A Magyar Filozo1fiai Ta1rsasa1g meghi1vja O2nt e1s munkata1rsait felovaso1 u2le1se1re. Julius Moravcsik Stanfordi Egyetem (USA): Justice as Sharing Az elo3ada1s helye e1s ido3pontja: ELTE BTK Kari Tana1csterem (1052 Budapest V., Pesti B. u. 1, I. emelet 1). 1994. ma1jus 5., csu2to2rto2k d.u. 4 o1ra. Az elo3ada1s a szerzo3nek a ko2zeljo2vo3ben megjeleno3 Individual Ideals and Ideal Communities c. ko2nyve1nek 5. fejezete1r_l sza1mol be. Moravcsik professzor u1r elo3ada1sa1nak tartalma1t a ko2vetkezo3kben foglalja o2ssze: The lecture will start with a few introductory remarks about ``normative communitarianism'', and with a few comments situating this chapter in the framework of the book. a. Sharing posited as a human universal; all humans want to share something with somebody - problem is to the extent domain of beneficiaries and list of goods to be shared. b. Brief sketch of objections to well known alternatives such as Rawls' conception of justice as fairness. c. Defence of the claim of sharing as a psychological universal. Conceptual anatomy of sharing. Sharing non-competitive, competitive goods, spontaneous and reasoned sharing, etc. d. Sketch of how sharing can be the underlying foundation for distributive justice. e. Treatment of some major types of humans resisiting the appeal to share. f. Sharing applied to power (primarily political); power as responsibility, as a good. g. The pragmatics of sharing. No decision procedure. Normative communitarianism as a background. Several of the examples and illustrations are from South Africa, where I spent last September lecturing at several universities, and where I encountered serious problems involving justice, challenging the philosopher