The CEU Philosophy Department cordially invites you to a lecture
by
Thomas Pink (King's College, London))
on
Promising and Moral Personality
Friday,17 April, 5.00 PM, Zrinyi 14, Room 412
ABSTRACT
What is the basis of promising and the obligation to keep promises? Is promising founded
on human nature itself or is it, as Hume thought, the product of convention? The paper
will argue that Hume's conventionalist approach is incoherent. The basis of promissory
obligation is instead natural, and lies in two very different and contrasting aspects of
human nature.
Besides Hume there will be critical discussion of the theories of Grotius, Raz and Finnis,
and of what a natural law account of the morality of a practice such as promising might
involve.
Kriszta Biber
Department Coordinator
Philosophy Department
Tel: 36-1-327-3806
Fax: 36-1-327-3072
E-mail: biberk(a)ceu.hu
Show replies by date
The CEU Philosophy Department cordially invites you to a lecture
by
Thomas Pink (King's College, London))
on
Promising and Moral Personality
Friday,17 April, 5.00 PM, Zrinyi 14, Room 412
ABSTRACT
What is the basis of promising and the obligation to keep promises? Is promising founded
on human nature itself or is it, as Hume thought, the product of convention? The paper
will argue that Hume's conventionalist approach is incoherent. The basis of promissory
obligation is instead natural, and lies in two very different and contrasting aspects of
human nature.
Besides Hume there will be critical discussion of the theories of Grotius, Raz and Finnis,
and of what a natural law account of the morality of a practice such as promising might
involve.
Kriszta Biber
Department Coordinator
Philosophy Department
Tel: 36-1-327-3806
Fax: 36-1-327-3072
E-mail: biberk(a)ceu.hu
The CEU Philosophy Department cordially invites you to a lecture
by
Thomas Pink (King's College, London))
on
Promising and Moral Personality
Friday,17 April, 5.00 PM, Zrinyi 14, Room 412
ABSTRACT
What is the basis of promising and the obligation to keep promises? Is promising founded
on human nature itself or is it, as Hume thought, the product of convention? The paper
will argue that Hume's conventionalist approach is incoherent. The basis of promissory
obligation is instead natural, and lies in two very different and contrasting aspects of
human nature.
Besides Hume there will be critical discussion of the theories of Grotius, Raz and Finnis,
and of what a natural law account of the morality of a practice such as promising might
involve.
Kriszta Biber
Department Coordinator
Philosophy Department
Tel: 36-1-327-3806
Fax: 36-1-327-3072
E-mail: biberk(a)ceu.hu