koglist

koglist@maillist.ttk.hu

4 participants
5929 discussions

[koglist] Theoretical Philosophy Forum, Zsolt Kapelner

by Laszlo E. Szabo

THEORETICAL PHILOSOPHY FORUM Institute of Philosophy Faculty of Humanities, Eötvös University Address: Múzeum krt. 4/i, Budapest 24 October (Wednesday) 5:00 PM Room 226 Zsolt Kapelner Institute of Philosophy, Eötvös University, Budapest A more radical translation ___________________________________ Abstracts and printable program (poster) are available from the web site of the Forum: http://phil.elte.hu/tpf (Please feel free to post the program in your institution!) The Forum is open to everyone, including students, visitors, and faculty members from all departments and institutes! Format: 60 minute lecture, coffee break, 60 minute discussion. The organizer of the Forum: László E. Szabó (leszabo(a)phil.elte.hu) -- L a s z l o E. S z a b o Professor of Philosophy DEPARTMENT OF LOGIC, INSTITUTE OF PHILOSOPHY EOTVOS UNIVERSITY, BUDAPEST http://phil.elte.hu/leszabo

13 years, 8 months

[koglist] MISTAKES IN POLITICS: Public Lecture by ALAN RYAN--5:30 p.m., Thursday, October 25.

by Krisztina Biber

The Department of Philosophy & the Provost Office at CEU cordially invite you to a public lecture by ALAN RYAN Princeton University on MISTAKES IN POLITICS at 17:30 on Thursday, October 25, 2012 CEU-Auditorium, 1051 Bp., Nádor u. 9. There is a large, and to many people alarming, body of literature on the erroneous views of the ordinary voter; not only do most voters hold many views that are strikingly at odds with the facts, they resist information that tends to overturn these views, and where they do not, they re-adopt their false views more or less quickly. This poses an obvious problem for democratic politics: if politicians are responsive to the (erroneous) views of the electorate, will they not be forced to pursue irrational and counter-productive policies, both domestically or internationally; they are not responsive to the views of the electorate, do they not lack democratic credibility? Many writers believe that there are structural features of – modern rather than ‘Athenian’ – democracy that dissolve this problem, and the democracy functions ‘in spite of itself.’ The lecture will argue that this is unduly optimistic, and that there is too much room for the interested manufacture of erroneous opinions by elites, whether benign, malign, or simply trying to maintain their economic advantages, to give us many grounds for cheerfulness about contemporary democratic politics. Alan Ryan was educated at Balliol College, Oxford, and taught politics at New College, and as a visiting professor at Hunter College, CUNY, The University of the Witwatersrand, the University of Texas at Austin and UC Santa Cruz. From 1988 to 1996 he was Professor of Politics at Princeton, and one of the founding faculty of the UCHV. After completing thirteen years as head of New College, Oxford, he returned to Princeton in 2009 and now serves as the Director of the undergraduate program on Values in Public Life. Kind regards, Zsuzsanna Bajó Assistant Office of Provost & the Pro-Rector for Hungarian and EU Affairs Central European University H-1051 Budapest, Nador u. 9. Tel.: (+ 36 1) 327 3000/2188 Fax: (+ 36 1) 327 3007 ( tel:%28%2B%2036%201%29%20327%203007 ) E-mail: bajozs(a)ceu.hu ( mailto:bajozs@ceu.hu ) Web: www.ceu.hu

13 years, 8 months

[koglist] Meghívó - BME Kognitív Szemináriumsorozat / Invitation - BME Cognitive Seminar Series

by Attila Keresztes

We cordially invite you to the next lecture of the BME Cognitive Seminar Series: Date & Time: October 29, Monday, 12:00-13:00 Location: BME, XI., Egry József utca 1., T. ép 515. *Sensory noise processing in the human brain: insights from object recognition studies on healthy and amblyopic subjects* *Bankó Éva* Information Technology Department, Pázmány Péter Catholic University Neurobionics Research Lab http://vision.itk.ppke.hu/ Personal webpage: http://digitus.itk.ppke.hu/~banko/ <http://digitus.itk.ppke.hu/%7Ebanko/> Abstract Human visual object recognition is fast and efficient when viewing conditions are good. However, under low visibility conditions the visual system must recruit additional processing resources to handle the noisy and deteriorated visual images, thus object recognition becomes more effortful. Even though this is often the case, little is known about the neural mechanisms engaged in processing of noisy images. This is even more important since adding noise to images is widely used in decision-making studies to modulate task difficulty while not taking into account the confound introduced by the increased sensory processing demands. In a series of experiments on healthy and amblyopic subjects we have pinned down both in time and space the active processes associated with sensory noise processing using faces with decreased phase-coherence. Namely, phase noise affects the electrophysiological responses in the first 300 ms following stimulus onset that is unrelated to changes in task-difficulty; most importantly, there is an increase in the ERP single-trial (i.e. true) response amplitudes between 200 - 300 ms after stimulus onset -- involving the P2 component -- the noise-modulation of which is diminished in amblyopia. This amblyopic deficit measured on the P2 component predicted the severity of the noise-related behavioral impairments and could not be explained by an overall increase in stimulus uncertainty or task difficulty in the case of noisy stimuli, which have been also proposed previously as explanations of the noise-related ERP changes. On the other hand, the noise-modulation of the N170 component of the ERP responses -- reflecting structural processing of face images -- was similarly affected by the presence of noise in the amblyopic and the fellow eye of amblyopes, suggesting that the noise-induced decrease of the N170 could simply be due to the decrease in the face content of the images. Furthermore, we also showed that processing of phase randomized as compared to intact faces is associated with increased fMRI responses in specific areas of the lateral occipital cortex. These results suggest that efficient processing of noisy images depends on the engagement of visual cortical mechanisms that take place after the early structural processing of visual objects has been completed and is reflected in the P2 component of the ERP response sand most likely localized to a retinotopic part of the lateral occipital cortex that has been implicated in grouping and image segmentation. -- Attila Keresztes Junior Research Fellow Budapest University of Technology and Economics Dept. of Cognitive Science, Egry József u. 1, Budapest 1111, Hungary Tel: +36 1 4633525

13 years, 8 months

[koglist] [CDC Seminars] ANNOUNCEMENT: CDC Seminar, Liz Robinson, Wednesday, October 17, 5 PM

by Mikolaj Hernik

PLEASE NOTE: Our seminar room has a limited capacity. Please arrive early to ensure you get a seat. The talk will begin promptly at 5. The next talk in the CDC Seminar series will be given by: Liz Robinson, The University of Warwick Date: Wednesday, October 17, 2012, 5 PM Location: Cognitive Development Center, Hattyú u. 14, 3rd floor To Believe or Disbelieve what we’re Told? Understanding about Transfer of Knowledge Abstract: I shall contrast two different bases for judging whether or not an apparently well-intentioned informant’s testimony is likely to be reliable. In the first, the informant serves as a proxy for the self, gaining the knowledge that we would gain if we had that same experience. For example, our informant looks out the window and tells us that the taxi has arrived. Assuming the informant is well-intentioned, it is reasonable to believe that the taxi has indeed arrived. Under circumstances such as these we can make an accurate evaluation of the truth of what we are told, but we gain only specific knowledge. For gaining generalizable and culture-specific knowledge such as names or function of objects, we need to determine whether our informant has characteristics indicative of being generally knowledgeable, such as having a history of accuracy. Our prediction of trustworthiness will be rough and ready, and could just be based on rules of thumb rather than understanding of knowledge transfer. I shall summarize experiments examining children’s understanding that a person with a history of inaccuracy will not necessarily be unreliable in the future (their errors might be due to circumstances that no longer hold), while a person with a history of accuracy will not necessarily be reliable (they might have had external help that is no longer available). Taking such circumstances into account demands understanding of knowledge transfer. Cognitive Science Events at CEU: http://cognitivescience.ceu.hu/events _______________________________________________ Subscribe by sending an empty mail to seminars-subscribe(a)cdc.ceu.hu Unsubscribe by sending an empty mail to seminars-unsubscribe(a)cdc.ceu.hu

13 years, 8 months

[koglist] BCCCD13 poster submission deadline TODAY, midnight CET

by Dora Kampis

Dear Colleagues, this is a reminder, that for the Budapest CEU Conference on Cognitive Development 2013 (BCCCD13) we are accepting poster abstracts until tonight, October 15, until midnight CET (GMT+1). You can submit a 250 word abstract here: http://asszisztencia.hu/bcccd/index.php?menu=7 Please visit our website to learn more about our invited speakers and preliminary program, as well as for registration and hotel information. http://www.asszisztencia.hu/bcccd/ We hope to see you in Budapest in January! Best, The BCCCD13 organizing committee

13 years, 8 months

[koglist] reminder: invitation to a talk on`Caring for Autonomy: Becoming Self-Governing With Others` Help` by John Christman - 16 October 5.30 PM

by Krisztina Biber

The CEU Department of Philosophy cordially invites you to a talk (as part of its Departmental Colloquium series) by John Christman (Penn State University) on `Caring for Autonomy: Becoming Self-Governing With Others` Help` Tuesday, 16 October, 2012, 5.30 PM, Zrinyi 14, Room 412 Working Abstract Respecting the autonomy of agents grounds various obligations to others such as non-interference, deference to her authority over self-regarding decisions, limitations on paternalism, and so on. According to a broadly liberal moral sensibility, respecting others? in this way implies accepting (in some sense) the values they autonomously hold even if they are judged problematic, immoral, self-destructive, or otherwise non-ideal. However, in discussions of such respect, it is generally assumed that persons expressing that respect (or not) have no direct bearing on whether the subject of that respect is herself autonomous. But in many situations, persons interact in a way that helps establish or re-establish the autonomy of one or both of these agents themselves. For example, the would-be paternalist may be a committed aid worker whose professional obligation is to facilitate the process of re-establishing autonomy for vulnerable victims of trauma. In such scenarios, the usual lines between hard and soft paternalism, as well as the standard liberal rejection of the former, do not apply. Still, it would be wrong for the aid worker to simply impose her views of a decent life on the struggling person. How, then, do we reformulate restrictions on paternalism and other such normative strictures grounded in respect for autonomy in scenarios where the relationship between client and aid worker is itself a crucial part of the process that results in the self-governing agency of the client? This paper explores these issues and argues that such (very typical) scenarios indicate that conceptions of autonomy must view the self as diachronic as well as socially constituted but also must be sensitive to the ways autonomy can be (re-)established only with others? help. In particular, the obligation to remain relatively neutral toward the content of others? values in showing respect for their autonomy (the broad liberal sensibility) must be reformulated to take into account the way interpersonal dynamics themselves help establish the autonomy with which persons hold the values that they hold. These observations are applied to cases of aid and care where such questions are central.

13 years, 8 months

[koglist] Szépe György búcsúztatása

by Mária Sipos

Kedves Kollégák! A Szépe Györgyről október 14-én tartandó megemlékezés részletes programja látható a http://www.nytud.hu/hirek/szepe/ oldalon.

13 years, 8 months

[koglist] Theoretical Philosophy Forum, Gabor Hofer-Szabo

by Laszlo E. Szabo

THEORETICAL PHILOSOPHY FORUM Institute of Philosophy Faculty of Humanities, Eötvös University Address: Múzeum krt. 4/i, Budapest 17 October (Wednesday) 5:00 PM Room 226 Gábor Hofer-Szabó Institute of Philosophy, Research Center for the Humanities Hungarian Academy of Sciences Trying to understand a new no-go result: the PBR theorem ___________________________________ Abstracts and printable program (poster) are available from the web site of the Forum: http://phil.elte.hu/tpf (Please feel free to post the program in your institution!) The Forum is open to everyone, including students, visitors, and faculty members from all departments and institutes! Format: 60 minute lecture, coffee break, 60 minute discussion. The organizer of the Forum: László E. Szabó (leszabo(a)phil.elte.hu) -- L a s z l o E. S z a b o Professor of Philosophy DEPARTMENT OF LOGIC, INSTITUTE OF PHILOSOPHY EOTVOS UNIVERSITY, BUDAPEST http://phil.elte.hu/leszabo

13 years, 8 months

[koglist] invitation to a talk on`Caring for Autonomy: Becoming Self-Governing With Others` Help` by John Christman - 16 October 5.30 PM

by Krisztina Biber

13 years, 8 months

[koglist] reminder: invitation to a talk on"Belief and its bedfellows" by Tim Bayne - 9 October, 5.30 PM

by Krisztina Biber

The CEU Department of Philosophy cordially invites you to a talk (as part of its Departmental Colloquium series) by Tim Bayne (University of Oxford) on "Belief and its bedfellows" Tuesday, 9 October, 2012, 5.30 PM, Zrinyi 14, Room 412 ABSTRACT This paper attempts to draw some lessons about the nature of belief from considerations concerning beliefs’ ‘bedfellows’: states that are not paradigmatic beliefs but are belief-like in certain important respects. I examine the merits of various proposals about how to categorize such states, before turning to the question of what such states might be able to teach us concerning the nature of belief, the propositional attitudes, and mental states more generally.

13 years, 8 months

Jump to page:

2026

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

2002

2001

2000

1999

1998

1997

1996

1995

1994

1993

koglist