The next talk in the CDC Seminar series will be given by:
Soonja Choi, San Diego State University
Date: Wednesday, September 21, 2011, 5 PM
Location: CEU Cognitive Development Center, Hattyú u. 14, 3rd floor
*Language and Thought: Spatial Semantics & Spatial Cognition from Infancy to
Adulthood*
Abstract: Languages differ significantly in the way they categorize spatial
relations. For example, English makes a distinction between containment
(e.g. putting an apple IN a bowl) and support (e.g. putting a cup ON a
table), whereas Korean makes a distinction between loose fit and tight fit
regardless of containment and support. In Korean, the verb *KKITA* ‘tight
fit or interlock’ is used for both a tight-fit containment relation such as
‘putting a book tightly in its box-shaped cover’ and a tight-fit support
relation such as ‘putting a Lego piece tightly onto another’.
The extensiveness of cross-linguistic differences in spatial semantic
categorization found in recent studies on adult grammars raises questions
about when and how children acquire the spatial semantic system of their
native language, and more generally, about the relationship between language
and cognition in children and adults. In this talk, I present studies that
examine language-specific input and spatial cognition in learners and adult
speakers of English and Korean. In particular, I examine whether and to what
extent language-specific semantics can influence nonverbal spatial
categorization involving tight fit, containment and support. Overall, my
studies show that there is a dynamic interaction between language and
cognition from an early age and that language starts to influence spatial
cognition as children use spatial words productively. However, some
perceptual aspects persist and contribute to spatial categorization in
certain contexts regardless of language-specific input.
Cognitive Science events at CEU: http://cognitivescience.ceu.hu/events
_______________________________________________
Subscribe by sending an empty mail to seminars-subscribe(a)cdc.ceu.hu
Unsubscribe by sending an empty mail to seminars-unsubscribe(a)cdc.ceu.hu
The next talk in the CDC Seminar series will be given by
Mikołaj Hernik, CEU
Date: Wednesday, September 14, 2011, 5 PM
Location: Cognitive Development Center, Hattyú u. 14, 3 em.
Front matters: On infants’ ability to fast-map fronts of novel agents
Abstract:
Bodies of almost all modern animals, including all vertebrates, are
organized according to a bilateral body-plan with a pronounced
anterio-posterior axis. In other words, most animals have fronts and backs.
In addition, in many organisms neuronal structures (e.g. brains in
vertebrates) tend to be accumulated towards their frontal parts (an
evolutionary trend called cephalization). These two general facts of animal
evolution may have tremendous significance for a cognitive grasp of animal
behavior for two reasons: (i) the ubiquitous bilateral and cephalized body
plan promotes salient differences in morphology (most animals’ fronts tend
to look different from their backs); (ii) the body plan constrains animal
locomotion (some obvious exceptions notwithstanding, animals tend to move
facing forward). As a consequence, animal’s orientation in motion is a
reliable source of information about its frontal features (the parts at the
front of a moving animal are very likely to *be* its frontal features). But
also, the location of the already known frontal features of an animal in
rest is a reliable source of information about that animal’s ability to act
(it is more likely to start moving in the direction determined by its
frontal features). I am going to present results from a series of studies
designed to test whether preverbal human infants can engage in such
inferences. Indeed infants in their first year of life are sensitive to
front-movement mismatches, they fast-map novel frontal features from the
agent’s behavior and take their orientation into account when anticipating
the agent’s subsequent actions. I will argue that the ubiquity of bilateral
body plan might have resulted in cognitive adaptations for processing the
movement-front co-relation.
_______________________________________________
Subscribe by sending an empty mail to seminars-subscribe(a)cdc.ceu.hu
Unsubscribe by sending an empty mail to seminars-unsubscribe(a)cdc.ceu.hu
Reminder/Sorry for cross-postings.
The programme of the Institute for Linguistics can be found at the following page (the schedule for September):
http://www.nytud.hu/eng/prog.html
A happy new academic year to all of you.
Anne
Mindenkit szeretettel látunk A BME Kognitív Szemináriumsorozat
következo" elo"adására:
We cordially invite you to the next lecture of the BME cognitive seminar
series:
Figyelem / Attention!
Új helyre költöztünk / We moved to a new place
Date & Time: September 12, Monday, 11:00-12:00
Location: BME, XI., Egry József utca 1., T. ép 515.
*The early right anterior negativity as an index of music-syntactic
processing
Stefan Koelsch*
Department of Educational Science and Psychology
Cluster "Languages of Emotion"
Freie Universität Berlin
http://www.stefan-koelsch.de/
Abstract
This talk will first give a brief overview over theoretical concepts of
musical syntax. Then studies using the early right anterior negativity
(ERAN) as an electrophysiological index of music-syntactic processing
will be reviewed. The ERAN is usually occurs at around 150 - 200 ms
after the onset of a musical event, and receives main contributions from
the inferior fronto-lateral cortex (Broca's area and its
right-hemispheric homotope). The ERAN is taken as an index of a
disruption of musical structure building. Although the morphology of the
ERAN is reminiscent of that of the mismatch negativity (MMN), there are
important functional differences between ERAN and MMN. For example, the
regularities underlying the generation of the MMN are established
on-line (that is, based on on representations of regularities that are
extracted on-line from the acoustic environment). By contrast, the
generation of the ERAN requires (implicit) knowledge about regularities
(that is, representations of regularities that are stored in a long-term
format). Furthermore, the generation of the MMN is based on local
dependencies, whereas the generation of the ERAN involves processing of
long-distance dependencies at the level of phrase-structure grammar
(context-free grammar).
--
Attila Keresztes
Junior Research Fellow
Budapest University of Technology and Economics
Dept. of Cognitive Science,
Egry József u. 1, Budapest
1111, Hungary
Tel: +36 1 4633525
The next talk in the CDC Seminar series will be given by
Mikołaj Hernik, CEU
Date: Wednesday, September 14, 2011, 5 PM
Location: Cognitive Development Center, Hattyú u. 14, 3 em.
Front matters: On infants’ ability to fast-map fronts of novel agents
Abstract:
Bodies of almost all modern animals, including all vertebrates, are
organized according to a bilateral body-plan with a pronounced
anterio-posterior axis. In other words, most animals have fronts and backs.
In addition, in many organisms neuronal structures (e.g. brains in
vertebrates) tend to be accumulated towards their frontal parts (an
evolutionary trend called cephalization). These two general facts of animal
evolution may have tremendous significance for a cognitive grasp of animal
behavior for two reasons: (i) the ubiquitous bilateral and cephalized body
plan promotes salient differences in morphology (most animals’ fronts tend
to look different from their backs); (ii) the body plan constrains animal
locomotion (some obvious exceptions notwithstanding, animals tend to move
facing forward). As a consequence, animal’s orientation in motion is a
reliable source of information about its frontal features (the parts at the
front of a moving animal are very likely to *be* its frontal features). But
also, the location of the already known frontal features of an animal in
rest is a reliable source of information about that animal’s ability to act
(it is more likely to start moving in the direction determined by its
frontal features). I am going to present results from a series of studies
designed to test whether preverbal human infants can engage in such
inferences. Indeed infants in their first year of life are sensitive to
front-movement mismatches, they fast-map novel frontal features from the
agent’s behavior and take their orientation into account when anticipating
the agent’s subsequent actions. I will argue that the ubiquity of bilateral
body plan might have resulted in cognitive adaptations for processing the
movement-front co-relation.
_______________________________________________
Subscribe by sending an empty mail to seminars-subscribe(a)cdc.ceu.hu
Unsubscribe by sending an empty mail to seminars-unsubscribe(a)cdc.ceu.hu