Szevasztok, az alabbi levelet kuldtem Prof. Margitay Tihamernak.
Ha valaki az egesszel vagy egy reszevel nem ert egyet, at is veheti (reszleteket megbeszeljuk), nem ragaszkodom a megszunesehez igy 20+ ev utan, de en nem kivanom folytatni.
udv kgy
> Anfang der weitergeleiteten Nachricht:
>
> Von: George Kampis <kampis.george(a)gmail.com>
> Betreff: MAKOG megszunese
> Datum: 9. November 2024 um 13:24:27 MEZ
> An: Margitay Tihamér <margitay.tihamer(a)gtk.elte.hu>
> Kopie: George Kampis <kampis.george(a)gmail.com>
>
> Szia Tihamer, Marta halala :( ota Te gyakorlod az Alapitvanyban az alapitoi jogokat.
> Mint a Kuratorium elnoke hivatalosan tajekoztatlak, hogy az Alapitvanyt 2025 marc 31.-evel meg kivanom szuntetni. Az indok az, hogy szerintem okafogyotta valt, bar a(z egyik?) legregebbi magyar levlistan, a koglist-en meg fogom hirdetni. Ket konkret celbol jott letre, az evenkenti kognitiv konferencia es a BSCS (Budapest Semester in Cognitive Science, foleg Amerikai program) szervezese es adminisztracioja. Mindketto evek ota nincsen. Az egesz nemzetkozi cognive science mozgalom onallo tudomanykent haldoklik, mikozben beepult pl. a pszichologiaba.
> A konyvelovel beszeltem, azt hiszem ez ennyi. Neked nincs az egesszel tennivalod a tudomasulvetelen kivul, valamikor megkapod a 30kft :) toket.
> udv gy
Logic and Philosophy of Science Seminar
Department of Logic, Institute of Philosophy
Eötvös Loránd University Budapest
Múzeum krt. 4/i Room 224
_____________________________________________
P R O G R A M
The seminar is held in hybrid format, in person (Múzeum krt. 4/i Room 224)
and online. Zoom Meeting link:
https://us02web.zoom.us/j/889933315?pwd=Q3U3V3VQdXpXckhJYWRrcWRiMUhhQT09
8 November (Friday) 4:15 - 6:15 PM Room 224 + ONLINE
Fabio Lampert
Department of Philosophy, University of Vienna
A priori knowledge and our limits
Abstract: There is a venerable argument stated and defended in multiple
ways, since the Early Middle Ages, which attempts to show that there is no
free will or moral responsibility if human actions were infallibly
predicted in the past – by a divine being, supercomputer, or what have you.
The Spanish philosopher and theologian Luis de Molina (1535-1600)
formulated one of the clearest versions of this argument, only to reject
its main inferential move without any argument. For this reason, Molina’s
’solution’ to the puzzle was by and large ignored. I will argue, however,
that technology stemming from the works of Saul Kripke (in particular, the
thesis of the necessity of identity and some instances of contingent a
priori knowledge) provides the tools to generate an argument motivating the
Molinist solution to the puzzle in question. Molina didn’t have an argument
because he didn’t have Kripke. But we did.
______________________________
Seminar website: http://lps.elte.hu/lps
The seminar is open to everyone, including students, visitors, and
faculty members
from all departments and institutes! Format: 60 minute lecture, coffee
break, 60 minute discussion.
Organizers: Márton Gömöri and Zalán Molnár
Dear All,
The CEU Department of Cognitive Science and the Center for Cognitive Computation (CCC) invites you to the upcoming event of the Budapest Computational Neuroscience Forum<https://ccc.ceu.edu/budapest-computational-neuroscience-forum>.
Speaker: József Konczer<https://konczer.github.io/>
Title: Statistical Games, Playful approach to statistics
Abstract: This work contains the mathematical exploration of a few prototypical games in which central concepts from statistics and probability theory naturally emerge. The first two kinds of games are termed Fisher and Bayesian games, which are connected to Frequentist and Bayesian statistics, respectively. Later, a more general type of game is introduced, termed Statistical game, in which a further parameter, the players' relative risk aversion, can be set. In this work, we show that Fisher and Bayesian games can be viewed as limiting cases of Statistical games. Therefore, Statistical games can be viewed as a unified framework, incorporating both Frequentist and Bayesian statistics. Furthermore, a philosophical framework is (re-)presented -- often referred to as minimax regret criterion -- as a general approach to decision making.
The main motivation for this work was to embed Bayesian statistics into a broader decision-making framework, where, based on collected data, actions with consequences have to be made, which can be translated to utilities (or rewards/losses) of the decision-maker. The work starts with the simplest possible toy model, related to hypothesis testing and statistical inference. This choice has two main benefits: i.) it allows us to determine (conjecture) the behaviour of the equilibrium strategies in various limiting cases ii.) this way, we can introduce Statistical games without requiring additional stochastic parameters. The work contains game theoretical methods related to two-player, non-cooperative games to determine and prove equilibrium strategies of Fisher, Bayesian and Statistical games. It also relies on analytical tools for derivations concerning various limiting cases.
Time: 17:30 Tuesday, 5 November 2024.
Location: CEU Budapest (1051 Budapest, Nádor u. 15.) N15. room 203.
Zoom: Meeting ID: 976 1541 3014<https://ceu-edu.zoom.us/j/97615413014?pwd=BbaIDK56amazlaex84ukFP3MEurhMX.1> Passcode: 525888
Should you have any inquiries about the series, please contact Mihály Bányai<mailto:mihaly.s.banyai@gmail.com>.
Please, be informed that video/photo recording might take place at the event and the edited version of the video material might be published to communicate or promote CEU's activities. Please, find our Privacy Notice here<https://www.ceu.edu/privacy>.
Best regards,
Ildikó Varga
Department Coordinator (Budapest)
Department of Cognitive Science
[cid:ccecb7df-0ac9-4d85-9b7f-73dad69412e4]
H-1051 Budapest
Nádor u. 15. FT room 404.
tel: +36-1 327-3000 2941
http://www.ceu.edu<http://www.ceu.edu/>
http://cognitivescience.ceu.edu<http://cognitivescience.ceu.edu/>
______________________________________________
Subscribe by sending an empty mail to talks-subscribe(a)cogsci.ceu.edu
Unsubscribe by sending an empty mail to talks-unsubscribe(a)cogsci.ceu.edu
Logic and Philosophy of Science Seminar
Department of Logic, Institute of Philosophy
Eötvös Loránd University Budapest
Múzeum krt. 4/i Room 224
_____________________________________________
P R O G R A M
The seminar is held in hybrid format, in person (Múzeum krt. 4/i Room 224)
and online. Zoom Meeting link:
https://us02web.zoom.us/j/889933315?pwd=Q3U3V3VQdXpXckhJYWRrcWRiMUhhQT09
8 November (Friday) 4:15 - 6:15 PM Room 224 + ONLINE
Fabio Lampert
Department of Philosophy, University of Vienna
A priori knowledge and our limits
Abstract: There is a venerable argument stated and defended in multiple
ways, since the Early Middle Ages, which attempts to show that there is no
free will or moral responsibility if human actions were infallibly
predicted in the past – by a divine being, supercomputer, or what have you.
The Spanish philosopher and theologian Luis de Molina (1535-1600)
formulated one of the clearest versions of this argument, only to reject
its main inferential move without any argument. For this reason, Molina’s
’solution’ to the puzzle was by and large ignored. I will argue, however,
that technology stemming from the works of Saul Kripke (in particular, the
thesis of the necessity of identity and some instances of contingent a
priori knowledge) provides the tools to generate an argument motivating the
Molinist solution to the puzzle in question. Molina didn’t have an argument
because he didn’t have Kripke. But we did.
______________________________
Seminar website: http://lps.elte.hu/lps
The seminar is open to everyone, including students, visitors, and
faculty members
from all departments and institutes! Format: 60 minute lecture, coffee
break, 60 minute discussion.
The organizers: Márton Gömöri and Zalán Molnár