Below is the abstract of a forthcoming BBS target article
[Please note that this paper was in fact accepted and
archived to the web in February 2001 but the recent
move of BBS to New York delayed the Call until now.]
Can robots make good models of biological behaviour?
by
Barbara Webb
http://www.bbsonline.org/Preprints/Webb/
This article has been accepted for publication in Behavioral and Brain
Sciences (BBS), an international, interdisciplinary journal providing
Open Peer Commentary on important and controversial current research in
the biobehavioral and cognitive sciences.
Commentators must be BBS Associates or nominated by a BBS Associate. To
be considered as a commentator for this article, to suggest other
appropriate commentators, or for information about how to become a BBS
Associate, please reply by EMAIL within three (3) weeks to:
calls(a)bbsonline.org
The Calls are sent to 8000 BBS Associates, so there is no expectation
(indeed, it would be calamitous) that each recipient should comment
on every occasion! Hence there is no need to reply except if you wish
to comment, or to nominate someone to comment.
If you are not a BBS Associate, please approach a current BBS
Associate (there are currently over 10,000 worldwide) who is familiar
with your work to nominate you. All past BBS authors, referees and
commentators are eligible to become BBS Associates. A full electronic
list of current BBS Associates is available at this location to help
you select a name:
http://www.bbsonline.org/Instructions/assoclist.html
If no current BBS Associate knows your work, please send us your
Curriculum Vitae and BBS will circulate it to appropriate Associates to
ask whether they would be prepared to nominate you. (In the meantime,
your name, address and email address will be entered into our database
as an unaffiliated investigator.)
To help us put together a balanced list of commentators, please give
some indication of the aspects of the topic on which you would bring
your areas of expertise to bear if you were selected as a commentator.
To help you decide whether you would be an appropriate commentator for
this article, an electronic draft is retrievable from the online
BBSPrints Archive, at the URL that follows the abstract below.
_____________________________________________________________
Can robots make good models of biological behaviour?
Barbara Webb
Centre for Computational and Cognitive Neuroscience
Department of Psychology
University of Stirling
Stirling FK9 4LA
Scotland, U.K.
b.h.webb(a)stir.ac.uk
www.stir.ac.uk/psychology/Staff/bhw1/
KEYWORDS: models; simulation; animal behaviour; neuroethology;
robotics; realism; levels.
ABSTRACT: How should biological behaviour be modelled? A relatively
new approach is to investigate problems in neuroethology by building
physical robot models of biological sensorimotor systems. The
explication and justification of this approach are here placed within a
framework for describing and comparing models in the behavioural and
biological sciences. First, simulation models - the representation of a
hypothesis about a target system - are distinguished from several other
relationships also termed 'modelling' in discussions of scientific
explanation. Seven dimensions on which simulation models can differ are
defined and distinctions between them discussed:
(1) Relevance: whether the model tests and generates hypotheses
applicable to biology.
(2) Level: the elemental units of the model in the hierarchy from
atoms to societies.
(3) Generality: the range of biological systems the model can
represent.
(4) Abstraction: the complexity, relative to the target, or amount of
detail included in the model.
(5) Structural accuracy: how well the model represents the actual
mechanisms underlying the behaviour.
(6) Performance match: to what extent the model behaviour matches the
target behaviour
(7) Medium: the physical basis by which the model is implemented
No specific position in the space of models thus defined is the only
correct one, but a good modelling methodology should be explicit about
its position and the justification for that position. It is argued that
in building robot models biological relevance is more effective than
loose biological inspiration; multiple levels can be integrated; that
generality cannot be assumed but might emerge from studying specific
instances; abstraction is better done by simplification than
idealisation; accuracy can be approached through iterations of complete
systems; that the model should be able to match and predict target
behaviour; and that a physical medium can have significant advantages.
These arguments reflect the view that biological behaviour needs to be
studied and modelled in context, that is in terms of the real problems
faced by real animals in real environments.
http://www.bbsonline.org/Preprints/Webb/
___________________________________________________________
Please do not prepare a commentary yet. Just let us know, after having
inspected it, what relevant expertise you feel you would bring to bear
on what aspect of the article. We will then let you know whether it was
possible to include your name on the final formal list of invitees.
_______________________________________________________________________
*** SUPPLEMENTARY ANNOUNCEMENTS ***
(1) The authors of scientific articles are not paid money for their
refereed research papers; they give them away. What they want is to
reach all interested researchers worldwide, so as to maximize the
potential research impact of their findings.
Subscription/Site-License/Pay-Per-View costs are accordingly
access-barriers, and hence impact-barriers for this give-away
research literature.
There is now a way to free the entire refereed journal literature,
for everyone, everywhere, immediately, by mounting interoperable
university eprint archives, and self-archiving all refereed research
papers in them.
Please see: http://www.eprints.orghttp://www.openarchives.org/http://www.dlib.org/dlib/december99/12harnad.html
---------------------------------------------------------------------
(2) All authors in the biobehavioral and cognitive sciences are
strongly encouraged to self-archive all their papers in their own
institution's Eprint Archives or in CogPrints, the Eprint Archive
for the biobehavioral and cognitive sciences:
http://cogprints.soton.ac.uk/
It is extremely simple to self-archive and will make all of our
papers available to all of us everywhere, at no cost to anyone,
forever.
Authors of BBS papers wishing to archive their already published
BBS Target Articles should submit it to BBSPrints Archive.
Information about the archiving of BBS' entire backcatalogue will
be sent to you in the near future. Meantime please see:
http://www.bbsonline.org/help/
and
http://www.bbsonline.org/Instructions/
---------------------------------------------------------------------
(3) Call for Book Nominations for BBS Multiple Book Review
In the past, Behavioral and Brain Sciences (BBS) had only been able
to do 1-2 BBS multiple book treatments per year, because of our
limited annual page quota. BBS's new expanded page quota will make
it possible for us to increase the number of books we treat per
year, so this is an excellent time for BBS Associates and
biobehavioral/cognitive scientists in general to nominate books you
would like to see accorded BBS multiple book review.
(Authors may self-nominate, but books can only be selected on the
basis of multiple nominations.) It would be very helpful if you
indicated in what way a BBS Multiple Book Review of the book(s) you
nominate would be useful to the field (and of course a rich list of
potential reviewers would be the best evidence of its potential
impact!).
*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*
Please note: Your email address has been added to our user database for
Calls for Commentators, the reason you received this email. If you do
not wish to receive further Calls, please feel free to change your
mailshot status through your User Login link on the BBSPrints homepage,
useing your username and password above:
http://www.bbsonline.org/
For information about the mailshot, please see the help file at:
http://www.bbsonline.org/help/node5.html#mailshot
*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*
Below is the abstract of a forthcoming BBS target article
[Please note that this paper was in fact accepted and
archived to the web in February 2001 but the recent
move of BBS to New York delayed the Call until now.]
Can robots make good models of biological behaviour?
by
Barbara Webb
http://www.bbsonline.org/Preprints/Webb/
This article has been accepted for publication in Behavioral and Brain
Sciences (BBS), an international, interdisciplinary journal providing
Open Peer Commentary on important and controversial current research in
the biobehavioral and cognitive sciences.
Commentators must be BBS Associates or nominated by a BBS Associate. To
be considered as a commentator for this article, to suggest other
appropriate commentators, or for information about how to become a BBS
Associate, please reply by EMAIL within three (3) weeks to:
calls(a)bbsonline.org
The Calls are sent to 8000 BBS Associates, so there is no expectation
(indeed, it would be calamitous) that each recipient should comment
on every occasion! Hence there is no need to reply except if you wish
to comment, or to nominate someone to comment.
If you are not a BBS Associate, please approach a current BBS
Associate (there are currently over 10,000 worldwide) who is familiar
with your work to nominate you. All past BBS authors, referees and
commentators are eligible to become BBS Associates. A full electronic
list of current BBS Associates is available at this location to help
you select a name:
http://www.bbsonline.org/Instructions/assoclist.html
If no current BBS Associate knows your work, please send us your
Curriculum Vitae and BBS will circulate it to appropriate Associates to
ask whether they would be prepared to nominate you. (In the meantime,
your name, address and email address will be entered into our database
as an unaffiliated investigator.)
To help us put together a balanced list of commentators, please give
some indication of the aspects of the topic on which you would bring
your areas of expertise to bear if you were selected as a commentator.
To help you decide whether you would be an appropriate commentator for
this article, an electronic draft is retrievable from the online
BBSPrints Archive, at the URL that follows the abstract below.
_____________________________________________________________
Can robots make good models of biological behaviour?
Barbara Webb
Centre for Computational and Cognitive Neuroscience
Department of Psychology
University of Stirling
Stirling FK9 4LA
Scotland, U.K.
b.h.webb(a)stir.ac.uk
www.stir.ac.uk/psychology/Staff/bhw1/
KEYWORDS: models; simulation; animal behaviour; neuroethology;
robotics; realism; levels.
ABSTRACT: How should biological behaviour be modelled? A relatively
new approach is to investigate problems in neuroethology by building
physical robot models of biological sensorimotor systems. The
explication and justification of this approach are here placed within a
framework for describing and comparing models in the behavioural and
biological sciences. First, simulation models - the representation of a
hypothesis about a target system - are distinguished from several other
relationships also termed 'modelling' in discussions of scientific
explanation. Seven dimensions on which simulation models can differ are
defined and distinctions between them discussed:
(1) Relevance: whether the model tests and generates hypotheses
applicable to biology.
(2) Level: the elemental units of the model in the hierarchy from
atoms to societies.
(3) Generality: the range of biological systems the model can
represent.
(4) Abstraction: the complexity, relative to the target, or amount of
detail included in the model.
(5) Structural accuracy: how well the model represents the actual
mechanisms underlying the behaviour.
(6) Performance match: to what extent the model behaviour matches the
target behaviour
(7) Medium: the physical basis by which the model is implemented
No specific position in the space of models thus defined is the only
correct one, but a good modelling methodology should be explicit about
its position and the justification for that position. It is argued that
in building robot models biological relevance is more effective than
loose biological inspiration; multiple levels can be integrated; that
generality cannot be assumed but might emerge from studying specific
instances; abstraction is better done by simplification than
idealisation; accuracy can be approached through iterations of complete
systems; that the model should be able to match and predict target
behaviour; and that a physical medium can have significant advantages.
These arguments reflect the view that biological behaviour needs to be
studied and modelled in context, that is in terms of the real problems
faced by real animals in real environments.
http://www.bbsonline.org/Preprints/Webb/
___________________________________________________________
Please do not prepare a commentary yet. Just let us know, after having
inspected it, what relevant expertise you feel you would bring to bear
on what aspect of the article. We will then let you know whether it was
possible to include your name on the final formal list of invitees.
_______________________________________________________________________
*** SUPPLEMENTARY ANNOUNCEMENTS ***
(1) The authors of scientific articles are not paid money for their
refereed research papers; they give them away. What they want is to
reach all interested researchers worldwide, so as to maximize the
potential research impact of their findings.
Subscription/Site-License/Pay-Per-View costs are accordingly
access-barriers, and hence impact-barriers for this give-away
research literature.
There is now a way to free the entire refereed journal literature,
for everyone, everywhere, immediately, by mounting interoperable
university eprint archives, and self-archiving all refereed research
papers in them.
Please see: http://www.eprints.orghttp://www.openarchives.org/http://www.dlib.org/dlib/december99/12harnad.html
---------------------------------------------------------------------
(2) All authors in the biobehavioral and cognitive sciences are
strongly encouraged to self-archive all their papers in their own
institution's Eprint Archives or in CogPrints, the Eprint Archive
for the biobehavioral and cognitive sciences:
http://cogprints.soton.ac.uk/
It is extremely simple to self-archive and will make all of our
papers available to all of us everywhere, at no cost to anyone,
forever.
Authors of BBS papers wishing to archive their already published
BBS Target Articles should submit it to BBSPrints Archive.
Information about the archiving of BBS' entire backcatalogue will
be sent to you in the near future. Meantime please see:
http://www.bbsonline.org/help/
and
http://www.bbsonline.org/Instructions/
---------------------------------------------------------------------
(3) Call for Book Nominations for BBS Multiple Book Review
In the past, Behavioral and Brain Sciences (BBS) had only been able
to do 1-2 BBS multiple book treatments per year, because of our
limited annual page quota. BBS's new expanded page quota will make
it possible for us to increase the number of books we treat per
year, so this is an excellent time for BBS Associates and
biobehavioral/cognitive scientists in general to nominate books you
would like to see accorded BBS multiple book review.
(Authors may self-nominate, but books can only be selected on the
basis of multiple nominations.) It would be very helpful if you
indicated in what way a BBS Multiple Book Review of the book(s) you
nominate would be useful to the field (and of course a rich list of
potential reviewers would be the best evidence of its potential
impact!).
*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*
Please note: Your email address has been added to our user database for
Calls for Commentators, the reason you received this email. If you do
not wish to receive further Calls, please feel free to change your
mailshot status through your User Login link on the BBSPrints homepage,
useing your username and password above:
http://www.bbsonline.org/
For information about the mailshot, please see the help file at:
http://www.bbsonline.org/help/node5.html#mailshot
*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*
Header field too long (>1024)
----
Date: Thu, 28 Jun 2001 02:41:22 -0300 (ADT)
From: Lev Goldfarb <goldfarb(a)unb.ca>
To: ai(a)cs.stanford.edu, ai-stats(a)watstat.uwaterloo.ca, ail-l(a)austin.onu.edu,
allstat(a)jiscmail.ac.uk, annimab(a)listserv.hum.gu.se,
arpanet-bboards(a)edu.mit.lcs.mc, bayes-news(a)stat.cmu.edu,
biocomp(a)umiacs.umd.edu, cogpsy(a)phil.uu.nl, colt(a)cs.uiuc.edu,
community(a)mlnet.org, connectionists(a)cs.cmu.edu,
dalist(a)fuqua.duke.edu,
datamine-l(a)nautilus-sys.com, dbworld(a)cs.wisc.edu,
editor(a)kdnuggets.com,
empiricists(a)csli.stanford.edu, fuzzy-mail(a)dbai.tuwien.ac.at,
ga-list(a)aic.nrl.navy.mil, gann-list(a)cs.cmu.edu,
genetic-programming(a)cs.stanford.edu, hybrid-list(a)cs.ua.edu,
idss(a)socs.uts.edu.au, ie-list(a)cs.ucl.ac.uk, inductive(a)unb.ca,
kdd(a)gte.com, machine-learning(a)egroups.com, ml(a)ics.uci.edu,
neuron(a)cattell.psych.upenn.edu, neuron(a)hpl.hp.com,
news-announce-conferences(a)uunet.uu.net, nl-kr(a)cs.rpi.edu,
planning(a)asu.edu, reinforce(a)cs.uwa.edu.au, sigart(a)vaxa.isi.edu,
simulation(a)ufl.edu, uai(a)cs.orst.edu, ai-medicine(a)smi.stanford.edu
Subject: What is a structural represetation?
(Our apologies if you receive multiple copies of this announcement)
Dear colleagues,
The following paper, titled "What is a structural representation?",
( http://www.cs.unb.ca/profs/goldfarb/struct.ps )
which we believe to be, in a sense, the first one formally addressing the
issue of structural representation and proposing the formal ETS model,
should be of interest to many researchers in various areas.
It implies, in particular, that the properly understood (non-trivial)
"structural" representations cannot be "replaced" by the classical
numeric, e.g. vector-space-based, representations. Moreover, the concept
of "structural" representation emerging from the ETS model is not the one
familiar to all of you.
(The abstract of the paper is appended below; for a change, the default
paper size is A4. Unfortunately for some, the language of the paper is of
necessity quite formal, since the main concepts do not have any analogues
and therefore must be treated carefully.)
Although the proposed model was motivated by, and will be applied to, the
"real" problems coming from such areas as pattern recognition, machine
learning, data mining, cheminformatics, bioinformatics, and many others,
in view of the required radical rethinking that must now go into its
implementations, at this time, we can only offer a very preliminary
discussion, in the following companion paper, addressing the model's
potential applications in chemistry
http://www.cs.unb.ca/profs/goldfarb/cadd.ps
(please keep in mind that the last paper was written on the basis of an
earlier draft of the paper we are announcing now and it will be updated
accordingly next month).
We intend to discuss the paper shortly on INDUCTIVE mailing list.
(To subscribe, send to INDUCTIVE-SERVER(a)UNB.CA the following text
SUBSCRIBE INDUCTIVE FIRSTNAME LASTNAME)
We would greatly appreciate any comments regarding both of the above
papers.
Best regards,
Lev Goldfarb Tel: 506-458-7271
Faculty of Computer Science Tel(secret.): 453-4566
University of New Brunswick Fax: 506-453-3566
P.O. Box 4400 E-mail: goldfarb(a)unb.ca
Fredericton, N.B., E3B 5A3 Home tel: 506-455-4323
Canada
http://www.cs.unb.ca/profs/goldfarb/goldfarb.htm
****************************************************************************
*
WHAT IS A STRUCTURAL REPRESENTATION?
Lev Goldfarb, Oleg Golubitsky, Dmitry Korkin
Faculty of Computer Science
University of New Brunswick
Fredericton, NB, Canada
We outline a formal foundation for a "structural" (or "symbolic")
object/event representation, the necessity of which is acutely felt in
all sciences, including mathematics and computer science. The proposed
foundation incorporates two hypotheses:
1) the object's formative history must be an integral part of the
object representation and
2) the process of object construction is irreversible, i.e. the
"trajectory" of the object's formative evolution does not intersect
itself.
The last hypothesis is equivalent to the generalized axiom of (structural)
induction. Some of the main difficulties associated with the transition
from the classical numeric to the structural representations appear to be
related precisely to the development of a formal framework satisfying
these two hypotheses. The concept of (inductive) class--which has inspired
the development of this approach to structural representation--differs
fundamentally from the known concepts of class.
In the proposed, evolving transformations system (ETS), model, the class
is defined by the transformation system---a finite set of weighted
transformations acting on the class progenitor--and the generation of the
class elements is associated with the corresponding generative process
which also induces the class typicality measure.
Moreover, in the ETS model, a fundamental role of the object's class in
the object's representation is clarified: the representation of an object
must include the class.
From the point of view of ETS model, the classical discrete
representations, e.g. strings and graphs, appear now as incomplete
special cases, the proper completion of which should incorporate the
corresponding formative histories, i.e. those of the corresponding strings
or graphs.
Evan Thompson bucsuztatoja Varelarol, RIP.
udv kgy
-------- Original Message --------
Subject: Obituary for F Varela in PSYCHE
Date: Wed, 20 Jun 2001 18:33:05 -0400
From: evant(a)yorku.ca
To: Adrian Palacios <adrianp(a)entelchile.net>,Alva Noë
<anoe(a)cats.ucsc.edu>,Al Kaszniak <kaszniak(a)u.arizona.edu>,Anthony
Freeman <Anthony(a)imprint.co.uk>,Axel Cleeremans
<axcleer(a)ulb.ac.be>,Arthur Zajonc <agzajonc(a)amherst.edu>,"B. Alan
Wallace" <maitri(a)gte.net>,brian cantwell smith
<smithbc(a)indiana.edu>,"Christopher D. Green" <christo(a)yorku.ca>,
ddennett(a)emerald.tufts.edu,Dan Zahavi <d_zahavi(a)yahoo.com>, David
Chalmers <chalmers(a)arizona.edu>,Denis Fisette
<fisette.denis(a)uqam.ca>,Diane Zorn <dianezorn(a)hotmail.com>,Diego
Cosmelli <diego.cosmelli(a)chups.jussieu.fr>,"Donald T. Dryden"
<dtd1(a)acpub.duke.edu>,dumouchel paul <dumouchel.paul(a)uqam.ca>,Eduard
Marbach <eduard.marbach(a)philo.unibe.ch>,Franz Reichle
<reichle(a)bluewin.ch>,Hanna Robert <Robert.Hanna(a)Colorado.EDU>,
jagdish(a)yorku.ca,"hugh r. wilson" <hrwilson(a)yorku.ca>, Jessica Riskin
<jriskin(a)MIT.EDU>,John Brockman <brockman(a)edge.org>,
tsotsos(a)cs.yorku.ca,Jonathan Cole
<jonathan_cole(a)new-forest.org>,Jonathan Shear <jcs(a)richmond.infi.net>,
Kampis Gyorgy <gk(a)hps.elte.hu>,Kathleen Akins <kathleea(a)sfu.ca>, Kay
Toombs: ;,Keith Sutherland <keith(a)imprint.co.uk>,Kevin Mulligan
<Kevin.Mulligan(a)lettres.unige.ch>,oregan(a)ext.jussieu.fr, Lis Nielsen
<lnielsen(a)u.arizona.edu>,"Louis C. Charland"
<charland(a)julian.uwo.ca>,Luiz Pessoa
<pessoa(a)ln.nimh.nih.gov>,"Margaret.Donaldson(a)ed.ac.uk"
<ejua56(a)holyrood.ed.ac.uk>,Max Velmans <psa01mv(a)gold.ac.uk>,Merlin
Donald <donaldm(a)psyc.queensu.ca>,Natalie Depraz <frj(a)ccr.jussieu.fr>,
thompson(a)scar.utoronto.ca,Pier Luigi Luisi <luisi(a)ifp.mat.ethz.ch>, Piet
Hut <piet(a)IAS.EDU>,tbt7(a)columbia.edu, Ronald de Sousa
<sousa(a)chass.utoronto.ca>,sandylemberg(a)juno.com, Shaun Gallagher
<gallaghr(a)canisius.edu>,Stevan Harnad
<harnad(a)coglit.ecs.soton.ac.uk>,Steven Tainer <tainer(a)earthlink.net>,
biossr@panther.gsu.edu,SSRLRC@aol.com, Susan Oyama
<s.oyama(a)prodigy.net>,mddy(a)musica.mcgill.ca,valerie bonnardel
<valerie.bonnardel(a)sunderland.ac.uk>,Vittorio Gallese
<gallese(a)ipruniv.cce.unipr.it>,William Seager <seager(a)scar.utoronto.ca>,
arisaka(a)usfca.edu,Yves Candau <ycandau(a)cybercable.fr>,Jean Petitot
<petitot(a)poly.polytechnique.fr>,Jean-Michel Roy
<roy(a)heraclite.ens.fr>,Antoine Lutz <antoine.lutz(a)chups.jussieu.fr>
Dear Friends,
Attached to this message is an obituary for Francisco Varela which I
have
written for the on-line journal PSYCHE. I thought I would share it with
you
directly.
Regards,
Evan
Csaba Pleh, Professor of psychology
Dept of Information Management Technical University of Budapest
Budapest, Sztoczek utca 2 H-1111
Phone: (361) 4631832 Fax: (361)45631225
also at the Dept of Psychology, University of Szeged
Editor in chief HUNGARIAN REVIEW OF PSYCHOLOGY
Home: Budakeszi, Zichy P. u 4, H-2092
Phone: (36)(23)453933,06203278922 Fax: (36)(23)453932
email: pleh(a)itm.bme.hu Homepage: www.jate.u-szeged.hu/~pleh
---------- Forwarded message ----------
Date: Wed, 20 Jun 2001 12:05:35 GMT+100
From: URBAN Robert <RURBAN(a)IZABELL.elte.hu>
To: tanar(a)izabell.elte.hu
Subject: meghivo
Resent-Date: Wed, 20 Jun 101 12:05:37 +100
Resent-From: PLEH(a)izabell.elte.hu
Resent-To: pleh(a)sol.cc.u-szeged.hu
2001. junius 25-en, hetfin 17 orakor a 301-es teremben
Thomas Szasz eliadast tart elsi magyarul megjelent koenyvenek
(Szertartasos kemia - Drogmitologiak) kapcsan.
Minden erdeklidit szeretettel varunk!
The Austrian Science and Research Liaison Office, Budapest,
the Department of History and Philosophy of Science at Eötvös
University, Budapest, the Austrian Society of
Organismic-Systemic Research and Theory, Vienna
cordially invite you to their workshop
REDUCTIONISM AND HOLISM IN SCIENCES AND IN
PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE
Place: Eötvös University, Lágymányos Campus
1117 Budapest, Pázmány sétány 1 / Room 654
Date: 20/22 June 2001
PROGRAM
Wednesday June 20
15.00
Opening
15.30
Markus Peschl (Department for Philosophy of Science and Social
Studies of Science, University of Vienna,
Vienna)
Challenging the Reductionist Approach in Cognitive Science
16.30
Péter Szegedi (Department of History and Philosophy of Science,
Eötvös University, Budapest)
Correspondence and Incommensurability
17.30
Manfred Fraunlob (Viennese Fund for Integration, Vienna)
Discrimination or Reintegration ? On Legitimate and Illegitimate
Reductionism in Science and Philosophy
Thursday June 21
9.30
Karl Edlinger (Natural Historical Museum, Vienna)
The Theory of Organismic Constructions: Bridging the Gap between
Holism and Reductionism
10.30
György Kampis (Department of History and Philosophy of Science,
Eötvös University, Budapest)
Complexity in Natural Sciences
11.30
Péter Érdi (Department of Biophysics, KFKI Research Instititue for
Particle and Nuclear Physics of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences,
Budapest)
Social Systems as Complex Interactive Networks
12.30
Lunch Break
14.30
Günther Fleck (Military Psychology Service, Vienna)
Philosophies of Science and their Origins in Ways of Thinking: A
Psychological Reconstruction
15.30
Katalin Martinás (Department of Atomic Physics, Eötvös University,
Budapest)
Reductionism and Holism in Economic Theory
16.30
László Ropolyi (Department of History and Philosophy of Science,
Eötvös University, Budapest)
Information and Interpretation
Friday June 22
9.30
Simon Jencius (Department of Psychology, University of Vienna,
Vienna)
Reductionism and Holism in Personality Science
10.30
Csaba Pléh (Depatment of Psychology, University of Szeged, Szeged
and Technical University, Budapest)
Types of Classical Reductionism in Psychology and Present Day
Cognitive Trends
11.30
Ralf Risser (Department of Sociology, University of Vienna, Vienna)
The Role of Psychology in the Applied Field of Traffic and Transport
12.30
Closing
For further information please contact:
Béla Rásky
Osztrák Kelet- és Délkelet-Európa Intézet (OSI)
Budapesti Kirendeltsége
Úri utca 53.
H-1014 Budapest
Tel/Fax: 375 68 46
eMail: bela.rasky(a)univie.ac.at
http://www.nexus.hu/osi-bp
Ropolyi László
Eötvös Loránd Tudományegyetem
Tudománytörténet és Tudományfilozófia Tanszék
Pázmány Péter sétány 1.
H-1117 Budapest
Tel: 372 2949 Fax: 372 2924
eMail: ropolyi(a)hps.elte.hu
http://hps.elte.hu
Non-member submission from ["Haller Jozsef" <Haller(a)koki.hu>]
---
Kedves Kollegak!
2000 oszen megrendeztuk az elso Magyar Visselkedes-elettani Konferenciat. A
rendezveny sikeresnek
volt mondhato. A resztvevok szamat 60 korulire becsultuk, igy a reszvetel
magasabb volt mint amire
elozetesen szamitottunk. A letszam, a hangulat, valamint a resztvevok
velemenye alapjan arra gondolunk,
hogy a kezdemenyezest folytatnunk es fejlesztenunk erdemes. Ugy tunt, hogy
azok, akik idehaza
viselkedes-elettannal foglalkoznak, profitalhatnanak egy szervezett keretek
kozotti egyuttmukodesbol. A
konferencia resztvevoi Dr. Gyertyan Istvant, Dr. Haller Jozsefet es Dr.
Levai Gyorgyot felhatalmaztak,
hogy a fent emlitett fejlesztesen gondolkozzanak, illetve felvegyek a
kapcsolatot mar letezo tudomanyos
tarsasagokkal ez ugyben.
Magyarorszagon nehany eve letezik a Magyar Kiserleti Pszichfiziologiai
Tarsasag, amely be van
jegyezve, es rendelkezik nemzetkozi kapcsolatokkal is. A tarsasag elnoke
Karmos Gyorgy professzor,
vezetosegenek tagjai Dr. Bardos Gyogy es Dr. Molnar Mark. A Magyar
Kiserleti Pszichofiziologiai
Tarsasag kezdemenyezte azt, hogy az esetleges uj, es a mar letezo tarsasag
egyesitse eroit.
Dr. Bardos Gyogy, Dr. Gyertyan Istvan, Dr. Haller Jozsef, Dr. Karmos Gyorgy,
Dr. Levai Gyorgy, es Dr.
Molnar Mark (risztvevok abc-sorrendben) megbeszeltek az ugyet a 2001. evi
MITT konferencian, es a
kovetkezo javaslatot tarjak a Magyar Kiserleti Pszichofiziologiai Tarsasag
tagjai, az I. Magyar Viselkedes-
Elettani konferencia resztvevoi, valamint minden tovabbi erdeklodo ele:
1) A Magyar Kiserleti Pszichofiziologiai Tarsasag, valamint az I. Magyar
Viselkedes-Elettani
Konferencia resztvevoibol alakult ad hoc kozosseg egyesitene eroit, es egy
kozos tarsasagot alapitana
"Magyar Pszichofiziologiai es Viselkedes-Elettani Tarsasag" (Hungarian
Psychophysiology and
Behavioural Neuroscience Society) neven;
2) A "Magyar Pszichofiziologiai es Viselkedes-Elettani Tarsasag" a Magyar
Kiserleti
Pszichofiziologiai Tarsasag jogutodja volna, es orokolne annak szervezeti
elozmenyeit es nemzetkozi
kapcsolatait.
3) Az uj tarsasag celjai az lenne, hogy
3.a) rendszeresen szervezendo konferenciak reven elosegitse a
tudomanyagon beluli hazai
kapcsolattartast, informaciocseret es egyuttmukodesek kialakulasat;
3.b) segitse tagjainak integralasat a hazai es kulfoldi tudomanyos
eletbe.
4) A tarsasag, a fenti celoknak megfeleloen, egyreszt ugyelne arra, hogy a
tematikus
konferenciak rendszeresen megrendezesre keruljenek masreszt kapcsolatokat
epitene ki olyan hazai es
nemzetkozi tudomanyos tarsasagokkal, amelyek tematikailag kozel allnak
hozza. E kapcsolatepites soran
azonban nem szeretne elveszteni indvidualitasat. A kapcsolatepitesben az uj
tarsasag egyreszt a Magyar
Kiserleti Pszichofiziologiai Tarsasag elozmenyeire epitene, de azt tovabb
is bovitene. A fent emlitettek
informalisan felvettek a kapcsolatot a Magyar Idegtudomanyi Tarsasaggal, es
ugy tunik, hogy a
kapcsolatepites lehetseges. A letrejovo kapcsolat szorossaga tovabbi
targyalasok eredmenyeitol fugg.
Felmerult az a lehetoseg, hogy a Magyar Pszichofiziologiai es Viselkedes-
Elettani Tarsasag -
indivdualitasat megorizve - a MITT szekciojakent is mukodhetne, aminek
szamos elonye lenne (pl.
szoros kapcsolatot tarthatnank olyan kollegakkal, akiknek tevekenysege
szorosan kapcsolodik a
mienkhez, is egyszerusodne az uj tarsasag penzugyi-adminisztrativ
ugyintezese is) . Az uj tarsasag
felvenne a kapcsolatot nemzetkozi szervezetekkel is (pl. European Brain and
Behavioral Society,
European Behavioral Pharmacology Society, Psychopharmacology Society, etc; a
nevsor bovitheto).
5) Az uj tarsasagon beluli informaciocsere (konferenciak kozott) e-mailen,
egy mar letezo
levelezesi listan (BehavPhysiolist(a)yahoogroups.com), es esetleg egy kesobb
letrehozando honlapon
alapulna.
6) A kapcsolattartas modja miatt a tarsasag mukodtetese olcso volna. Ennel
fogva tagdijak
szedeset elsosorban az uj tarsasag nemzetkozi kapcsolatainak fenntartasa
erdekeben tervezzuk. Igy
valamilyen - kesobb meghatarozando, de velhetoleg alacsony - tagdij
szedesevel szamolnunk kell. Bar a
tagdij a tarsasagok neuralgikus pontja, itt olyan tagdijrol van szo, amely
konkret elonyokkel jarna a
fizetoknek. A tagdijszedes technikai korulmenyeit meg ki kell dolgoznunk.
A kovetkezokben tisztelettel felkerunk mindenkit arrra, hogy
A) amennyiben a Magyar Kiserleti Pszichofiziologiai Tarsasag tagja volt,
jelezze, hogy tagja
maradna-e az uj tarsasagnak;
B) amennyiben nem volt tagja a Magyar Kiserleti Pszichofiziologiai
Tarsasagnak, jelezze, hogy
be kivan-e lepni az ujba;
C) mondja el velemenyet a fenti tervezetrol egeszeben es amennyiben kivanja,
reszleteiben is.
Minden kritikat, javaslatot orommel veszunk;
D) irja meg, hogy az identitas megorzese mellett egyetertene-e azzal, hogy
az uj tarsasag MITT
szekciokent mukodjon;
E) nepszerusitse ezt a kezdemenyezest azok koreben, akikhez az informacio
valamilyen okbol
nem jutott el. E level vegen ott van mindazok neve es e-mail cime, akihez
valoszinuleg eljutott a level.
Elore is elnezest kerunk azoktol, akiknek e-mail cimet nem sikerult
megtudnunk.
Valaszukat Dr. Haller Jozsef e-mail cimere kerjuk (haller(a)koki.hu). Kesobb,
ha mar a levelezolista
megbizhatoan mukodik, a kapcsolattartast azon bonyolitanank.
Tisztelettel,
Dr. Bardos Gyogy
Dr. Gyertyan Istvan
Dr. Haller Jozsef
Dr. Karmos Gyorgy
Dr. Levai Gyorgy
Dr. Molnar Mark
gyorgy.bardos(a)elte.hu
bardosgy(a)ludens.elte.hu
i.gyertyan(a)richter.hu
haller(a)koki.hu
karmos(a)cogpsyphy.hu
levay(a)elender.hu
levayg(a)itsa.ucsf.edu
molnar(a)cogpsyphy.hu
Jozsef Haller, PhD
Institute of Experimental Medicine
1450 Budapest, P..O. Box 67
Hungary
Phone: (36) 12100819 ext. 126
Fax: (36) 12100811
e-mail: haller(a)koki.hu
Department of History and Philosophy of Science
Eotvos University
Budapest, Pazmany P. setany 1/A
PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE SEMINAR
(http://hps.elte.hu/seminar)
________________________________________________
18 June 4:00 PM 6th floor 6.54
(Language: English)
B a r r y L o e w e r
Philosophy, Rutgers University, New York
David Lewis formulated a principle (he calls it "the Principal
Principle") that he claims tells how chances (and beliefs concerning
chances) should guide belief. The principle is that if the chance at t
of A's occurring is x then your credence at that A will occur should be
x as long as you don't possess any inadmissible information. The
principle is intuitive and explains a lot of statistical practice.
However Lewis thinks it is incompatible with his favorite theory of the
nature of chance and more generally with a metaphysical doctrine called
"Humean Supervenience." I argue that Lewis is mistaken about this.
Further more I show that while there can be no "justification" of the
principle that shows that following it will lead to successful results
one can provide a kind of "rationale" for the principle based on Lewis'
account of the nature of chance.
________________________________________________________
End of the 2000/2001 program
________________________________________________________
I would like to thank you all, the lecturers and the audience,
your participation and the stimulating atmosphere of the seminars!
See you in September!
László E. Szabó
The organizer of the seminar
--
Laszlo E. Szabo
Department of Theoretical Physics
Department of History and Philosophy of Science
Eotvos University, Budapest
H-1518 Budapest, Pf. 32, Hungary
Phone/Fax: (36-1)372-2924
Home: (36-1) 200-7318
Mobil/SMS: (36) 20-366-1172
http://hps.elte.hu/~leszabo
Kedves Listatagok !
Az OPNI Addiktológiai Osztályára klinikai szakpszichológust keresünk, aki
kognitív vagy egyéb csoportpszichoterápiák iránt érdeklődik, illetve ebben
képzett. Érdeklődhettek az osztályvezető főorvosnál: Dr. Takách Gáspár:
391-5364 vagy 202-2418
Üdv Tamás
Molnár Tamás szakpszichológus
World Congress on Neuroinformatics
Vienna University of Technology
Austria
September 24-29, 2001
deadline for abstract submission: June 30
http://www.neuroinformatics.cc/