Lindstrom 3. Epistemology and Philosophy of Science, David Papineau 4. Metaphysics and Philosophy of Mind, Kevin Mulligan 5. Practical Philosophy, John Skorupski Invited speakers: Wolfgang Künne, University of Hamburg (Section 1) Sten Lindstrom, University of Umea (Section 2) Kevin Mulligan, University of Geneva (Section 4) Roman Murawski, University of Poznan (Section 2) David Papineau, University of London (Section 3) Philip Pettit, University of Princeton (Section 5) Eva Picardi, University of Bologna (Section 2) Josep Prades, University of Girona (Section 4) Stathis Psillos, University of Athens (Section 3) John Skorupski, University of St Andrews (Section 5) Special Workshops: Definite Descriptions, organized by Adriana Silva Graça (Lisbon). Philosophy, Economics and Public Policy, organized by Luc Bovens (Colorado). Probability in Quantum Mechanics, organized by Stephan Hartmann (London School of Economics) and Amit Hagar (Konstanz). Realism and Anti-Realism in the Philosophy of Mathematics, organized by Fernando Ferreira (Lisbon). Value, organized by Kevin Mulligan (Geneva) and Wlodek Rabinowicz (Lund) Submission of abstracts: Authors are invited to submit abstracts of papers that they wish to presentat the congress. Each presentation will be given 40 minutes, including timefor discussion. Abstracts should be printed on one page with single line-space, 12 pointsfont size and must not exceed 2500 characters (including spaces). Theabstract page should include the name of the author, her or his affiliation,the title of the paper and the name of the section in which the authorwishes to present it. It is desirable that the abstract provides an outlineof the arguments given in the paper, and not just the theses argued for. The abstract should be sent in duplicate to ECAP 5, by fax (number below),or electronically as an attachment (preferably pdf) to esap5(a)centrofilosofia.org All abstracts will be blind reviewed. Authors will be notified by 1 April2005 about the programme Committee's decision regarding their presentations. Deadline for submission of abstracts: 1 February, 2005. Registration: Registration should be made by 1 June, 2005. Please use the enclosedregistration form (pdf file) or go to http://www.centrofilosofia.org/ecap5 Programme Committee of ECAP 5: João Branquinho (Chair), Josep Corbi, Pascal Engel, Ferenc Huoranszki,Wlodek Rabinowicz, Howard Robinson, Stelios Virvidakis, Alberto Voltolini,Ulla Wessels, and Jan Wolenski. Contacts: For updates on the congress, suggestions for accommodation and furtherinformation please visit the web page: http://www.centrofilosofia.org/ecap5 Inquiries about abstract submissions should be sent to Teresa Marques,esap5(a)centrofilosofia.org Inquiries about registration, accommodation and social programme should besent to: Elsa Sousa Abreu Congress Department Avenida 25 de Abril, 2 * Edifício Abreu 2795-195 Linda-a-Velha Portugal Fax: + 351 214156383/4 E-mail: esousa(a)abreu.pt All other inquiries should be sent to: ECAP 5 Philosophy Centre Faculdade de Letras de Lisboa Alameda da Universidade 1600-214 Lisboa Portugal Fax: +351 21 796 00 63 Email: ecap5(a)centrofilosofia.org -- L a s z l o E. S z a b o Theoretical Physics Research Group of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences Department of History and Philosophy of Science Eotvos University, Budapest http://hps.elte.hu/leszabo

21 years, 8 months

Jump to page:

2026

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

2002

2001

2000

1999

1998

1997

1996

1995

1994

1993

koglist