The Rector
and Permanent Fellows of
COLLEGIUM
BUDAPEST / Institute for Advanced Study
invite you to a
Public Lecture
by
Derek Bickerton
on Thursday, 25 April 2002, at 5.30
p.m.
in Collegium Budapest
1014
Budapest
Szentháromság u. 2.
"If you can't make a sentence you can't
make sense:
The real relation between thought and
language"
The relationship between thought and language has
been systematically misunderstood
by almost everyone who has ever written
about it. First, the two categories are
incommensurate. Language
does not admit of gradation or qualification—something
either is language or
it isn't. Thought on the other hand can appear in a variety of forms.
It can be conscious or unconscious. It can be on-line or
off-line. It can be directed or
undirected. There is probably
only one kind of thought that requires language, that is,
conscious,
off-line, directed thought.
Directed thought requires that symbolic
units of some kind be manipulated. We tend to
think of these as 'words'
because that's what they are when we utter or write our
thoughts. If
they remain in the brain they aren't words because there are no words in the
brain, only electrochemical impulses. If we think of these things as
'concepts' we fall
into the trap of thinking that on the one hand there are
words and on the other concepts
and the former simply consist of some kind
of clothes for the latter. Because again there
aren't 'concepts' in
the brain—only electrochemical impulses. It helps if we say that
whether we thinking ot speaking, we are simply manipulating symbolic units
(of some
sort).
In order for those symbols to result in any kind of
meaning –that is, in order for them to
constitute conscious, off-line,
directed thought--they have to be assembled in some
structured kind of
way. Syntax—what makes grammatical sentences—is the only way of
structuringsymbolic units. That there are two ways of putting them
together—some
mysterious 'language of thought' as opposed to some specific
human language—seems
to be incorrect. Basic principles of syntax
common to all languages serve to structure
symbolic units BEFORE those units
achieve morphological or phonological expression.
The same process
that enables us to speak in sentences is what enables us to have the
kind of
sirected thoughts that make us human—'I talk, therefore I think'.
CV:
Professor Emeritus, University of
Hawaii.
Date of birth: 1926. 1949 BA, Cambridge University; 1976 PhD,
Cambridge University;
1972–1976 Associate Professor, 1976–96 Professor,
University of Hawaii; 1979 Visiting
Professor at SUNY; 1982 UT Austin;
1986–1987 University of Amsterdam; 1987–1988
University of Provence; Awards:
1992 U. H. Regents Medal for Excellence in Research;
1992 Danz Lecturer, U.
of Washington, Seattle; 1995 Landsdowne Scholar, University of
Victoria
(Canada); 1997 Fulbright Distinguished Chair, Federico II University, Naples;
1997 Resident Scholar, Rockefeller Center, Bellagio.
SELECTED PUBLICATIONS
- Dynamics of a Creole System (Cambridge: Cambridge
University Press, 1975), 224 pp.
- Roots of Language (Ann Arbor, MI: Karoma
Press, 1981), 351 pp.
- 'Creole languages', Scientific American 249.1 (1983),
pp. 116–122.
- 'The language bioprogram hypothesis', Behavioral and Brain
Sciences 7 (1984), pp.
173–221.
- Language and Species (Chicago:
University of Chicago Press, 1990), 297 pp.
- Language and Human Behavior
(Seattle: University of Washington Press, 1995),
180 pp.
- with William
Calvin, Lingua ex Machina (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2000), 298 pp.
Csaba Pleh, Professor of
Psychology
Budapest U. of Technology and Economics, Center for
Cognitive Science
Presently at Collegium Budapest, Budapest, Szentharomsag u
2 H-1014
cspleh@ colbud.hu, T: 3612248323, Fax: 3612248310
Mobile: (06)303500431