koglist

koglist@maillist.ttk.hu

4 participants
5930 discussions

BBS Call for Commentary Proposals: Jones

by Behavioral and Brain Sciences

Dear Dr. Qwerty: When a target article or recent book has been accepted for BBS Open Peer Commentary, the editorial office sends out the Call for Commentary Proposals to thousands of people. Commentary proposals help the editors craft a well-balanced commentary invitation list. Please DO NOT submit a commentary article unless you are formally invited. If this target article interests you as a possible subject for commentary, please download the full un-copyedited preprint to see if you would like to *propose* a commentary. If you are interested, carefully follow the instructions below the target article information. Please keep in mind that we are not asking you to submit a commentary article -- but rather, a short proposal in order to be considered as an invited author after the proposal deadline. Also be aware that we typically receive far more commentary proposals than we can accommodate with formal invitations. NOW PROCESSING COMMENTARY PROPOSALS ON: Target Article: "Human kinship, from conceptual structure to grammar" Author: Doug Jones Deadline for Commentary Proposals: April 22, 2010 Abstract: Research in anthropology has shown that kin terminologies have a complex combinatorial structure, and vary systematically across cultures. This article argues that universals and variation in kin terminology result from the interaction of (1) an innate conceptual structure of kinship, homologous with conceptual structure in other domains, and (2) principles of optimal, "grammatical" communication active in language in general. Kin terms from two languages, English and Seneca, give a chance to show how terminologies that look very different on the surface can be generated by a universal set of constraints in different rankings. Constraints on kin terms form a system: some are concerned with absolute features of kin (sex), others with the position (distance and direction) of kin in "kinship space," others with groups and group boundaries (matrilines, patrilines, generations, etc.). Also, kin terms are sometimes extended indefinitely via recursion, and recursion in kin terminology has parallels with recursion in other areas of language. Thus the study of kinship sheds light on two areas of cognition, and their phylogeny. The conceptual structure of kinship seems to borrow its organization from the conceptual structure of space, while being specialized for representing genealogy. And the grammar of kinship looks like the product of an evolved grammar faculty, opportunistically active across traditional domains of semantics, syntax, and phonology. Grammar is best understood as an offshoot of a uniquely human capacity for playing coordination games. Keywords: cognitive anthropology; conceptual structure; coordination games; evolutionary psychology; grammar; kinship; kin terms; language evolution; Optimality Theory (OT); recursion Download Target Article Preprint: http://journals.cambridge.org/BBSJournal/Call/Jones_preprint COMMENTARY PROPOSALS MUST INCLUDE THE FOLLOWING 1. What aspect of the target article or book you would anticipate commenting upon. 2. The relevant expertise you would bring to bear on the target article or book. Please include names and affiliations of your co-authors if applicable. SUGGESTING COMMENTATORS AND NOMINATING BBS ASSOCIATES Commentators must be BBS Associates, or suggested by a BBS Associate. If you are not a BBS Associate, please follow the instructions below. To suggest others as possible Commentators, or to nominate others for BBS Associateship status, please email bbsjournal(a)cambridge.org. http://journals.cambridge.org/BBSJournal/Inst/Assoc HOW TO SUBMIT A COMMENTARY PROPOSAL If you would like to nominate yourself for potential commentary invitation, you must submit a Commentary Proposal via our BBS Editorial Manager site: 1. Log-in as Author Username: CQwerty-545 Password: Qwerty875632 Log-in to your BBS Editorial Manager account as an author: http://www.editorialmanager.com/bbs. If you do not have an account, please visit the site and register. You can also submit a request for missing username and password information if you have an existing account. 2. Submit New Manuscript Within your author main menu please select Submit New Manuscript. 3. Select Article Type Choose the article type of your manuscript from the pull-down menu. Commentary Proposal article types are temporarily created for each accepted target article or book. Only select the Commentary Proposal article type that you wish to submit a proposal on. For example; "Commentary Proposal (Jones)" 4. Enter Title Please title your proposal submission by indicating the relevant first author name of the target article or book. For example: "Commentary Proposal on Jones" 5. Add Co-Authors If you are proposing to write a commentary with any co-authors, please enter their required information here. These potential co-authors need not contribute to the Commentary Proposal itself. 6. Attach Files The only required submission Item is your Commentary Proposal in MSWord or RTF format. In the Description field please add the first author name of the target article or book. For example: "Commentary Proposal on Anderson" 7. Approve Your Submission Editorial Manager will process your Commentary Proposal submission and will create a PDF for your approval. On the 'Submissions Waiting for Author's Approval' page, you can view your PDF, edit, approve, or remove the submission. Once you have Approved the Submission, the PDF will be sent to the editorial office. **It is VERY important that you check and approve your Commentary Proposal manuscript as described above. Otherwise, we cannot process your submission.** Note: If you have designated a different Corresponding Author, only the new Corresponding Author will have access to the PDF and must log-in to the system in order to approve the PDF. 8. Editorial Office Decision At the conclusion of the Commentary Proposal period, the editors will review all the submitted Commentary Proposals. An undetermined number of Commentary Proposals will be approved and those author names will be added to the final commentary invitation list. At that time you will be notified of the decision. If you are formally invited to submit a commentary, you will be asked to confirm your intention to submit by the commentary deadline. Note: Before the commentary invitations are sent, the copy-edited and revised target article will be posted for invitees. In the case of Multiple Book Review, invitees will be sent a copy of the book to be commented upon if requested. With Multiple Book Reviews, it is the book, not the précis article that is the target of commentary. Please do not write a commentary unless you have received an official invitation! SPECIAL NOTE Since this is our first year on Editorial Manager, we would like your feedback regarding how the process could be improved. Please let me know if you have any questions or concerns. BEING REMOVED FROM THE CALL EMAIL LIST If you DO NOT wish to receive Call for Commentary Proposals in the future, please reply to bbsjournal(a)cambridge.org, and type "remove" in the subject line. Sincerely, Ralph DeMarco Editorial Administrator, BBS Associate Editor, STM Journals Cambridge University Press 32 Avenue of the Americas New York, NY 10013-2473 Tel 001 212.337.5016 bbsjournal(a)cambridge.org http://journals.cambridge.org/bbs http://bbs.edmgr.com/

16 years, 2 months

SIMON LEHELTŐL, A XVI. MAKOG KÖTETÉNEK BEMUTATÓ KONFERENCIÁJA, TKBF, MÁJUS 9-E, 15 ÓRA

by Lehel Simon

ELŐADÁSOK, MÓDOSÍTÁS, VÉGLEGES A Kelet-Nyugat Kutatóintézet 2010. május 9-én 15 órától rendezi meg következő házikonferenciáját A Tan Kapuja Buddhista Főiskolán *A középút és a tudat filozófiája* címmel. Előadások: *Agócs Tamás: Dzogcsen (Nagy Beteljesedés) tudatfilozófiája * *Szabados Levente: AE - Artificial Enlightment - avagy természetes-e a megvilágosodás?* *Fórizs László: A gondolkodás határain túl* A konferencia kezdetén bemutatjuk a TKBF Kelet-Nyugat Kutatóintézete és a L'Harmattan Kiadó közös gondozásában megjelent *Szubjektív tudás - Objektív tudomány* című tanulmánykötetet (szerkesztette Csörgő Zoltán és Szabados Levente). A kötet tanulmányainak szerzői valamennyien résztvevői, előadói voltak a Magyar Kognitív Tudományi Alapítvány és A Tan Kapuja Buddhista Főiskola Kelet-Nyugat Kutatóintézete által 2008. október 28-30. között megrendezett XVI. MAKOG Konferenciának. -- Csörgő Zoltán / Zoltan CSÖRGŐ folyamatmenedzser / Process Manager Kelet-Nyugat Kutatóintézet / East-West Research Institute A Tan Kapuja Buddhista Főiskola / The Dharma Gate Budapest Buddhist University H-1098 Budapest, Börzsöny u. 11. Hungary Tel.: +36 30 99 127 66 E-mail: csorgo.zoltan(a)tkbf.hu Skype: mirsusnehum Óvjuk a fákat! Ha nem feltétlenül szükséges, kérem, ne nyomtassa ki ezt az e-mail-t!

16 years, 2 months

CDC Seminar reminder Today 3pm Leonhard Schilbach

by Agnes Kovacs

The next talk in the Cognitive Development Center seminar series at the CEU will be given by Leonard Schilbach (Psychiatry, Köln) A Second-Person Approach to Other Minds: Preliminary Evidence from Functional Neuroimaging Thursday, April 1, 3.00pm CEU Cognitive Development Center Hattyuhaz, Level 3, Hattyu u. 14., 1015 Budapest Abs Starting from the distinction between adopting a first- as compared to a third-person perspective of others' mental states, this presentation will attempt to argue for a second-person approach to understanding other minds. This approach is based on the idea that social cognition is fundamentally different when we are actively engaged with another person ('online' social cognition) as compared to being a mere observer of others. Furthermore the second-person account suggests to take the reciprocity of social interactions seriously by focusing on the different roles interactors play when initiating or responding to each others' actions. Subsequently, results of two sets of studies are presented which were based upon the above mentioned theoretical considerations. The first set of studies was realized to assess the neurobiological correlates (fMRI, EMG, eyetracking) of the perception of socially relevant facial expressions depending upon whether or not they were directed towards the human observer (as opposed to someone else; Schilbach et al. 2006, Mojzisch et al. 2006, Schilbach et al. 2008). A second paradigm was devised to investigate the neural correlates of joint attention in online interaction. To this end a novel fMRI-compatible eyetracking setup was devised which allows participants to interact with an anthropomorphic virtual character. Here, a crucial experimental manipulation consisted in varying whether participants initiated joint attention themselves or responded to someone else's gaze shifts (Wilms et al. in press; Schilbach et al. in press). Results of these studies highlight differential effects on neural processing both related to self-involvement and to the reciprocal nature of social interaction consistent with the idea of these being important constituents of social cognition. On a more speculative note, these results may be seen as preliminary evidence in support of the notion of a second-person approach to other minds which could help to further our understanding of the neurobiology of social cognition and may help to bridge recent findings in the burgeoning field of social neuroscience. Hope this works for you! -- Ágnes M. Kovács Marie Curie Research Fellow-DISCOS MTA PKI Hungarian Academy of Sciences & CEU, Cognitive Development Centre Budapest Hungary tel: +3612796095

16 years, 2 months

Meghívó - BME Kognitív Szemináriumsorozat

by Attila Keresztes

A BME Kognitív Tudományi Tanszék szeretettel vár mindenkit tanszéki szemináriumsorozatának következő előadására: Április 12., hétfő, 12:00-13:00, BME, XI., Stoczek u. 2., St. ép., 320.-as terem. A mentális képességek általános faktorának kognitív magyarázata Kovács Kristóf Magyary Zoltán Poszdoktori Ösztöndíjas BME Kognitív Tudományi Tanszék Absztrakt: Több, mint egy évszázadnyi kutatás után a kognitív képességekben meglévő egyéni különbségek természete és eredete továbbra is nyitott kérdés. A terület legtöbbször megismételt eredménye szerint aki egyfajta kognitív képességet (pl. fejszámolást) mérő teszten jobban teljesít, az másfajta mentális teszteken (pl. szövegértés) is jobban fog szerepelni. Ezt a statisztikai jelenséget, amelyet gyakran neveznek pozitív sokféleségnek, le lehet írni az intelligencia általános (g) faktorával, amelynek magyarázatáról jelenleg sincs elfogadható konszenzus. A doktori disszertációmban egy olyan modellt javasoltam az általános faktor magyarázatára, amely túlmutat a pozitív sokféleség puszta leírásán, és számos empirikus eredményre ad magyarázatot a pszichometria, a fejlődés-pszichológia, a kognitív pszichológia és az idegtudomány területeiről, és anélkül magyarázza meg az általános faktort, hogy egyetlen, általános képesség (általános intelligencia, IQ stb.) létezését feltételezné. E helyett abból indul ki, hogy minden komplex kognitív feladat megoldásakor az emberek több, különféle képességre támaszkodnak, ám ezen képességek közül némelyik, amelyek elsősorban a magasabb rendű kognícióhoz kötődnek, és amelyekért a frontális és parietális kéreg dorzális területei felelősek, számos különböző feladat megoldásához szükségesek, az adott feladatnak megfelelő specifikus képességekkel együtt. Bővebb info innen Attila Keresztes Junior research fellow Budapest University of Technology and Economics Dept. of Cognitive Science, Stoczek u. 2., Budapest 1111, Hungary +36 1 4631072 akeresztes(a)cogsci.bme.hu

16 years, 2 months

invitation - Pierre Jacob on `Can one share another's pain?` 30th March,4.30 PM

by Krisztina Biber

The CEU Philosophy Department cordially invites you to a talk (as part of its Departmental Colloquium series) by Pierre Jacob (Institut Jean Nicod) on Can one share another's pain? Tuesday, 30 March, 2010, 4.30 PM, Zrinyi 14, Room 412 ABSTRACT The goal of this paper is to sketch an account of empathetic pain. The experience of empathetic pain is a species of vicarious experiences of pain. Empathetic responses to another's affective state of kind S are vicarious experiences of affective states of kind S. There are presently two prevalent approaches to empathetic experiences in both cognitive science and philosophy: a mimicry approach (based on the discovery of mirror neurons) and the direct perception approach. Both approaches face insuperable objections. I argue instead for an imagination-based account of vicarious pain and turn to some neuroscientific findings in order to try and account for the distinction between two kinds of vicarious experiences of pain: contagious experiences and empathetic experiences. Kriszta Biber Department Coordinator Philosophy Department Tel: 36-1-327-3806 Fax: 36-1-327-3072 E-mail: biberk(a)ceu.hu

16 years, 2 months

CDC Seminar April 1 Thursday Leonhard Schilbach

by Agnes Kovacs

Leonard Schilbach (Psychiatry, Köln) A Second-Person Approach to Other Minds: Preliminary Evidence from Functional Neuroimaging Thursday, April 1, 3.00 pm CEU Cognitive Development Center Hattyuhaz, Level 3, Hattyu u. 14., 1015 Budapest Abstract Starting from the distinction between adopting a first- as compared to a third-person perspective of others' mental states, this presentation will attempt to argue for a second-person approach to understanding other minds. This approach is based on the idea that social cognition is fundamentally different when we are actively engaged with another person ('online' social cognition) as compared to being a mere observer of others. Furthermore the second-person account suggests to take the reciprocity of social interactions seriously by focusing on the different roles interactors play when initiating or responding to each others' actions. Subsequently, results of two sets of studies are presented which were based upon the above mentioned theoretical considerations. The first set of studies was realized to assess the neurobiological correlates (fMRI, EMG, eyetracking) of the perception of socially relevant facial expressions depending upon whether or not they were directed towards the human observer (as opposed to someone else; Schilbach et al. 2006, Mojzisch et al. 2006, Schilbach et al. 2008). A second paradigm was devised to investigate the neural correlates of joint attention in online interaction. To this end a novel fMRI-compatible eyetracking setup was devised which allows participants to interact with an anthropomorphic virtual character. Here, a crucial experimental manipulation consisted in varying whether participants initiated joint attention themselves or responded to someone else's gaze shifts (Wilms et al. in press; Schilbach et al. in press). Results of these studies highlight differential effects on neural processing both related to self-involvement and to the reciprocal nature of social interaction consistent with the idea of these being important constituents of social cognition. On a more speculative note, these results may be seen as preliminary evidence in support of the notion of a second-person approach to other minds which could help to further our understanding of the neurobiology of social cognition and may help to bridge recent findings in the burgeoning field of social neuroscience. -- Ágnes M. Kovács Marie Curie Research Fellow-DISCOS MTA PKI Hungarian Academy of Sciences & CEU, Cognitive Development Centre Budapest Hungary tel: +3612796095

16 years, 2 months

CDC Seminar Reminder March 29 Bart Geurts

by Agnes Kovacs

The next talk in the Cognitive Development Center seminar series at the CEU will be given by Bart Geurts (Philosophy, Nijmegen): A small theory of behaviour Monday, March 29, 5.00pm CEU Cognitive Development Center Hattyuhaz, Level 3, Hattyu u. 14., 1015 Budapest Abs Based on a wealth of experimental data, it has been argued that, already between their first and second birthdays, children routinely appeal to mental states---goals, perceptions, beliefs, and desires---to explain the behaviour of others. In this talk, I will analyse a range of experiments involving, e.g., non-verbal false-belief tasks, cooperative pointing, and reasoning about goals and desires, and attempt to show that all of them can be accounted for on the assumption that infants have a quite minimal theory of behaviour, which is defined purely in terms of relations between particulars (individuals, places, and times) and is not mentalistic in any deep way. -- Ágnes M. Kovács Marie Curie Research Fellow-DISCOS MTA PKI Hungarian Academy of Sciences & CEU, Cognitive Development Centre Budapest Hungary tel: +3612796095

16 years, 2 months

Cognitive Systems Research, Vol. 11, Iss. 2, 2010

by Professor Ron Sun

New issue is now available on ScienceDirect: * Cognitive Systems Research Volume 11, Issue 2, Pages 131-210 http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/issue/ 6595-2010-999889997-1623128 NOTE: If the URLs in this email are not active hyperlinks, copy and paste the URL into the address/location box in your browser. = = = = = = = = ======================================================================== TABLE OF CONTENTS 2) Emergence of self-organized symbol-based communication in artificial creatures Pages 131-147 Angelo Loula, Ricardo Gudwin, Charbel Niño El-Hani, João Queiroz http://www.sciencedirect.com/science?_ob=GatewayURL&_method=citationSearch&… 3) On strong anticipation Pages 148-164 N. Stepp, M.T. Turvey http://www.sciencedirect.com/science?_ob=GatewayURL&_method=citationSearch&… 4) Is a naturalistic theory of communication possible? Pages 165-180 Gabriella Airenti http://www.sciencedirect.com/science?_ob=GatewayURL&_method=citationSearch&… 5) A micro-level simulation for the prediction of intention and behavior Pages 181-193 Juliette Richetin, Abhijit Sengupta, Marco Perugini, Iqbal Adjali, Robert Hurling, Danica Greetham, Michael Spence http://www.sciencedirect.com/science?_ob=GatewayURL&_method=citationSearch&… 6) An alternative account of the minimal counterintuitiveness effect Pages 194-203 M. Afzal Upal http://www.sciencedirect.com/science?_ob=GatewayURL&_method=citationSearch&… Book Review 7) Review of T.T. Rogers and J.L. McClelland, semantic cognition: A parallel distributed processing approach , MIT Press (2004). Pages 204-207 J.F. Glazebrook http://www.sciencedirect.com/science?_ob=GatewayURL&_method=citationSearch&… Call for papers 8) The Workshop on Cognitive Social Sciences—Grounding the Social Sciences in the Cognitive Sciences Pages 208-209 http://www.sciencedirect.com/science?_ob=GatewayURL&_method=citationSearch&… =========== See the following Web page for submission, subscription, and other information regarding Cognitive Systems Research: http://www.cogsci.rpi.edu/~rsun/journal.html See http://www.elsevier.com/locate/cogsys for further information regarding accessing these articles. If you have questions about features of ScienceDirect, please access the ScienceDirect Info Site at http://www.info.sciencedirect.com ======================================================== Professor Ron Sun President-Elect, International Neural Network Society Cognitive Science Department Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute 110 Eighth Street, Carnegie 302A Troy, NY 12180, USA phone: 518-276-3409 fax: 518-276-3017 email: rsun(a)rpi.edu web: http://www.cogsci.rpi.edu/~rsun =======================================================

16 years, 2 months

BBS Call for Commentary Proposals: Knobe

by Behavioral and Brain Sciences

Dear Dr. Qwerty: When a target article or recent book has been accepted for BBS Commentary, the editorial office sends out the Call for Commentary Proposals to thousands of people. Commentary Proposals help the BBS Editors craft a well-balanced commentary invitation list. If this target article interests you as a possible subject for commentary, please download the full pre-print to see if you would like to propose a commentary. If you are interested please follow the instructions below the target article information. Please keep in mind that we are not asking you to submit a commentary -- but rather, a short proposal in order to be considered as an invited author after the proposal deadline. Please also be aware that we typically get far more proposals than we can accept. NOW ACCEPTING COMMENTARY PROPOSALS ON: Target Article: "Person as Scientist, Person as Moralist" Author: Joshua Knobe Deadline for Commentary Proposals: April 16, 2010 Abstract: It has often been suggested that people's ordinary capacities for understanding the world make use of much the same methods one might find in a formal scientific investigation. A series of recent experimental results offer a challenge to this widely-held view, suggesting that people's moral judgments can actually influence the intuitions they hold both in folk psychology and in causal cognition. The present target article distinguishes two basic approaches to explaining such effects. One approach would be to say that the relevant competencies are entirely non-moral but that some additional factor (conversational pragmatics, performance error, etc.) then interferes and allows people's moral judgments to affect their intuitions. Another approach would be to say that moral considerations truly do figure in workings of the competencies themselves. It is argued that the data available now favor the second of these approaches over the first. Keywords: experimental philosophy; folk psychology; intentional action; moral cognition; theory of mind Download Target Article Preprint: http://journals.cambridge.org/BBSJournal/Call/Knobe_preprint COMMENTARY PROPOSALS MUST INCLUDE THE FOLLOWING 1. What aspect of the target article or book you would anticipate commenting upon. 2. The relevant expertise you would bring to bear on the target article or book. Please include names and affiliations of your co-authors if applicable. SUGGESTING COMMENTATORS AND NOMINATING BBS ASSOCIATES Commentators must be BBS Associates, or suggested by a BBS Associate. If you are not a BBS Associate, please follow the instructions below. To suggest others as possible Commentators, or to nominate others for BBS Associateship status, please email bbsjournal(a)cambridge.org. http://journals.cambridge.org/BBSJournal/Inst/Assoc HOW TO SUBMIT A COMMENTARY PROPOSAL If you would like to nominate yourself for potential commentary invitation, you must submit a Commentary Proposal via our BBS Editorial Manager site: 1. Log-in as Author Username: CQwerty-545 Password: Qwerty875632 Log-in to your BBS Editorial Manager account as an author: http://www.editorialmanager.com/bbs. If you do not have an account, please visit the site and register. You can also submit a request for missing username and password information if you have an existing account. 2. Submit New Manuscript Within your author main menu please select Submit New Manuscript. 3. Select Article Type Choose the article type of your manuscript from the pull-down menu. Commentary Proposal article types are temporarily created for each accepted target article or book. Only select the Commentary Proposal article type that you wish to submit a proposal on. For example; "Commentary Proposal (Anderson)" 4. Enter Title Please title your proposal submission by indicating the relevant first author name of the target article or book. For example: "Commentary Proposal on Anderson" 5. Add Co-Authors If you are proposing to write a commentary with any co-authors, please enter their required information here. These potential co-authors need not contribute to the Commentary Proposal itself. 6. Attach Files The only required submission Item is your Commentary Proposal in MSWord or RTF format. In the Description field please add the first author name of the target article or book. For example: "Commentary Proposal on Anderson" 7. Approve Your Submission Editorial Manager will process your Commentary Proposal submission and will create a PDF for your approval. On the 'Submissions Waiting for Author's Approval' page, you can view your PDF, edit, approve, or remove the submission. Once you have Approved the Submission, the PDF will be sent to the editorial office. **It is VERY important that you check the and approve your Commentary Proposal manuscript as described above. Otherwise, we cannot process your submission.** Note: If you have designated a different Corresponding Author, only the new Corresponding Author will have access to the PDF and must log-in to the system in order to approve the PDF. 8. Editorial Office Decision At the conclusion of the Commentary Proposal period, the editors will review all the submitted Commentary Proposals. An undetermined number of Commentary Proposals will be approved and those author names will be added to the final commentary invitation list. At that time you will be notified of the decision. If you are formally invited to submit a commentary, you will be asked to confirm your intention to submit by the commentary deadline. Note: Before the commentary invitations are sent, the copy-edited and revised target article will be posted for invitees. In the case of Multiple Book Review, invitees will be sent a copy of the book to be commented upon if requested. With Multiple Book Reviews, it is the book, not the Précis article that is the target of commentary. Please do not write a commentary unless you have received an official invitation! SPECIAL NOTE Since this is our first year on Editorial Manager, we would like your feedback regarding how the process could be improved. Please let me know if you have any questions or concerns. BEING REMOVED FROM THE CALL EMAIL LIST If you DO NOT wish to receive Call for Commentary Proposals in the future, please reply to bbsjournal(a)cambridge.org, and type "remove" in the subject line. Sincerely, Ralph DeMarco Editorial Administrator, BBS Associate Editor, STM Journals Cambridge University Press 32 Avenue of the Americas New York, NY 10013-2473 Tel 001 212.337.5016 bbsjournal(a)cambridge.org http://journals.cambridge.org/bbs http://bbs.edmgr.com/

16 years, 2 months

Meghívó Prof. Christo Pantev előadására

by Honbolygó Ferenc

Kedves Kollégák! Továbbítom az MTA-KEB meghívóját "A tudomány a zenéről a zenéért" előadássorozat első előadására.

16 years, 2 months

Jump to page:

2026

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

2002

2001

2000

1999

1998

1997

1996

1995

1994

1993

koglist