The CEU Department of Philosophy cordially invites you to a talk
(as part of its Departmental Colloquium series)
by
Victor Caston (University of Michigan)
on
` Aristotle on Perceptual Content`
Tuesday, 26 February, 2013, 5.30 PM, Zrinyi 14, Room 412
ABSTRACT
There is a certain tension in Aristotle’s theories, at least prima
facie, between the nature and role of perception. Aristotle gives a
prominent role to perception not just in the acquisition of knowledge,
but also in the explanation of human action and the behavior of animals
more generally. For these purposes, perceptual content needs to be
fairly rich. Perception must inform an animal about features of the
environment that are significant for it, even animals with a very crude
and limited behavioral repertoire. But it is unclear whether his theory
of perception has the resources to deliver content of the sort he needs.
In the past, scholars have worried whether the causal mechanisms he
describes in his psychological works are sufficient to explain anything
more than the most basic perception of sensible qualities like colors
or tones. But before we can tackle this problem, we must answer a prior
one, about whether perception essentially involves perceiving something
as belonging to a certain kind or perceiving that something is of a
certain character. According to the predominant line of interpretation,
it does not: perception, for Aristotle, is of particulars and not
universals. Consequently, we cannot perceive anything as being of a
certain sort without the aid of other faculties that go beyond it (if
not conceptual thought, then at least what Aristotle calls phantasia or
empeiria).
In this paper, I challenge this line of interpretation in various forms
and eventually reject it, arguing instead that taking an object to be a
certain sort of thing is essential to perception as such, in all its
forms, for Aristotle. Perception in his theory can be seen to have a de
re content, which exhibits both extensional and nonextensional features.
It also commits him to a certain view about nonconceptual content as
well. On this basis, we can offer more precise reconstructions of the
central notions in Aristotle’s theory of perception.
THEORETICAL PHILOSOPHY FORUM
Institute of Philosophy
Faculty of Humanities, Eötvös University
Address: Múzeum krt. 4/i, Budapest
20 February (Wednesday) 5:00 PM Room 226
Peter Fekete
Former Headmaster of Black's Academy, Jersey, Channel Islands
On the Continuum
___________________________________
Abstracts and printable program (poster) are available from the web
site of the Forum: http://phil.elte.hu/tpf (Please feel free to post
the program in your institution!)
The Forum is open to everyone, including students, visitors, and faculty
members from all departments and institutes! Format: 60 minute lecture,
coffee break, 60 minute discussion.
The organizer of the Forum: László E. Szabó
(leszabo(a)phil.elte.hu)
--
L a s z l o E. S z a b o
Professor of Philosophy
DEPARTMENT OF LOGIC, INSTITUTE OF PHILOSOPHY
EOTVOS UNIVERSITY, BUDAPEST
http://phil.elte.hu/leszabo
Sziasztok,
pszichológia szakdolgozatomhoz kutatást végzek a Szegedi Egyetemen, melyhez kérem a segítségeteket.A téma a kiégés és egyes személyiségjegyek kapcsolata. Legyetek szívesek kitölteni az alábbi (egyébként érdekes) kérdőívet. A kitöltés kb. 10 percet vesz igénybe és teljesen anonim, én csak az eredményeket kapom meg, melyeket együttesen fogok elemezni:https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/viewform?formkey=dF9wODVoNlo1e… a segítséget előre is, már csak néhány kitöltőre van szükségemGábor
The CEU Department of Cognitive Science cordially invites you to a talk (as part of its Departmental Colloquium series)
by
John Dewey
Michigan State University, Dept of Psychology
Central European University - Department of Cognitive Science
Date: Wednesday, February 20, 2013 - 17:00 - 18:30
Location: Department of Cognitive Science, CEU, Frankel Leó út 30-34., Room G15
Title: Sensory prediction and the sense of agency, from individual to joint action
During voluntary action, forward models in the brain pre-activate representations of the predicted sensory consequences. These forward models are believed to play important roles in motor control and the sense of agency (SA), i.e. registration that one was the initiator or controller of the action. The majority of the literature on sensory prediction and its relation to SA has focused on individual action. An open question is whether, during joint actions, such forward models can be re-purposed to predict the additive consequences of multiple actors, for example two individuals trying to steer a moving object by coordinating their motor inputs, and how this relates to each actor’s SA. In this talk, I will present an overview of previous research, and outline plans for two upcoming studies to investigate sensory prediction and SA in the joint action context. The first study will investigate the impact of joint action on implicit and explicit measures of agency, by testing whether the additive consequences of two actors’ actions are attenuated by expectation (as would be expected by a forward model), and by comparing explicit agency judgments in the individual and joint action contexts. The second study will investigate whether SA for joint actions depends primarily on the match between one’s individual action and the sensory consequences, or alternatively, on the satisfaction of joint action goals. The proposed research would combine insights from the agency and joint action literatures to develop theories for why people may feel more or less responsible for the outcomes of group actions.
We're looking forward to see you there (Frankel Leo u. 30-34) !
Cognitive Science Events at CEU: http://cognitivescience.ceu.hu/events
_______________________________________________
Subscribe by sending an empty mail to seminars-subscribe(a)cdc.ceu.hu
Unsubscribe by sending an empty mail to seminars-unsubscribe(a)cdc.ceu.hu
*MEGHÍVÓ*
A *Társas-Kognitív Nyelvészeti Kutatócsoport *
és a *DAB Nyelvtudományi Munkabizottsága***
meghívja
*2012. évi tavaszi társas-kognitív nyelvészeti előadás-sorozatára.*
A Debreceni Egyetem Magyar Nyelvtudományi Tanszékének Társas-Kognitív
Nyelvészeti Kutatócsoportja és a DAB Nyelvtudományi Munkabizottsága a DE
BTK Hallgatói Önkormányzata támogatásával 2013 februárjában
folytatja<http://mnytud.arts.unideb.hu/tkny/ea2.html>nyitott,
nyilvános előadás-sorozatát a társas-kognitív nyelvészet
témaköréből.
*Helyszín: *MTA Debreceni Területi Bizottság (DAB) székháza (Debrecen,
Thomas Mann u. 49. <http://mnytud.arts.unideb.hu/tkny/de-dab_map.html>), I.
emelet
*Időpont: *hétfőnként, 16 órától
*Előadások:*
1. *Kálmán László *(MTA Nyelvtudományi Intézet; MTA-ELTE Elméleti
Nyelvészeti Kihelyezett Tanszék): *Mi a szabályos, és mi a
szabálytalan? *(2013.
február 25.)
2. *Szabó Tamás Péter* (MTA Nyelvtudományi Intézet): *Szabály, vélemény
vagy hagyomány? Nyelvi értékítéletek nyomában* (2013. március 4.)
3. *Békés Vera* (MTA Filozófiai Intézet; EKF Filozófia Tanszék): *Réger
Zita hagyatéka* (2013. március 11.)
4. *Tompa Tamás* (ME Preventív Medicina Tanszék; Department of
Neuroscience, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston): *Van
képünk hozzá? Avagy mire KÉPes a posztmodern idegtudomány társas
környezetben *(2013. március 18.)
5. *Wéber Katalin *(PTE, Idegen Nyelvi Titkárság): *Igévé vált tettek. Az
igeragozás megjelenése a magyar gyermeknyelvben *(2013. március 25.)
6. *Gyarmathy Zsófia *(Applied Logic Laboratory, Budapest):* A
bizonytalanság két arca: hiány és variáció a fonológiában* (2013. április
8.)
7. *Nemes László *(DE DEOEC Magatartástudományi Intézet): *A moralitás
fogalma társas-intuícionista megközelítésben* (2013. április 15.)
Az előadásokon minden érdeklődőt örömmel lát a Társas-Kognitív Nyelvészeti
Kutatócsoport és a DAB Nyelvtudományi Munkabizottsága.
Ha előadás-sorozatunk vagy kutatásaink felkeltették érdeklődését,
látogasson el honlapunkra (http://mnytud.arts.unideb.hu/tkny/), és
regisztráljon hírlevelünkre (https://mail.unideb.
hu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tarskogny/), vagy kövesseen bennünket a
Facebookon <https://www.facebook.com/tarskogny>, hogy a későbbiekben is
értesítést kapjon előadásainkról, publikációinkról. Az előadásokat nem
sokkal elhangzásuk után megtekintheti a Videotoriumon is hasonlóan a 2011.
évi<http://videotorium.hu/hu/events/mydetails/340,Bevezetes_a_tarsas-kognitiv_n…>és
tavalyi<http://videotorium.hu/hu/events/mydetails/589,A_Tarsas-Kognitiv_Nyelveszeti…>előadás-sorozatunkhoz.
Debrecen, 2012. március 2.
Kis Tamás
Fehér Krisztina
Tóth Valéria
A Társas-Kognitív Nyelvészeti Kutatócsoport alapító tagjai
A DAB Nyelvtudományi Munkabizottságának elnöke
The CEU Department of Philosophy cordially invites you to a talk
(as part of its Departmental Colloquium series)
by
Elisabeth Pacherie (CNRS Institut Jean-Nicod, Paris –
CEU IAS Fellow 2013)
on
`Conscious Agency`
Tuesday, 19 February, 2013, 5.30 PM, Zrinyi 14, Room 412
ABSTRACT
On a traditional philosophical view of the structure of agency,
intentions, conceived as conscious mental states, are the causes of
actions. In recent times, this traditional view has come under attack
from both philosophers and cognitive scientists. Two main worries have
been raised. The first worry concerns the causal efficacy of intentions
qua conscious states. The second worry concerns the nature of the
relation between intentions and action, and whether this relation is
best described as a causal relation rather than as a control relation.
Current scientific evidence provides strong support for the view that
action is hierarchically organized and involves several levels of
intentions, action representations and action control processes. I shall
argue that the traditional philosophical view, but also some of the
objections levelled against it, rest in part on an over-simplified
conception of the structure of agency and that taking into account the
hierarchical nature of intentions and control processes can lead to a
reassessment of the relation between intentions and action and of the
role of conscious agency in action production.
Szeretettel látunk mindenkit sorozatunk következő előadására!
We cordially invite you to the next lecture of the BME Cognitive Seminar
Series
Időpont/Date & Time: February 11, Hétfő/Monday, 11:00-12:00
Helyszín/Location: BME, XI., Egry József utca 1., T. ép 515.
***EEG- fMRI integration and its application in the analysis of
epileptic data and cognitive paradigms
*
*Hunyadi Borbála*
Dept. Electrical Engineering, ESAT/SCD
Katholieke Universiteit Leuven*
*http://homes.esat.kuleuven.be/~biomed/person.php?persid=434*
*
--
Attila Keresztes
Junior research fellow
Budapest University of Technology and Economics
Dept. of Cognitive Science,
Egry József u. 1., Budapest
1111, Hungary
+36 1 4633525
akeresztes(a)cogsci.bme.hu
The CEU Department of Philosophy and the Human Project cordially invite
you to a seminar
organized jointly with the Institute Français de Budapest
by
Vincent Descombes (EHESS, Paris)
on
Delineating the Content of the Mind
Friday, 15 February, 2013, 10 – 12 AM, Nádor u 13, Room 001
ABSTRACT
"Externalism about the mind” is the view that mental states and
attitudes cannot be attributed to a subject in abstraction from her/his
exterior environment. This paper will revisit the issue of externalism
from the perspective of a social philosophy of action.
Szeretettel látunk mindenkit sorozatunk következo" elo"adására!
We cordially invite you to the next lecture of the BME Cognitive Seminar
Series
Ido"pont/Date & Time: February 11, Hétfo"/Monday, 11:00-12:00
Helyszín/Location: BME, XI., Egry József utca 1., T. ép 515.
***EEG- fMRI integration and its application in the analysis of
epileptic data and cognitive paradigms
*
*Hunyadi Borbála*
Dept. Electrical Engineering, ESAT/SCD
Katholieke Universiteit Leuven*
*http://homes.esat.kuleuven.be/~biomed/person.php?persid=434*
*
--
Attila Keresztes
Junior research fellow
Budapest University of Technology and Economics
Dept. of Cognitive Science,
Egry József u. 1., Budapest
1111, Hungary
+36 1 4633525
akeresztes(a)cogsci.bme.hu
Csaba Pléh
professor of psychology
presently: Collegium de Lyon
15 parvis Rene Descartes
ENS Recherche R 147
69007 Lyon France
T: 33437376596 Fax: 33437376273
Mobile: 36303493735, csaba.pleh(a)ens-lyon.fr
Eszterhazy Karoly College
Eger H-3300
editor in chief, Hungarian Review of Psychology
member, Academia Europaea and the Hungarian Academy of Sciences
----- Original Message -----
From: Krisztina Biber
To: whatson(a)ceu.hu ; mafla(a)phil.elte.hu
Sent: Wednesday, February 06, 2013 9:23 AM
Subject: [koglist] invitation to a talk on`Merleau-Ponty and his „primacy of perception“ thesis`by Jakub Čapek - 12 February, 5.30 PM
The CEU Department of Philosophy cordially invites you to a talk
(as part of its Departmental Colloquium series)
by
Jakub Čapek (Charles University, Prague)
on
`Merleau-Ponty and his „primacy of perception“ thesis`
Tuesday, 12 February, 2013, 5.30 PM, Zrinyi 14, Room 412
ABSTRACT
In Merleau-Ponty’s philosophy, perception is not just a possible philosophical issue. The analysis of perception largely determines the way other philosophical issues, such as consciousness, time, language or ideal objects, should be approached. Merleau-Ponty repeatedly affirms the priority of perceiving, as, for instance, in his 1946 lecture The Primacy of Perception and Its Philosophical Consequences or in his masterpiece Phenomenology of Perception (1945), where he regards perception as our “primordial knowledge” of the real. In my work on Merleau-Ponty, I do two things: (1.) I try to state as clearly as possible, what meaning the primacy of perception has, and (2.) what philosophical consequences it implies.
In my lecture, I proceed in three steps. Since the thesis of the primacy of perception – in all its possible meanings – presupposes a certain idea of what perception is, I briefly outline Merleau-Ponty’s theory of perception. Secondly, I come back to the primacy of perception thesis. I propose to distinguish its three possible meanings. This enables us to formulate our question more precisely. Thirdly, I focus on one area of application of Merleau-Ponty’s fundamental thesis, viz. on his analysis of consciousness. I will interpret his statement: “All consciousness is, in some measure, perceptual consciousness.”