==================================================================
*** CALL RESPONSE INSTRUCTIONS ***
==================================================================
Please DO NOT respond to this email. If you wish to submit a proposal for
commentary and/or suggest potential commentators, please go to the new
Online Commentary Proposal System at the following URL:
http://www.bbsonline.org/perl/commentary/commproposal?authordir=Suddendorf-…
* If you only wish to suggest potential commentators, please ignore prompts to
submit a proposal with expertise information.
* If you experience technical difficulties, please email bbs(a)bbsonline.org.
* Please respond to this Call no later than January 29, 2007
NOTE: Behavioral and Brain Sciences (BBS) is an international, interdisciplinary
journal providing Open Peer Commentary on important and controversial current
research in the biobehavioral and cognitive sciences. Commentators must be BBS
Associates, or suggested by a BBS Associate. If you are not a BBS Associate, please
follow the instructions linked below:
http://www.bbsonline.org/Instructions/associnst.html
==================================================================
** Target Article Information **
==================================================================
To help you decide whether you would be an appropriate commentator for this
article, an unedited, uncorrected target article is retrievable at the URL that
follows the abstract and keywords below. This unedited draft has been prepared only
for potential commentators who wish to nominate themselves for formal commentary
invitation. Please DO NOT write a commentary until you receive a formal invitation.
If you are invited to submit a commentary, a copyedited, corrected version of this
paper will be posted in the invitation letter. The commentary invitation list is
compiled by the Editors so as to balance proposals, areas of expertise, and
frequency of prior commentaries in BBS.
TITLE: The evolution of foresight: What is mental time travel and is it unique to
humans?
AUTHORS: Thomas Suddendorf and Michael C. Corballis
ABSTRACT: In a dynamic world, mechanisms allowing prediction of future situations
can provide a selective advantage. We suggest that memory systems differ in the
degree of flexibility they offer for anticipatory behavior and put forward a
corresponding taxonomy of prospection. The adaptive advantage of any memory system
can only lie in what it can contributes for future survival. The most flexible is
episodic memory, which we suggest is part of a more general faculty of mental time
travel that allows us not only to go back in time, but also to foresee, plan, and
shape virtually any specific future event. We review comparative studies and find
that, in spite of increased research in the area, there is as yet no convincing
evidence for mental time travel in non-human animals. We submit that mental time
travel is not an encapsulated cognitive system, but instead comprises several
subsidiary mechanisms. A theater metaphor serves as an analogy for the kind of
mechanisms required for effective mental time travel. We propose that future
research should consider these mechanisms in addition to direct evidence of
future-directed action. We maintain that the emergence of mental time travel in
evolution was a crucial step towards our current success.
KEYWORDS: cognitive evolution, comparative cognition, episodic memory, memory
systems, mental time travel, planning, prospection
FULL TEXT: http://www.bbsonline.org/Preprints/Suddendorf-04122006/Referees/
==================================================================
*** CALL RESPONSE INSTRUCTIONS ***
==================================================================
Please DO NOT respond to this email. If you wish to submit a proposal for
commentary and/or suggest potential commentators, please go to the new
Online Commentary Proposal System at the following URL:
http://www.bbsonline.org/perl/commentary/commproposal?authordir=Suddendorf-…
* If you only wish to suggest potential commentators, please ignore prompts to
submit a proposal with expertise information.
* If you experience technical difficulties, please email bbs(a)bbsonline.org.
* Please respond to this Call no later than January 29, 2007
NOTE: Behavioral and Brain Sciences (BBS) is an international, interdisciplinary
journal providing Open Peer Commentary on important and controversial current
research in the biobehavioral and cognitive sciences. Commentators must be BBS
Associates, or suggested by a BBS Associate. If you are not a BBS Associate, please
follow the instructions linked below:
http://www.bbsonline.org/Instructions/associnst.html
==================================================================
==================================================================
Barbara Finlay - Editor
Paul Bloom - Editor
Behavioral and Brain Sciences
bbs(a)bbsonline.org
http://www.bbsonline.org
-------------------------------------------------------------------
Új tagként kérek segítséget. Olyan olvasmányok érdekelnek, amelyek a
rekurzió értelmezését taglalják a természetes emberi nyelvekben. Főleg
magyar és angol szövegeket szeretnék megismerni.
Kovács Ferenc
György Gergely
Institute for Psychological Research
Hungarian Academy of Sciences
*Learning 'about' versus learning 'from other minds: *
*The role of ostensive cues in triggering pedagogical knowledge transfer
in human infants***
Tuesday, 23 January, 2007, 5 PM
CEU Department of Philosophy, 1051 Budapest, Zrínyi u. 14, 4th floor,
rm. 412.**
* Abstract*
By the end of their first year human infants start to exhibit a number
of species-unique social cognitive competences (such as social
referencing, imitative learning of novel means, or proto-declarative
pointing) that involve triadic interactions in ostensive communicative
cuing contexts. The currently dominant interpretation of these early
social-cognitive phenomena assumes that their primary function is to
serve /social motives/ (such as intersubjective sharing of mental
states). In this talk I shall contrast this view with an alternative
interpretation based on the theory of human 'pedagogy' (Csibra &
Gergely, 2006; Gergely & Csibra, 2005, 2006) which assumes that
ostensively cued triadic interactions serve primarily the /epistemic
/function of transferring new and relevant cultural knowledge about
referents to infants. The theory argues that others' referential
manifestations during triadic interactions are typically framed by
specific types of /ostensive-communicative cues/ for which infants show
early sensitivity and preference. These include eye-contact, contingent
turn-taking reactivity, the prosodic intonation pattern of motherese,/
/and/ /addressing infants by their own name/./ Such ostensive cues
trigger in infants the interpretation that the other exhibits a
communicative intention addressed to them to manifest new and relevant
information for them to fast learn about the referent. It is
hypothesized that ostensive cues can act as an 'interpretation switch'
directing infants to construe others' referential knowledge
manifestations as pedagogical 'teaching' events. I shall review recent
evidence from studies of relevance-guided selective imitative learning
and of infants' differential interpretation of others' referential
emotion expressions during the second year that provide convergent
empirical support for the hypothesized interpretation-modulating role of
ostensive cuing in early infancy.
The CEU Philosophy Department and the Center for Hellenic Traditions cordially invite you to a lecture
by
FILIP GRGI*
(Institiute of Philosophy, Zagreb and University of Rijeka, Fellow at Center for Hellenic Traditions, CEU)
on
"SEXTUS EMPIRICUS ON THE POSSIBILITY OF INQUIRY"
5.00 PM, Tuesday, 16 January, Zrinyi 14, room 412
Abstract
At the beginning of the second book of his Outlines of Pyrrhonism Sextus Empiricus raises the question how can the Pyrrhonist inquire into something of which he has no knowledge. This is a question of vital importance for the Pyrrhonists, who insist that we should suspend judgment about everything and who characterize themselves as perpetual inquirers. I will discuss Sextus solution to this problem. He seems to accept the idea that in order to inquire into something one must have some concept of it, and that such an antecedent concept does not imply the existence of its object. I will try to show that this is just a dialectical concession to his opponents.
FILIP GRGI* is a research fellow at the Institute of Philosophy in Zagreb and a visiting lecturer at the Department of Philosophy, University of Rijeka. His research interest is in ancient philosophy, especially Aristotle and skepticism. His publications include articles in Ancient Philosophy, Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie, Phronesis and elsewhere.
Kriszta Biber
Department Coordinator
Philosophy Department
Tel: 36-1-327-3806
Fax: 36-1-327-3072
E-mail: biberk(a)ceu.hu
Kedves Kollegak,
tobbek keresere ujra (ugy tunik, hozzajuk nem jutott el) kuldom/juk
a 2007 evi konferencia felhivasat. Hatarido-alkuval .-) es egyebekkel
kapcsolatban kerem, hogy valoban a szervezoket keressek (cf lent).
makog(a)cogpsyphy.hu <makog(a)cogpsyphy.hu>
Jo konferenciazast es Boldog Uj Evet!
udv Kampis Gyorgy
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Időpont: 2007. január 19-21.
Helyszín: Eger
Regiszrtáció határideje:
2007. január 8.
Örömmel értesítünk minden kedves érdeklődőt, hogy a 2007-ben megrendezésre kerülő MAKOG konferencia szervezését elkezdtük. A várható részvételi díj kb. 10.000 Ft (amely tartalmazza a szállást, regisztrációt, pólót, absztrakt füzetet, ellátást, a konkrét összeg a szállás függvényében változhat, részletes információ a regisztrációnál).
További kérdésekkel és észrevételekkel forduljanak a szervezőkhöz.