----- Original Message -----
From: Boros János
To: Aladár Zichy ; Andras Mink ; Andras Kertesz ; Andrea Clausen ; bacso(a)emc.elte.hu ; Balazs.Gulyas(a)neuro.hu ; Beszélő ; dr. Mikes Éva ; Dr.Stark ; Eors Szathmary ; Fehér Márta ; FREUND, Tamas ; Gal Egon ; George Kampis
Sent: Tuesday, September 21, 2004 8:02 AM
Subject: BorosJ
,Kedves Kollégák, BArátaim, két programra hivom fel figyelmeteket, mellékelve, üdvözlettel,
P h i l o s o p h y o f S c i e n c e C o l l o q u i u m
Department of History and Philosophy of Science
Eotvos Lorand University, Budapest
Room 6.54 (6th floor) Monday 4:00 PM
Pazmany P. setany 1/A Budapest, Hungary
Phone/Fax: (36-1) 372 2924
http://hps.elte.hu/seminar
27 September 4:00 PM 6th floor 6.54
(Language: English, except if all participants speak Hungarian)
L a s z l o E. S z a b o
Theoretical Physics Research Group
Department of History and Philosophy of Science
Eotvos Lorand University, Budapest
Does principle of relativity hold in relativistic physics?
Abstract: http://hps.elte.hu/seminar/2004/September/#2
___________________________________
The 60-minute lecture is followed by a 10-minute break. Then we hold a
30-60-minute discussion. The participants may comment on the talks and
are encouraged to initiate discussion through the Internet. The
comments should be written in the language of the presentation.
The organizer of the colloquium: Laszlo E. Szabo (email: leszabo(a)hps.elte.hu)
--
L a s z l o E. S z a b o
Theoretical Physics Research Group of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences
Department of History and Philosophy of Science
Eotvos University, Budapest
http://hps.elte.hu/leszabo
*Előadás a BME Kognitív Tudományi Központ*
*házi kollokvium sorozata keretében:*
*Előadó: **Laurence B. Leonard (Purdue University)*
*Cím:* *The Crosslinguistic Study of Children with Specific Language
Impairment*
*Absztrakt:*
Children with specific language impairment (SLI) show a significant
deficit in their language ability but appear to be functioning normally
in other areas. Their hearing is normal, they earn age-appropriate
scores on nonverbal tests of intelligence, they do not show symptoms
characteristic of autism, and they exhibit no clear signs of
neurological impairment. Children with SLI who are acquiring English
often experience a mild to moderate deficit in vocabulary and sentence
length but a more serious deficit in the use of grammatical morphology
(e.g., saying /Mommy like eat ice cream /instead of /Mommy like*s to
*eat ice cream/). The purpose of this presentation is to show that a
clear understanding of this profile, or other profiles of SLI, requires
careful study of SLI across languages. Examples will be presented of
very different symptoms of SLI depending on the type of language (e.g.,
English, Swedish, Italian, Cantonese) being acquired. Implications for
language treatment will also be discussed.
*Idő:* 2004 szeptember 30 (*kivételesen csütörtök*), 16 óra
*Hely:* BME, St. 320.
Minden érdeklődőt szeretettel várunk.
Jakab Zoltán
P h i l o s o p h y o f S c i e n c e C o l l o q u i u m
Department of History and Philosophy of Science
Eotvos Lorand University, Budapest
Room 6.54 (6th floor) Monday 4:00 PM
Pazmany P. setany 1/A Budapest, Hungary
Phone/Fax: (36-1) 372 2924
http://hps.elte.hu/seminar
Program: October
4 October 4:00 PM 6th floor 6.54
(Language: English)
A n d r e j U l e
Philosophy, Philosophy, University of Ljubljana
Thought and Machine: Some Wittgenstein's Comments
Abstract: http://hps.elte.hu/seminar/2004/October/index.html#1
11 October 5:00 PM CEU (Nador u. 9), Gellner Room (2nd floor) !!!
(Language: English)
Joint seminar session of the HPS Department of Eotvos
University and the CEU Mathematics Department
M a r k St e i n e r
Philosophy, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem
Philosophy, Columbia University
Mathematics: Application and Applicability
Abstract: http://hps.elte.hu/seminar/2004/October/index.html#2
18 October 4:00 PM 6th floor 6.54
(Language: English, except if all participants speak Hungarian)
K a t a l i n F a r k a s
Philosophy, Central European University, Budapest
Time and Tense
Abstract: http://hps.elte.hu/seminar/2004/October/index.html#3
25 October 4:00 PM 6th floor 6.54
(Language: Hungarian)
G y u l a B e n e
Theoretical Physics, Eotvos Lorand University, Budapest
Gyorsulo univerzum
(Accelerating universe)
Abstract: http://hps.elte.hu/seminar/2004/October/index.html#4
___________________________________
The 60-minute lecture is followed by a 10-minute break. Then we hold a
30-60-minute discussion. The participants may comment on the talks and
are encouraged to initiate discussion through the Internet. The
comments should be written in the language of the presentation.
The organizer of the colloquium: Laszlo E. Szabo (email: leszabo(a)hps.elte.hu)
--
L a s z l o E. S z a b o
Theoretical Physics Research Group of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences
Department of History and Philosophy of Science
Eotvos University, Budapest
http://hps.elte.hu/leszabo
P h i l o s o p h y o f S c i e n c e C o l l o q u i u m
Department of History and Philosophy of Science
Eotvos Lorand University, Budapest
Room 6.54 (6th floor) Monday 4:00 PM
Pazmany P. setany 1/A Budapest, Hungary
Phone/Fax: (36-1) 372 2924
http://hps.elte.hu/seminar
20 September 4:00 PM 6th floor 6.54
(Language: English)
R o b e r t B i s h o p
Philosophy, Probability, and Modeling Group
Center for Junior Research Fellows
University of Konstanz
Free will and physics
Abstract: http://hps.elte.hu/seminar/2004/September/#1
___________________________________
The 60-minute lecture is followed by a 10-minute break. Then we hold a
30-60-minute discussion. The participants may comment on the talks and
are encouraged to initiate discussion through the Internet. The
comments should be written in the language of the presentation.
The organizer of the colloquium: Laszlo E. Szabo (email: leszabo(a)hps.elte.hu)
--
L a s z l o E. S z a b o
Theoretical Physics Research Group of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences
Department of History and Philosophy of Science
Eotvos University, Budapest
http://hps.elte.hu/leszabo
*Előadás a BME Kognitív Tudományi Központ*
*házi kollokvium sorozata keretében:*
*Előadó: Kiss Tamás, Orbán Gergő, Érdi Péter, KFKI RMKI Biofizika
Osztály, CNS Csoport
**Cím:* Hippokampális membránpotenciál oszcillációk generálásának és
farmakológiai módosításának számítógépes modellezése. Számítógépes
neurofarmakológia?
*
Absztrakt:
*
<>A hippokampusz az agy egy olyan központi területe, mely szinte minden
neokortikális és sok szubkortikális területtől kap elő-feldolgozott,
multimodális inputokat, melyek lehetővé teszik számára, hogy számos
kognitív folyamatban játsszon szerepet. Ezen folyamatok, valamint az
állat különféle viselkedési formái alatt gyakran figyelhetők meg a
hippokampuszban jellegzetes, a viselkedéssel korreláló sejt-élettani
jelenségek, legtöbbször elektroenkefalográffal (EEG), vagy
makroelektródával mérhető populációs oszcillációk formájában.
Anatómiai szempontból a hippokampusz a limbikus rendszerhez tartozik és
az ún. Papez-körnek is része, mely többek közt az érzelmek
szabályozásában játszik szerepet, így nem meglepő, hogy a hippokampusz
elektromos aktivitása az érzelmi változásokat is követi. Számos olyan
szorongást, illetve depressziót csökkentő szer ismert, mely gyógyhatása
mellett, vagy azzal párhuzamosan, hatással van a hippokampális
aktivitásra is. Azonban az a kérdés, hogy ezek a szerek hatásukat más
agyterületeken fejtik ki és csupán ez tükröződik a hippokampuszban,
vagy esetleg hippokampális hatásuk okán csökken a páciens szorongása,
esetleg e kettő hatás egyszerre jelentkezik, nem ismert.
A számítógépes agykutatás (Computational Neuroscience) eszközeivel azt
vizsgáljuk, melyek azok az anatómiai és élettani jelenségek, feltételek,
(matematikai kényszerek), melyek a kísérletekben megfigyelt populációs
(hálózati) aktivitáshoz vezetnek, illetve a kialakult oszcilláció az
egyes feltételek (paraméterek) változtatásával, azaz különféle hatású
drogok adásával hogyan változtatható meg. Ha a módszer átfogó képet tud
adni általános droghatásokról, – melyet jövőbeli vizsgálatokkal is
igazolnunk kell még – esetleg alkalmazhatóvá válhat a gyógyszerkutatás
számára is.
*
*
*Idő:* 2004 . szeptember 27. 16 óra
*Hely:* BME, St. ép. 320.
Minden érdeklődőt szeretettel várunk.
Jakab Zoltán
EUROCAST 2005 Workshop on Intelligent Information Processing
Location: Las Palmas de Gran Canaria (Canary Islands), Spain
Date: 07-Feb-2005 - 11-Feb-2005
http://www.ciber.ulpgc.es/iuctc/spain/eurocast/workshop.html
Description:
"Declarative Methods in Intelligent Information Processing" is one of
the 8 workshops forming the "Tenth International Conference on
Computer Aided Systems Theory" to be held in February 7-11, 2005 in
Las Palmas de Gran Canaria (Canary Islands, Spain). The proceedings
with extended papers will be published in the LNCS series of Springer
Verlag after the conference.
Abstract deadline: 31-Oct-2004
Declarative Methods in Intelligent Information Processing
Topics * Modelling and verification of communication protocols *
Concurrent and distributed computing * Design patterns for distributed
aplications * Formal verification * Document classification and search
* Extraction/retrieval of information * Question answering *
Interfaces.
Program Commitee Chairman: J. L. Freire (Univ. of Coruna, Spain)
An extended two pages abstract, including references in English with
indication of the workshop of the intended contribution must be sent
by e-mail before October, 31, 2004 to the Organizing Committee
contact Alexis Quesada, aquesada(a)dis.ulpgc.es
For the extended abstract, you must follow instructions in Information
for LNCS Authors Authors will be notified of acceptance by December 1,
2004. It is anticipated that the final selected full papers will be
published in line with previous Eurocast meetings (Springer Lecture
Notes in Computer Science No 410, No 585, No 763, No 1030, No 1333, No
1798, No 2178 and No 2809). Full papers for publication are required
before April 30, 2005.
--------------------------------------------------------------------
mail2web - Check your email from the web at
http://mail2web.com/ .
Below the proposal instructions please find the abstract, keywords, and
a link to the full text of the forthcoming BBS target article:
Understanding and sharing intentions:
The origins of cultural cognition
Michael Tomasello, Malinda Carpenter, Josep Call,
Tanya Behne, and Henrike Moll
This article has been accepted for publication in Behavioral and Brain
Sciences (BBS), an international, interdisciplinary journal providing
Open Peer Commentary on important and controversial current research in
the biobehavioral and cognitive sciences.
Commentators must be BBS Associates or suggested by a BBS Associate. To
be considered as a commentator for this article, to suggest other
appropriate commentators, or for information about how to become a BBS
Associate, please reply by EMAIL within three (3) weeks to:
calls(a)bbsonline.org
The Calls are sent to 10,000 BBS Associates, so there is no expectation
(indeed, it would be calamitous) that each recipient should comment on
every occasion! Hence there is no need to reply except if you wish to
comment, or to suggest someone to comment.
If you are not a BBS Associate, please approach a current BBS Associate
(there are currently over 10,000 worldwide) who is familiar with your
work to nominate you. All past BBS authors, referees and commentators
are eligible to become BBS Associates. An electronic list of current BBS
Associates is available at this location to help you select a name:
http://www.bbsonline.org/Instructions/assoclist.html
If no current BBS Associate knows your work, please send us your
Curriculum Vitae and BBS will circulate it to appropriate Associates to
ask whether they would be prepared to nominate you. (In the meantime,
your name, address and email address will be entered into our database
as an unaffiliated investigator.)
=======================================================================
*** COMMENTARY PROPOSAL INSTRUCTIONS ***
=======================================================================
To help us put together a balanced list of commentators, it would be
most helpful if you would send us an indication of the relevant
expertise you would bring to bear on the paper, and what aspect of the
paper you would anticipate commenting upon.
Please DO NOT prepare a commentary until you receive a formal
invitation, indicating that it was possible to include your name on the
final list, which is constructed so as to balance areas of expertise and
frequency of prior commentaries in BBS.
=======================================================================
*** TARGET ARTICLE INFORMATION ***
=======================================================================
TITLE: Understanding and sharing intentions: The origins of cultural
cognition
AUTHORS: Michael Tomasello, Malinda Carpenter, Josep Call, Tanya Behne,
and Henrike Moll
ABSTRACT: We propose that the crucial difference between human cognition
and that of other species is the ability to participate with others in
collaborative activities with shared goals and intentions: shared
intentionality. Participation in such activities requires not only
especially powerful forms of intention-reading and cultural learning,
but also a unique motivation to share psychological states with others
and unique forms of cognitive representation for doing so. The result
of participating in these activities is species-unique forms of cultural
cognition and evolution, enabling everything from the creation and use
of linguistic symbols to the construction of social norms and individual
beliefs to the establishment of social institutions. In support of this
proposal we argue and present evidence that great apes (and some
children with autism) understand the basics of intentional action, but
they still do participate in activities involving joint intentions and
attention (shared intentionality). Human children's skills of shared
intentionality develop gradually during the first 14 months of life as
two ontogenetic pathways intertwine: (i) the general ape line of
understanding others as animate, goal-directed, and intentional agents,
and (ii) a species-unique motivation to share emotions, experience, and
activities with other persons. The developmental outcome is children's
ability to construct dialogic cognitive representations, which enable
them to participate in earnest in the collectivity that is human
cognition.
KEYWORDS: Collaboration, Cooperation, Cultural Learning, Culture,
Evolutionary Psychology, Intentions, Shared Intentionality, Social
Cognition, Social Learning, Theory of Mind, Joint Attention
FULL TEXT: http://www.bbsonline.org/Preprints/Tomasello-01192004/Referees/
FIGURES: http://www.bbsonline.org/Preprints/Tomasello-01192004/Referees/Tomasello.fi…
=======================================================================
SUPPLEMENTARY ANNOUNCEMENT
=======================================================================
(1) Call for Book Nominations for BBS Multiple Book Review
In the past, Behavioral and Brain Sciences (BBS) had only been able
to do 1-2 BBS multiple book treatments per year, because of our
limited annual page quota. BBS's new expanded page quota will make
it possible for us to increase the number of books we treat per
year, so this is an excellent time for BBS Associates and
biobehavioral/cognitive scientists in general to nominate books you
would like to see accorded BBS multiple book review.
(Authors may self-nominate, but books can only be selected on the
basis of multiple nominations.) It would be very helpful if you
indicated in what way a BBS Multiple Book Review of the book(s) you
nominate would be useful to the field (and of course a rich list of
potential reviewers would be the best evidence of its potential
impact!).
*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*
Please note: Your email address has been added to our user database for
Calls for Commentators, the reason you received this email. If you do not
wish to receive further Calls, please feel free to change your mailshot
status through your User Login link on the BBSPrints homepage, using your
username and password. Or, email a response with the word "remove" in the
subject line.
*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*
Barbara Finlay - Editor
Paul Bloom - Editor
Behavioral and Brain Sciences
bbs(a)bbsonline.org
http://www.bbsonline.org
-------------------------------------------------------------------
---------- Forwarded message ----------
Date: Wed, 15 Sep 2004 12:00:18 -0000
From: Kevin Cox <kcox(a)fasfind.com>
To: ctsoc(a)yahoogroups.com
As technology advances we are witnessing changes in the nature of
cognition. A wide range of issues pertaining to technology and
cognition will be covered in a series of special issues of the
journal Pragmatics & Cognition. We are inviting contributions to our
special issues, as specified below (for full details, please see:
http://www.ecs.soton.ac.uk/~id/technology.html )
Pragmatics & Cognition (P&C) will henceforth pay special attention
to the growing interest in the relationship between technological
advances and cognition a field that is intimately related to
the journal's basic concerns.
Beginning with volume 13 (2005), Pragmatics & Cognition will contain
three issues instead of the current two. Each year, one of P&C's
issues will be a thematic Special Issue devoted to "Cognition and
Technology" (C&T), containing invited as well as submitted
refereed papers. Space will also be reserved in these thematic
issues for submitted articles, discussion notes, and book reviews in
the field of C&T not specifically related to the theme of the
Special Issue. Each Special Issue will be co-edited by a Guest
Editor and Itiel Dror, who has been appointed P&C's Associate
Editor for C&T.
For full details, please see:
http://www.ecs.soton.ac.uk/~id/technology.html
Special Issues
1. New Technologies and the Pragmatics of Cognition Editors: Marcelo
Dascal and Itiel Dror
2. Distributed Cognition Editors: Stevan Harnad and Itiel Dror
3. Robotics and Cognition Editors: Pim Haselager, Maria Eunice
Qumlice Gonzales, and Itiel Dror
4. Ageing, Impairment, and Technology Editors: Romola Bucks,
Jonathan Cole, and Itiel Dror
5. Technologies for Cognitive Research: Achievements, Problems, and
Prospects Editors: Boris Velichkovsky and Itiel Dror
6. Cognitive Development and Education in the Mirror of Technology
Editors: TBA and Itiel Dror
Contributions are invited to the Special Cognition and Technology
Series (for full details, please see:
http://www.ecs.soton.ac.uk/~id/technology.html )
---------- Forwarded message ----------
Date: Wed, 15 Sep 2004 12:53:13 +0100
From: Stevan Harnad <harnad(a)ecs.soton.ac.uk>
To: AMERICAN-SCIENTIST-OPEN-ACCESS-FORUM(a)LISTSERVER.SIGMAXI.ORG
Subject: Re: Victory for the NIH open access plan in the House
There is an excellent summary of the NIH self-archiving mandate and
the growing momentum of Open Access (OA) in Information Today, September 15, 2004
"NIH Requires Open Access for Its Funded Medical Research"
by Barbara Quint
http://www.infotoday.com/newsbreaks/nb040913-1.shtml
Information Today is also hosting a Debate on Open Access at the
Internet Librarian Internet Librarian International:
In London, England
Monday 11 October 2004
http://www.internet-librarian.com/Monday.shtml#OpenAccess
In Monterey, California
Wednesday 27 November 2004
http://www.infotoday.com/il2004/wednesday.shtml#TrackC
Barbara Quint's valuable and informative survey devotes more space
to the speculations about hypothetical negative consequences of OA
http://www.eprints.org/self-faq/#17.Publishers
than to the actual and growing evidence for the positive consequences
http://opcit.eprints.org/oacitation-biblio.html
which are the real rationale for OA, but these will become
more widely known and understood with time.
One minor point: I support the proposal to mandate the OA self-archiving
of NIH-funded biomedical research 100%! My suggestion (which has nothing
to do with the speculations about hypothetical negative consequences!) is
only that the mandate's effects will propagate far more widely and quickly
to research in fields other than NIH-funded biomedical research if just
one small implementational detail is modified:
Instead of stipulating that the self-archiving must be done in one
central archive -- PubMed Central --
http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/cpquery/?&db_id=cp108&r_n=hr636.108&sel=TOC_3…
it would be far better not to stipulate the archive at all, only that it must
be OAI-compliant:
http://www.openarchives.org/
OAI-compliance ensures that the growing network of distributed
institutional archives
http://archives.eprints.org/eprints.php?action=browse
is interoperable, and hence functionally equivalent to one global
virtual network:
http://oaister.umdl.umich.edu/o/oaister/
If the self-archiving is done institutionally rather than centrally,
the practice of self-archiving will spread far more readily
across each institution's other disciplines. Compliance with the
self-archiving mandate can be monitored and the metadata can even
be harvested into PubMed Central, hence nothing is lost, but a
great deal more OA is gained:
http://www.eprints.org/signup/sign.php
The UK self-archiving mandate -- otherwise very much like the US mandate --
got this small but important implementational detail exactly right:
http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm200304/cmselect/cmsctech/399/399…
Stevan Harnad