The CEU Department of Cognitive Science cordially invites you to a talk
(as part of its Departmental Colloquium series)
by
Anna Babarczy, Budapest University of Technology and Economics
on
Can the comprehension of abstract language be rooted in sensory
experiences?
Date: Wed, March 14, 2012 - 17:00 - 18:30
Location: Department of Cognitive Science, CEU, Frankel Leó út 30-34.,
Room G15
Can the comprehension of abstract language be rooted in sensory
experiences?
ABSTRACT: The question of learning the meaning of abstract language
(roughly, expressions with no perceptible referents) has been bugging
philosophers for thousands of years. More recently, a number of
experimental paradigms have emerged trying to shed light on this issue.
The basic idea explored in the talk is that people understand abstract
(metaphorical) expressions by linking them to sensory or bodily
experiences. If this is the case, we should be able to show that these
experiences affect people’s interpretation of abstract utterances. The
talk looks at the evidence we have so far (pro and contra).We're looking
forward to see you there (Frankel Leo u. 30-34) !
_______________________________________________
Subscribe by sending an empty mail to seminars-subscribe(a)cdc.ceu.hu
Unsubscribe by sending an empty mail to seminars-unsubscribe(a)cdc.ceu.hu
Dear friends/colleagues,
First of all, I'd like to apologise for spamming your inbox. As you've probably heard by now the 6th version of the Intercultural Pragmatics Conference will be taking place in Malta towards the end of May. As the call for papers deadline is now fast approaching (20th December), I'd be grateful if you could forward the call for papers (available here: http://www.um.edu.mt/events/interculturalpragmatics2014/callforpapers) to your research group or any other potentially interested parties. It goes without saying of course that we'd be also delighted to receive your own abstracts too.
Many thanks in advance for your time,
Stavros
--
Stavros Assimakopoulos
Institute of Linguistics
University of Malta
------------------------------------
http://staff.um.edu.mt/stavros.assimakopoulos/
THEORETICAL PHILOSOPHY FORUM
Institute of Philosophy
Faculty of Humanities, Eötvös University
Address: Múzeum krt. 4/i, Budapest
4 December (Wednesday) 5:00 PM Room 226
Sára Jellinek
Department of Cognitive Science, Central European University, Budapest
Bayesian probability theory in cognitive science
___________________________________
Abstracts and printable program (poster) are available from the web
site of the Forum: http://phil.elte.hu/tpf (Please feel free to post
the program in your institution!)
The Forum is open to everyone, including students, visitors, and faculty
members from all departments and institutes! Format: 60 minute lecture,
coffee break, 60 minute discussion.
The organizer of the Forum: László E. Szabó
(leszabo(a)phil.elte.hu)
--
L a s z l o E. S z a b o
Professor of Philosophy
DEPARTMENT OF LOGIC, INSTITUTE OF PHILOSOPHY
EOTVOS UNIVERSITY, BUDAPEST
http://phil.elte.hu/leszabo
Dear All,
Please find the poster.
Csaba additionally would like to inform you all that one can buy the
book here with a 40% discount.
Kind regards,
Reka
>>> "Agnes-Melinda Kovacs" <kovacsag(a)ceu.hu> 11/26/2013 11:06 AM >>>
Dear All,
There will be a book presentation hosted by the department, however i
am
afraid that the event will take place in Hungarian as the book is also
in Hungarian.
Általános Nyelvészeti Tanulmányok (Monographs in General Linguistics -
Cognitive Linguistics)
eds: Pléh Csaba, Kenesei István
among the authors of the monograph:
Dan Sperber – Deirdre Wilson
Olivier Morin
Bálint Forgács
Csaba Pléh
Ágnes Kovács
discussion with: Ágnes Lukács, Zsolt Unoka, Pléh Csaba, Kenesei István
Dec 4th 13.30 at Frankel, G15
best Agi
_______________________________________________
Subscribe by sending an empty mail to seminars-subscribe(a)cdc.ceu.hu
Unsubscribe by sending an empty mail to seminars-unsubscribe(a)cdc.ceu.hu
THEORETICAL PHILOSOPHY FORUM
Institute of Philosophy
Faculty of Humanities, Eötvös University
Address: Múzeum krt. 4/i, Budapest
December Program
4 December (Wednesday) 5:00 PM Room 226
Sára Jellinek
Department of Cognitive Science, Central European University, Budapest
Bayesian probability theory in cognitive science
11 December (Wednesday) 5:00 PM Room 226
András Máté
Department of Logic, Institute of Philosophy, Eötvös University, Budapest
Okok, célok, indokok: Phaidón 96A-107B – egy fordító töprengései
(Causes, purposes, reasons: Phaedo 96A-107B - a translator's reflections)
18 December (Wednesday) 5:00 PM Room 226
Gergely Ambrus
Institute of Philosophy, University of Miskolc
Az analitikus metafizika eredete
(The origin of analytic metaphysics)
___________________________________
Abstracts and printable program (poster) are available from the web
site of the Forum: http://phil.elte.hu/tpf (Please feel free to post
the program in your institution!)
The Forum is open to everyone, including students, visitors, and faculty
members from all departments and institutes! Format: 60 minute lecture,
coffee break, 60 minute discussion.
The organizer of the Forum: László E. Szabó
(leszabo(a)phil.elte.hu)
--
L a s z l o E. S z a b o
Professor of Philosophy
DEPARTMENT OF LOGIC, INSTITUTE OF PHILOSOPHY
EOTVOS UNIVERSITY, BUDAPEST
http://phil.elte.hu/leszabo
--
L a s z l o E. S z a b o
Professor of Philosophy
DEPARTMENT OF LOGIC, INSTITUTE OF PHILOSOPHY
EOTVOS UNIVERSITY, BUDAPEST
http://phil.elte.hu/leszabo
Kedves Kollégák, kérem a bemutatóra gyertek s propagáljátok
Részletek a részletes meghívóban
Üdv
Pléh Csaba e. tanár
professor of psychology
ed. chief Hungarian Review of Psychology
member, Academia Europaea
Hungarian Academy of Sciences
Eszterházy College, Eger
pleh.csaba(a)ektf.hu
3300 Eszterházy tér 1 HUNGARY
36(30)3493735
Szeretettel meghívjuk Önt és munkatársait szemináriumsorozatunk
következő előadására:
We cordially invite you to the next lecture of the BME Cognitive Seminar
Series:
Date & Time: November 25, Monday, 12:00-13:00
Location: BME, XI., Egry József utca 1., T. ép. 515.
*Enhancement of learning and memory by transcranial electrical
stimulation in healthy subjects
****Andrea Antal*
Clinic for Clinical Neurophysiology, University Medical Center, Georg
August University Göttingen
--
Attila Keresztes
PhD candidate
Junior Research Fellow
Budapest University of Technology and Economics
Dept. of Cognitive Science,
Egry József u. 1, Budapest
1111, Hungary
Tel: +36 1 4633525
THEORETICAL PHILOSOPHY FORUM
Institute of Philosophy
Faculty of Humanities, Eötvös University
Address: Múzeum krt. 4/i, Budapest
27 November (Wednesday) 5:00 PM Room 226
Dániel Corsano
Institute of Philosophy, Eötvös University, Budapest
Lehet-e műalkotás művész nélkül?
(Can there be a work of art without an artist?)
___________________________________
Abstracts and printable program (poster) are available from the web
site of the Forum: http://phil.elte.hu/tpf (Please feel free to post
the program in your institution!)
The Forum is open to everyone, including students, visitors, and faculty
members from all departments and institutes! Format: 60 minute lecture,
coffee break, 60 minute discussion.
The organizer of the Forum: László E. Szabó
(leszabo(a)phil.elte.hu)
--
L a s z l o E. S z a b o
Professor of Philosophy
DEPARTMENT OF LOGIC, INSTITUTE OF PHILOSOPHY
EOTVOS UNIVERSITY, BUDAPEST
http://phil.elte.hu/leszabo
--
L a s z l o E. S z a b o
Professor of Philosophy
DEPARTMENT OF LOGIC, INSTITUTE OF PHILOSOPHY
EOTVOS UNIVERSITY, BUDAPEST
http://phil.elte.hu/leszabo
The CEU Department of Philosophy cordially invites you to a talk
(as part of its Departmental Colloquium series)
by
Saul Smilansky (University of Haifa)
on
`The Moral Evaluation of Past Tragedies: A New Puzzle`
Tuesday, 26 November, 2013, 5.30 PM, Zrinyi 14, Room 412
ABSTRACT
The past is full of terrible tragedies, including slavery, World War I, and the Holocaust. Morality would clearly appear to support the claim that it would have been preferable for the victims of those calamities to have lived free and peaceful lives. And yet, a Zeno-like puzzle or even a paradox appears to be lurking here. Moral evaluation can be either personal or impersonal, yet neither one of these two perspectives nor any other prevalent moral evaluation of events appears to yield the morally expected conclusion. To the best of my knowledge, this puzzle has not been discussed before.