koglist November 2002

koglist@maillist.ttk.hu

9 participants
20 discussions

Start a nNew thread

Philosophy of Science Colloquium, Tamas Rudas

by Laszlo E. Szabo

23 years, 6 months

Anderson & Lebiere/The Newell Test: BBS Call for Commentators

by Behavioral & Brain Sciences

Below is a link to the forthcoming BBS target article The Newell Test for a Theory of Mind by John R. Anderson and Christian Lebiere Carnegie Mellon University http://www.bbsonline.org/Preprints/Anderson/Referees/ This article has been accepted for publication in Behavioral and Brain Sciences (BBS), an international, interdisciplinary journal providing Open Peer Commentary on important and controversial current research in the biobehavioral and cognitive sciences. Commentators must be BBS Associates or suggested by a BBS Associate. To be considered as a commentator for this article, to suggest other appropriate commentators, or for information about how to become a BBS Associate, please reply by EMAIL within three (3) weeks to: calls(a)bbsonline.org The Calls are sent to 10,000 BBS Associates, so there is no expectation (indeed, it would be calamitous) that each recipient should comment on every occasion! Hence there is no need to reply except if you wish to comment, or to suggest someone to comment. If you are not a BBS Associate, please approach a current BBS Associate (there are currently over 10,000 worldwide) who is familiar with your work to nominate you. All past BBS authors, referees and commentators are eligible to become BBS Associates. An electronic list of current BBS Associates is available at this location to help you select a name: http://www.bbsonline.org/Instructions/assoclist.html (please note that this list is being updated) If no current BBS Associate knows your work, please send us your Curriculum Vitae and BBS will circulate it to appropriate Associates to ask whether they would be prepared to nominate you. (In the meantime, your name, address and email address will be entered into our database as an unaffiliated investigator.) ======================================================================= IMPORTANT To help us put together a balanced list of commentators, please give some indication of the aspects of the topic on which you would bring your areas of expertise to bear if you were selected as a commentator. To help you decide whether you would be an appropriate commentator for this article, an electronic draft is retrievable from the online BBSPrints Archive, at the URL that follows the abstract below. _______________________________________________________________________ The Newell Test for a Theory of Mind John R. Anderson Department of Psychology BH345D Carnegie Mellon University Christian Lebiere Human Computer Interaction Institute Carnegie Mellon University ABSTRACT: Newell (1980, 1990) proposed that cognitive theories be developed trying to satisfy multiple criteria to avoid theoretical myopia. He provided two overlapping lists of 13 criteria that the human cognitive architecture would have to satisfy to be functional. We have distilled these into 12: flexible behavior, real-time performance, adaptive behavior, vast knowledge base, dynamic behavior, knowledge integration, natural language, learning, development, evolution, and brain realization. There would be greater theoretical progress if we evaluated theories by a broad set of criteria such as these and attended to the weaknesses such evaluations revealed. To illustrate how theories can be evaluated we apply them to both classical connectionism (McClelland & Rumelhart, 1986; Rumelhart & McClelland, 1986) and the ACT-R theory (Anderson & Lebiere, 1998). The strengths of classical connectionism on this test derive from its intense effort in addressing empirical phenomena in domains like language and cognitive development. Its weaknesses derive from its failure to acknowledge a symbolic level to thought. In contrast, ACT-R includes both symbolic and subsymbolic components. The strengths of the ACT-R derive from its tight integration of the symbolic with the subsymbolic. Its weaknesses largely derive from its failure as yet to adequately engage in intensive analyses of issues related to certain criteria on Newells list KEYWORDS: Cognitive Architecture; Connectionism; Hybrid Systems; Language Learning; Symbolic Systems http://www.bbsonline.org/Preprints/Anderson/Referees/ ====================================================================== IMPORTANT Please do not prepare a commentary yet. Just let us know, after having inspected it, what relevant expertise you feel you would bring to bear on what aspect of the article. We will then let you know whether it was possible to include your name on the final formal list of invitees. ======================================================================= *** SUPPLEMENTARY ANNOUNCEMENT *** (1) Call for Book Nominations for BBS Multiple Book Review In the past, Behavioral and Brain Sciences (BBS) had only been able to do 1-2 BBS multiple book treatments per year, because of our limited annual page quota. BBS's new expanded page quota will make it possible for us to increase the number of books we treat per year, so this is an excellent time for BBS Associates and biobehavioral/cognitive scientists in general to nominate books you would like to see accorded BBS multiple book review. (Authors may self-nominate, but books can only be selected on the basis of multiple nominations.) It would be very helpful if you indicated in what way a BBS Multiple Book Review of the book(s) you nominate would be useful to the field (and of course a rich list of potential reviewers would be the best evidence of its potential impact!). *-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-* Please note: Your email address has been added to our user database for Calls for Commentators, the reason you received this email. If you do not wish to receive further Calls, please feel free to change your mailshot status through your User Login link on the BBSPrints homepage, using your username and password. Or, email a response with the word "remove" in the subject line. *-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-* Ralph BBS ------------------------------------------------------------------- Ralph DeMarco Editorial Coordinator Behavioral and Brain Sciences Journals Department Cambridge University Press 40 West 20th Street New York, NY 10011-4211 UNITED STATES bbs(a)bbsonline.org http://www.bbsonline.org Tel: +001 212 924 3900 ext.374 Fax: +001 212 645 5960 -------------------------------------------------------------------

23 years, 6 months

Categorization Summer Institute June 30 - July 11 2003 Montreal

by Stevan Harnad

The theme of the 2003 UQaM Summer Institute is CATEGORISATION http://www.unites.uqam.ca/sccog/liens/program.html Universite of Quebec @ Montreal: June 30 - July 11 2003 Day 1. CATEGORIZATION IN COGNITIVE SCIENCES (all disciplines) Categorization in cognitive neuroscience - S Grossberg (Boston U) Categorization in psychology - S Harnad (UQaM) Categorization in computer science - JF Sowa (LLC) Categorization in linguistics - TBA Categorization in Philosophy - TBA Categorization in cognitive sciences - A Papafragou (Penn) Day 2. SEMANTIC CATEGORIES (anthropology, linguistics, philosophy, psychology) Emotion categories across languages - J Boster (U Conn) Semantic categorization - B Gillon (McGill) Conceptual Change - P Thagard (Waterloo) Biology of substance categories - R Millikan(U Conn) Color categories across languages - P Kay (Berkeley) Semantic categories - S Coulson (UCSD) Day 3. SYNTACTIC CATEGORIES AND CATEGORY CHANGE (linguistics) Syntactic categories 1 - A Zwicky (Stanford) Multifunctional categories - Lisa Travis (McGill) Crossgcategorial constructions - R Malouf (Groningen) Category change - Ian Roberts (Cambridge) How different can languages be? - D Gil (MPI Leipzig) Syntactic categories 2 - J Bobaljik (McGill) Day 4. CATEGORIES IN SPOKEN AND SIGNED LANGUAGES (linguistics and psychology) Sign Language 1 - D Bouchard/C Dubuisson (UQaM) Sign languages 2 - Judy Kegl (U So Maine) Sign vs speech - D Lillo-Martin (U Conn) ACQUISITION OF CATEGORIES L1 acquisition - M Labelle (UQaM) L2 acquisition - L White (McGill) Categorisation and acquisition - E Clark (Stanford) Day 5. DATA MINING FOR CATEGORIES AND ONTOLOGIES (computer science, philosophy) Graph structure clustering - G Mineau (Laval) Data mining - Y Kodratoff (Paris-Sud XI) Text mining - A Napoli (LORIA) Computer-aided categorization - J-G Meunier (UQaM) Categorization nets - R Proulx (UQaM) Day 6. NEUROSCIENCE OF CATEGORIZATION AND CATEGORY LEARNING (psychology, philosophy) Neuropsychology of category learning - FG Ashby (Santa Barbara) Striatum and category learning - WT Maddox (UT Austin) Brain basis of category learning - J Gabrieli (Stanford) Categorical speech perception/production - S Ravizza (Berkeley) Neural nets - Pierre Poirier (UQaM) Day 7. MACHINE CATEGORY LEARNING (computer science, philosophy, robotics) Conceptual spaces - P Gardenfors (Lund) Symbolic learning - Patrick Gallinari (U PM Curie) Similarity in fuzzy categories - D Dubois/H Prade (U P Sabatier) Self-organizing vocabularies - S Nolfi (ICST Rome) Inferential learning theory - RS Michalski (G Mason U) Cognitive computation - SJ Hanson (Rutgers) Day 8. PERCEPTION AND INFERENCE (psychology, philosophy) Perception to symbols - L Barsalou (Emory) Return of conceptual empiricism - J Prinz (Wash U St-Louis) Category representation - R Nosofsky (Indiana) Category learning - R Goldstone (Indiana) Categorization and inference - A Markman (UT Austin) Perception and inference - S Coulson (UCSD) Day 9. GROUNDING, RECOGNITION, AND REASONING (psychology, philosophy) Reference - S Larochelle (U Montreal) Shape recognition - I Biederman (USC) Object perception - PG Schyns (Glasgow) Analogical reasoning - D Gentner (Northwestern) Categorization and reasoning - S Robert (UQaM) Day 10. THE NATURALIZATION OF CATEGORIES (philosophy) Nominalism and concepts - C Panaccio (UQTR) Social construction of categories - L Faucher (UQaM) Concept nativism - E Margolis (Rice) Category neurosemantics - C Eliasmith (Waterloo) Philosophical Analysis - G Rey (Maryland) Registration information: http://www.unites.uqam.ca/sccog/liens/registration.html

23 years, 6 months

Anderson & Lebiere/The Newell Test: BBS Call for Commentators

by Behavioral & Brain Sciences

Dear Dr. Qwerty, Below is a link to the forthcoming BBS target article The Newell Test for a Theory of Mind by John R. Anderson and Christian Lebiere Carnegie Mellon University http://www.bbsonline.org/Preprints/Anderson/Referees/ This article has been accepted for publication in Behavioral and Brain Sciences (BBS), an international, interdisciplinary journal providing Open Peer Commentary on important and controversial current research in the biobehavioral and cognitive sciences. Commentators must be BBS Associates or suggested by a BBS Associate. To be considered as a commentator for this article, to suggest other appropriate commentators, or for information about how to become a BBS Associate, please reply by EMAIL within three (3) weeks to: calls(a)bbsonline.org The Calls are sent to 10,000 BBS Associates, so there is no expectation (indeed, it would be calamitous) that each recipient should comment on every occasion! Hence there is no need to reply except if you wish to comment, or to suggest someone to comment. If you are not a BBS Associate, please approach a current BBS Associate (there are currently over 10,000 worldwide) who is familiar with your work to nominate you. All past BBS authors, referees and commentators are eligible to become BBS Associates. An electronic list of current BBS Associates is available at this location to help you select a name: http://www.bbsonline.org/Instructions/assoclist.html (please note that this list is being updated) If no current BBS Associate knows your work, please send us your Curriculum Vitae and BBS will circulate it to appropriate Associates to ask whether they would be prepared to nominate you. (In the meantime, your name, address and email address will be entered into our database as an unaffiliated investigator.) ======================================================================= IMPORTANT To help us put together a balanced list of commentators, please give some indication of the aspects of the topic on which you would bring your areas of expertise to bear if you were selected as a commentator. To help you decide whether you would be an appropriate commentator for this article, an electronic draft is retrievable from the online BBSPrints Archive, at the URL that follows the abstract below. _______________________________________________________________________ The Newell Test for a Theory of Mind John R. Anderson Department of Psychology BH345D Carnegie Mellon University Christian Lebiere Human Computer Interaction Institute Carnegie Mellon University ABSTRACT: Newell (1980, 1990) proposed that cognitive theories be developed trying to satisfy multiple criteria to avoid theoretical myopia. He provided two overlapping lists of 13 criteria that the human cognitive architecture would have to satisfy to be functional. We have distilled these into 12: flexible behavior, real-time performance, adaptive behavior, vast knowledge base, dynamic behavior, knowledge integration, natural language, learning, development, evolution, and brain realization. There would be greater theoretical progress if we evaluated theories by a broad set of criteria such as these and attended to the weaknesses such evaluations revealed. To illustrate how theories can be evaluated we apply them to both classical connectionism (McClelland & Rumelhart, 1986; Rumelhart & McClelland, 1986) and the ACT-R theory (Anderson & Lebiere, 1998). The strengths of classical connectionism on this test derive from its intense effort in addressing empirical phenomena in domains like language and cognitive development. Its weaknesses derive from its failure to acknowledge a symbolic level to thought. In contrast, ACT-R includes both symbolic and subsymbolic components. The strengths of the ACT-R derive from its tight integration of the symbolic with the subsymbolic. Its weaknesses largely derive from its failure as yet to adequately engage in intensive analyses of issues related to certain criteria on Newells list KEYWORDS: Cognitive Architecture; Connectionism; Hybrid Systems; Language Learning; Symbolic Systems http://www.bbsonline.org/Preprints/Anderson/Referees/ ====================================================================== IMPORTANT Please do not prepare a commentary yet. Just let us know, after having inspected it, what relevant expertise you feel you would bring to bear on what aspect of the article. We will then let you know whether it was possible to include your name on the final formal list of invitees. ======================================================================= *** SUPPLEMENTARY ANNOUNCEMENT *** (1) Call for Book Nominations for BBS Multiple Book Review In the past, Behavioral and Brain Sciences (BBS) had only been able to do 1-2 BBS multiple book treatments per year, because of our limited annual page quota. BBS's new expanded page quota will make it possible for us to increase the number of books we treat per year, so this is an excellent time for BBS Associates and biobehavioral/cognitive scientists in general to nominate books you would like to see accorded BBS multiple book review. (Authors may self-nominate, but books can only be selected on the basis of multiple nominations.) It would be very helpful if you indicated in what way a BBS Multiple Book Review of the book(s) you nominate would be useful to the field (and of course a rich list of potential reviewers would be the best evidence of its potential impact!). *-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-* Please note: Your email address has been added to our user database for Calls for Commentators, the reason you received this email. If you do not wish to receive further Calls, please feel free to change your mailshot status through your User Login link on the BBSPrints homepage, using your username and password. Or, email a response with the word "remove" in the subject line. *-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-* Ralph BBS ------------------------------------------------------------------- Ralph DeMarco Editorial Coordinator Behavioral and Brain Sciences Journals Department Cambridge University Press 40 West 20th Street New York, NY 10011-4211 UNITED STATES bbs(a)bbsonline.org http://www.bbsonline.org Tel: +001 212 924 3900 ext.374 Fax: +001 212 645 5960 -------------------------------------------------------------------

23 years, 6 months

Kovacs Ilona habilitacios eloadasa

by Csaba PLEH

Kedves Kollegak: Kovacs Ilona habilitacios eloadasa Pecsett 2OO2 november 14-en csutortokon 14 h 3O-kor lesz. Helye : PTE Bolcseszkari Diszterem, Pecs, Ifjusag utja 6 A epulet fo lepcsohazabol, un. uvegterem Tantermi eloadas: Az emberi latas fejlodese Tudomanyos eloadas: Latasfejlodesi zavarok Willaims szindromaban Aznap a Pecsi Tudomanyegyetem 1O eves pszichologuskepzesenek unneplese kereteben szamos igen erdekes eloadas lesz, Bereczkei, Moscovici, Lenard, Laszlo s hasonlok. Udvozlettel Pleh Csaba Csaba Pleh, professor of psychology, Center for Cognitive Science Budapest U.of Technology and Economics Budapest Muegyetem rkp 9. R-203 H-1111 T and Fax: 36-1-4631072 email: pleh(a)itm.bme.hu Home: Budakeszi Zichy P. u. 4 H-2092 Hungary (36)(23)453933 Fax:932 Editor: Hungarian Review of Psychology

23 years, 6 months

Workshop on cognitive modeling of agents and multi-agent interactions

by rsun＠cecs.missouri.edu

Workshop on Cognitive Modeling of Agents and Multi-Agent Interactions During IJCAI'2003 9-11 August, 2003. Acapulco, Mexico Computational models of cognitive agents that incorporate a wide range of cognitive functionalities (such as a variety of memory/representation, various types of learning, and sensory motor capabilities) have been developed in both AI and cognitive science. In AI, they appear under the rubric of intelligent agents and multi-agent systems. In cognitive science, they are often known as cognitive architectures. These strands of research provide useful paradigms for addressing some fundamental questions in AI and Cognitive Science. Artificial intelligence started out with the goal of designing functioning intelligent agents. However, faced with the enormous difficulty of the task, the focus has largely been on modeling specific aspects of intelligence, often in highly restricted domains. Nevertheless, some researchers have focused on putting the pieces together with the goal of designing autonomous agents. More important, there is a growing interest in multi-agent interactions that addresses issues of coordination and cooperation among cognitive agents. On the other side, traditionally, the main focus of research in cognitive science has been on specific components of cognition (e.g., perception, memory, learning, language). Recent developments in computational modeling of cognitive architectures provide new avenues for precisely specifying complex cognitive processes in tangible ways, thereby addressing foundational questions in cognitive science. Such developments need to be extended to multi-agent interactions and there are promising developments in this regard (see e.g. recent papers in this area in the journal Cognitive Systems Research). Against this background, this workshop seeks to bring together cognitive scientists and AI researchers, with a wide range of background and expertise, to discuss research problems in understanding cognition at the individual level as well as at the collective level. The workshop is open to all members of the AI and CogSci research communities. We invite submissions on all aspects of cognitive modeling of agents and multi-agent interactions, including, but not limited to: * Cognitive architectures of individual cognitive agents. * Cognitive models of multi-agent interactions (e.g., communication, cooperation, and negotiation, in relation to cognition). * Cognitive models of multi-agent organizations (e.g., organizational structure, economies, culture, and other coordination structures and mechanisms, in relation to cognition). * Cognitive models of co-learning of multiple cognitive agents. * Computational models of evolution of cognition and behavior. * Computational abstractions, languages, and tools for cognitive modeling of agents and multi-agent interactions. The discussions at the workshop will focus on the following issues, among many others: * What are the characteristics of the successful cognitive architectures for modeling individual cognitive agents? * What are the suitable characteristics of cognitive architectures for modeling both individual cognitive agents and multi-agent interactions? * What are the fundamental ways of understanding and modeling multi-agent interactions? Can they be reduced to individual cognition? * How can we best characterize and model social structures and organizations in relation to cognition? * How important is evolution in shaping individual cognition and collective behavior? How can we model that aspect? SUBMISSION If you are interested in giving a presentation at the workshop, please submit a full paper, 6-10 pages, in the IJCAI paper format. If you are only interested in attending, submit a brief abstract (one page or less) describing your interest. Use the IJCAI paper format (and templates) for your papers. See the IJCAI Web site: http://www.ijcai-03.org for details. Electronic submission is required. Only the Postscript or PDF format is accepted. Send your paper (in PS or PDF) as an email attachment. In the body of your email, include (in plain ASCII): names of all authors, their affiliations, their physical addresses, and their email addresses. In addition, the same information should also be included in your paper itself. All submissions should be sent to: rsun(a)cecs.missouri.edu Each paper will be reviewed for technical soundness, relevance, significance, and clarity. An edited book volume, as well as a special issue of the journal Cognitive System Research, is planned for a selected subset of the papers of the workshop. IMPORTANT DATES AND DEADLINES * Deadline for the submission of full papers (6 to 10 pages) or abstracts (1 page): March 1, 2003. * Notification of acceptance/rejection: March 30, 2003. * Deadline for the receipt of camera-ready papers: May 1, 2003 ORGANIZING COMMITTEE Prof. Ron Sun (Chair) CECS Department, 201 EBW University of Missouri-Columbia Columbia, MO 65211-2060 rsun(a)cecs.missouri.edu http://www.cecs.missouri.edu/~rsun Prof. Cristiano Castelfranchi Department of Communication Sciences University of Siena Siena, Italy castel(a)ip.rm.cnr.it Prof. Jan Treur Department of Artificial Intelligence Faculty of Sciences Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam 1081 HV Amsterdam, Netherlands treur(a)cs.vu.nl Dr. Robert L. West Department of Psychology and Department of Cognitive Science Carleton University 1125 Colonel By Drive Ottawa, Ontario K1S 5B6 robert_west(a)carleton.ca Dr. Christian Lebiere Human-Computer Interaction Institute School of Computer Science Carnegie Mellon University Pittsburgh, PA 15213 cl(a)andrew.cmu.edu ------------------------------------------------------------ See the workshop Web page at: http://www.cecs.missouri.edu/~rsun/wsp03.html =================================================================== Professor Ron Sun, Ph.D CECS Department, 201 EBW phone: (573) 884-7662 University of Missouri-Columbia fax: (573) 882 8318 Columbia, MO 65211-2060 email: rsun(a)cecs.missouri.edu http://www.cecs.missouri.edu/~rsun ===================================================================

23 years, 6 months

MTA Pszich. Kutat�int�zete: jubileumi �l�s

by Istvan Czigler

Az MTA Pszichol�giai Kutat�int�zete 100 �ves jbileuma alkalm�val tdom�nyos �l�st rendez az MTA Sz�kh�z�ban (Roosvelt t�r) november 12-13-�n. Mindenkt sz�vesen l�tunk. Program: http://www.ptapi.hu Czigler Istv�n __________________________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? U2 on LAUNCH - Exclusive greatest hits videos http://launch.yahoo.com/u2

23 years, 6 months

Philosophy of Science Colloquium, Janos Tanacs

by Laszlo E. Szabo

Department of HISTORY AND PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE Eotvos University, Budapest Pazmany P. setany 1/A Budapest Phone/Fax: (36-1) 372 2924 Department's Home Page:http://hps.elte.hu Philosophy of Science Colloquium Room 6.54 (6th floor) Monday 4:00 PM ____________________________________ 11 November 4:00 PM 6th floor 6.54 (Language: Hungarian) János Tanács <nego(a)primposta.com> Philosophy and History of Science, Technical University of Budapest Ami hiányzik Bolyai János Appendixébo"l - és ami nem A Bolyai-féle paralléla-terminus hiánya és rekonstrukciója (The missing term 'parallela' and its reconstruction in Bolyai's Appendix) Az elo"adás célja megmutatni, hogy nem támasztható alá az a standard nézet, amely Bolyai János Appendix címu" mu"vével, azon belül is a Bolyai-féle paralléla-terminus értelmezésével kapcsolatban kialakult. A bevett nézet ugyanis - egymástól kevéssé eltéro" megfogalmazási változatokban - azt állítja, hogy Bolyai János a mu" elso" aragrafusában (i) értelmezi, (ii) definiálja vagy (iii) újradefiniálja a párhuzamosság fogalmát. Az elo"adás elso" lépésben a bevett nézet rekonstrukciójára tesz kísérletet, amely az interpretatív szándékú magyar Appendix-fordításokat, valamint a nemzetközi matematikatörténeti szakirodalom által - helytelenül - elso"dleges forrásként használt angol (Halsted-féle), valamint francia (Hoüel-Schmidt-féle) fordításokat elemzi, illetve az elso" paragrafusra vonatkozó matematikatörténeti nézeteket összegzi. A standard nézet cáfolásához az álláspontok legjóindulatúbb, közös minimális megfogalmazását veszem alapul. A tézis cáfolatát az Appendix eredeti latin nyelvu" - facsimile és levéltári - példányaira, a Bolyaiak levelezésére, Bolyai János sajátkezu" német Appendix-fordítására és Lobacsevszkij mu"vével kapcsolatos feljegyzéseire, továbbá a magyar nyelvújítási mozgalom matematikai mu"szavakra adott javaslataira valamint a szóalkotás elveire szándékozom építeni. Végül azzal a meglepo" tézissel fogok elo"állni, hogy a paralléla-terminus nem az Appendix elso" paragrafusában, hanem a mu" egy másik helyén bukkan fel. Ám hogy hol, ennek megválaszolását az elo"adásra tartogatom. A fogalmi általánosítás problémája felo"l amellett fogok érvelni, hogy az euklideszi geometria mellett megjeleno" nem-euklideszi geometria fogalmi rendszere, pontosabban a ketto" közötti fogalmi átmenet aluldeterminált. Ez azt jelenti, hogy az átmenetben a fogalmi általánosításnak nincs kitüntetett iránya, hanem nyitott az alternatív kiterjesztések vonatkozásában. Ennek következménye, hogy nem beszélhetünk az euklideszi geometria egyetlen helyes fogalmi kiterjesztéséro"l és a hiperbolikus geometria egyetlen helyes fogalmi rendszeréro"l sem. Ez azzal a következménnyel jár, hogy megmutatható: az adott fogalmi rendszeren, jelesül az euklideszi geometriáén belül érvényes szinonimitási viszonyok nem tarthatók fenn egy az egyben a fogalmi rendszerek közötti átmenetben - egyes szinonimitási viszonyokhoz ragaszkodva másokat fel kell adnunk, azonban bármelyik viszony mego"rzéséhez ragaszkodhatunk a többi rovására. Bolyai János tehát teljes joggal választhatott Lobacsevszkij vagy Gauss fogalmi kiterjesztéséto"l eltéro"t. Mindez elméletileg támasztja alá, hogy Bolyainak miért nem kellett szükségképpen azt a fogalmi általánosítást végrehajtania, vagy azt a kiterjesztési alternatívát választania, amelyet a standard nézet favorizál, és amelyet az appendix-interpretációk és -fordítások révén, hibásan, Bolyaira kényszerít. ------------------------------------------------------------------------ The 60-minute lecture is followed by a 10-minute break. Then we held a 30-60-minute discussion. ------------------------------------------------------------------------ The organizer of the seminar: László E. Szabó <http://hps.elte.hu/~leszabo> (email: leszabo(a)hps.elte.hu) -- L a s z l o E. S z a b o Theoretical Physics Research Group of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences Department of History and Philosophy of Science Eotvos University, Budapest H-1518 Budapest, Pf. 32, Hungary Phone/Fax: (36-1)372-2924 Mobil/SMS: (36) 20-366-1172 http://hps.elte.hu/~leszabo

23 years, 6 months

Open-access consciousness articles -- and how to find them on the Web (fwd)

by Stevan Harnad

---------- Forwarded message ---------- Date: Sat, 2 Nov 2002 12:25:18 +0000 From: Thomas Zoega Ramsoy <ramsoy(a)tiscali.dk> To: SEPTEMBER98-FORUM(a)LISTSERVER.SIGMAXI.ORG Subject: Open-access consciousness articles and how to find them on the Web Science & Consciousness Review http://psych.pomona.edu/scr/ has just released a new article on free science articles on the Internet. The article mentions many relevant ways of searching for reprints etc of scientific articles on consciousness, among them is the CogPrints Archive. Please go to http://psych.pomona.edu/scr/LN_Oct02_FreeScienceOnline.htm to see the full article. Sincerely, Thomas Zoega Ramsoy ____________________________ Thomas Zo�ga Rams�y Neuropsychologist The Lions Collegium http://www.lions-kollegiet.dk/ Tuborgvej 181 DK-1400 Copenhagen NV Homepage: http://www.ramsoy.dk (under construction) Managing Editor Science & Consciousness Review http://psych.pomona.edu/scr/ Moderator: SCR-NewsViews http://groups.yahoo.com/group/SCR-NewsViews/ and, Mind and Brain http://groups.yahoo.com/group/MindBrain/ Administrator Nordic Network for Consciousness Studies http://www.psyk.ku.dk/forsk/fora/nncs/

23 years, 6 months

new issues of Cognitive Systems Research

by rsun＠cecs.missouri.edu

New issues are now available COGNITIVE SYSTEMS RESEARCH Volume 3, Issue 3, Pages 271-554, 2002 =============================================================================== Cognitive Systems Research Volume 3, Issue 3, Pages 271-554 a special issue on situated and embodied cognition edited by Tom Ziemke TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction to the special issue on situated and embodied cognition, Pages 271-274 Tom Ziemke http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/B6W6C-46XHBH0-1/1/3fb9b1689e5f… Representation in dynamical and embodied cognition, Pages 275-288 Fred Keijzer http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/B6W6C-45H92WR-1/1/7418aabb1518… An ecological approach to embodiment and cognition, Pages 289-299 Naoya Hirose http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/B6W6C-45HWNG0-1/1/29d27bf1b778… Semantics, experience and time, Pages 301-337 Stephen E. Robbins http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/B6W6C-45M6B2X-1/1/98a589eed632… When is a cognitive system embodied?, Pages 339-348 Alexander Riegler http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/B6W6C-45HFF6Y-2/1/84e99cabef65… Cognitive task transformations, Pages 349-359 David de Leon http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/B6W6C-45HFF6Y-3/1/140319f8b44c… Operationalizing situated cognition and learning, Pages 361-383 Steven M. Kemp http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/B6W6C-45KSPCF-1/1/24a1f6377884… Interfaces of social psychology with situated and embodied cognition, Pages 385-396 Gun R. Semin and Eliot R. Smith http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/B6W6C-45H92WR-2/1/cdbdedfa258d… >From embodied to socially embedded agents - Implications for interaction-aware robots, Pages 397-428 Kerstin Dautenhahn, Bernard Ogden and Tom Quick http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/B6W6C-45JGW5T-1/1/4ebe8ecc9706… The physical symbol grounding problem, Pages 429-457 Paul Vogt http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/B6W6C-45JY928-2/1/9f933ec9575e… On the dynamics of robot exploration learning, Pages 459-470 Jun Tani and Jun Yamamoto http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/B6W6C-45NPDR9-1/1/30232225aeb2… Simulating activities: Relating motives, deliberation, and attentive coordination, Pages 471-499 William J. Clancey http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/B6W6C-45JY928-1/1/a63c8d94790e… Activity organization and knowledge construction during competitive interaction in table tennis, Pages 501-522 Carole Seve, Jacques Saury, Jacques Theureau and Marc Durand http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/B6W6C-45KSPCF-2/1/92cbefc31625… Situatedness in translation studies, Pages 523-533 Hanna Risku http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/B6W6C-45HFF6Y-1/1/f294067d693a… >From action to discourse: The bridging function of gestures, Pages 535-554 Wolff-Michael Roth http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/B6W6C-45HWNG0-2/1/ead6e8b30a44… =============================================================================== If you have questions about ScienceDirect, please locate your nearest Help Desk at http://www.info.sciencedirect.com/contacts. =============================================================================== See the following journal Web pages for subscription information for the journal Cognitive Systems Research: http://www.cecs.missouri.edu/~rsun/journal.html http://www.elsevier.com/locate/cogsys =================================================================== Professor Ron Sun, Ph.D CECS Department, 201 EBW phone: (573) 884-7662 University of Missouri-Columbia fax: (573) 882 8318 Columbia, MO 65211-2060 email: rsun(a)cecs.missouri.edu http://www.cecs.missouri.edu/~rsun ===================================================================

23 years, 6 months

2026

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

2002

2001

2000

1999

1998

1997

1996

1995

1994

1993

koglist November 2002