koglist March 2003

koglist@maillist.ttk.hu

10 participants
19 discussions

Categorization: Summer Institute (Montreal)

by Stevan Harnad

For the 12 days from June 30th to July 11 2002, Montreal will be the Categorization Capital of the Cognitive World. http://www.unites.uqam.ca/sccog/liens/program.html The latest developments in all aspects of categorization will be described and debated across the cognitive sciences spectrum: cognitive anthropology, computer science, linguistics, cognitive neuroscience, philosophy and psychology. The University of Quebec/Montreal will host this Cognitive Sciences Summer Institute. I hope you and your colleagues and students will attend and participate in this remarkable convergence. I've attached a sample of only a few of the over 50 speakers. For the full programme: http://www.unites.uqam.ca/sccog/liens/program.html Best wishes, Stevan Harnad. Canada Research Chair University of Quebec/Montreal Partial List: Categorization in cognitive neuroscience, Stephen Grossberg, Boston University Brain basis of category learning, John Gabrieli, Stanford University Categorization in linguistics, Pieter Muysken, Universiteit van Nijmegen Color categories across languages, Paul Kay, University of California at Berkeley Shape recognition, Irv Biederman, University of Southern California Object perception, Phil G. Schyns, University of Glasgow Category representation, Rob Nosofsky, Indiana University A state of the art on syntactic categories, Arnold Zwicky, Stanford University On categorisation and acquisition, Eve Clark, Stanford University Inferential theory of learning Ryszard S. Michalski, George Mason University Simulation and embodiment in situated conceptualization, Lawrence Barsalou, Emory University Category learning, Rob Goldstone, Indiana University Self-organizing vocabularies, Stefano Nolfi, Institute of Cognitive Sciences and Technology, Rome Analogical reasoning, Dedre Gentner, Northwestern University Categorisation and conceptual change, Paul Thagard, University of Waterloo A biological theory of empirical concepts, Ruth Millikan, University of Connecticut On category change, Ian Roberts, University of Cambridge

23 years, 1 month

Krueger & Funder/Towards a Balanced Social Psychology: BBS Call for Commentators

by Behavioral & Brain Sciences

Below is a link to the forthcoming BBS target article Towards a Balanced Social Psychology: Causes, Consequences and Cures for the Problem-seeking Approach to Social Behavior and Cognition by Joachim I. Krueger and David C. Funder http://www.bbsonline.org/Preprints/Krueger/Referees/ This article has been accepted for publication in Behavioral and Brain Sciences (BBS), an international, interdisciplinary journal providing Open Peer Commentary on important and controversial current research in the biobehavioral and cognitive sciences. Commentators must be BBS Associates or suggested by a BBS Associate. To be considered as a commentator for this article, to suggest other appropriate commentators, or for information about how to become a BBS Associate, please reply by EMAIL within three (3) weeks to: calls(a)bbsonline.org The Calls are sent to 10,000 BBS Associates and affiliates, so there is no expectation (indeed, it would be calamitous) that each recipient should comment on every occasion! Hence there is no need to reply except if you wish to comment, or to suggest someone to comment. If you are not a BBS Associate, please approach a current BBS Associate (there are currently over 10,000 worldwide) who is familiar with your work to nominate you. All past BBS authors, referees and commentators are eligible to become BBS Associates. An electronic list of current BBS Associates is available at this location to help you select a name: http://www.bbsonline.org/Instructions/assoclist.html (please note that this list is being updated) If no current BBS Associate knows your work, please send us your Curriculum Vitae and BBS will circulate it to appropriate Associates to ask whether they would be prepared to nominate you. (In the meantime, your name, address and email address will be entered into our database as an unaffiliated investigator.) ======================================================================= ** IMPORTANT ** ======================================================================= To help us put together a balanced list of commentators, it would be most helpful if you would send us an indication of the relevant expertise you would bring to bear on the paper, and what aspect of the paper you would anticipate commenting upon. (Please note that we only request expertise information in order to simplify the selection process.) Please DO NOT prepare a commentary until you receive a formal invitation, indicating that it was possible to include your name on the final list, which is constructed so as to balance areas of expertise and frequency of prior commentaries in BBS. To help you decide whether you would be an appropriate commentator for this article, an electronic draft is retrievable at the URL that follows the abstract and keywords below. ======================================================================= ======================================================================= Towards a Balanced Social Psychology: Causes, Consequences and Cures for the Problem-seeking Approach to Social Behavior and Cognition by Joachim I. Krueger and David C. Funder ABSTRACT: Mainstream social psychology focuses on how people characteristically violate norms of action through social misbehaviors such as conformity, obedience, and failures to help. Likewise, they are seen to violate norms of reasoning through cognitive errors such as misuse of social information, self-enhancement, and an over-readiness to attribute dispositional characteristics. The causes of this negative research emphasis include the apparent informativeness of norm violation, the status of good behavior and judgment as unconfirmable null hypotheses, and the allure of counter-intuitive findings. The shortcomings of this orientation include frequently erroneous imputations of error, findings of mutually contradictory errors, incoherent interpretations of error, an inability to explain the sources of behavioral or cognitive achievement, and the inhibition of generalized theory. Possible remedies include increased attention to the complete range of behavior and judgmental accomplishment, analytic reforms emphasizing effect sizes and Bayesian inference, and a theoretical paradigm able to account for both the sources of accomplishment and of error. A more balanced social psychology would yield not only a more positive view of human nature, but also an improved understanding of the bases of good behavior and accurate judgment, coherent explanations of occasional lapses, and theoretically-grounded suggestions for improvement. KEYWORDS: Bayesian inference; biases; normative models; personality; positive psychology; rationality; reasoning; social behavior, social judgment; social psychology http://www.bbsonline.org/Preprints/Krueger/Referees/ ======================================================================= ======================================================================= *** SUPPLEMENTARY ANNOUNCEMENT *** (1) Call for Book Nominations for BBS Multiple Book Review In the past, Behavioral and Brain Sciences (BBS) had only been able to do 1-2 BBS multiple book treatments per year, because of our limited annual page quota. BBS's new expanded page quota will make it possible for us to increase the number of books we treat per year, so this is an excellent time for BBS Associates and biobehavioral/cognitive scientists in general to nominate books you would like to see accorded BBS multiple book review. (Authors may self-nominate, but books can only be selected on the basis of multiple nominations.) It would be very helpful if you indicated in what way a BBS Multiple Book Review of the book(s) you nominate would be useful to the field (and of course a rich list of potential reviewers would be the best evidence of its potential impact!). *-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-* Please note: Your email address has been added to our user database for Calls for Commentators, the reason you received this email. If you do not wish to receive further Calls, please feel free to change your mailshot status through your User Login link on the BBSPrints homepage, using your username and password. Or, email a response with the word "remove" in the subject line. *-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-* Barbara Finlay Editor Jeffrey Gray Editor Behavioral and Brain Sciences bbs(a)bbsonline.org http://www.bbsonline.org -------------------------------------------------------------------

23 years, 1 month

Krueger & Funder/Towards a Balanced Social Psychology: BBS Call for Commentators

by Behavioral & Brain Sciences

Dear Dr. Qwerty, Below is a link to the forthcoming BBS target article Towards a Balanced Social Psychology: Causes, Consequences and Cures for the Problem-seeking Approach to Social Behavior and Cognition by Joachim I. Krueger and David C. Funder http://www.bbsonline.org/Preprints/Krueger/Referees/ This article has been accepted for publication in Behavioral and Brain Sciences (BBS), an international, interdisciplinary journal providing Open Peer Commentary on important and controversial current research in the biobehavioral and cognitive sciences. Commentators must be BBS Associates or suggested by a BBS Associate. To be considered as a commentator for this article, to suggest other appropriate commentators, or for information about how to become a BBS Associate, please reply by EMAIL within three (3) weeks to: calls(a)bbsonline.org The Calls are sent to 10,000 BBS Associates and affiliates, so there is no expectation (indeed, it would be calamitous) that each recipient should comment on every occasion! Hence there is no need to reply except if you wish to comment, or to suggest someone to comment. If you are not a BBS Associate, please approach a current BBS Associate (there are currently over 10,000 worldwide) who is familiar with your work to nominate you. All past BBS authors, referees and commentators are eligible to become BBS Associates. An electronic list of current BBS Associates is available at this location to help you select a name: http://www.bbsonline.org/Instructions/assoclist.html (please note that this list is being updated) If no current BBS Associate knows your work, please send us your Curriculum Vitae and BBS will circulate it to appropriate Associates to ask whether they would be prepared to nominate you. (In the meantime, your name, address and email address will be entered into our database as an unaffiliated investigator.) ======================================================================= ** IMPORTANT ** ======================================================================= To help us put together a balanced list of commentators, it would be most helpful if you would send us an indication of the relevant expertise you would bring to bear on the paper, and what aspect of the paper you would anticipate commenting upon. (Please note that we only request expertise information in order to simplify the selection process.) Please DO NOT prepare a commentary until you receive a formal invitation, indicating that it was possible to include your name on the final list, which is constructed so as to balance areas of expertise and frequency of prior commentaries in BBS. To help you decide whether you would be an appropriate commentator for this article, an electronic draft is retrievable at the URL that follows the abstract and keywords below. ======================================================================= ======================================================================= Towards a Balanced Social Psychology: Causes, Consequences and Cures for the Problem-seeking Approach to Social Behavior and Cognition by Joachim I. Krueger and David C. Funder ABSTRACT: Mainstream social psychology focuses on how people characteristically violate norms of action through social misbehaviors such as conformity, obedience, and failures to help. Likewise, they are seen to violate norms of reasoning through cognitive errors such as misuse of social information, self-enhancement, and an over-readiness to attribute dispositional characteristics. The causes of this negative research emphasis include the apparent informativeness of norm violation, the status of good behavior and judgment as unconfirmable null hypotheses, and the allure of counter-intuitive findings. The shortcomings of this orientation include frequently erroneous imputations of error, findings of mutually contradictory errors, incoherent interpretations of error, an inability to explain the sources of behavioral or cognitive achievement, and the inhibition of generalized theory. Possible remedies include increased attention to the complete range of behavior and judgmental accomplishment, analytic reforms emphasizing effect sizes and Bayesian inference, and a theoretical paradigm able to account for both the sources of accomplishment and of error. A more balanced social psychology would yield not only a more positive view of human nature, but also an improved understanding of the bases of good behavior and accurate judgment, coherent explanations of occasional lapses, and theoretically-grounded suggestions for improvement. KEYWORDS: Bayesian inference; biases; normative models; personality; positive psychology; rationality; reasoning; social behavior, social judgment; social psychology http://www.bbsonline.org/Preprints/Krueger/Referees/ ======================================================================= ======================================================================= *** SUPPLEMENTARY ANNOUNCEMENT *** (1) Call for Book Nominations for BBS Multiple Book Review In the past, Behavioral and Brain Sciences (BBS) had only been able to do 1-2 BBS multiple book treatments per year, because of our limited annual page quota. BBS's new expanded page quota will make it possible for us to increase the number of books we treat per year, so this is an excellent time for BBS Associates and biobehavioral/cognitive scientists in general to nominate books you would like to see accorded BBS multiple book review. (Authors may self-nominate, but books can only be selected on the basis of multiple nominations.) It would be very helpful if you indicated in what way a BBS Multiple Book Review of the book(s) you nominate would be useful to the field (and of course a rich list of potential reviewers would be the best evidence of its potential impact!). *-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-* Please note: Your email address has been added to our user database for Calls for Commentators, the reason you received this email. If you do not wish to receive further Calls, please feel free to change your mailshot status through your User Login link on the BBSPrints homepage, using your username and password. Or, email a response with the word "remove" in the subject line. *-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-* Barbara Finlay Editor Jeffrey Gray Editor Behavioral and Brain Sciences bbs(a)bbsonline.org http://www.bbsonline.org -------------------------------------------------------------------

23 years, 1 month

Philosophy of Science Colloquium, P. Foldiak

by Laszlo E. Szabo

23 years, 1 month

Philosophy of Science Colloquium, Szabolcs Kiss

by Laszlo E. Szabo

Department of HISTORY AND PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE Eotvos University, Budapest Pazmany P. setany 1/A Budapest Phone/Fax: (36-1) 372 2924 Department's Home Page:http://hps.elte.hu P h i l o s o p h y o f S c i e n c e C o l l o q u i u m Room 6.54 (6th floor) Monday 4:00 PM ____________________________________ 24 March 4:00 PM 6th floor 6.54 S z a b o l c s K i s s* <mailto:kiss.szabolcs@matavnet.hu> I r i n g ó H a l a s i E d i t M o l n á r _________ * elo"adó Institute of Psychology University of Pécs A humán vélekedésrendszer konzisztenciájának tulajdonítása gyermekeknél (Children's ascription logical consistency to human beliefs) Az ún. naív tudatelmélet kutatása napjaink megismeréstudományának egyik központi területe (ld. pl. Baron-Cohen et al. 2000). Ezen belül a gyermek elméro"l való gondolkodásának és ítélethozatalának a feltárása kitüntetett terület (ld. pl. Mitchell és Riggs 2000). A szociálpszichológiában a fenti kutatásoktól függetlenül ugyanakkor nagy hagyománya van a humán nézet- vagy vélekedésrendszerek kutatásának. Itt az egyik központi kérdés a vélekedésrendszerek konzisztenciáját érinti (ld. pl. Hunyadi 1980). Napjaink tudatfilozófiájában pedig a másik személy tudatának interpretálásakor használt racionális elvek beazonosítása kap központi szerepet. Jelen elo"adás célja, hogy egy saját empirikus munka eredményeinek ismertetése keretében összekapcsolja a naív tudatelméleti, a szociálpszichológiai és a tudatfilozófiai elméleteket. A kognitív fejlo"déslélektani kísérleti adatgyu"jtés kiindulópontja a másik személy tudatának értelmezésekor használt normatív (racionális) alapelvek egyike volt. Ezt az ún. zárás alapelvét a tudatfilozófiában például Fodor és Lepore (1992, 143.o.) is ismerteti : ?(...) Szükségszeru"en, ha egy lényt úgy reprezentálunk, mint aki P-t véli és P implikálja Q-t, akkor a lényt úgy kell reprezentálni, mint aki Q-t véli.? Mikortól folyamodik a gyermek ehhez az alapelvhez? Hogyan sajátítja ezt el? Mi a kapcsolat a gyermek logikai fejlo"dése és a zárás alapelvének kialakulása között? Milyen szerepet játszik a saját vélekedésrendszerhez való introspektív hozzáférés az alapelv elsajátításában? Az elo"adásban ismertetett kísérlettel a fenti kérdésekre kerestünk választ. Az empirikus munka során óvodás korú gyermekek olyan rövid történeteket hallgattak, amelyek feltételezték a zárás alapelvének megértését. A történetek végén feltett kérdésekre adott helyes válaszokon keresztül mértük fel a gyermekek teljesítményét. A számos rendkivül izgalmas kísérleti eredmény ismertetésekor kitérek a három évesek gyenge adataira és erre vonatkozó lehetséges magyarázatokat fogalmazok meg. Tárgyalom a talált fejlo"dési trendet és az eredményeket összevetem a hamis vélekedés teszt klasszikus eredményeivel. Eközben bemutatom az általunk használt próba komputációs szintu" feladatelemzését is, amely szorosan kapcsolódik a vélekedésrendszer reprezentációjának különbözo" szintjeihez. * Fodor, J. and Lepore E. (1992) Holism. A Shopper's Guide. Oxford: Blackwell. * Baron-Cohen et al. (Ed.) (2000). Understanding Other Minds. Oxford University Press. * Fodor, J. and Lepore E. (1992) Holism. A Shopper's Guide. Oxford: Blackwell. * Hunyady György (1980). A konzisztencia mint a vélekedések szervezõdési elve. In: Frank T. és Hoppál M. (szerk.) Hiedelemrendszer és társadalmi tudat. Vol. 2. Tömegkommunikációs Kutatócsoport. 16-29.o. * Mitchell P. and Riggs, K.J. (Ed.) (2000) Children's Reasoning and the Mind. Psychology Press. ___________________________________ The 60-minute lecture is followed by a 10-minute break. Then we held a 30-60-minute discussion.The participants may comment the talks and initiate discussion on the Internet. The comments should be written in the language of the presentation. The organizer of the colloquium: Laszlo E. Szabo (email: leszabo(a)hps.elte.hu) -- Laszlo E. Szabo Department of Theoretical Physics Department of History and Philosophy of Science Eotvos University, Budapest H-1518 Budapest, Pf. 32, Hungary Phone/Fax: (36-1)372-2924 Home: (36-1) 200-7318 Mobil/SMS: (36) 20-366-1172 http://hps.elte.hu/~leszabo

23 years, 1 month

FW: meghivo

by Pléh Csaba

Csaba Pleh, professor of psychology, Center for Cognitive Science Budapest U.of Technology and Economics Budapest Muegyetem rkp 9. R-203 H-1111 T and Fax: 36-1-4631072 email: pleh(a)itm.bme.hu Home: Budakeszi Zichy P. u. 4 H-2092 Hungary (36)(23)453933 Fax:932 Mobile: (36)(30) 3500 431 Home page: www.itm.bme.hu/ktk/csaba/ Editor, Hungarian Review of Psychology -----Original Message----- From: Gyula Kovacs [mailto:g.kovacs@itm.bme.hu] Sent: Thursday, March 20, 2003 10:46 AM To: 'Csaba PLEH'; 'Ajuska'; 'András Rung'; 'Balazs Gulyas'; 'Beke Monika'; 'Csaba pleh'; 'Dank?rtalan'; 'Gabi Felhosi'; 'Gabor Zemplen'; 'Gabris Krisztian'; 'Gergely Csibra'; 'Gervain Judit'; 'Kovács Kristóf'; 'Krajcsi Attila'; 'Lukács Ágnes'; 'Magyari Lilla'; 'NEMETH, Dezso'; 'noemi'; 'Peter Foldiak'; 'Zoltan' Subject: meghivo Dr. Kovács Gyula Budapesti Műszaki Egyetem / Technical University of Budapest Kognitiv Tudományi Központ / Center for Cognitive Sciences ------------------------------------------------------------------------ ----------------------- H-1111 Budapest Műegyetem rkp 9 R. II/203 T:+36-1-463-1176 F:+36-1-463-1072

23 years, 1 month

News from Science & Consciousness Review

by Thomas Zoëga Ramsøy

Science & Consciousness Review ( http://psych.pomona.edu/scr ) has released new articles and reviews: _______________________ EDITORIAL REVIEW --- FIFTH COMMENTARY ON CRICK & KOCH The 10 point framework and the altogether too hard basket - By Colin Hales The large footprints of the Crick/Koch duo at the frontier of knowledge can be a little daunting, which is why I was concerned at the very first paragraph of A Framework for Consciousness (1). It says that qualia are too hard and it appears fruitless to approach them head on. Qualia are then tacitly assumed emergent from the framework presented. I know the work is entitled A framework, not The framework, but from Crick and Koch it read a little like Qualia cannot be approached from outside the framework. I dont think this was the intent, but it may be that the plausible explanation they need is stopped by the framework. Full text at: http://psych.pomona.edu/scr/editorials/20030302.html See more commentaries of the Crick & Koch article at: http://psych.pomona.edu/scr/ww_framework.html _______________________ LATEST HEADLINES - NEW ISSUE - TICS - Psychology professor maps choice-making in the brain - Do dogs have minds? - Developmental prosopagnosia: A study of three patients - The three vectors of consciousness and their disturbances after brain injury See NEWS IN BRIEF at: http://psych.pomona.edu/scr/more_news.html _______________________ ALL PREVIOUS ARTICLES ARE FREELY AVAILABLE IN OUR ARCHIVE! Visit our archives at: http://psych.pomona.edu/scr/archive.html _______________________ SEND YOUR CONTRIBUTION For students, teachers, scientists, and all other fans of consciousness... Send your news summaries to us. See more at: http://psych.pomona.edu/scr/author_instructions.html Sincerely, Thomas Zoëga Ramsøy Managing Editor

23 years, 1 month

Job announcements

by Summer School of Cogitive Science

Dear Colleague, We would like to post two announcements (please, see the attachments). Could you, please, provide us with all the necessary information regarding the posting process. Thank you very much in advance. Radostina Belcheva, Radostina Belcheva Administrative manager Central and East European Center for Cognitive Science Svetlana Petkova Administrative manager Central and East European Center for Cognitive Science

23 years, 1 month

Meghívó

by Ladányi Mária

Meghívó a Magyar Nyelvtudományi Társaság Általános Nyelvészeti Szakosztályának rendezvényére Szabó Zoltán: Az "irányzatiság" mint lehető stilisztikai vizsgálati elv (az irányzattörténet mint alkalmazott diszciplína) Az előadás időpontja: március 25., kedd du. 1/2 5 Helye: ELTE BTK Múzeum krt. 4/A III. emelet 331. terem Minden érdeklődőt szívesen látunk! Péter Mihály, a szakosztály elnöke, Ladányi Mária, a szakosztály titkára

23 years, 1 month

Deadline approaching

by Summer School of Cogitive Science

Advanced Interdisciplinary Workshop on Constructive Memory: Data and Models Sofia, New Bulgarian University, July 12-14, 2003 The aim of the workshop will be to challenge our current understanding of human memory by integrating data with theoretical and computational models and by bringing researchers from a variety of domains together. The workshop topics will include: * False Memory and Memory Illusions * Interaction between memory and reasoning, between memory and imagination * Autobiographical memory * Spatial Memory * Memory for Actions and Events * Memory for Faces and Objects * WM and constructive processes * Context-Sensitivity of Human Memory * Collective memory The workshop is deliberately interdisciplinary and will cover a variety of methods: * lab experiments * field studies * computer simulations * mathematical models * brain imaging * brain lesions The workshop program will consist of invited key speaker talks which will be challenged by discussants, short talks by regular participants, and numerous discussions and working groups. In parallel to the workshop an International Summer School in Cognitive Science will take place. Key talks · Jay McClelland (Carnegie Mellon University, USA) Emergence of Theory-like Knowledge from Experience: A Parallel-Distributed Processing Account · Elizabeth Loftus (University of Washington, USA) - False Memories and Other Mind Changes · Alan Baddeley (University of Bristol, UK) - Constructive Processes in Working Memory · Daniel Schacter (Harvard University, USA) - The Seven Sins of Memory: A Cognitive Neuroscience Perspective · Morris Moscovitch (University of Toronto, Canada) Remote Memory, Consolidation and Hippocampal-Neocortical Interaction: Evidence from the Laboratory and Clinic. · Robert Bjork and Elizabeth Bjork (University of California, Los Angeles, USA) - The Role of Retrieval-Induced Forgetting in the Construction and Distortion of Memories · Michael Anderson (University of Oregon, USA) - Inhibitory Processes and the Regulation of Awareness · Martin Conway (University of Durham, UK) & Amanda Barnier (University of New South Wales, Australia) - On the Accessibility of Autobiographical Memories: Shaping the Self · Johannes Engelkamp (Saarland University, Germany) - What is Special about Memory for Actions? · William Hirst (New School for Social Research, NY, USA) The Construction of a Collective Memory · Jeroen Raaijmakers (University of Amsterdam, The Netherlands) - Towards a General Theory of Human Memory · Boicho Kokinov (New Bulgarian University) - The AMBR Model of Episodic Memory Construction and Distortion: Interaction between Memory and Reasoning Call for Papers Potential participants are invited to submit papers in electronic form (MS Word or PDF format) for presentation during the workshop. The papers should be not longer than 10 single spaced pages, including tables, figures, references, and appendices and use Times New Roman Font size 10. The papers may address any of the topics described above. Interdisciplinary work is especially welcome. Priority will be given to papers that open up new issues, challenge the current understanding of human memory, present new models or data. Papers should be sent by April 1st 2003 to the following address: memory(a)cogs.nbu.bg Program Committee Michael Anderson (University of Oregon, USA) Alan Baddeley (University of Bristol, UK) Robert Bjork (University of California, Los Angeles, USA) Martin Conway (University of Durham, UK) Johannes Engelkamp (Saarland University, Germany) William Hirst (New School for Social Research, NY, USA) - Co-Chair Boicho Kokinov (New Bulgarian University) - Co-Chair Elizabeth Loftus (University of Washington, USA) Jay McClelland (Carnegie Mellon University, USA) Morris Moscovitch (University of Toronto, Canada) Jeroen Raaijmakers (University of Amsterdam, The Netherlands) Daniel Schacter (Harvard University, USA) For more information look at: http://www.nbu.bg/cogs/events/workshop.html Central and East European Center for Cognitive Science New Bulgarian University 21 Montevideo Str. Sofia 1618 phone: 955-75-18 e-mail: school(a)cogs.nbu.bg memory(a)cogs.nbu.bg Radostina Belcheva Administrative manager Central and East European Center for Cognitive Science Svetlana Petkova Administrative manager Central and East European Center for Cognitive Science

23 years, 1 month

2026

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

2002

2001

2000

1999

1998

1997

1996

1995

1994

1993

koglist March 2003