Science & Consciousness Review ( http://psych.pomona.edu/scr ) has released new articles and reviews: _______________________ EDITORIAL REVIEW --- FIFTH COMMENTARY ON CRICK & KOCH The 10 point framework and the altogether too hard basket - By Colin Hales The large footprints of the Crick/Koch duo at the frontier of knowledge can be a little daunting, which is why I was concerned at the very first paragraph of “A Framework for Consciousness” (1). It says that qualia are too hard and ‘it appears fruitless to approach them head on’. Qualia are then tacitly assumed emergent from the framework presented. I know the work is entitled ‘A’ framework, not ‘The’ framework, but from Crick and Koch it read a little like “Qualia cannot be approached from outside the framework”. I don’t think this was the intent, but it may be that the plausible explanation they need is stopped by the framework. Full text at: http://psych.pomona.edu/scr/editorials/20030302.html See more commentaries of the Crick & Koch article at: http://psych.pomona.edu/scr/ww_framework.html _______________________ LATEST HEADLINES - NEW ISSUE - TICS - Psychology professor maps choice-making in the brain - Do dogs have minds? - Developmental prosopagnosia: A study of three patients - The three vectors of consciousness and their disturbances after brain injury See NEWS IN BRIEF at: http://psych.pomona.edu/scr/more_news.html _______________________ ALL PREVIOUS ARTICLES ARE FREELY AVAILABLE IN OUR ARCHIVE! Visit our archives at: http://psych.pomona.edu/scr/archive.html _______________________ SEND YOUR CONTRIBUTION For students, teachers, scientists, and all other fans of consciousness... Send your news summaries to us. See more at: http://psych.pomona.edu/scr/author_instructions.html Sincerely, Thomas Zoëga Ramsøy Managing Editor