A Magyar Filozo1fiai Ta1rsasa1g meghi1vja O2nt e1s
munkata1rsait felovaso1 u2le1se1re.
Julius Moravcsik
Stanfordi Egyetem (USA):
Justice as Sharing
Az elo3ada1s helye e1s ido3pontja:
ELTE BTK Kari Tana1csterem
(1052 Budapest V., Pesti B. u. 1, I. emelet 1).
1994. ma1jus 5., csu2to2rto2k d.u. 4 o1ra.
Az elo3ada1s a szerzo3nek a ko2zeljo2vo3ben megjeleno3
Individual Ideals and Ideal Communities c. ko2nyve1nek 5.
fejezete1r_l sza1mol be.
Moravcsik professzor u1r elo3ada1sa1nak tartalma1t a
ko2vetkezo3kben foglalja o2ssze:
The lecture will start with a few introductory remarks about
``normative communitarianism'', and with a few comments
situating this chapter in the framework of the book.
a. Sharing posited as a human universal; all
humans want to share something with
somebody - problem is to the extent domain
of beneficiaries and list of goods to be
shared.
b. Brief sketch of objections to well known
alternatives such as Rawls' conception of
justice as fairness.
c. Defence of the claim of sharing as a
psychological universal. Conceptual anatomy of
sharing. Sharing non-competitive, competitive
goods, spontaneous and reasoned sharing, etc.
d. Sketch of how sharing can be the underlying
foundation for distributive justice.
e. Treatment of some major types of humans
resisiting the appeal to share.
f. Sharing applied to power (primarily political);
power as responsibility, as a good.
g. The pragmatics of sharing. No decision procedure.
Normative communitarianism as a background.
Several of the examples and illustrations are from
South Africa, where I spent last September lecturing
at several universities, and where I encountered
serious problems involving justice, challenging the
philosopher
Show replies by date