The CEU Department of Philosophy cordially invites you to a talk
(as part of its Departmental Colloquium series)
by
Hanoch Ben-Yami (CEU)
on
Libet’s Confusions
Tuesday, 3 March 2015, 5.30 PM, Zrinyi 14, Room 412
ABSTRACT
I try to demonstrate a possible contribution of philosophy to the
sciences by exposing conceptual confusions in Libet’s empirical work on
free will. The elimination of these confusions show that his research
failed to establish what he claimed it does.
Libet measured patterns of electric potential in subjects’ brain while
asking them to report when they became conscious of an urge or decision
to perform a certain action. Relying on the results he concluded that
the urge or decision does not affect action, and hence that we have no
free will. However, his research relies on a false picture of what free
action involves. Libet thought that free action should be caused by a
mental event – an urge or decision – which is the cause of action. But
this mechanical picture of the mental is not entailed from our criteria
for classifying an action as voluntary, free, intentional and so on. An
action is free if the agent would have done something else in the same
circumstances had he been given a good reason for that, if he knew what
he was doing, if he didn’t act under duress, and so on. Accordingly,
Libet’s experiment was irrelevant to the question, whether the subjects
acted out of their free will. And moreover, of course they acted freely:
had they had a good reason to act earlier or later, say, they would have
done so.
Krisztina Biber
Department of Philosophy
Coordinator
------------------------------------------
Central European University
Nador u. 9. | 1051 Budapest, Hungary
Office: + 36.1.327.3806 | biberk(a)ceu.hu | www.ceu.hu
THEORETICAL PHILOSOPHY FORUM
Institute of Philosophy
Faculty of Humanities, Eötvös University
Address: Múzeum krt. 4/i, Budapest
CANCELLATION
Márton Gömöri's February 25 lecture is canceled due to illness.
László E. Szabó
_______________________________
Abstracts and printable program (poster) are available from the web
site of the Forum: http://phil.elte.hu/tpf (Please feel free to post
the program in your institution!)
The Forum is open to everyone, including students, visitors, and faculty
members from all departments and institutes! Format: 60 minute lecture,
coffee break, 60 minute discussion.
The organizer of the Forum: Laszlo E. Szabo
(leszabo(a)phil.elte.hu)
--
L a s z l o E. S z a b o
Professor of Philosophy
DEPARTMENT OF LOGIC, INSTITUTE OF PHILOSOPHY
EOTVOS UNIVERSITY, BUDAPEST
http://phil.elte.hu/leszabo
*apologies for multiple postings*
VII. Dubrovnik Conference on Cognitive Science
Metacognition and Reasoning
May 21-23, 2015
Dubrovnik
Participants are invited to submit their work as a poster with 200 word abstracts
We invite poster submissions from all areas of cognitive science
Abstract submission deadline EXTENDED: March 6
(Submission is now open!)
Invited speakers
Klaus Fiedler
Ruprecht-Karls-Universität Heidelberg
Asher Koriat
University of Haifa
Joelle Proust
Jean Nicod Institute, CNRS, Paris
Nicholas Shea
King's College London
Valerie Thompson
University of Saskatchewan
Maggie Toplak
York University
Website: http://www.cecog.eu/ducog/page_invitation.php
REMINDER:
The CEU Department of Cognitive Science cordially invites you to its
talk of 2015 (as part of its Departmental Colloquium series)
by
Ferenc Huoranszki (CEU Department of Philosophy)
Date: Wednesday, February 25, 2015 - 17:00-18:30
Location: Department of Cognitive Science, CEU, Frankel Leó út 30-34.,
Room G15
The Issue about Dispositions
Most of us think that some objects are fragile, some chemicals are
poisonous, and some people are honest. But philosophers, or at least
some of them, find such claims puzzling. The reason why they find them
puzzling is that being fragile, being poisonous, and being honest are
dispositional predicates. In this talk I shall tell a story about why
many philosophers from the early 20th century on have found the
ascription of dispositions puzzling, and how some have attempted to
resolve that puzzle. I shall also briefly indicate which significance,
if any, such debates might have to empirical research concerning the
micro-foundation of macroscopic behavior.
- See more at:
http://cognitivescience.ceu.edu/events/2015-02-25/departmental-colloquium-f…
We're looking forward to see you there (Frankel Leo u. 30-34) !
Cognitive Science Events at CEU: http://cognitivescience.ceu.hu/events
_______________________________________________
Subscribe by sending an empty mail to seminars-subscribe(a)cdc.ceu.hu
Unsubscribe by sending an empty mail to seminars-unsubscribe(a)cdc.ceu.hu
THEORETICAL PHILOSOPHY FORUM
Institute of Philosophy
Faculty of Humanities, Eötvös University
Address: Múzeum krt. 4/i, Budapest
25 February (Wednesday) 5:00 PM Room 226
Márton Gömöri
Department of Logic, Institute of Philosophy
Eötvös University Budapest
Only conjunction
_______________________________
Abstracts and printable program (poster) are available from the web
site of the Forum: http://phil.elte.hu/tpf (Please feel free to post
the program in your institution!)
The Forum is open to everyone, including students, visitors, and faculty
members from all departments and institutes! Format: 60 minute lecture,
coffee break, 60 minute discussion.
The organizer of the Forum: Laszlo E. Szabo
(leszabo(a)phil.elte.hu)
--
L a s z l o E. S z a b o
Professor of Philosophy
DEPARTMENT OF LOGIC, INSTITUTE OF PHILOSOPHY
EOTVOS UNIVERSITY, BUDAPEST
http://phil.elte.hu/leszabo
The CEU Department of Philosophy cordially invites you to a talk
(as part of its Departmental Colloquium series)
by
James ladyman (university of bristol)
on
observing symmetries in physics
Tuesday, 24 February 2015, 5.30 PM, Zrinyi 14, Room 412
ABSTRACT
There is a debate about whether so-called local symmetries in physics
have direct empirical consequences. In this paper I defend the orthodoxy
according to which they don’t against a recent argument by Hilary
Greaves and David Wallace. In the course of doing so I will first
explain what physical symmetries are, emphasising the distinction
between transformations of representations and transformations of
physical systems, and then the differences between various kinds of
symmetry. I will then explicate the nature of so-called ‘Galileo’s Ship
Scenarios’, and go on to argue that that so far it has not been shown
that there are any that are only explicable by local symmetries.
Krisztina Biber
Department of Philosophy
Coordinator
------------------------------------------
Central European University
Nador u. 9. | 1051 Budapest, Hungary
Office: + 36.1.327.3806 | biberk(a)ceu.hu | www.ceu.hu
> Begin forwarded message:
>
> Evolutionary Developmental Biology: Current debates
>
> This satellite meeting, to be held one day before the EHBEA (http://www.ehbea2015.org <http://www.ehbea2015.org/>) Helsinki conference, has been generously sponsored by the Galton Institute, EHBEA, and the Journal of Evolutionary Psychology.
>
> Time: Saturday the 28th of March 2015 (from 9:00-16:00)
>
> Location: University of Helsinki (Fabianinkatu 33, 2nd floor)
>
> Topic: In recent years there has been much discussion about how to conceptualize the relationship between development and evolution: are developmental trajectories selected for, and how much does development influence evolutionary process? In this event we will excoriate the fundamental assumptions at work in several influential existing arguments, to look at the view of development within the modern synthesis, and to look at criticisms of this synthesis.
>
> Registration: There is a separate registration fee for this meeting: 50 € for full EHBEA members, 25 € for student EHBEA members and 80 € for everyone else. This includes teas/coffees, buffet lunch, and wine reception. You can sign up for the event by registering and paying the participation fee here http://www.ehbea2015.org/ <http://www.ehbea2015.org/>. Up to 70 participants can register. Registration is on a first come, first served basis. Refunds are not possible. Please note that the registration does not include hotel accommodation.
>
> Speakers and titles:
>
> Open reaction norms and human flexibility
> H. Clark Barrett, University of California, Los Angeles
>
> (Epi)mutational dynamics and bet hedging
> Ben Dickins, Nottingham Trent University
>
> Information as a loom to weave development and evolution
> Sinead English, University of Oxford
>
> Developmental changes in aggression and body size: an evolutionary perspective
> Tim W. Fawcett, University of Bristol
>
> Developmental niche construction
> Emma Flynn, Durham University
>
> Developmental plasticity in the European starling: Empirical observations and evolutionary interpretations
> Daniel Nettle, Newcastle University
>
> Organisers:
> Clark Barrett – UCLA
> Tom Dickins – Middlesex University
> Willem Frankenhuis - Radboud University Nijmegen
>
> Questions: Contact Tom Dickins at T.Dickins(a)mdx.ac.uk <mailto:T.Dickins@mdx.ac.uk>
>
> For abstracts see: http://tomsnonacademicwork.blogspot.co.uk/2015/02/meeting-evolutionary-deve… <http://tomsnonacademicwork.blogspot.co.uk/2015/02/meeting-evolutionary-deve…>